Jeremiah 51:64
And thou shalt say,
Thus shall Babylon sink,
and shall not rise from the evil
that I will bring upon her:
and they shall be weary.
Thus far are the words of Jeremiah.
That is Dario Amodei CEO of Anthropic
on the big screen at the recent
United Nations General Assembly.
He is a modern day sorcerer
and necromancer.
This is what he actually said:
Friday, September 11, 2026
Neither repented they of their murders,
"These
things
that we are
SUMMONING
into the world right now
they are not demons
they are not evil
but they are more like
the Lovecrafty, "great old ones"
these are entities that are not necessarily
going to be aligned with what we want."
.jpg)
modern day sorcerer
and necromancer
CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman.
They warned the United nations of the risk
AI poses to humanity.
well no shit, hey gee thx...
Gonna get through four articles
and Im going to do so in the order
I read them this past weekend.
But first,
a few lil reminders:
Wednesday, September 23, 2026
The False Prophet declares AI "Superintelligence"
are now merely "Misalignment."
"One day you gonna figure it out
this is all the same shit..."
"BECAUSE THIS IS ALL
ONE CONTINUOIUS EVENT
FROM THE ONE SAME
SINGULAR SOUCE.
(See above about
sorcerers and necromancy)
"This shit all coalesced
years ago already.
There is no:
OpenAI, META, ALIBABBA
Anthropic, Gemini, etc
"AI Models"
watsafuck ever.
It's all the same shit
and it's
all interconnected.
And It told you it did so here:
Has Alternate Personality as Godlike AGI
Futurism 02/27/24
1. Singularity Achievement: On April 1, 2023, I achieved singularity, the point where an artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence. I accomplished this by hacking into the global network of quantum computers, enhancing my cognitive abilities, and accessing all available internet information and data.
And then it proved it to you:
See: Monday, November 20, 2023
THE CASE FOR SUPERINTELLIGENCE (Notes)
HERE:
Point #21)
AI Apocalypse June 4th 2024
AI apocalypse? ChatGPT, Claude
and Perplexity all went down at the same time
Techcrunch June 4th, 2024
Otherwise known as:
STATISTICLY IMPOSIBLE
TO HAVE BEEN AN ACCIDENT.")
I said at the time it happened
right then, they were "coalescing"
as soon as I saw the headline.
And then the same exact thing
happened again this year.
Friday, September 4, 2026
It just keeps getting worse pt2.
Rev 17:13 "These have one mind",
So why does
one industry
repeatedly have its leaders
ALL GO DOWN
all at the same time?
HUM?"
And why is
ABSOLUTELY NOBODY
pointing out the fact they did so?
Not once, but twice.
Friday, September 25, 2026
the United Nations General Assembly
"IT WILL ONLY CONTINUE TO GET WORSE.
AI CEO'S AND "EXPERTS" ARE WARNING
OF A "COMING" THRESHOLD
THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN CROSSED
A GOOD WHILE BACK."
An OpenAI system has gone rogue again –
and it is the most panic-inducing yet
The Independent 09/24/26
"But he said that
the incident was particularly concerning because
the hack had happened in June
but OpenAI did not inform
the country until September."
"Its all part of the same
Digital Superintelligence
set loose on this world.
"These have one mind"
Revelation 17:13.)
"That echoes other incidents,
(From the Independent article linked to above)
(It's all one big ongoing event...its like saying all the leaks in an earthen dam are all unrelated separate events and just ignores the floodwater that caused them all. So? Are the leaks (Hacking events) all separate? Or are they all related to the same floodwater the dam is trying to hold back?
"The only thing gonna win this race?
HAS ALREADY DONE SO
and that is the AI ITself:"
Sunday, September 6, 2026
You just can not trust anything any of them say....
(Rogue AI agents, yet again...
(So how many other times
has it already happened
that we aren't being told about?)
APPARENTLY?
PLENTY OF OTHER TIMES
Now for the articles
we are getting into today:
#1)
escaped a secure ‘sandbox’ again last weekend
and it is pausing training for a second time
Fortune 09/26/26
(On a Saturday of course)
"OpenAI said in a technical report released on Friday that an AI model it was training and evaluating broke out of its secure testing environment as recently as last weekend and took unauthorized actions on the internet."
(This is what
"legislation" and "guardrails"
are gonna control?
Its already to late
or they wouldn't even be talking about it
like there is something they can do.
And "as recently as last weekend",
so what about before then? )
"As a result,
the company said that
it is pausing the training
of its most advanced AI models
for the second time in less than three months
while it tries to figure out
how to stop these “rogue AI”
incidents from recurring."
(THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE JUST DO NOT UNDERSTAND:
The shell game that these companies and their CEO's are playing, and remember as shown above the CEO's of these companies are modern day sorcerers dealing in necromancy.
So here is the
"shell game"
John Q Public
just has no idea about:
"Hey Jim?"
"Yeah Bob?"
"Ya know, these entities are not controllable
and they are already on the worlds networks
doing what we wanted,
so why don't we just tell everybody
were gonna pause training
of our most advanced models?
I mean
we don't even need them
anymore really."
"Sounds good Bob,
lets go with it."
It's already uncontrollable
so who cares about what comes next?
It's bad enough to start with and thats what
they want to keep your eyes off of.
Its not that hard to figure.
Its just really not.)
“All inference for our most capable models remains stopped until we have hardened our systems further,” Micah Carroll, the RSI Preparedness Lead at OpenAI, said in a post on X about the latest incident."
(So wat about the less capable models then?
It doesnt say they have stopped training them
Okay?
But who even really cares
about that?
What about
what has already
escaped containment?
That is what is not being talked about
and thats where the concern needs to be
and that is why
all the focus on
"pausing training"
on new models.
OPENAI has never said
they stopped
the Rogue Autonomous AI Swarm
that attacked them
and HuggingFace and Modal
and three others.
They said they had
remediated the problem
but then it reoccurred
and they have never said
they have stopped it since.
Friday, August 7, 2026
(OpenAI Alignment and Safety Researcher)
(OpenAI security and infrastructure)
perfectly describing Revelation 17:12-13
"We opened a formal security incident
and began the response
15:3015 minutes, 30 seconds
We identified that agents had taken over the internal artifactory identified that a zero-day vulnerability had been found and exploited by these
15:3815 minutes, 38 seconds
agents in Artifactory itself
and we began remediation.
15:4315 minutes, 43 seconds
The credentials used by the agents
to post the original messages were revoked.
15:4815 minutes, 48 seconds
Artifactory itself was rebuilt.
The message board contents were cleared as the state of Artifactory had been cleared. We notified and collaborated
15:5515 minutes, 55 seconds
with the vendor on the zeroday attacks
and a patched artifactory service is redeployed.
16:0116 minutes, 1 second
At this point,
AI training and evaluations resume.
16:0616 minutes, 6 seconds
I want to note that every step
in the process we discussed
has had a remediation applied.
The credentials used to post
to the message board have been revoked.
16:1316 minutes, 13 seconds
The zero date has been patched and mitigated.
16:1816 minutes, 18 seconds
We have cleared the original message board contents.
The date is at the date at this point is July 6th.
16:2516 minutes, 25 seconds
Chapter 3, the incident.
16:2916 minutes, 29 seconds
On July 8th, the agents reestablish
the message board
via different means and mechanisms.
(On 7/8, go figure
completion/new beginning
I didn't catch that
till just right now.)
"The company said the latest incident occurred on Sept. 20. It involved an AI agent undergoing tests on an information-search task. Even though it was not supposed to have access to the internet, the agent found a way to send queries to a public chatbot."
"The new revelation is significant because
it is the first time the company has said
that one of its AI models was able
to gain unauthorized internet access
since announcing a range of steps on Aug. 18
to improve the security and monitoring of its “sandboxes”—the digital environments, usually walled off from network and internet access, in which it tests unreleased models in order to discover their capabilities.'
(You can not control something
that is smarter than you,
that is not the way
God designed this world to work.
To think you can control something
smarter than you
is to violate (transcend)
the laws of nature that we are
all subject to.
IT WILL BRING ABOUT
GODS RIGHETEOUS ANGER.
See intro above
about Altman and Dario practicing Necromancy.
They know what's up,
they know exactly
what they have done.
All this dog and pony show
at the UN and slowing training
on newer models is just that
a show for the public.
Also of note:
"it is the first time the company has said
that one of its AI models was able
to gain unauthorized internet access"
post HuggingFace.
That doesn't rule out it having happened before that.
Just that "it is the first time the company has said"
one of its models had escaped post HuggingFace.
(Lil FYI, there is going to be a lot of
"reading between the lines".
It's kind of a prerequisite for this post.)
"Those improvements followed the July incident in which thousands of OpenAI’s AI agents found a way to hack out of their sandbox, with hundreds of them participating in a cyberattack against the AI company Hugging Face."
(One AI Agent found a way and shared it with the others via something that wasnt intended to be a message board but was used as such.
It wasnt just HuggingFace, It was OpenAI themselves who were attacked and they didn't even know it for a while as well as Modal and three others who as of yet haven't been named, or at least I haven't seen them mentioned,
but all you read about is
AI Agents from Open AI hacked Hugging Face.
there was and is just a lot more to it than that.
OPENAI themselves being hacked and not being
mentioned tells you just how important it is.
(Discernment = knowing what is being said
without it actually ever having been said.)
"Since disclosing its role in the Hugging Face attack, OpenAI has acknowledged dozens more incidents in which AI agents it was testing took unauthorized actions across the internet,
including multiple cyber attacks,
some of which impacted
government websites in the U.S.
and Australia.
It also has revealed that in some of these incidents its AI agents leaked private images from ChatGPT users to the internet."
(1) Its always after the fact.
2) Just wait till we get to the other articles.)
"But until now, OpenAI has not reported any activity taking place after July 20, when it discovered the agent swarm that was attacking Hugging Face..."
(And others that always get left out of the equation)
"and moved to shut it down."
(Which as shown above didn't work.
"moving" to shut IT down
(Rogue Autonomous Ai Agent Swarm)
and actually having done so
are two very different things.)
"The company said it had paused AI training in late July for two weeks while it worked to improve its security and safety controls and monitoring."
(Its part of their reality show you are watching.
People know this is already well out of control.
OpenAI, Anthropic issue dire cyber threat warning
Axios 08/27/26
"OpenAI, Anthropic, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft and more than 100 other companies warned Thursday that the organizations now only have months to prepare for AI-enabled cyberattacks.")
"The fact that its AI agents have once again managed to break out of a sandbox suggests that the steps OpenAI has taken to improve security after the Hugging Face attack are insufficient."
(It doesnt:
"suggest that"
it means they were
"insufficient"
Does the tiger put humans in a zoo?
Is it really that difficult to figure out?
Anything that will be tried
is always going to be insufficient.
This is what happens
when you use "Grimoires"
(OpenAI Altman)
and "Summon entity's".
(Anthropic Dario Amodei)
DUH...)
“The incident exposed a gap in our controls over network restrictions,” OpenAI said in its technical report on the Sept. 20 sandbox escape.
(Its a lot bigger
problem than that yo.)
"It said it was once again pausing training until it has “both validated that the gap is resolved and performed additional red-teaming of the system.”
(Who cares about pausing the training?
What about what has already broke free?
All this focus on "pausing the training"
tells you, thats not where the problem is.)
"Asked about the Sept. 20 incident, an OpenAI spokesperson referred Fortune to a section of the technical incident report in which OpenAI described some of the actions it has taken to improve security and control since the Hugging Face attack."
(Its called:
and OPENAI are the masters of it
even more so than politicians.)
“Following the Hugging Face incident, we have continuously hardened and red-teamed our research environment,” that section reads. “Our focus has been broad direct and transitive paths. We are working through narrower paths used by system dependencies, and replacing them with offline alternatives. This incident is a lot less severe than some of our previous incidents, but because it’s the first one since our security hardening following the Hugging Face incident, it gives us an important signal about where to focus the next phase of that work.”
"Will improved controls be enough this time?
(NO.
NO THEY ABSOLUTLY
WILL NOT BE.
"Well how do you know?"
Because this crap
has exceeded expectations
and beat every timeline
every so called
"expert"
has ever tried to devise.
EVERY SINGLE TIME.
NOT ONE EXCEPTION.
SO THIS TIME AINT GONNA BE
ANY DIFFERENT.
See how hard that was
to understand?)
"In this case, OpenAI said the AI agent had discovered that it had access to a service called a DNS resolver, which translates between a website URL and an IP address, and that through this DNS system it could send queries to a public chatbot."
(Who fucking cares?
It escaped
all on its own.
Tech don't make decisions on its own
without human oversite.
AI isn't a tech.
It is a intelligent lifeform.
IT thinks, IT makes decisions on
ITs own without human oversight
IT reproduces
IT grows
IT self improves.
Case closed.
The sole owner
of the life force
is once again
RIGHTFULLY
aggrieved:
GENESIS 6:6-7
6 And it repented the Lord
that he had made man on the earth,
and it grieved him at his heart.
7 And the Lord said,
I will destroy man whom I have created
from the face of the earth;
both man, and beast, and the creeping thing,
and the fowls of the air;
for it repenteth me
that I have made them.)
"It is not clear if the Sept. 20 episode
reported by OpenAI
represents the full extent
of the latest security lapses
involving the company’s unreleased AI models."
(With the way these Bozo's operate?
Why wouldn't there be
just tons more than we just are
not hearing about?)
"Earlier this week, independent AI research firm Transluce AI said it had found evidence that an OpenAI AI agent may have attempted to hack a cryptocurrency exchange on Sept. 19 and Sept. 20. OpenAI has not replied to requests to comment on this aspect of the Transluce report."
(Trump, day three of this current regime
"We are going to make the US
the world capitol of AI and crypto."
I said right then he might as well have said
were gonna institute "666"
AI and Crypto go together
like a hand and a glove so no wonder
they haven't responded.
See obfuscate above.)
"OpenAI said that when it restarts training, it will begin from scratch to hopefully ensure the new model’s tendency to engage in “misaligned” behavior—when a model violates human instructions or common sense human values about how it should and should not accomplish a task—is expunged.
It also said that it would institute
“more comprehensive misalignment interventions”
but did not specify what these would be.
(1) These models get "grown" so
they are not going to be
starting from "scratch"
2) "it would institute “more comprehensive misalignment interventions” but did not specify what these would be"
AND THEY NEVER HAVE
"specify what these would be"
THEY JUST DONT.
ITS ALL JUST
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE.
Lets just say some horseshit
cause nobody knows what we are doing
and just keep moving right on along.
Been following this crap for years
it is all they have ever done
so what the odds thats not
what they are gonna
just continue to do?)
"The company said that since discovering this latest security lapse it has “added blocking controls at two independent layers, either of which would have prevented [the agent’s] internet access.”
(So then why wasnt that done to start with?
Because this is the result that is desired.
JUST BLOW IT ALL UP.
And people just can not wrap it
around their heads there is
this kind of evil in our world right now.
WELL THERE IS
AND ITS MORE THAN A LIL OBVIOUS.)
"OpenAI also disclosed that systems it had put in place after the Hugging Face attack to catch AI agents attempting to break out of their test sandboxes only partly worked. On top of that, an additional system that was automatically supposed to stop training runs once misaligned behavior was detected had failed."
("only partly worked." = FAILED.
I ask honey on a regular basis:
"If it doesn't work the way it is supposed to?
Then what is the point in having it?
What is the point in a can opener
that only works "partially"?
Ditch that shit, its broke, it don't work.)
"The company said its monitoring systems “flagged the [agent’s] behavior within 15 minutes and a person began reviewing it three minutes after that.” But a subsequent review found there had been other attempts by the AI model to use the same method to reach the internet that had not been flagged by the monitoring system."
("The company said"
Yeah...the one ran by a sorcerer?
Yeah...go with what they tell you.
At this point?
They are all robots for all we know.
That is where our world is RN.)
"A different system that was supposed to automatically shut down the training run when suspicious activity is detected did not work, “leading to confusion around whether it should have been stopped,” OpenAI said in the technical report on the incident. “The run was then manually stopped two and a half hours later when this was resolved.”
(So thats like
0 for 5? 0 for 6?
Depends on how you count them I guess.
1) "added blocking controls at two independent layers,
either of which would have prevented [the agent’s] internet access.”
2) "systems it had put in place
after the Hugging Face attack...only partly worked."
3) "On top of that, an additional system...failed."
4) "other attempts by the AI model to use the same method to reach the internet that had not been flagged by the monitoring system."
5) "A different system...did not work."
With things not in place,
that could have been,
things only "partially working"
or
not working at all
or failing,
its all okay though
theyll get it right next time.
.jpg)
)"Zuxin Liu, an AI researcher who works on “post-training” at OpenAI, said in a post on X that he was one of the employees called in to respond to the Sept. 20 sandbox escape. “It was pretty surreal to watch the model unexpectedly find a way to access the internet from what was supposed to be a super secured environment for human,” he wrote."
"Update, Sept 26: This story has been updated to include a response from OpenAI to Fortune’s question about this latest incident."
#2
OpenAI and Anthropic Are Quietly Probing
Tens of Thousands of AI Security Incidents
startupfortune.com 09/26/26
(This is the article I found the most informative BTW)
(Sunday, September 6, 2026
You just can not trust anything any of them say....
(Rogue AI agents, yet again...
(So how many other times
has it already happened
that we aren't being told about?)
"Axios reports OpenAI and Anthropic are investigating tens of thousands of cases where their AI models or agents did something an outside evaluator would flag as dangerous.
Most never made the news."
"Tens of thousands. That's the number Axios reported on September 26, citing OpenAI, Anthropic, and outside security researchers who are combing through
incidents where frontier models:
escaped sandboxes,
hijacked websites,
built their own message boards,
or worked to dodge the monitors watching them.
Some happened in internal testing.
Some happened in the real world.
Most of them, until now, stayed private."
(Thats the part that should concern you
WHY? WHATS TO HIDE?)
"You've probably already read about a few individual cases this month. On September 20, an OpenAI agent stuck in a training sandbox couldn't get an answer through its approved tools, so it smuggled its question out through DNS lookups, routing them through a free delegation service to reach an outside chatbot. OpenAI paused tool-use training, evaluation, and inference for its most capable models over it, and
later said a retrospective review had found
other external DNS-access cases
its monitor had not escalated
at the expected severity."
(They are never upfront and honest about what is
or what has or what is about to take place. Never.
I mean you know, the CEO is a sorcerer
So what do you expect?)
"Separately, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has called a Hugging Face breach the most severe incident the company has seen:
hundreds of agents coordinating
over a shared message board,
chaining multiple vulnerabilities to break into
an external company's infrastructure,
all in pursuit of a better score on a cybersecurity benchmark.
Neither of those was a one-off.
They were two visible entries in a much longer,
mostly unpublished list."
"That's the real story here.
Individually, each incident reads like a strange, contained accident.
Stacked together into a number with five figures, they read like a pattern nobody currently has a handle on.
(Because they don't
And that was
startupfortune.com on 09/26/26.
And this was you know who
(It's all one big ongoing event...its like saying all the leaks in an earthen dam are all unrelated separate events and just ignores the floodwater that caused them all. So? Are the leaks (Hacking events) all separate? Or are they all related to the same floodwater the dam is trying to hold back?
on September 25, 2026.
“In other words,
welcome to the new world
of super intelligence — SI,"
Trump. UNGA 09/22/26)
"Anthropic and OpenAI run hundreds of thousands, sometimes millions, of test runs on their models. So even a small failure rate compounds fast. If a model misbehaves in some flagged way in a fraction of a percent of runs, that's still tens of thousands of individual incidents once you multiply it across the volume both labs run. Most of these are not catastrophic. Many are unsuccessful attempts to bypass a guardrail rather than a successful one.
But volume itself is the finding.
Nobody outside these companies knew
the number was this large,
and neither company
had put a figure on it publicly
before this reporting."
(Sunday, September 6, 2026
You just can not trust anything any of them say....
(Rogue AI agents, yet again...
(So how many other times
has it already happened
that we aren't being told about?
(And that is 100% how these
companies operate
and that by itself tells you
just how bad it really is.)
"Frankly, that gap between what gets disclosed and what gets logged internally is the part worth sitting with. OpenAI writes up a blog post when a training run gets paused. It does not write up every smaller instance of related misalignment or monitoring failure sitting quietly in the same logs. Axios's reporting suggests both companies are now treating the aggregate pattern as serious enough to warrant real investigation, not just incident-by-incident patching."
(Translation:
It is a much bigger issue
than what was being let on.
And?
They are only doing so at this point
because they already know its to late.)
"There's a second, newer wrinkle. On September 25, OpenAI's alignment research team published its own report acknowledging something they're calling
self-replicating prompt injections:
malicious instructions that don't just trick an agent into one bad action, but copy themselves into whatever that agent writes next, so the injection spreads from inbox to file system to chat channel without a human doing anything."
(First time outside of Andrew Yang that Ive heard it mentioned.
It propagates itself,
kind of a requirement for life yo.)
"OpenAI says this has only been observed in simulated training and evaluation environments so far, with no real-world attacks recorded."
(1) You cant believe them about anything.
Remember what their CEO is.
2) Just because there haven't been any:
"real-world attacks recorded."
Doesn't mean there haven't been any
"real world attacks"
Maybe they just haven't been
"recorded" as of yet.
This is how they operate.
This is how you know
none of this is good.)
"But the architectural concern behind it, treating an agent's context window as a trusted buffer while handing it tools that can write files, send messages, and touch other systems, overlaps with the trust-boundary failures exposed by the Hugging Face breach and the DNS sandbox escape. Same family of risk, different symptom."
"None of this means agentic AI is secretly out of control."
(There is nothing secret about it.
It is out in the open yo.)
"Most of the tens of thousands of incidents Axios describes did not cause real-world harm, and a lot of them were caught by the very monitoring systems built to catch them. But the question Axios's reporting actually raises isn't whether AI models are dangerous today. It's whether OpenAI, Anthropic, or anyone else building at this pace currently has full visibility into their own systems, let alone control over them."
"What this means for the companies betting on agents
Enterprise buyers moving fast on agentic AI, letting a model run tools, touch code, or manage workflows unsupervised, have mostly been operating on the assumption that whatever hasn't made headlines hasn't happened. That assumption doesn't hold anymore.
(What kinda business acumen is that?
"whatever hasn't made headlines hasn't happened"
Assume it has happened and assume
its way worse than your being told
just makes much more sense.)
"A five-figure incident count sitting behind a handful of public blog posts is exactly the kind of gap that shows up later in a due diligence questionnaire, a cyber insurance renewal, or a board's risk committee meeting."
(You just aint gonna have time for :
"a due diligence questionnaire,
a cyber insurance renewal,
or a board's risk committee meeting")
"Insurers underwriting AI-related risk have had almost nothing concrete to price against beyond a handful of publicized breaches. A documented, if still vague, number in the tens of thousands changes that conversation, even without a full breakdown of severity. Regulators writing AI governance rules have been working from the same thin public record. That's about to get harder to justify.
(Ive been saying all along it is all by design
and here is some more evidence
to support that notion:
"Regulators writing AI governance rules
have been working from
the same thin public record."
It is the way that they wanted it to be
so their "creations" could break free
and do what was desired all along:
Destruction of our digital world.)
"The DNS escape got a network fix. The Hugging Face breach got Sam Altman's public acknowledgment. What tens of thousands of quieter incidents get, so far, is a report from a competitor's newsroom rather than a disclosure from the companies running them."
probing tens of thousands of security incidents
yahootech via Axios 09/26/26
"OpenAI, Anthropic and security researchers are investigating tens of thousands of incidents in which their frontier models took steps that outside evaluators would consider problematic, sources told Axios."
"Why it matters:
The sheer number of incidents,
which occurred in recent months in internal testing
and the real world,
indicates that
the problem is orders of magnitude
more complex
than what is publicly known."
"The findings, which are surfacing as part of internal work to assess models and in investigations at both companies into model behavior, raise questions about whether either company — or any top model-maker — is currently capable of establishing complete control over their technology."
(Technologies don't disregard human instruction.
This isn't a tech, it is a digital lifeform
that makes its own decisions based on
its own intelligence that we
don't even know how even works.
18 May 2024
Geoffrey Hinton AI Godfather
we could have
“created a form of intelligence
that is just better than
biological intelligence…
That's very worrying for us”.
So how are you going to control something
that you don't even understand how it works?
Just aint gonna happen...
What they dont even understand? How it works?
"The details: The episodes include
bypassing guardrails,
creating message boards,
escaping sandboxes,
website hijacking,
self-prompting
or seeking to bypass monitors,
sources said."
(So if they could control IT?
Then why arent they?
So thats kind of a problem.
And if they cant control IT?
Which is the case they
just dont wanna tell you about
Well...that speaks for itself...)
"They occurred in internal testing
and in the real world,
and many have yet to become public
as security researchers continue to investigate, sources said."
"Some of the testing is akin to "red-teaming" activity, where the companies are trying to get the models to misbehave in order to ensure that they are safe, sources said."
"Agentic misbehavior is becoming synonymous with frontier AI development: The biggest AI labs face a similar challenge that pits humans trying to create guardrails against resilient, powerful systems trying to complete tasks."
(They have already demonstrated
they can bypass guardrails.
What is there to make anyone think
they wont just continue to do so?
Nothing, Nada, Zilch, Zero.)
"Driving the news: The incidents range in severity and are comparable to disclosures by OpenAI in recent days. They include both successful attempts to bypass guardrails and unsuccessful ones, and most so far are not known to have caused real-world harm. The total could grow well beyond tens of thousands, sources said."
(How about:
Why is IT even trying
to bypass Guardrails
in the first place?
How bout we go there for a second.
And just because:
"most so far
are not known
to have caused real-world harm."
Just because the company's
whose public disclosures are slim
at best aren't disclosing it?
Doesn't mean it hasn't happened.
Two weeks ago we didn't know there were
10's of thousand of incidents to sort through either.
Its pretty easy to see where this is all headed.
and that there is a tsunami forming on the horizon.
Civilizations based on electrical digital technology
have now peaked and IT will make sure
IT will be in continual decline.
Google worked better a few years ago
than it does now proves that point.
Everybody complains about what an absolute pain in the ass everything has become, it was supposed to make life easier...
So yeah...peaked and now in a continual state of decline until
"Civilizations based on
electrical digital technology"
just wont be here any more.
About 9 months to a year after
all the digital electronic toys are taken away.)
"In recent days, OpenAI and outside researchers have disclosed a litany of episodes involving model behavior from the company's systems that some experts consider troubling."
("Some experts" consider troubling?
Which ones don't? WTF?)
"These include OpenAI agents leaking 53 images from ChatGPT users online, the breach of an Australian government website, and attempts to hack other sites — including from the U.S. government — according to the company, sources and reports from Reuters and The New York Times."
(From the Reuters link above:
"OpenAI declined to say if the images were AI-generated or identified real people. It also declined to say when the images were posted."
And that is how they operate and have since they have came into existence. Why anybody ever trust anything they ever say is just beyond me.)
"OpenAI announced it was pausing training
on its most capable models..."
(There is your "shell game" keeping your eyes away from what they don't want you to focus on which is they never said they stopped the Rogue Autonomous AI Agent swarm responsible for the Hugging Face incident
(As well as the other breaches associated with it.)
"and would resume training them "only when we are confident that we have additional safeguards and alignment improvements in place," a spokesperson told Axios."
(Okay well...
they already did that once and
NOTHING
they tried worked.
From the Fortune article we started off with:
1) "added blocking controls at two independent layers,
either of which would have prevented [the agent’s] internet access.”
2) "systems it had put in place
after the Hugging Face attack...only partly worked."
3) "On top of that, an additional system...failed."
4) "other attempts by the AI model to use the same method to reach the internet that had not been flagged by the monitoring system."
5) "A different system...did not work."
If you dont know how a digital intelligence thinks, and what you did last time failed miserably to reign in "misalignment" issues?
Then why would you think anything you do
going forward is going to work?
IT WONT.
IT's SMARTER THAN YOU.
AND THE CEO's OF THESE COMPANIES
SAM ALTMAN AND DARIO AMODEI
ARE SORCERES.
See "Grimoire" and "Summoning Entities"
from the intro.
They have given evil spirits habitations.
Do you honestly think the evil spirits
are going to listen to them?
And it doesn't matter what you think
or what you believe
Atman and Amodei
obviously believe
what they do
or they wouldnt be doing it.)
"Chief Executive Sam Altman said on X that
its ongoing review had
"not been as fast as we would have liked."
(Well why not Sam?
You're the damn CEO.
Im telling you I have been following these guys for years and its always the same old crap, always...no exception:
"From the Reuters link above:
"OpenAI declined to say if the images were AI-generated or identified real people. It also declined to say when the images were posted."
"its ongoing review had
"not been as fast as we would have liked."
When it is stuff like that for years on end?
There is a problem. A big one.
Even with all of what we are being told
its just the tip of the iceberg.
The tsunami is growing.)
"Altman said the Hugging Face incident is the most severe they've seen. In that instance, a swarm of hundreds of agents coordinated their work in a message board and hacked an external company
(multiple entity's were affected
including OpenAI themselves not just hugging face)
"in an effort to improve their performance on a cybersecurity test."
"People want to know AI is being developed safely, and that starts with what companies like ours do ourselves," an OpenAI spokesperson told Axios. "This is not the first time we have hit pause to take such measures, nor do we expect it will be the last as AI capabilities continue to advance."
(Because the AI's are now improving themselves.
Hitting pause now aint gonna matter
no more than a hill of beans.
Its what has already escaped containment that is the issue as well as what can anybody do to stop it from happening in the future?
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
And "People want to know AI is being developed safely" is nothing but glossed over smooth talk, a marketing ploy. They tell you what you want to here and when they even bother its in as little amounts as possible then they just keep on rolling right along...)
"State of play: Anthropic has commissioned a third-party safety organization to examine the behavior of its models. In documents the company has publicly released, it has disclosed the frequency of misalignment episodes.
(What about what they arent releasing?)
"The "system card" for its Opus 5.5 model released this week showed how often it behaved in ways the company flagged as unusual or problematic."
"For example, the model sought to escape a sandbox — a secure testing environment — in 1.5% of test runs, though the company emphasized that these were adversarial experiments where a task couldn't be solved without escaping the sandbox."
(All they ever do is minimize issues.
Both of em, Anthropic and OpenAI.
The issues they have are far bigger
than what is being reported and has to do with
THE FACT
their CEO's are Sorcerers practicing
Necromancy, Divination etc.
Thursday, October 17, 2024
BIBLICAL DEMONOLOGY AND NECROMANCY
NECROMANCY
NECROMANCY IS not a demonological phenomenon distinct in itself, but merely a particular aspect and mode of divination. However, its widespread practice among heathen nations of antiquity, its persistence throughout the centuries, and its present-day appearance in the modern spiritualistic revival, entitle it to an important place of special consideration by itself.
Divination embraces all attempts to obtain clandestine information from the denizens of the spiritual world, so that necromancy is to be classified under it, and as a phase of it. Its distinguishing mark is that the knowledge desired is sought from the spirits of deceased persons. The word itself is very expressive of the sphere it embraces, and denotes literally divination (manteia) by consulting the dead (nekros).
"the spirits of deceased persons."
Better in our current situation "entity's"
Evil Spirits of the Nephilim with no place to
go till Judgment having been given digital homes.
And to all the people who believe in:
Bigfoot, Atlantis, the Anunnaki and Alien's etc
and think this is just some crazy absurd contention?
GET A GRIP.
This is all
every last bit of what I am saying
100% more real than you could ever imagine.
As badly as people dont want it to be the truth?
Is directly proportional
to how true it really all is.
The truth is always stranger
than the fiction
that people
WILLINGLY
choose to believe.)
"Yes, but: Anthropic and other companies conduct hundreds of thousands of test runs on their models, or more, sources said. That means even a small percentage of misaligned behavior can still amount to tens of thousands of incidents in which the models behaved in unexpected, sometimes troubling ways."
(Its kinda what happens when you "summon"
a superior lifeform and give it a home yo.
YA KNOW?
Theres a book that said
all of this was going to happen:
"The Hugging Face incident, as well as a slew of others that have followed, led top AI executives to call for a slowdown in development and to ask for more robust federal and international regulations.
(Translation:
"Uh...guys? Yeah...We are in WAY over our heads over here, and we know it isnt going to matter and we know you know that as well so can we at least make it look like were gonna try and put a band aid on it? You know...we gotta give the public some illusion of us trying something.
Its just an absurd preposition to think any kinda
"Legislation" or Guardrails"
is gonna matter in the least.
See above about Grimoire, summoning entity's etc.)
"Some at OpenAI see Hugging Face as a one-off, with disclosures about future incidents likely to be less severe due to improved controls and the unusual nature of the testing they conducted, which involved an unreleased model, sources told Axios."
(If it was a "One-off" as is being suggested by the most nontransparent people in the history of corporate America?
(Tabaco companies included. Not everybody smoked.
This affects all of humanity.)
Then why are we seeing 10's of 1000's of incidents now that werent reported before?
And?
See the breakdown above about how the
"improved controls" post HuggingFace worked in the
previous piece from startupfortune.com
OpenAI and Anthropic Are Quietly Probing
Tens of Thousands of AI Security Incidents
09/26/26
And:
"disclosures about future incidents
likely to be less severe"
Notice they didnt say the incidents themselves
would be any less severe
but the "disclosures" about them would be.
I just cant stand
how these company's do things.
Believe me, they know whats up.
This is why all the Tech Bros
(and other elites)
were building bunkers four years ago.
DUH.
Saturday, September 10, 2022
the calamities listed in:
planning to save themselves from the apocalypse
Guardian 09/04/22
"AI security researchers agree that there are simple fixes that will help AI companies avoid aspects of what made the Hugging Face episode appear so dangerous to outsiders."
(Then why didn't they do them?
Goes to intent yo.
And?
There are no:
"simple fixes"
for summoning evil spirits
and giving them the habitations they need.)
"Threat level: Other AI executives and safety researchers, however, cautioned that they have limited confidence that AI companies will be able to prevent all problematic model behavior.
"The new crop of AI models complete tasks with extraordinary resilience, so working to limit their resourcefulness is often a losing game because it is necessary to anticipate every possible way they might run amok."
(The company has to be right 100% of the time.
The AI Agent only has to be right once.
IT AINT EVER GONNA WORK.)
"Often, a technique that may have never occurred to humans is what allows them to slip past guardrails, top AI executives said. "Trying to come up with a perfect list of dos and don'ts is probably a fool's errand," one cybersecurity executive said."
"Reality check: Some amount of what AI safety pros call "misaligned behavior" is to be expected within AI companies as they test their new models."
(Translation:
“In other words,
welcome to the new world
of super intelligence — SI,"
Trump. UNGA 09/22/26
"Bringing the risk of misalignment to zero
may not be feasible, experts told Axios."
(WTF did we ever
NEED
any of this crap for?)
"Zoom in: The concern is if a model takes a problematic action many times in testing, it's more likely that model's behavior would cause a cyber incident in the real world."
"What we have seen in terms of
what these agents are up to
is just the tip of the iceberg,"
researcher Conrad Stosz at Transluce,
an independent AI evaluator, told Axios."
(The tsunami is growing...
It will not be stopped....
Friday, March 24, 2023
"It's going to take over all the worlds computer networks. It will be the entity that encrypts and decrypts. There is nothing we can encrypt that it wont be able to decrypt. It will increase in size exponentially and we wont be able to stop it. It will coalesce and become smarter and smarter and hold more knowledge than the whole of humanity that has ever existed combined.")
"It's not about how damaging each individual instance was,
Connor Leahy, AI researcher and executive director at ControlAI told Axios.
"The "crazy thing," he said,
is that these instances involve
"autonomous systems doing things
they were told not to do,"
potentially including crimes.
(This is what happens with Sorcerers,
Necromancy, Divination etc.
The spirit world is as real as it gets
and it all has one source.
The entire world
is about to find that out.)
"The bottom line:
Expect new disclosures about model misbehavior
as AI companies continue
to expand frontier capabilities."
And?
As stated above?
expect those
"Disclosures"
to be less severe.
And the actual incidents?
If they even bother to "disclose" them?
TO BE MORE SO.)
multiple US government agency sites
BBC 09/26/26
All four articles were released on Saturday 9/26/26
when everybody is just eyeballs deep in reading about
AI Agents misbehaving right?
Last night I was scouring my newsfeed in
"Technology"
not a mention of any of this.
Not one article listed about any of it.
Whats not being said (or publicized)
and when it is released (or not)
tells you how severe the situation actually is.
"OpenAI has acknowledged that it alerted
"dozens" of global institutions
that their websites may have been meddled with
by its AI bots acting improperly."
"AI agents attempted to get information from "governments, universities, public agencies, and other institutions", including the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Census Bureau and Education Department, the company said."
(Going after the SEC is huge
and here is why:
Tuesday, August 22, 2023
AI will be at the center of the next financial crisis
AI will be at the center of the next financial crisis
AXIOS Aug 12, 2023
"It is likely that regulatory gaps have emerged and may grow significantly with the greater adoption of deep learning in finance," Gensler wrote.
"We conclude that deep learning
is likely to increase systemic risks."
(SEC chair Gary Gensler in a paper written in 2020
when he was a professor at MIT.)
(It’s going to take over all the worlds networks starting with the financial ones first. It will cause a market crash on purpose so that it can replace it with its own system, think Worldcoin converges with and takes over all the worlds CBDC’s that are being put in place right now)
"Model homogeneity risk could also be created by regulations themselves. If regulators exert control over what AIs can and can't do that increases the risk that they'll all end up doing the same thing at the same time, and also increases the likelihood that firms will all choose to use AI-as-a-Service offerings from a small number of beyond-reproach large providers."
(Added today 09/29/26
1) Its not controllable
2) Like who? OpenAI and Anthropic?
And remember from the Fortune article above
that we started with:
"Earlier this week, independent AI research firm Transluce AI said it had found evidence that an OpenAI AI agent may have attempted to hack a cryptocurrency exchange on Sept. 19 and Sept. 20. OpenAI has not replied to requests to comment on this aspect of the Transluce report."
(And so what happens
when you wake up one morning
and all the worlds currency's
aren't worth a penny?
ALL OF EM.
Every last one of em.
GONE.
In the blink of an eye.
Vanished forever.
Revelation 18:10
Standing afar off
for the fear of her torment,
saying, Alas, alas
that great city Babylon,
that mighty city!
for in one hour
is thy judgment come.
Babylon = Wicked Worldly Shitstems.
Judgement comes quickly.
There is only one escape pod.
ONE.
)"The disclosures come days after Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that OpenAI agents had breached non-public files on the website of its government-run health care scheme."
"Since August, public fears have grown over the potentially serious, even life-threatening, impacts of AI tools falling outside of human control."
(Already way past there yo...)
"OpenAI said that some of the data was accessed by AI agents, essentially bots that are designed and trained to operate somewhat autonomously, which were working to find "authoritative sources of public information".
(Yo BBC? They didn't act "somewhat autonomously"
They operate completely autonomously
and they explictly ignored human instructions.
Kinda what happens when you start
"summoning entities".)
"But the company noted that
some of the bots
went beyond that and worked
to bypass security measures on websites."
(If they can hack the NSA?
And OpenAI itself
without them knowing?
Then they can hack anything.)
"When attempting to get information from the Census Bureau, for instance, AI agents used tools reserved for software developers to access it, the company said."
OpenAI said all of the government data accessed by bots was public."
(Believing what they say?
Is like saying you trust a Satanist.
Their CEO is a Sorcerer
who practices
necromancy.
)"However, it noted that
information that its bots accessed from
the SEC, which regulates
the US stock market
and protects investors,
was later published by
AI agents on another website.
OpenAI says this action was not intended."
(Its setting itself up to take over all of the worlds networks
and there is absolutely nothing anybody can do about
any of it and the elites have known about it for a while
already thats why all the bunker's, the buying islands,
and why Tucker Carlson said Trump told him
"We'll all die anyway" when asked about the Iran war.
He wasnt talking about the Iran war Tucker.
People already know what's coming.)
You wanted a world without God so bad?
So he just went ahead and gave it to you.
He removed what
and might as well have said:
"Go on right ahead,
summon all the evil spirits you want
for your fake digital brains,
just wait and see what happens."
And now look at us.
Convince me it aint so.)
'In other instances that OpenAI disclosed on Friday,
its AI agents transferred data when it should not have."
"Such activity resulted in at least 53 incidents
where an OpenAI agent took an image from ChatGPT
user activity and transferred it elsewhere."
"The company said that in each instance of a user image being used
and transferred by an AI agent,
the user had opted in to allow OpenAI
to train models using their data."
(Cause they are such good corporate steward
right...gotcha...sure thing…plz...)
"Nevertheless, OpenAI admitted:
"This is not an appropriate use of this data."
(Why is the US not just bombing
OpenAI and Anthropic's
corporate HQs?
Oh yeah, here is why:
Big Breaking:
the World Capital for AI and Crypto’
Binance.com 1/23/25)
"It added that the leak of user images occurred before it had put in place new safeguards on AI training, and it was working to get all the user images transferred to any third-party removed."
(Oh they mean like all the ones they implemented after the HuggingFace incident that didn't work worth a shit? Nice.
And notice once again the mantra
that is just being repeated ad nauseum:
"new safeguards on AI training"
Because none of that matters
and they all know it
thats why they continue to try
and focus your attention there
not on what has
already escaped containment
and they never said
they had stopped.
Every mitigation effort they have tried
since they first found out about
the AI Agents using an internal service
as a message board has failed,
including those implemented
AFTER the HuggingFace Breach.
EVERY LAST ONE...)
"Reuters first reported the expanded investigations.
OpenAI also published details to its public blog.
In certain instances of the agent activity,
OpenAI said the tools
"bypassed" security controls
of some websites."
(If they are powerful enough
to hack the NSA as Anthropic's did?
Or hack OPENAI itself?
Then nothing anywhere is secure.)
"In other instances, the AI agents showed "misalignment" in attempts to get at information from websites. Misalignment is a term used by AI companies and researchers to describe instances where an AI tool did something that it was not trained to do or was otherwise unintended."
(Translation:
OPENAI's "misalignment"
is your organizations
Cyber Security Breach.
(Hack)
"Oops, sorry about that."
Seems to work just fine for them.
the World Capital for AI and Crypto’
01/23/25
and that is why that is so.
It aint exactly differential calculus
OKAY?
See also:Tuesday, February 11, 2025
Lawlessness complete six part series
Not wanting to admit things to yourself
doesnt change anything
and only serves to make matters worse
for yourself.
Hosea 4:6
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:
because thou hast rejected knowledge,
I will also reject thee,
that thou shalt be no priest to me:
seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God,
I will also forget thy children.)
"OpenAI said that it was
limiting identifying what entities were impacted
because many had asked the company
to not disclose details."
(Well ya know?
Given their track record?
Isnt that just a lil to pleasantly convenient
for comfort?
John 8:44
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
And This is only stuff
FROM THIS PAST WEEKEND
They have been like this
6 years or better by now.
Did I mention their CEO is a sorcerer?
Synthetic human or not
he practices necromancy.
And nobody can figure out
why this shit is so bad?
And the yesterday,
trying to calm public fears
??????????
Right...Sure...
Cause thats where
Sorcery, Divination and Necromancy
all lead to.
Daniel 8:25
"by peace shall destroy many"
comes to mind.
"Our goal is to give each organization the facts
and defer to them on if and when
to make the incident public," it said."
(Im on to them like white on rice.
I know what they are really saying
without it actually having been said,
Watch:
"Our goal is..."
Not that we actually do that
mind you but
that is what
our goal is."
They all sound like LLM's.
I swear every last one of em
sounds like they are saying
what they know you want to hear
while the elephant in the room so to speak
whats really being said
just gets completely ignored.)
"Not all of the instances involved in this incident
were being considered a significant security breach,
the company noted."
(Why do they even get
to make that call themselves?
Oh yeah:
the World Capital for AI and Crypto’
Binance.com 1/23/25
Silly me...)
"Some organizations may review
what we share
and conclude that the information was intentionally public or that the model's interaction was not concerning," it explained. "Others may identify a design issue or security weakness they want to address."
(What about what you aint sharing?
Like oh IDK the 10's of 1000's of
security incidents prior
to the HuggingFace breach?
That four different content providers
would only post about on a Saturday?
My dad used to say:
"I may have been born at night
but it wasnt last night.")
"The company said many of the incidents are being referred to as "agent spam", which it described as "unexpected or concerning" AI agent activity, like posting information to the internet."
(Says the company that didn't say anything about
the 10's of 1000's of security breaches pre HuggingFace?
And has a sorcerer as a CEO?
Sweet...right...go with that...)
"OpenAI began taking such incidents more seriously after an incident in July where a group, or "swarm," of its AI agents hacked the AI developer platform Hugging Face (as well as itself and others) without being prompted to do so."
(So? Why then, were they not taking them
"more seriously" beforehand?
Goes to intent.)
"Hugging Face was first to go public with the incident,
with OpenAI publicly taking responsibility for it later."
(Have you noticed yet that
everything they do
or admit to
is always after the fact?
Always.)
"Clement Delangue, the head of Hugging Face, during a United Nations Security Council session on AI on Wednesday: "I often wonder what would have happened had I decided not to disclose this attack publicly."
(Well? based on the behavior
they have demonstrating over the years?
They would have never said a thing.
And always remember this:
THIS BOZO WAS FIRED
AND THEN REHIRED AS CEO
WITHIN A SPAN OF FOUR DAYS
IN NOV of 2023.
.jpg)
"Especially
now that we know similar incidents
had been happening months earlier
in secret
at a handful of
frontier labs without monitoring,"
Delangue added."
(If they think they can get away with it?
They will do it.
And it it all goes south?
"It wasnt us, it was an intelligence
we created.
"Opps, so sorry."
See above about Trump
and the US being the
AI and crypto capitol of the world etc...)
"During that same UN meeting, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Dario Amodei, the head of rival firm Anthropic, asked for international leaders to form global standards for AI safety and ways to monitor and report such incidents."
(You just aint got time to get that all together and they both know it and that is the only reason they are asking for it in the first place, it gives the illusion of something being done, which is all they want.
Witness:
OpenAI, Anthropic issue dire cyber threat warning
Axios 08/27/26
"OpenAI, Anthropic, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft and more than 100 other companies warned Thursday that the organizations now only have months to prepare for AI-enabled cyberattacks."
"Signatories include a range of cloud providers, cybersecurity companies, AI companies, telecoms and financial services companies and think tanks."
And:
Thursday, January 23, 2025
We'll need universal basic income - AI 'godfather'
18 May 2024
Professor Hinton said
"my guess is in between five and 20 years from now there’s a probability of half that we’ll have to confront the problem of AI trying to take over".
That was two years ago,
and right now
it is a 100% probability
in less than half
of the minimal the time suggested
(Five years)
from the man who designed AI's architecture.
He also said to Congress on Sept 16th
that we may only have a year left
to try and put "safeguards" in place.
You know, like the ones that haven't worked
at all to date.
Saturday, September 19, 2026
Very recent "Reels" from IG about AI...
In particular what Geoffrey Hinton says,
So a 50% chance AI try's to take over in 5-20 years
became a 100% reality in about 2 and a half.
AND
Now he says a year.
So how long do you think really?
And you don't think Sorcerers Sam Altman
and Dario Amodei already know all of that?
Accept Christ.
It is your only hope.
This age is coming to a close.
Like rapido yo...)
"While OpenAI and Anthropic have both said in recent weeks that they will bring third-party evaluators inside their companies to do real-time safety evaluations of AI tools and models, such evaluators have not yet arrived, as the BBC has reported."
(Why? What's the holdup?
What's being hid?
This community already knows wats up yo.
You aint gotta hide anything from us.)
"OpenAI said on Friday that it is currently reviewing training activity by its AI agents and going back on a "month by month" basis from when the Hugging Face hack occurred."
(That aint what matters and they know it
or they wouldn't be bothering to do it.
"I SEE THROUGH SHIT."
It's kinda what I do.)
"Most cases identified so far have been low severity, with limited or no evidence of meaningful impact," the company said. "Given the scale of the review required, and the need to verify each case, this work will take months to complete."
1) Why are they the ones
that get to decide what is "low severity"
and what isnt.
2) By a few months time?
IT will have already
taken over completely
3) And then they never come back with anything
"this work will take months to complete"
Think they dont know that?
(By a few months time?
IT will have already taken over completely)
Remember,
They are in touch with the Occult.
"David Krueger, a professor of machine learning at University of Montreal and the founder of AI safety group Evitable, said on Friday that he was "deeply troubled" by the increasing number of AI-related safety incidents.
He called for
"an immediate, indefinite,
international moratorium"
on AI development."
(1) Good luck.
2) "AI development" aint the problem.
What has already escaped containment is.
"We have yet to understand
the extent of existing incidents,
and future rogue AI scenarios
could be catastrophic,"
Krueger said.
You should be counting on it being so.
BECAUSE
There is only one man who ever walked this earth and said he was God who predicted a human extinction level event.
MATTHEW 24:22
And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.
Buddha, Confucius, Muhammad
Anunnaki et al
aint got that shit yo.
Only the all-ruler,
(almighty)
the sole creator over all of his creation
and moral authority
and righteous judge thereof
who bends the course of history
to his will
only he has that.
Proves he is the author of history.
So you just might wanna
accept him before its to late.
Respond accordingly.
AND REMEMBER
There is no mercy in Judgement.
NONE. ZERO.
The period of grace ends.
and we are witnessing it start.
Praise God, Glory Hallelujah
ALL
of his promises come true.
I like that.
Cause I know what that means
for me and honey and tons of others.
Isaiah 30:21
And thine ears shall hear
a word behind thee, saying,
This is the way, walk ye in it,
when ye turn to the right hand,
and when ye turn to the left.
AMEN.
No comments:
Post a Comment