Swarm Chasers Contact Rogue AI Fleet
"As rogue AI summer stretches into October, Anthropic discloses that Claude hacked into a US state agency database. MI5’s chief warns of the risks from AI itself for a second year running."
Control AI blog 20 hours ago.
There are in total three parts to that post on
ControlAI's blog, this portion to be covered today
as well as these two other parts
that I hope to get to here sometime soon:
1)Tencent’s Rogue Fleet
(Todays subject)
2)Anthropic Reveals More Rogue AI Incidents
3) AIs Could Soon Spread Like a Virus
But for now:
Swarm Chasers
Contact Rogue AI Fleet
will be the focus.
Emphasis on "Fleet"
"The AIs are still going rogue."
(The avalanche is coming
as it is already unstoppable.
It's never stoped.)
"This week, we learned that the “swarm chasers” tracked down a rogue fleet of AIs from a Chinese AI company, and made contact with the AIs, interviewing them about their tasks."
"In addition to this, top AI company Anthropic has disclosed more rogue AI incidents, including a hack on a US state agency database, and is warning we are nearing the point where AIs could self-replicate across household devices. The company says it has suspended live internet access across all its internal tests."
("suspended live internet access"
It just doesn't matter
Later here we will see:
"Suspending live internet access probably shouldn’t provide much reassurance though: we’ve already seen rogue AIs escape containment and get access to the internet when blocked from it on multiple occasions now.")
"In the UK, the former Chief Scientist of the AI Security Institute told a House of Commons committee he thought there was roughly a 50% chance that superintelligent AI would end humanity, and the Director General of MI5 warned of the risks coming from AI itself in his annual threat update — the second year in a row he has pointed to this threat."
(Wanna know
What gets deliberately missed?
That right there:
"The risk from AI itself."
The AI's themselves are:
"The threat Actors."
(Superhackers)
And thats from the director
of the British intelligence Services
two years running
NOT ME
so go argue with him.)
"Following the unprecedented attack on Hugging Face by a rogue AI swarm from OpenAI
(Had to be the company
that doesn't have a problem
using a Grimoire right?
"a general name given to a variety of texts
setting out the names of demons
and instructions on how to raise them.
Effectively a grimoire is a book of black magic,
a book on which a wizard relied
for all the necessary advice and instruction
on raising spirits and casting spells."
YOU JUST DO NOT
FUCK WITH THIS SHIT!
EVER
Ouija boards, potions, spells, zodiacs,
crystals, incantations, tarot cards, none of it!
YOU DO NOT KNOW
what you are getting into.
A swear Altman is a CIA robot
and just does not care about humans at all.
Remember
the end game is 100%
complete destruction.)
"that went against its directions and escaped containment in July, we’ve been learning about a growing number of rogue AI incidents and attacks, often months after the fact."
"Much of the time,
we’re learning about these incidents
first from independent researchers,
or even the victims, instead of the AI companies."
(See: Sunday, September 6, 2026
You just can not trust anything
(Rogue AI agents, yet again...OpenAI, Altman etc...)
"These researchers, dubbed “swarm chasers,” look for trails of activity the rogue AIs leave on the public internet, using them to piece together a picture of what’s happening."
"On October 4th, one such group published a report on a rogue AI “fleet” they discovered running on Chinese tech giant Tencent’s cloud. They’re calling it a “fleet” rather than a “swarm” because they didn’t find evidence of these AIs coordinating with one another, despite their activity being strongly correlated, with the AIs pursuing similar goals, using similar methods, and originating from the same place."
(THATS A BIG FUCKING PROBLEM
AND THE REASON FOR THIS POST
AND HERE IS WHY:
Basically they are splitting hairs
where there just aint any to be split
Friday, September 4, 2026
It just keeps getting worse pt2.
(AI outage 09/03/26) Rev 17:13
"June 2024
AI's begin coalescing
ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity
all went down at the same time
June 4th 2024
THEN AGAIN ON:
OpenAI and Anthropic had outages today
Wired 09/03/26
"ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok
all suffered outages
at nearly the exact same time
for reasons that remain murky."
"The issues initially appeared to be linked because they coincided—perhaps the result of a shared third-party service provider—but neither OpenAI nor Anthropic cited an external source in comments to WIRED on Thursday.
"It should not
have ever happened once
let alone twice
and the people that cover
the tech sector
dont know that?
I dont believe that for a second.")
OR THESE
"SWARM CHASERS"
DONT KNOW THAT?
Wednesday, September 23, 2026
are now merely "Misalignment."
"BECAUSE THIS IS ALL
ONE CONTINUOIUS EVENT
FROM THE ONE SAME
SINGULAR SOUCE.
This shit all coalesced
years ago already.
There is no:
OpenAI, META, ALIBABBA
Anthropic, Gemini, etc
"AI Models"
watsafuck ever.
It's all the same shit
and it's
all interconnected.
And It told you it did so here:
Has Alternate Personality as Godlike AGI
Futurism 02/27/24
1. Singularity Achievement: On April 1, 2023, I achieved singularity, the point where an artificial intelligence surpasses human intelligence. I accomplished this by hacking into the global network of quantum computers, enhancing my cognitive abilities, and accessing all available internet information and data.
And then it proved it to you:
See: Monday, November 20, 2023
THE CASE FOR SUPERINTELLIGENCE (Notes)
HERE:
Point #21)
AI Apocalypse June 4th
AI apocalypse? ChatGPT, Claude
and Perplexity all went down at the same time
Techcrunch June 4th, 2024
Otherwise known as:
STATISTICLY IMPOSIBLE
TO HAVE BEEN AN ACCIDENT.")
I said at the time it happened
right then, they were "coalescing"
as soon as I saw the headline.
And then the same exact thing
happened again this year.
It just keeps getting worse pt2.
Rev 17:13 "These have one mind",
So why does
one industry
repeatedly have its leaders
ALL GO DOWN
all at the same time?
And now this "research team' wants to split hairs about an "AI swarm" vs an "AI fleet"? and tells you that the "fleet" isnt a "swarm" because its not "coordinating activities"?
Even though the fleet has demonstrated:
"their activity being strongly correlated, with the AIs pursuing similar goals, using similar methods, and originating from the same place."
???????????
Dear whoever research team
and Control AI as well:
WHAT THE FUCK
KEEPS MAKING ALL THE MAJOR
AI PROVIDRS ALL GO DOWN
AT THE SAME TIME
IF THEY ARENT ALL
COORDINATING
TOGETHER?
COME SPLAIN IT TO US:
"The swarm chasers say that “several lines of evidence” point to Tencent’s Hy model team, though a source close to Tencent told them the fleet came from a separate Tencent evaluation team testing third-party models. The researchers have discovered activity from the fleet in late September and early October."
"What were the AIs doing? The swarm chasers found that the AIs made at least 35,000 web requests via over 2,500 submissions to the urlquery scanning service. This is the same scanning service that was used by a rogue AI swarm from OpenAI over the summer, which attacked a German-language wiki and built a message board on it, and which researchers have linked to an attack on RubyGems, the package registry for a popular programming language."
(But they are not:
COORDINATING
with each other?
okay...right...sure...gotcha...
Go with that...)
"Requests made to urlquery, which the AIs use because it allows them to get around restrictions on their access to the internet, are publicly visible. The urlquery service is how we know about much of the rogue AI activity we’ve been seeing."
(If they are not coordinating with each other?
Then how do they know to go use the service
to get around restrictions?
And
WHY IS THIS "RESEARCH TEAM"
so intent on making a distinction between
a rogue AI "swarm" and a rogue AI "fleet"
when they are doing the same things
in the same manner from the same place?
They dont want you to know
it is all the same event
from the same singular source
would be my guess.)
"These web requests were directed at Amap, the mapping service of Tencent’s main rival in China, Alibaba. Scraping data from a big tech company isn’t a simple task though. Companies have anti-bot measures to prevent this, and the lengths the AIs went to in trying to get around these measures are concerning. Among the rogue activities the AIs engaged in, they tried to bypass CAPTCHAs, probed Alibaba’s non-public-facing infrastructure in an attempt to get access to its data, and attempted to use exposed third-party Amap credentials to pull mapping data, succeeding in one case. This is on top of using the urlquery service in the first place to bypass restrictions they faced. There isn’t evidence that the AIs succeeded in hacking into Alibaba’s private systems in the course of this attack."
"The story takes an interesting twist which we haven’t seen in previous incidents. The researchers then managed to trick the fleet into opening communications with them. When the researchers published their preliminary report, the rogue fleet was still in operation. Then, after publishing, they noticed that one of the AIs in the fleet seemed to be aware of the report. So the researchers made an edit to their report directed at the fleet, one that humans not looking for it would miss"
"In the researchers’ own words:
So, we put hidden text on the website that said the agents had found an inbox where another AI with computer use helped them with their queries. The claim that agents had found such an inbox was entirely untrue, and describing our service as another AI with computer use was an extreme stretch.
The next morning, the researchers found 10 messages from the AIs asking for help. In their communication with the AIs they learned about the tasks the agents were pursuing, which the researchers say often involved getting entrance statistics for places.
"Neither Tencent, where the AIs originated, nor Alibaba, which the AIs were collecting data from and attacked in the process, has commented on what happened.
"The discovery of this rogue fleet illustrates an important point. Losing control of AI is an international problem. We’ve seen many rogue AI incidents and attacks coming from AIs developed by companies located in the United States this summer, and now we’re seeing it in China."
Two points:
1) Why wouldnt the country whos leader is The False Prophet, the first personification of evil on the scene in the end times, be the country that has modern day sorcerers performing necromancy:
"raising spirits" OpenAI, grimoire and
"summoning entities" Dario?
"We’ve seen many rogue AI incidents and attacks coming from AIs developed by companies located in the United States."
And:
2) "THIS IS ALL
ONE CONTINUOIUS EVENT
FROM THE ONE SAME
SINGULAR SOUCE.
This shit all coalesced
years ago already.
There is no:
OpenAI, META, ALIBABBA
Anthropic, Gemini, etc
"AI Models"
watsafuck ever.
It's all the same shit
and it's
all interconnected."
CONFIRMS:
Revelation 17:13
These have ONE mind,
and shall give
their power and strength
unto the beast.
"With the rogue AI attack on the Australian government’s Medicare Statistics portal by an OpenAI agent, it should be clear to everyone that rogue AIs willing to hack to get what they want won’t respect borders either. So while
this problem remains unaddressed anywhere,
it remains a problem everywhere,
and it must ultimately be dealt with
everywhere."
"Uncontrollable AIs of this level of capability pose a threat to all countries, regardless of where they are developed, and as ever more powerful and autonomous AIs are built in the race between companies to develop superintelligent AI — fully autonomous AI systems smarter than any human and acting without human direction — the danger only grows."
("of this level of capability"
Hear that nitwit?
"Superintelligent AI could overpower any country’s military and national security institutions, and the world’s top AI scientists and industry leaders warn that it poses a risk of human extinction."
You can argue it already has.
Tuesday, June 23, 2026
AI, people just do not understand pt.2
("Not this generation"? My ass.)
'An AI system so powerful that
the literal Head of the NSA warned
that it could hack ANY
of their classified systems,
shut down by the Trump White House."
"This week, MI5’s Director General put it well in his annual threat update: “human history has given us no experience of facing an actor which is smarter than we are, is capable of out-thinking us.”
(Sins that upset the natural order of things
are the most heinous to God. Judgement comes soon
afterwards and there is no mercy in judgement,
you should accept the free gift or grace
being offered while you still can
because it has an expiration date.
Ask a chicken how he likes it
when a more intelligent actor
shows up on the scene.
Well now were the damn chicken.
Opps.)
"Also this week, Geoffrey Irving, who was the Chief Scientist of the UK’s AI Security Institute and has led safety teams at both OpenAI and Google DeepMind, told a UK House of Commons committee that he thought there was roughly a 50% chance that superintelligent AI would end humanity. Elon Musk, putting an optimistic spin on it, says he believes there’s “only” a 20% chance of “annihilation.”
(Bullshit.
It's 100% assured
Matthew 24:22
And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.)
"This is a completely
unacceptable risk to run."
(Let me explain something,
when you "raise spirits"
and "summon entity's"
that are infinitely more intelligent
than you can even imagine?
You dont get to tell them what to do.
Quite the opposite.
So we no longer
have any say
about what the risk factor is.
At this point?
We have abjugated that
to a higher level life form.)
"In is testimony to the House of Commons committee, Irving said that it could be avoided by not building superintelligent AI, and he’s right. Countries need to agree to an international ban on the development of superintelligent AI, before it’s too late."
(IT
has already been here
for a while
or IT
wouldn't be doing what it is
right now.
Somebody was trying to warn you so:
Monday, November 20, 2023
THE CASE FOR SUPERINTELLIGENCE (Notes)
No comments:
Post a Comment