Avi Loeb Medium 09/09/25
"Until recently, all spectroscopic studies of 3I/ATLAS indicated a reddish color. The latest image of 3I/ATLAS from September 7, 2025 (reported by Michael Jäger and Gerald Rhemann here), suggests that the glow around it turned green."
"The transition from red to green-blue colors might be associated with the steep rise in the production of cyanide (CN) as reported by the Very Large Telescope on August 25, 2025 (here). The production of both cyanide and nickel without iron was found to increase dramatically with decreasing heliocentric distance to the power of about 9 (+/-1)."
(The shorter the distance to the sun,
the more the cyanide and nickel production increased.)
"This morning, the ATLAS telescope team released data dating back to March 28, 2025 (accessible here),
(But it wasnt confirmed to be an interstellar visitor by NASA till July 2nd?)
"showing that the cross section of scattered light around 3I/ATLAS grew inversely with heliocentric distance to the power of 3.9 when the object was farther than 3.3 times the Earth-Sun separation (AU). Once 3I/ATLAS got closer, the growth was moderated to a power-law index of 1.2.
(It "moderated" it wasnt growing
like it was when it was farther away.
Opps.
Kinda the opposite
of what one would expect from a comet yo.)
"The ATLAS team interprets this anomalous
(deviating from what is standard, normal, or expected.)
evolution as a shift from scattering of sunlight by dust lifted from a reddened surface to the production of small, optically bright icy grains, which changed the opacity of the plume of materials shed off by 3I/ATLAS."
(1) Why arent the "icy grains' blown backwards
off of something going 130000 +mph?
And,
Translation?
"This damn thing isnt doing what we expect it to Bob."
"We had better start making up some crap
to try and explain it Jim."
Righton Bob."
Me to honey in early July
"Wit till you see the crap they are gonna just make up
when this thing starts doing things they cant explain."
And now we are here.)
"The Hubble Space Telescope image of 3I/ATLAS from July 21, 2025 (reported here) when 3I/ATLAS was at a heliocentric distance of 3.8 AU, shows an extension of scattered light towards the Sun and not away from it — as typically for comets."
"The Webb Space Telescope data from August 6, 2025 (reported here) and the SPHEREx space observatory from August 8–12, 2025 (reported here) showed that the plume of gas around 3I/ATLAS is dominated by carbon dioxide — CO2 (87% by mass) with traces of carbon monoxide — CO (9%), and water — H2O (most of the remaining 4%)."
(Why not give us the % of H2O instead of:
"most of the remaining 4%"
??????????
It could be as low as 2.1%
of the remaining 4%
and still be considered:
"most of the remaining 4%".
So why not just give us the number as you did for the CO2 and CO?
I'll tell ya why the % of H2O wasnt given like the other two numbers were.
It's because they don't want you to know just how low
the actual % of H2O is, that's why.)
"Combined with the path of 3I/ATLAS being aligned with the ecliptic plane of the planets around the Sun, having a chance probability of a fifth of a percent, these facts make 3I/ATLAS interestingly anomalous relative to familiar icy rocks."
Sunday, August 31, 2025
Avi Loeb Medium
Detection of an Anti-Solar Tail for 3I/ATLAS
08/30/25
3) Have a "glow" going forward.
"We've never seen such a thing.
A comet doesn't have
glow in front of it."
Avi Loeb on CNN This Morning
Thursday 08/07/25 per Raw Story)
"3I/ATLAS is different from the first interstellar object 1I/`Oumuamua which displayed no signs of evaporation but exhibited non-gravitational acceleration and also from the second interstellar object 2I/Borisov which behaved like a familiar comet."
("We've never seen such a thing.")
Explaining the Anomalous Anti-Tail of 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 09/09/25
(Translation?
"This damn thing isnt doing what we expect it to Bob."
"We had better start making some crap up then
to try and explain it Jim."
Righton Bob."
Me to honey in early July
"Wait till you see the crap they are gonna just make up
when this thing starts doing things they cant explain."
And now we are here.)
First things first,
Avi?
was didnt you explain:
the Anomalous Anti-Tail of 3I/ATLAS
09/09/25
HERE:
Detection of an Anti-Solar Tail for 3I/ATLAS
08/30/25
When:
"As of now, it is unclear whether the scattering of sunlight in the glow and tail around 3I/ATLAS is from dust particles or icy fragments made of CO2, CO and H2O that broke off the surface of the nucleus."
Was as close as you got to doing so.
It is still "unclear".
So why did you wait
10 days
to try and explain it?
And?
"A new paper (available here) that I co-authored with my brilliant colleague, Eric Keto, provides an explanation for the development of an anti-tail based on a simple physical model."
(If its based on
"a simple physical model"
as stated?
Then wouldnt you have known so
10 days ago?
When you wrote:
the Anomalous Anti-Tail of 3I/ATLAS
It being so simple and all?
And?
"The ATLAS team interprets this anomalous evolution as a shift from scattering of sunlight by dust lifted from a reddened surface to the production of small, optically bright icy grains, which changed the opacity of the plume of materials shed off by 3I/ATLAS. The latter conclusion is consistent with our new model, except that the model argues for the dominance of ice and not refractory dust at a heliocentric distance of 3.8 AU."
(Avi?
Brother?
Why does your model just happen to match up with the ATLAS team interpretation, and they were both written on the same day?
Here is what they are doing.
They are making shit up
AFTER THE FACT
to trying to match up with what they are seeing.
Such are the methodologies
or the elitists' cult of scientism.
And they did it on the same day even.
This is from previous in the article
the Anomalous Anti-Tail of 3I/ATLAS
09/09/25
Where Avi tries to explain how
this thing is violating the known laws of physics:
(Feel free to skip over it all
as it is nothing but garbage,
almost like somebody made him write it.)
The long story short is still this:
Shit dont go forward
off of something going
130,000+ mph.
I dont care who says it
or how they try to explain it.
This community just isnt that stupid.
And Remember:
"Nonsense is still nonsense
even if it comes out of the mouths
of high-minded scientist."
"In short, our new model associates the glow around 3I/ATLAS with scattering of sunlight by ice fragments that are shed from its surface, rather than refractory dust particles as previously assumed. Most of the scattering stems from ice grains with a size comparable to the wavelength of sunlight, about half a micrometer. The ice fragments evaporate after some time but because of the enhanced mass loss in the Sun-facing side, more of the bigger fragments can reach a large distance — giving rise to an anti-tail. In other words, the anti-tail represents an extension of the snow line, or survival distance of a sublimating ice grain, in the direction of the Sun. The extension of the glow is due to the difference in the sublimation mass flux in the solar and perpendicular directions caused by the change in the illumination angle of the object’s surface. The stronger sublimation mass flux in the solar direction results in ice grains with larger sizes, longer sublimation lifetimes, and a snow line at a larger distance with respect to other directions. The observed surface brightness profiles as a function of illumination angle are well reproduced by our model for a constant outflow velocity and sublimating ice grains with angularly dependent survival lengths."
And that was
"In Short".
Avi my brother?
What happened?
Cause the answer
that doesn't violate
is the one you gave earlier:
"We've never seen such a thing.
A comet doesn't have
glow in front of it."
Avi Loeb on CNN This Morning
Thursday 08/07/25 per Raw Story)
Avi my brother?
You are writing as if you know
somebody is on
to what is going on here...yup.
One more:
Extreme Negative Polarization of 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 09/10/25
"A new study of 3I/ATLAS (reported here) establishes this interstellar object as uniquely distinct in its polarization properties from solar system bodies as well as the interstellar comet 2I/Borisov."
(Well no kidding,
cause it aint a comet
and people have known so
since whenever
it was they found it.
Who knows now?
"This morning, the ATLAS telescope team released data dating back to March 28, 2025..."
Thats almost four months
before it was confirmed by NASA
as an interstellar visitor on July 2nd)
"This polarimetric behavior is significantly different from all known comets, either interstellar or those bound to the Solar System, not fitting into either the high or low-polarization comet categories. The combination of low inversion angle and extreme negative polarization is unprecedented among comets and asteroids, marking 3I/ATLAS the first object known with such polarimetric behavior and representing a previously unobserved population."
("We've never seen such a thing.")
"This polarization anomaly highlights the fact that 3I/ATLAS is different from previous interstellar objects. The first interstellar object 1I/`Oumuamua displayed no signs of gas or dust around it but nevertheless exhibited non-gravitational acceleration. The second interstellar object 2I/Borisov behaved like a familiar comet."
"In addition to this new anomaly, 3I/ATLAS displayed a number of other anomalies that make it unique, leaving the option of a technological origin for it as a viable alternative:..."
(No...no it most certainly does not:
"leave the option of
a technological origin for it
as a viable alternative",
as a 5 billion year old technological artifact
in the harsh environment of space
would still be subject to
the second law of thermodynamics.)
"1. The retrograde trajectory of 3I/ATLAS is aligned with the ecliptic plane of the planets around the Sun to within 5 degrees, with a chance probability of 1 in 500 (as discussed here). This brings 3I/ATLAS within several tens of millions of kilometers from Mars, (Within 2.7 million KM of Mars BTW, and closing in apparently) Venus and Jupiter."
"2. The estimated diameter of the nucleus of 3I/ATLAS is up to 46 kilometers (as derived here). On October 3, the HiRISE camera on the Mars Reconnaissance orbiter will be able to image 3I/ATLAS with a pixel resolution of 30 kilometers, providing a tight limit on the diameter of its nucleus."
"3. When 3I/ATLAS was at a heliocentric distance of 3–4.5 times the Earth-Sun separation, it featured a glow which extended towards the Sun and not in the opposite direction. This feature of an anti-tail was never observed before for comets (as discussed here)."
"4. The plume of gas around 3I/ATLAS is composed primarily of carbon dioxide — CO2 (87% by mass) with traces of carbon monoxide — CO (9%), and water — H2O (most of the remaining 4%), as derived here."
(The highest ratio of CO2 to H20 ever seen BTW)
"It also features nickel without iron (as known to exist in industrially-produced nickel alloys) and cyanide, both rising sharply with decreasing heliocentric distance (as reported here)."
(Revelation 8:8
8 And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood;
I dont know a lot but Im pretty sure
a lot of nickel and cyanide
wouldnt be good for our oceans.)
"Given these unprecedented anomalies,
we must stay open-minded
regarding the nature of 3I/ATLAS
until we get better data."
(Stay open minded
but
anything but God
right?)
Going back to the first piece
to close with:
Avi Loeb Medium 09/09/25
"The insistence that everything in the sky is either icy rocks or human made technologies will not rid us of cosmic neighbors if they exist out there."
Avi?
are real brother,
count on it.
Somebody really needs to explain to Avi that codes don't self create, evolve or self assemble.
They require logic, pre-planning and organization.
The very opposite of random.
Every cell in everything that has ever processed oxygen to live, the only place we know that has life life, has had a genetic code in it.
So how was it created then?
And how did it get
in every cell
of every living thing?
If life wasnt an accident here
(and it obviously wasnt)
then it isnt going to be
an accident anywhere else either,
and therefore all this talk of
"technological artifacts"
"...is still nonsense
even if it comes out of the mouths
of high-minded scientist."
No comments:
Post a Comment