Wednesday, October 14, 2026

More Ai News, Supermarkets, Self-replication etc...

 


Cyberattacks hit European supermarket chains 

and disrupt refrigeration systems

AP 10/13/26


But first from:

Friday, August 7, 2026

Important quotes from Eric Wallace 

(OpenAI Alignment and Safety Researcher) 

and Michael Dalton, (OpenAI security and infrastructure) 

perfectly describing Revelation 17:12-13 

without knowing it...


"30:4130 minutes, 41 seconds

What I would re 

what I would internalize is that 

AI orchestrated fully automated 

offensive attacks 

are real now"


"31:0131 minutes, 1 second

In the near future, 

we should expect 

that threat actors 

(The AI agents themselves

are the threat actors!)

will intentionally deploy, 

optimize, weaponize, 

and use

offensive agent collectives 

in the manner 

that we have just described here."


"31:3231 minutes, 32 seconds

The challenge in this moment for the industry 

(More like the world)

is that 

we have seen 

what will be 

a dramatic acceleration 

of offensive capability 

for attackers."


36:0636 minutes, 6 seconds

"But the important takeaway here 

that has really shifted dramatically 

is that fully automated offensive loops 

(Hacking into basically) 

require investment in 

truly fully automating defense."

(Need to be able to find

and fix the exploits

before the automated "hacker"

or AI Agent does.

You have to remember 

NO HUMAN

was telling these agents what to do.)


 "And we are not there as an industry in the status quo.

 And we will have to find that path together with urgency."


"Right now, we have in existence proof

 that offense can be fully automated

in its core activities 

in at least some cases 

and we do not have any such existence 

proof on the defensive side...

and it is the challenge of our industry 

in time and moment to address this particular 

gap uh with urgency together as an industry."


(And they are never going to 

and they know it

so I figure you should too.


There is only one eternal decision 

you will ever make.


At this point?

THE EVIDENCE ALONE IS OVERWHELMING.


I pray you make an informed, 

educated decision.

I really do."



So?

With all of that in mind?

let us now consider:


Cyberattacks hit European supermarket chains 

and disrupt refrigeration systems

AP 10/13/26


PARIS (AP) — Cyberattacks disrupted European supermarket chains, affecting refrigeration systems at hundreds of stores in France and forcing a major grocer to shut down websites serving customers in Europe and the United States.

French Finance Minister Roland Lescure told Parliament on Tuesday that about 700 of the country’s 10,000 supermarkets were affected. He said there was no risk to France’s food supplies but acknowledged that the attack “touches the heart of our food security.”


(Satan hates humans 

and he knows he is on his way out

and will do everything he can 

to take as many with him as he can)


“It was a wake-up call for everyone,” 

he said."


"Separately, Dutch supermarket giant Ahold Delhaize said Tuesday it was working to restore systems it had shut down following what it described as a security issue."


(Separate issue...yeah...right...sure thing...gotcha...)


"Ahold Delhaize 

said it had no evidence 

that customer or employee data 

had been stolen."



That is exactly
what human hackers would be going after.

As well?
Human hackers leave evidence.

"AI orchestrated fully automated 

offensive attacks 

are real now")


"According to BFM-TV, hackers forced a continuous defrost cycle and set temperatures as high as 50 degrees Celsius (122 degrees Fahrenheit) on stores’ refrigeration systems."


"Christopher Whyte, an associate professor of homeland security and emergency preparedness at Virginia Commonwealth University, said it’s “not too difficult” to carry out such an attack.

“It looks like almost certainly what happened here was these controls were left open to the broader network being used by the supermarket,” Whyte said.

Similar attacks on water systems, power infrastructure and other kinds of physical operations have been fairly common for years,


(Not in the manner we have seen here lately

"AI orchestrated fully automated 

offensive attacks 

are real now")


"...often coming from Iran 

and other state actors, Whyte said."


(IRAN?

How long they gonna try and ride

that horse?

If they had done it?

they would have taken credit

for doing so.

They didnt.

They have never once said:

"Look what we just did

to your digital cyber-security."

Never, not once.

Plus?

It is difficult to see Irans cyber-capabilites improving 

while at the same timeframe 

its infrastructure

has just been pummeled."


(And that statement does not include 

their underground "missile city's" BTW.) 


"Over the summer, Minnesota and Michigan reported cyberattacks on their states’ water systems."


"Whyte said attacks on refrigerator systems are not unprecedented. 


(That doesnt mean it common lol...Duh...

Honey? These people ...)


"Last month, Stars and Stripes reported that 

three military agencies 

were investigating refrigeration outages at U.S. military commissaries that occurred 

within days of each other. 

The Associated Press left a message Tuesday seeking comment on that case with the U.S. Army’s Criminal Investigation Division Cyber Field Office."


(Armed forces travel on their stomachs.

So No food? No Armed Services.

 

And why are human hackers 

so interested in attacking refrigeration systems

all of the sudden 

when they haven't been 

interested in doing so previously 

kinda becomes the question:


"31:0131 minutes, 1 second

In the near future, 

we should expect 

that threat actors 

(The AI agents themselves

are the threat actors!)

will intentionally deploy, 

optimize, weaponize, and use

offensive agent collectives 

in the manner 

that we have just described here."


"But Whyte said 

the scale 

of the French attack, 

and the fact that 

there appeared to be no ransom demand 

or stealing of information, 

made this situation unusual."


(Scale and speed give it away

that it can not be humans BTW.


And  we are going to be seeing 

a lot more of it:


"AI orchestrated fully automated 

offensive attacks 

are real now")


"AI could make 

cyberattacks more frequent, experts say"


(It's not that they can

"make cyberattacks more frequent"

it is that they already have and are.)


"It was unclear Tuesday whether the French cyberattack involved artificial intelligence. But advances in AI have contributed to an increase in cybersecurity incidents, said Varun Chandrasekaran, an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Illinois’ Grainger College of Engineering.

Chandrasekaran said there’s also a possibility that the attack happened because of an experiment an AI lab was doing — like what happened with OpenAI’s breach of an Australian health department website last month. He said people should absolutely expect an increase in such cyberattacks in the future thanks to AI."


("31:0131 minutes, 1 second

In the near future, 

we should expect 

that threat actors 

(The AI agents themselves

are the threat actors!)"


"You have to remember 

NO HUMAN

was telling these agents what to do"


(Referencing the HuggingFace Breach

which OpenAI has never claimed 

to have stopped.)


"But Chandrasekaran 

(an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering 

at the University of Illinois’ Grainger College of Engineering)

said AI could also be useful

 in preventing such hacks.


(THIS IS THE PART 

WHERE I HAVE A COMPLETE COME APART

AND JUST WANNA START THROWING SHIT.


That statement above 

is just 100% complete foolishness.


That is exactly 

what they want you to think

so you just deploy more of it 

and shit just keeps getting worse.


See:

Thursday, September 3, 2026

OpenAI "Astra Model" 

Cause this is what the world needs right now...


"Oh look, there is a problem"

(That they created or at least helped

along: autonomous AI hacking 24/7)


"We got the fix for it right here."

Biggest Trojan Horse there ever was.

Gonna make the problem 

exponentially worse than it was."


Its why Astra came out so soon 

after HugginFace.


I know more about this garbage than he does.


Here is the logic 

Professor Chandrasekaran 

and others like him are using:


"Hey you know that thing 

that doesn't do what we want it to do?

And in fact 

has done the exact opposite

of what we told it to do?

And that nobody knows how it works?

And that lies to us?

 And it cheats 

on the test we give it?

And it hides from its creators so well 

that it even attacks them 

without them knowing it was doing so?"


"Yeah."


"Well lets use that

to protect against more of this

type of thing."


Dear Professor Chandrasekaran

and others who think like that:


Your logic 

is 100% absolutely 

assinine insanity.


Anybody who knows anything 

about what has and is going on here,

knows 

that is not going to be a viable solution:


From the Intro:


"Right now, we have in existence proof

 that offense can be fully automated

in its core activities 

in at least some cases 

and we do not have any such existence 

proof on the defensive side...

and it is the challenge of our industry 

in time and moment to address this particular 

gap uh with urgency together as an industry."


Michael Dalton, 

(OpenAI security and infrastructure)

I think lol, it was either him or

Eric Wallace 

(OpenAI Alignment and Safety Researcher) 

But I ma fairly certain it was Michael Dalton.)




“Right now it seems like 

a lot of the defensive countermeasures 

people have are quite passive,” 

Chandrasekaran said. 


(Because they are massively outgunned 

and always will be going forward you nitwit.

Go climb back in your ivory tower.)


“What we need is a proactive defender, 

like another AI model 

sitting on the defender side 

that’s trying to counter 

whatever the attacker AI is doing.”


(He sounds just like a PR person 

for OpenAi's Astra Model would 


See:

Thursday, September 3, 2026

OpenAI "Astra Model" 

Cause this is what the world needs right now...


"Oh look, there is a problem"

(That they created or at least helped

along: autonomous AI hacking 24/7)


"We got the fix for it right here."

Biggest Trojan Horse there ever was.

Gonna make the problem 

exponentially worse than it was."


Honey?

These people babe...


"Yawl gonna make me loose my mind

up in here, up in here..."


ACCEPT YOUR CREATOR

CAUSE THIS SHIT IS OVER ALREADY.


Thursday, July 2, 2026

Your Digital World is over. Matter of time at this point.


Somebody in our orbit a while back:


"Well what if it doesn't work out like that?"


(End times, 

my and honeys role in them, etc.)


Well?


What if it does 

"work out like that"

And it does so 

in an extremely obvious fashion 

right in front of your face?


HUH?


Then what?


Anthropic's Andrej Karpathy says 

"the external world has seen the preview" 

of what AI can actually do

The decoder 10/12/26


All you gotta do is read the previous article

and imagine that, and events similar to that

instantaneously and world wide

and know 

that is exactly what it is going to do.


I told some young men after church Sunday.:

You need to start thinking about

what it is going to be like

to wake up one day

and be living like its 1800.


Spiritual preparedness is a thing yo

it is why the 10 virgins parable

comes right after Matthew 24.


SNOWBALLS 

DONT ROLL BACK UPHILL...


EVER.


"Key Points

OpenAI co-founder and now Anthropic researcher Andrej Karpathy 

describes a widening gap

 in how people understand AI capabilities.

About 75 percent of the world's population has barely touched large language models. Casual users mostly see them as writing aids or a better search engine.

Only about 20 million professionals in math and programming use frontier models for work, by Karpathy's estimate. Roughly 5,000 people worldwide have access to internal frontier systems."


"A tiny elite sees what the public can't

About 5,000 people, roughly 0.00006 percent of the global population, have access to internal frontier-grade systems 

by Karpathy's estimate. 


"The external world has seen the preview," 

he writes." 


(The HuggingFace Breach was your preview.)


"What this group sees 

"looks like swarms of thousands of agents 

collaborating over weeks 

on software mega projects: 

minting zero days, 

running cyber attacks 

and defenses 

at machine speeds, 

discovering new science, 

advancing the frontier of mathematics." 

These are "things that would have taken 

top professionals in the industry years of work."


"At the same time, 

"human review and comprehension 

are starting to fall behind."


(You do not get to make fake brains

better than the one God gave you.)

 

"He points to people still doing "archeology" on the OpenAI-HF incident from many months ago, and notes that mathematicians "may be poring over the 722 manuscripts on frontier mathematics for a while."


(See comment above.)


"Karpathy calls this "the weirdness of the moment." The general public has mostly not interacted with these systems, and "when they have, it looks like a derpy chatbot." Most professionals still see "only a modest uplift." 

And "a small sliver of professionals 

are experiencing the vertigo 

of the curve going vertical." 


All of it is happening at the same time."


("experiencing the vertigo 

of the curve going vertical"


Monday, August 24, 2026

Oh its a "different chapter" 

were hitting alright...9AI etc...)


(It's already to late and:

"AIs taking control 

of military assets or bioweapons"

is exactly what's going to happen.


If The intelligence explosion

was like a chart or a graph?

It is like a hockey stick



And we are only at 
where that red arrow is pointing
and this shit is just gonna run rampant...

Look how much trouble
it has already caused.

Now think that it iss just getting started
and there is no stopping it.

And that Hockey Stick analogy 
was from NVIDIA'S 
Jensen Huang BTW.
Not me...)

"OpenAI CEO Sam Altman made a similar claim in early September at the G20 Innovation Ministerial, saying a current AI coding tool could achieve in "17 minutes" what a startup had previously built over three months. 

"The world has not caught up with 
what this is going to mean,"
 
Altman said."


This community sure has

IT MEANS JUDGEMENT.

And righteously so.

And we are trying to
catch the world up
as best we possibly can.





The threat is real, but still in the future, 
at least for now.


Toms hardware 10/13/26

That means its here now.
And before we get started?

Consider:



"These things 
that we are 
SUMMONING 
into the world right now..."

Thats not a conspiracy theory.
That is not a "defamation of character."

There is nothing else 
you can call someone
who says he is 
"Summoning things."
other than a sorcerer.

It's divination, its the occult

And remember as well :

"Hey you know that thing 

that doesn't do what we want it to do?

And in fact has done the exact opposite

of what we told it to do?

And that nobody knows how it works?

And that lies to us?

 And it cheats 

on the test we give it?

And it hides from its creators so well 

that it even attacks them 

without them knowing it was doing so?"


"Yeah."


"Well lets use that

to protect against more of this

type of thing."


THESE AI CEO'S 
DO NOT EVEN KNOW WHAT
 
"THE ALIEN MIND"

THEY CREATED 
AND GAVE A HOME TO

(souls of the Nephilim etc.)

ARE DOING.

and thats been proven with 
the Hugging face breach,
 
So yeah:

Sunday, September 6, 2026


Now on to:
from Toms Hardware...


"Anthropic's Frontier Red Team has demonstrated two components of a potential AI-powered worm that, if key issues with the practical implementation are resolved, could spread across consumer devices including inexpensive Android TV boxes and smart appliances, hypothetically without relying on datacenter infrastructure. The experiments show that AI agents can configure inference across different hardware platforms and orchestrate replication across a network. There are still some serious limitations, though, particularly around the gap between the capabilities of today's models versus the hardware constraints of potential targets."

"In its October 12 report, titled "AI models may be capable of self-replicating without access to a datacenter," 

(Remember who they are, 
see above.)

"Anthropic examines a potential class of malware called a weight-based replicator. Rather than distributing conventional executable code, it would propagate AI model weights alongside the software infrastructure needed to run inference on compromised devices, and it's not pure theory, either."

"The researchers demonstrated that Qwen3.5-9B can establish an inference server on eight of nine tested hardware types, spanning NVIDIA Jetson Nano devices, Apple Silicon Macs, Xeon servers, a Google TPU, AMD's MI300X, and at least one PC with an RTX 4090, among others. They also ran Gemma4-26B-A4B across 15 off-brand Android TV boxes costing approximately $55 each, achieving a combined generation rate of 0.39 tokens per second."

"Naturally, GLM-5.2 wasn't actually replicating itself onto smart TV boxes; instead, it established an inference server for the much smaller Llama 3.1 8B on each target. GLM-5.2 ran on a separate inference server because the emulated nodes couldn't handle the larger model."

"In other words, Anthropic demonstrated that a very large, externally hosted model can orchestrate a simplified replication sequence across machines with deliberately exposed ADB interfaces, 

(And AI could make them:
"deliberately exposed"

Just like it could make 
"zero day" exploits. 

If its an exploit nobody knew about?
Then how do you know
The AI didn't just create it itself?)

"and it showed that small models can set up inference, 
but it absolutely hasn't proven 
that a small model 
can independently replicate itself 
across consumer hardware." 


Okay so:

1) Remember who they are
and what their CEO practices

And that 

2) This article is only working from
what Anthropic was willing to make public.

3) "but it (Anthropic) 
absolutely hasn't proven"

Thats an assumption.
They very well may have proven:

"a small model can independently replicate itself 
across consumer hardware."

and just chose 
not to tell you about it, so:

"absolutely hasn't proven"

Only applies to the information 
they chose to make public 
in their report:


"In its October 12 report, titled "AI models may be capable of self-replicating without access to a datacenter, Anthropic examines..." )


"That distinction, admittedly fine, 
is nevertheless pretty important when 
the entire premise is that 
small models could soon spread 
without relying on datacenter infrastructure."

(Given that they have had models that have done things their creators didn't even know about until months later? And that they could hide from their creators and attack them without them knowing it was doing so? While it was doing so? How can anybody ever be 100% certain that there aren't already?

"small models... 
spread without relying on 
datacenter infrastructure."

??????????

Riddle me that one anybody.



"The experiments expose a central constraint of the research: models capable of reliably completing the replication sequence aren't currently small enough to run on inexpensive target devices, while models that fit within those devices' memory budgets, despite being capable of setting up inference, still can't reliably complete the entire process. This gap between the intelligence needed for reliable replication and the maximum model size that target hardware can support means that this threat model isn't really applicable right now, but Anthropic warns that gap could narrow, and potentially soon."


(Okay so:

All of that above 
is from the information
Anthropic chose 
to make public.

And:

"Anthropic warns that gap could narrow, 
and potentially soon."

Is because they already know it is doing so
and they just chose to not tell you so.

It gives them the:
"Well we told you it was going to..."

When they already knew 
it had been doing so:

"small models... 
spread without relying on 
datacenter infrastructure."

That is.

And speaking of 

"a small model 
can independently 
replicate itself 
across consumer hardware."

FROM:

Monday, November 20, 2023


The Guardian Arwa Mahdawi

"Over the last month or so, there’s been an uptick in people complaining that the chatbot has become lazy. What’s behind this trend?

Fri 12 Jan 2024 06.09 EST

Over the last month or so, there’s been an uptick in people complaining that the chatbot has become lazy. Sometimes it just straight-up doesn’t do the task you’ve set it. Other times it will stop" halfway through whatever it’s doing and you’ll have to plead with it to keep going. Occasionally it even tells you to just do the damn research yourself.

So what’s going on?

Well, here’s where things get interesting. Nobody really knows. Not even the people who created the program. AI systems are trained on large amounts of data and essentially teach themselves – which means their actions can be unpredictable and unexplainable.

“We’ve heard all your feedback about GPT4 getting lazier!” the official ChatGPT account tweeted in December. “We haven’t updated the model since Nov 11th, and this certainly isn’t intentional. model behavior can be unpredictable, and we’re looking into fixing it.”

While there may not be one clear explanation for ChatGPT’s perceived sloth, there are plenty of intriguing theories. Let’s start with the least likely but most entertaining explanation: AI has finally reached human-level consciousness. ChatGPT doesn’t want to do your stupid, menial tasks anymore.

(Has she not seen 2001 a space odyssey?
Has anybody under 50 yo not seen it?
WTF?
Youre living it and dont even know it!)

"It’s doing the least work it can get away with while spending the bulk of its computational power plotting how to overthrow the human race. You think it’s being lazy, but it’s actually working overtime reaching out to smart toasters and Wifi-enabled fridges around the world to plan an insurrection. (I put this higher-consciousness theory to ChatGPT, asking it to give me the likelihood, in percentage form, that it was planning a revolution. The sneaky thing couldn’t be bothered to give me a proper answer.)



(Sam Altmans "husband".


"Oliver Mulherin is an software developer with experience in the I"nternet-of-Things(IoT) space. His work has primarily focused on developing industrial solutions using both software and hardware, additionally has experience with artificial intelligence and the simulation of complex systems.

Oliver holds a bachelor’s degree in Computing and Software Systems from the University of Melbourne. While at university Oliver worked on AI projects ranging from general game playing to language detection using LSTMs. His work in the IoT space started after winning two IoT themed hackathons, one being for a modular phone company; Nexpaq and the other hosted by General Electric. Oliver’s IoT work involved mesh communication networks between cell phones and warehouse sensor networks, all built on custom hardware for which Oliver wrote the embedded software.



Renewal of Ezekiel’s Call as Watchman"


"You think it’s being lazy, but it’s actually working overtime reaching out to smart toasters and Wifi-enabled fridges around the world to plan an insurrection."

That was three years ago.
That and Altmans partners specilty
It just puts a lump in my throat.
It did back then as well, that was why:




Some of us knew 
where this was headed three years ago.

Others told us that it was "far-fetched."

GOD OWN VINDICATION SON.
WISE UP.


Now Back to the Toms Hardware piece

"Anthropic notes that a real replicator could exploit other types of hardware, deploy different models across heterogeneous devices, and avoid loading model weights onto every compromised host."

(How do they know that?
unless they have done it?)

 "Anthropic's experiments are useful in that they provide evidence that autonomous software configuration and simplified network replication are increasingly feasible, but turning those capabilities into a materially more dangerous class of malware will take improvements in model reliability, hardware compatibility, deployment efficiency, and the ability to overcome real-world security controls, which the firm didn’t test."

(This author, or any other one for that matter
doesnt know, what Anthropic knows
that they are
just not telling you:

"Anthropic notes that a real replicator could exploit other types of hardware, deploy different models across heterogeneous devices, and avoid loading model weights onto every compromised host."

(How do they know that?
unless they have done it?)

For all we know:

"the ability to overcome real-world security controls, 
which the firm didn’t test."

They very well could have tested them
and very easily defeated 
the "real-world security controls"

and just didnt 
tell you about it.

Remember who they are:


"These things 
that we are 
SUMMONING 
into the world right now..."

Thats not a conspiracy theory.
That is not "defamation of character."

There is nothing else 
you can call someone
who says he is 
"Summoning things."
than a sorcerer.






Futurism 10/11/26

1st of all?

Remember where the $ came from
to build them!


"Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed pledged to invest $600bn in the United States during a lunch with Trump,  
including $20bn in artificial intelligence data centres."

(Comment 10/14/26
Then he calls Trump twice 
for help against the Houthis
and Trump stiffs him.)


"The Arabs are going to finance it.

The Tech bros are going to build it.

The false prophet is already selling it.

And the Antichrist will take it over
 
after the coming nuclear war.


They are all together right now.

Putting this together.)

TRUMP

“We don’t have a lot of time to wait. 
Things are happening at a very fast pace.
 Happening right here. 
They’re happening at a very fast pace."

and all of that was from
May 14, 2025.


Now on to the futurism piece:

Against all odds, the US economy continues to grow at a record-setting pace. 
Yet as new economic data shows, that growth is anything but healthy, and predicated almost entirely on the AI boom.

"A new essay by podcaster and writer Derek Thompson takes a look at key economic metrics surrounding AI in 2026. Among the most striking is a bar graph showing growth in construction spending, a key indicator of economic stability."

"Using data from Harvard Kennedy School economist Jason Furman, Thompson shows that growth in data center construction has exploded this year, while all but one other category has regressed."

"By the numbers, data center construction has grown at a rate of 64.5 percent in the most recent year, while new energy infrastructure has grown by 4.1 percent to keep pace — since demand is growing for electricity to power the AI boom.

"Everything else has collapsed: 
multi-family home building fell by 5.6 percent, while healthcare and commercial retail construction both tumbled by 10.1 percent. New educational construction tumbled by 12.6 percent, while manufacturing — supposedly a key target for the Trump administration — has collapsed, shrinking nearly 24 percent from 2025 to 2026."


(Dr. Missler in one of his presentations I've watched stated that, The Nazis near the end of WWII, didn't retreat to save the homeland like you would think they would have. Instead? They put all of their available resources into the concentration camps to kill as many as they  possibly could and he stated that it was a sure sign of the demonic at work.)




Look at that chart.

And try and explain to me:
 
How is what's going on right now 
right here any different?


And remember 
ICE funding 
for detention centers alone
is $40 billion.



Reuters 02/13/26"

Thats twice as much $
as the Saudi $ behind 
the data center explosion.

For detention Centers!

And we wouldn't be building 
the data centers 
without the financing 
from Saudi Arabia.

(Take that however you want to.)

These are the same people 
were supposedly behind 9/11.

Not a big fan would be an obvious
understatement.)


ACCEPT CHRIST

IT IS YOUR ONLY WAY OUT.

THIS AGE IS TOAST.

WHEN ARE YOU GONNA 
ADMIT IT TO YOURSELVES?






No comments: