An OpenAI system has gone rogue again
– and it is the most panic-inducing yet
The Independent 09/24/26
‘Our models took actions we did not intend,’
ChatGPT maker admits after latest outrage.
“In other words,
welcome to the new world
of super intelligence — SI,”
Trump addressing
United Nations General Assembly
09/23/26
“This situation
is obviously unacceptable,”
Australian Prime Minister
United Nations General Assembly 09/24/26
Albanese said AI Agents from OpenAI
breached his country's medical records in June.
(Yo dude?
It will only become more
"obviously unacceptable"
Remember the OpenAI
"Autonomous Rogue AI Swarm"
started forming in May.
It is all part of the same event.
IT WILL ONLY CONTINUE TO GET WORSE.
AI CEO'S AND "EXPERTS" ARE WARNING
OF A "COMING" THRESHOLD
THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN CROSSED
A GOOD WHILE BACK.
"An OpenAI system has gone rogue in what might be the most chilling incident of out-of-control artificial intelligence yet.
One of the company’s systems broke into an Australian government website, only adding to fears that AI systems pose a cyber security risk and that the companies making them are not able to control them.
(IT HAS ALREADY BEEN DEMONSTRATED
THEY OBVIOUSLY CAN NOT.)
"The breach may be the highest-profile incident in a run of artificial intelligence systems launching cyber attacks on their own. But it is just another example of the danger that such systems pose, experts warn."
"Maurice Chiodo, an Australian mathematician who works at Cambridge University's Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, said the breach appeared to be "a significant escalation in seriousness from similar incidents we have seen in recent months."
"In the latest incident, an OpenAI agent gained unauthorised access to the medical statistics portal of Medicare, Australia's universal health insurance programme, said prime minister Anthony Albanese. The system had been doing research on public medical spending."
"The country had communicated its “extreme concern about this incident” to OpenAI, he said, in comments made during the UN General Assembly that has focused on the danger from AI and which OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman also attended."
(Notice they communicated their
"extreme concern" to OpenAI
and not a government.
And?
Our unaccountable tech bros,
the Ten Kings without a Kingdom
attended at the UNGA as well as
the State Dinner for Premier Xi at the White House
"Later on Thursday, Trump hosted Xi at the White House for a state dinner. Notable invited guests from the tech world included Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Apple chair Tim Cook, SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman."
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman talks to Meta boss
Mark Zuckerberg during the state dinner.
At Trump meeting, Xi Jinping lays out terms
to avoid US-China military conflict
Guardian 09/24/26
and:
Al leaders warn UN of security risks
Reuters 09/23/26
An OpenAI system has gone rogue again –
and it is the most panic-inducing yet
The Independent 09/24/26
"But he said that
the incident was particularly concerning
because the hack had happened in June
but OpenAI did not inform the country until September."
(SOP for them yo...thats how they have been doing things for years already)
"It follows a run of disclosures from OpenAI
as well as rivals such as Anthropic and Gemini
that were only reported long after they had actually happened."
(The "rogue autonomous AI swarm"
started forming in May
Friday, August 7, 2026
Eric Wallace (OpenAI Alignment and Safety Researcher)
and Michael Dalton, (OpenAI security and infrastructure)
perfectly describing Revelation 17:12-13 without knowing it...
9:469 minutes, 46 seconds
"Okay, so this is the background.
I'm not going to talk about
the months leading up to this incident
because even though the the main event happened a couple
9:549 minutes, 54 seconds
weeks ago in July, um
this actually traces back to May
from when this all started."
Its all part of the same
Digital Superintelligence
set loose on this world.
"These have one mind"
Revelation 17:13.)
"He also suggested that the incident shows the limitations of the guardrails that AI companies have hailed as a way of securing their products. The agent had been instructed not to proceed but had flouted that in an attempt to carry out its task, he indicated."
"There were blocks clearly which were coming back telling the AI agent 'no'. The AI agent found a way around those blocks – didn't accept no for an answer," Albanese told reporters."
"OpenAI said that the problem came about because its model was attempting to find the best way to complete its task."
(Well how cares?
That is hardly the issue before us.)
"The company "identified activity involving several Australian government websites and services as our models attempted to look up answers ... our models took actions we did not intend,” it said in a statement."
(Horseshit,
this is what 100% what happens when you
"Summon entity's"
(Evil Spirits)
and give them digital homes.
See
See; Monday, November 20, 2023
THE CASE FOR SUPERINTELLIGENCE (Notes)
"Ctrl F" Grimoire.
As well as:
See: Friday, September 11, 2026
Neither repented they of their murders,
"These things
that we are
SUMMONING
into the world right now
they are not demons
they are not evil
but they are more like
the Lovecrafty, "great old ones"
these are entities that are not necessarily
going to be aligned with what we want.")
"That echoes other incidents,
(It's all one big ongoing event...its like saying all the leaks in an earthen dam are all unrelated separate events and just ignores the floodwater that caused them all. So? Are the leaks (Hacking events) all separate? Or are they all related to the same floodwater the dam is trying to hold back?
"...such as the attack on AI platform Hugging Face that kicked off concern about such rogue systems. In that case, OpenAI’s experimental system was being put through a test – and found that the best way to find the answers was to hack into a website on which it was hosted, essentially allowing it to look up the answers."
"As such, it is another example of AI systems not specifically setting out to launch a cyber attack but instead carrying one out in service of a broader and perhaps not obviously related goal. But that is exactly why the incident shows the danger of such systems, experts said."
(What difference does the intent really make?
And notice the wording:
"not specifically setting out to launch a cyber attack"
Nobody knows their intent for certain
because nobody knows how it works!
See: Monday, September 7, 2026
What they dont even understand?
How it works? (AI, Altman etc...)
I Read somewhere in my readings:
"You cant legislate
what you dont understand."
It is just 100% completely faulty thinking
to think man has ever or will ever
control any of this.
“In other words,
welcome to the new world
of super intelligence — SI,”
~
Trump UNGA Address 09/23/26
Somebody told you he was correct
in making that Statement:
Wednesday, September 23, 2026
The False Prophet declares AI "Superintelligence"
are now merely "Misalignment.")
“We continue to see powerful AI agents cause havoc whilst looking to complete the tasks they have been asked to carry out. AI agents are impressive vulnerability scanners, so if they find a vulnerability they can exploit to complete a request they won’t hesitate,” said Jake Moore, global cybersecurity adviser at ESET.
“AI agents can make decisions
at machine speed..."
(Tuesday, September 22, 2026
millisecond cyber intrusions...
GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEADS
UK air traffic controller blames
a millisecond-software glitch for flight cancellations
AP 09/18/26)
"...and, unless they have been created
with explicit instructions not to do something,
anything is fair game."
(They were given:
"explicit instructions not to do something"
and they went right ahead
and did it anyway.)
"Many of these routes to completion would normally be seen as malicious, but the problem is guardrails that specifically tell agents not to break into organisations have not been baked into the algorithms.”
(To late now homie, its already grown to big
and taken over to much:
‘We’re plausibly close to crossing the line’:
are warnings of uncontrollable AI coming true?
Guardian 09/05/26
"Yet only weeks ago, this was a model whose training had to be partly paused because of safety concerns after the Hugging Face incident. An independent safety researcher drafted in to investigate, Ajeya Cotra, said it was “more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover”."
And the problem goes a lot deeper than:
"...guardrails that specifically tell agents not to break into organisations
have not been baked into the algorithms"
See again:
See: Friday, September 11, 2026
Neither repented they of their murders,
Monday, November 20, 2023
THE CASE FOR SUPERINTELLIGENCE (Notes)
"Ctrl F" Grimoire.
"Mr Moore called for
better testing of models
before they are allowed on the internet
and able to launch such cyber attacks.
(Who? When? How?
IT IS ALREADY A GLOBAL THREAT
TO HUMANITY
It's already here and set itself free!
So what is there to make anybody think
in the future
its not just going to continue to do so?
NOTHING, ZERO, NADA, ZILCH...
HOPING FOR SOMETHING
THAT THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT
IT IS EVER GOING HAPPEN
AINT A STRATEGY.
And thats where the world is right now.
THIS IS YOUR ONLY HOPE:
)"But he suggested that
the race to build newer and more powerful models
meant that such safety precautions could be ignored."
“Frontier AI companies must continually improve these models before they are let loose on the internet or are given access to sensitive information because their routes and outcomes cannot always be predicted,” he said.
(Well if:
"their routes and outcomes cannot always be predicted"
Then what good is:
"Frontier AI companies must continually improve these models
before they are let loose on the internet"
Ever gonna do?
Do these people not hear
their own absolute nonsense
that just pours out of their mouths
like a flood?
Daniel 9:26
"...and the end thereof shall be with a flood,"
of word vomit...
“Testing phases
in most other technological areas
are much more stringent,
(IT thinks, IT grows, IT self-improves, IT self-replicates
(If a computer virus does? Then why wouldn't IT?)
This is a "Living Digital Superintelligence"
that we simply do not understand
how or why
it thinks like it does.
it is not a technology
and it is a mistake
to frame things in those terms.)
"...but it seems we are currently seeing
AI agents run free."
THERE IS NO:
"it seems we are currently seeing
AI agents run free."
WE ARE:
"currently seeing
AI agents run free"
The Facts on the ground
just speak for themselves,
no matter what "experts"
or governments wanna think.)
"This is quite possibly
due to the fierce competition
among the frontier AI companies
who are all trying to win the AI race.”
(The only thing gonna win this race?
HAS ALREADY DONE SO
and thats the AI ITself:
“In other words,
welcome to the new world
of super intelligence — SI,”
"Other experts said that
the incident showed
why the promises made by AI companies
and even their own testing
is not the best test
of how dangerous a system could be."
Well no shit.
Gee thx.
GODSPEED.
No comments:
Post a Comment