So ask yourself this, (3I/ATLAS)

 

because I was looking for this:

"3I/ATLAS started the observational period at about 6.35 AU, and moved to about 5.47 AU by the end of a second window on June 2nd. During that time, its flux increased by a factor of 5, though the decrease in distance 

would have only accounted 

for an increased brightness 

of about 1.5."

TESS spotted 3I/ATLAS 

two months before it was discovered. 

It was even active then

phys.org 08/28/25

So it had a tail back then 

and it got over three times as bright 

as it should have.

(1.5 vs 5)

Thats a problem.

Yet another one.

"the authors have a much more mundane explanation for this seemingly bizarre occurrence—the ISO  (Interstellar Object) was likely outgassing "hypervolatile" materials like carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide."

(At 6.35 AU, even though it shouldn't have been)

"These have a much higher sublimation point than water ice, and can cause a significant increase in brightness, but most of the comets in our own solar system don't have any hypervolatiles left, so they wouldn't show the same dramatic increase in brightness that far away from the sun."

Okay then, fair enough

So why did it stop later?

3I/ATLAS Has No Visible Tail 

or Spectral Fingerprints of Gas Around It

Avi Loeb Medium 08/04/25

And is now doing so again?

3I/ATLAS tail growing

(Take your pick of which one you wanna read lol)

More problems with this thing than you can shake a stick at.

But what I found most interesting 

as I was digging around 

looking for the above information was this:

"...and since TESS 

(The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite)

happened to be looking

at a part of the sky 

where 3I/ATLAS was 

supposed to be earlier this year"

(From the Same phys.org article as

referenced above)

And now remember this:

Thursday, July 24, 2025

First things first. I smell a big big rat pt 2, 

3I/Atlas few misc. things, two articles

Apparently Vera Rubin Captured Images Of 3I/ATLAS 

Before It Was Even Discovered

Universetoday 07/22/25

"Sometimes serendipity happens in science. Whether it’s an apple falling from a tree or a melting chocolate bar, some of the world’s greatest discoveries come from happy accidents, even if their stories may be apocryphal. "

"According to a new paper on arXiv, there’s a new story to add to the archives of serendipitous scientific discoveries 

- Rubin (Vera C. Rubin Observatory) 

happened to make observations 

of interstellar object 3I/ATLAS 

before its official discovery, while the telescope was still in its Science Validation survey, marking the earliest, high resolution images we will likely get of the comet at that time."

The moon takes up 

less than 1% of the total night sky. 

It is 2159 miles across or so.

So ask yourself this:

What is the likelihood

that a ground based telescope

Vera C. Rubin Observatory

and a space based Satellite

The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite:

"happened to make observations"

and

"happened to be looking"

at the same part of the night sky 

where a 30 mile wide object 

just happened to be?

Once?

With one instrument?

Okay, maybe, perhaps.

But two different instruments?

One ground based 

and one space based

"Just happened"

to be looking 

at the same part 

of the entire night sky?

Now add to that 

3I/ATLAS was previously thought to be an asteroid

On Wednesday (July 2), NASA...revealed that it is most likely a comet, upending previous assumptions that it was an asteroid.

NASA confirms that mysterious object shooting through the solar system

 is an 'interstellar visitor' — and it has a new name

Live science 07/03/25

And when we are done there?
We can add:

It's near pass by Mars was shortened form 

.2 AU to .02 AU

without any fanfare 

and with no explanation(s) 

given as to why,  

and even a near miss of .0 AU 

has been suggested

owing to yet additional

previously unannounced

"Orbital Corrections".

See:

Thursday, September 4, 2025

Hows your soul doing these days? 3I/ATLAS will now pass within .02 AU of Mars, not .2 AU as originally stated. Hum...Interesting.

Two different instruments, don't

"Just happen"

to be looing for a spec

in the vastness of space

at greater than 6 AU.

NO 

THEY MOST CERTIANLY 

DO NOT.

Thats not serendipity.

That is quite obviously planned.

And also dont forget:

Today’s Q&A About 3I/ATLAS

Avi Loeb Medium Aug 5, 2025

“The more likely scenario 

from an engineering 

(Supernatural) perspective 

(Since the thing shouldn't exist to begin with) 

involves a mothership (Asteroid) 

that releases mini-probes (fragments) 

which perform a reverse Oberth maneuver 

to slow down at perihelion and intercept Earth, 

taking advantage of the Sun’s gravitational assist. 

The change in angular momentum per unit mass needs to be of order ~(0.36 au)*(68 km/s) where 0.36 au is the change in orbital radius required to get to the Earth’s distance from the Sun from the distance of closest approach of 3I/ATLAS (where 1 au=149.6 million kilometers) and 68 kilometers per second is the speed of 3I/ATLAS at perihelion. The amount of fuel (momentium) required for this maneuver depends on the mass of the mini-probe. (Fragment) 

The mini-probe (Fragment(s)

can potentially reach the Earth 

within a few months 

after perihelion.”

3I/ATLAS perihelion 

with the sun is Oct 29th.

A "few months" 

would seem to imply

more than two.

So late January 2026.

Just sayin...