I forgot lol

 

"The Three Problems 

with the original Big Bang."

BUT?
WHAT IF?
THEY ARENT REALLY POBLEMS?
JUST LIKE THE UNIVERSE 

HAVING A BEGINING ISNT?

Ask Ethan: How did the Universe truly begin?

"Cosmic inflation

But even as evidence was accumulating for the hot Big Bang in the 1960s and 1970s, puzzles emerged as well: things that were observed, but that the Big Bang itself couldn’t explain. For example, if the Universe began from a singular state of arbitrarily high temperatures and densities, then there are at least three observations that simply don’t make sense.

1) The horizon problem: if we look in different directions, we see the Universe as having the same temperature and density everywhere. 

(Because that's how the "outside agent" that that caused it to come into existence designed it?)

But even since the start of the hot Big Bang, these regions never had time to communicate, exchange information, 

(How would they exactly?)

or reach thermal equilibrium with one another. So how did they evolve to reach the same temperature and conditions everywhere?

(Because that's how the "outside agent" that caused it to come into existence designed it?)

2) The flatness problem: in an expanding Universe, in general, there’s a “fight” between the initial expansion rate that drives things apart and the gravitational effects that work to bring everything back together. In our Universe, we observe that these two opposing forces are pretty much perfectly, exactly balanced, leading to an exactly spatially flat Universe. So why was our Universe born with those properties?

(Because that's how the "outside agent" that caused it to come into existence designed it?)

3)The monopole (or ancient relic) problem: if the Universe reached these arbitrarily high temperature and energy conditions, then why are there no exotic, leftover heavy relics: right-handed neutrinos, magnetic monopoles, and other particles that should be observable and left over today?

(Because that's how the "outside agent" that caused it to come into existence designed it?)

I understand those aren't

"scientific" answers.

(But I don't really see the problem(s) either TBH.)

But you know what?

A 

"multiverse"

isn't a 

"scientific" answer 

either.

(Cant be falsified)

DECISION TIME

CHOOSE WISELY.

ETERNITY IS AT STAKE.