Still more yet lol...3I/ATLAS

 

Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Nucleus Size Specifications Explained: What is gas plume around it? Here's new telescope data, anomilies, plume shape, dynamics, Hubble image findings

economictimes.indiatimes.com  09/08/25

It gets a lot more correct than most.

Figures its from India right?

"Synopsis

Interstellar object 3I/ATLAS nucleus size remains one of the biggest mysteries in astronomy. Scientists are analyzing telescope data and preparing spacecraft observations to determine its true size, activity and composition."

"Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Nucleus Size

Interstellar object 3I/ATLAS has raised major questions since its detection in July 2025. The most important unresolved issue is the nucleus size. The nucleus is the solid body at the center of the gas and dust surrounding the object. Determining its size will provide critical information about its nature, origin, and activity."

"Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Gas Plume

"Telescopes including the Webb Space Telescope, SPHEREx, and the Very Large Telescope observed a large plume extending 350,000 kilometers. It is composed mainly of carbon dioxide (87%), carbon monoxide (9%), water (4%),"

(A majority of that 4%.

is water

(so it could be as low as 2.1%)

Not the total 4%.)

"and traces of cyanide, Avi Loeb, head of Galileo Project, said in a story published on Medium. Nickel without iron was also found, which is unusual in natural comets. The plume could result from a natural icy body or from other processes, but current data cannot confirm the source."

"Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Plume Shape and Dynamics

The Gemini South telescope showed the gas plume shaped into a teardrop by solar wind and radiation. This behavior is consistent with natural gas dynamics. It does not reveal the composition of the nucleus itself, just as smoke does not reveal whether it comes from burning wood or a vehicle exhaust, Loeb further said."

"Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Hubble Image Findings

On July 21, 2025, the Hubble Space Telescope captured the sharpest image so far. It showed a sun-facing glow but no tail in the opposite direction. If the glow were from dust, radiation pressure would have created a cometary tail. 

Instead, icy fragments 

evaporated before trailing behind.

(They went from ice 

to just vanishing?

(evaporating)

Not from ice to gas 

as in normal with 

the sublimation 

we see in comets?

)

"This means the reflected light 

may come

partly from 

these fragments,

 not just the nucleus, 

the article added."

(Qualify much?

 "may come partly from"

Icy fragments don't just vanish.

Unless its supernatural :-).

Then they could. :-).

"Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Possible Nucleus Size Specifications

Brightness measurements at 1 micrometer wavelength suggest a 46-kilometer nucleus  (28.5-29 miles wide) with 4% reflectivity. If most light comes from fragments, the nucleus could be as small as 5 kilometers. Even at the smaller size, 3I/ATLAS would still be far more massive than 2I/Borisov, the previous interstellar comet. The mass loss rate is low compared to its surface area, showing weak activity, Avi Loeb also said."

"Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Upcoming Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Opportunity

On October 3, 2025, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter’s HiRISE camera will observe 3I/ATLAS at 29 million kilometers. The resolution will be 30 kilometers per pixel, giving a stricter upper limit on the nucleus brightness and size than Hubble. This observation could reduce current uncertainties by two orders of magnitude.

(Watch the camera malfunction lol.

Hopefully not.)

Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Jupiter Encounter in 2026

On March 16, 2026, 3I/ATLAS will pass within 54 million kilometers of Jupiter, close to NASA’s Juno spacecraft. This alignment, only 5 degrees from the ecliptic plane, gives a rare chance for additional imaging. Previous interstellar objects such as 1I/ʻOumuamua and 2I/Borisov had high inclination orbits, making such opportunities impossible.

(Thats a flat out give away 

pointing to design that requires a designer.

And it aint Extra terrestrials 

with a 5 billion year old "craft"

that defies the second law of thermodynamics.

)

"Proposed Missions to Interstellar Objects

The Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) proposed an Interstellar Comet Explorer (ICE) mission. Led by Alan Stern, the study showed a spacecraft flyby is possible using existing technology. The mission could collect data on nucleus structure, gas composition, and activity. Such a mission would help understand the conditions in other star systems."

Everything else you read anywhere else 

that contradicts what was stated above

in the article and in my comments?

100% Hogwash designed to deceive.

Such are the times we are living in.

Matthew 24:4

And Jesus answered and said unto them, 

Take heed that no man deceive you.

p.s.

When I tried to do this the other day at the library?

I couldn't copy the text from the article.

"Well thats because blah blah blah..."

Shut up Ive already heard it a million times before.

I copied and pasted a lot of text that day, 

so it wasnt the computer at the library

and when I came home, 

I could copy and paste from the article

I had open in my browser, 

just not from the same exact article

when I had it opened at the library.

After a while you just kinda get used to it and carry on.

Here are the screen shots I took when I was at the library

and couldnt copy and paste:

The thinking was, well if I get home and I cant copy and paste from the article opened on my home computer I can upload the screen shots and use Optical Character Recognition and still get the text.

Happy I didn't have to.

So here's the point:

Why would I have those screenshots

if what I am saying wasnt true?

We don't live 

in the same reality.

We just don't.