have now entered the:
"Lets get them ready for what's coming"
stage of planning.
Scoop: Biden discussed plans to strike Iran nuclear sites
"White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan presented President Biden with options for a potential U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear facilities if the Iranians move towards a nuclear weapon before Jan. 20, in a meeting several weeks ago that remained secret until now, three sources with knowledge of the issue tell Axios."
"Why it matters: A U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear program during the lame duck period would be an enormous gamble from a president who promised he would not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon, but who would also risk handing a fresh conflict over to his successor. Biden did not green light a strike during the meeting and has not done so since, the sources said."
(Then why do we got B-52 stratofortresses sitting on a runway in Qatar? As well as a THADD system in place in Israel and to many other assets in the region to shake a stick at?
(Right...gotcha...thats why those B52's are sittin in Qatar.)
"A U.S. official with knowledge of the issue said the White House meeting was not prompted by new intelligence or intended to end in a yes or no decision from Biden. Instead, it was part of a discussion on "prudent scenario planning" of how the U.S. should respond if Iran were to take steps like enriching Uranium to 90% purity before Jan. 20, the official said.
(Okay so what prompted the meeting then?)
"Another source said there are currently no active discussions inside the White House about possible military action against Iran's nuclear facilities."
(Translation?
That decision has already been made.)
"Behind the scenes:
Some of Biden's top aides have argued internally that two trends —the acceleration of Iran's nuclear program, and the weakening of Iran and its proxies in their war with Israel — together give Biden an imperative and an opportunity to strike."
THE REASON
for the weakening of Iran and its proxies
was to take out the nuclear program
due to its acceleration.
(Its not like these two things exist in a vacuum separated from one another, one led to the other for goodness sakes.)
"The sources said some of Biden's aides, including Sullivan, think that the degrading of Iran's air defenses and missile capabilities, along with the significant weakening of Iran's regional proxies, would improve the odds of a successful strike and decrease the risk of Iranian retaliation and regional escalation."
(Yeah...right...and those are drones over New Jersey too.
Gotcha...
Zech 14:2
For I will gather all the nations for battle against Jerusalem, and the city will be captured, the houses looted, and the women ravished. Half of the city will go into exile, but the rest of the people will not be removed from the city.
Revelation 16:14
14 These are demonic spirits that perform signs and go out to all the kings of the earth, to assemble them for battle on the great day of God the Almighty.
Joel 3:2
I will gather all the nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. There I will enter into judgment against them concerning My people, My inheritance, Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations as they divided up My land.
Acts 4:26
The kings of the earth rise up
and the rulers band together
against the Lord
and against his anointed one
(References Psalm 2:1-2)
"The intrigue: One source said Biden honed in on the question of urgency, and whether Iran had taken steps that justify a dramatic military strike a few weeks before a new president takes office."
(We had assets in place before Biden ever gave the authorization to move them around. Israel's pager and walkie talkie attack against Hezbollah was a once in a lifetime attack, those b 52's aren't just sitting in Qatar to be sitting there.
"But in recent months, several former and current Iranian officials spoke publicly about the possibility of changing Iran's nuclear doctrine."
"You can look at the public statements of Iranian officials, which have changed in the last few months as they have been dealt these strategic blows, to raise the question: Do we have to change our doctrine at some point? The fact that that's coming out publicly is something that has to be looked at extremely carefully," Sullivan said at a conference in New York two weeks ago."
(The Iranians weren't
"dealt these strategic blows"
for no reason.
They were done to facilitate the coming attack.
That you can count on.)
"At the same event, Sullivan suggested the blows Iran and its proxies had received over the past year could push Tehran to seek a nuclear weapon. "It generates choices for that adversary that can be quite dangerous, and that's something we have to remain extremely vigilant about as we go forward," he said."
(If the end result is going to be the same
one way or the other?
Attacked no matter what?
What would you do?
If you were in their situation?)
"State of play: Iran's nuclear program has advanced dramatically during Biden's time in office, bringing Iran to the status of a de-facto "nuclear threshold state."
ONLY BECAUSE TRUMP
UNILATTERALY
PULLED US OUT OF THE
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
Do you honestly believe
that three dimensional chess player
made that decision on his own?
They wouldn't be letting
this type of information out
if if wasn't going to happen and soon.
(Attack on Iran's Nuclear sites.)
They have to get your mind ready for it first.
God help us all...