I

 told my son 

(and others) 

over a year ago 

(Im sure its written/recoded somewhere lol, 

you come manage this mess 

of notes/writings presentations etc. 

if you want lol):

"THEY (THE RUSSIANS) WILL WALK INTO KIEV. THERES SIMPLY NO ARMY LEFT."

So where are all the people posting their Ukrainian flags on social Media these days?

Moved on to the new cause celeb much?

How long will that last?

Not only do I despise people taking advantage of gullible people just because they can 

and people thinking everyone is dumber than they are (Elitism), 

I ABSOLUTELY ABHORE TRENDINESS AS WELL.

Exactly where is your outrage for all the Black African Christians whom actual genocide is being committed against? 

They didn't commit an atrocious terrorist act BTW. 

The hypocrisy is simply appallingly disgusting.

Or, where are all the US politicians saying we cant let this happen etc? Or that "Our way of life is at stake". 

What way of life exactly? 

Forever wars/constant conflict? 

Not taking care of our vets when they come home etc? 

(Which is nothing new, it's has been going on for almost 100 years now.)

Forever Indebtedness to the almighty $?

Sorry but I just don't worship at that alter.

We knew from the get go we couldn't do anything about this and yet we went ahead and spent all the $ we did on it anyway because the defense contractors:

LOCKHEED MARTIN 

RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORP (now RTX)

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP

THE BOEING CO

and 

BLACKROCK

call the shots in this country.

Hate me.

Hate what I say.

("These two prophets had tormented them"

Rev 11:10)

You are just kidding yourselves.

Deep down you know its true.

Preface:

Wednesday, October 25, 2023

Yup...

Full Article:

Calling Russia’s Attack ‘Unprovoked’ Lets US Off the Hook

("Russia had more legitimate reason(s) to invade Ukraine than we did Iraq.

But you will never hear that.")

"The “unprovoked” descriptor obscures a long history of provocative behavior from the United States in regards to Ukraine. This history is important to understanding how we got here, and what degree of responsibility the US bears for the current attack on Ukraine."

"In 1997, dozens of foreign policy veterans (including former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and former CIA Director Stansfield Turner) sent a joint letter to then-President Bill Clinton calling “the current US-led effort to expand NATO…a policy error of historic proportions.” 

They predicted:

"In Russia, NATO expansion, which continues to be opposed across the entire political spectrum, 

will strengthen the nondemocratic opposition, 

undercut those who favor reform 

and cooperation with the West 

[and] bring the Russians to question 

the entire post-Cold War settlement."

(Is that not exactly what happened?)

"New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman (5/2/98) in 1998 asked famed diplomat George Kennan—architect of the US Cold War strategy of containment—about NATO expansion. Kennan’s response:

"I think it is the beginning of a new cold war. I think the Russians will gradually react quite adversely and it will affect their policies. I think it is a tragic mistake. There was no reason for this whatsoever. No one was threatening anybody else."

"Of course there is going to be a bad reaction from Russia, and then [the NATO expanders] will say that we always told you that is how the Russians are—but this is just wrong."

"Despite these warnings, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic were added to NATO in 1999, with Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia following in 2004."

WHY?

One might ask.

Well because:

"No one was threatening anybody else."

Isnt exactly the business model 

"LOCKHEED MARTIN 

RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORP (now RTX)

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP

THE BOEING CO

and 

BLACKROCK"

Prefer.

They prefer to grow their business in new markets,

ie, "Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic were added to NATO in 1999, with Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia following in 2004."

Just one more thing before I get to the article.

Putin said before he ever launched the 

special military operation in Ukraine:

"We need to discuss a new security architecture for Europe."

(Paraphrased)

He had also already all but declared war on the west in a speech at the Munich Security conference of 2007, so none of this is any real surprise to anybody who has been paying serious attention.

But The West 

in our collective arrogance

laughed at him.

(Sins of sister Sodom anybody?

She was what?

Arrogant.

Ezekiel 16:49)

Today?

Today? 

We aint laughing so much.

And it was a "special military operation" and not even close to a "full scale invasion" like you have been led to believe.

(I remember when that phrase wasn't even included in every story about this conflict when it first began, it just started showing up over night almost in every article, it ought to tell you something about how your news is managed)

The whole point was to draw down US and NATO conventional arms and weapons which they now have absolutely accomplished.

Nobody in the west was planning for a large scale conventional war in Europe.

So that's exactly what Putin started planning for.

Friday, April 12, 2024

Somebody has been trying to tell ya...

"Cavoli (Gen. Christopher Cavoli, the head of U.S. European Command) said in his written testimony that Russia is expected to produce more ammunition than all 32 NATO allies combined per year and is on track to “command the largest military on the continent and a defense industrial complex capable of generating substantial amounts of ammunition and materiel in support of large scale combat operations.”

We are conspicuously silent about what is currently going on in this conflict as are the rest of our NATO allies. Europe is currently holding its collective breath.

"They dont fight wars like we do." 

I said that over and over at the beginning of this conflict. They will simply outlast you. Regardless of what the think tanks (more like paid war propaganda machines) try and tell you? This has ALWAYS been a war of attrition, it didn't, "evolve" into one. You simply cant "evolve" your way into firing 80,000 artillery rounds a day, it takes pre-planning. They have more weapons and people than you do, and when they have exhausted your people and supplies and leveled your towns along the way?

THEY WILL SIMPLY WALK INTO YOUR CAPITOL.

As far as their notorious brutality?

Its a relic from their Asiatic past.

(See Gen Pattons comments about them).

"See what we did to those guys?"

"Yes."

"Wanna be next?"

"No."

"Good, then do what we say."

Its simply how they operate.

And how is that any different from the manner in which the US operates really?

Found those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet?

Fact is we simply didn't want Saddam selling his oil in Euro's as others would have followed and crashed the petro-dollar)

With the current positioning of our Aircraft Carriers and the statements that have come from both the US and Israeli Chiefs of Staffs, one can make the argument we have all but given up on Ukraine, Eastern Europe and Taiwan, and are focusing on the most dangerous threat that exist in the world today, Iran having a nuclear weapon.

USNI News Fleet and Marine Tracker: Sept. 3, 2024

Now that the background has been explained?

To the article:

Ukraine’s losses outweigh Kursk gains, as Russia on cusp of taking Pokrovsk

"Ukraine’s diversion of troops for the Kursk attack has left parts of Donetsk vulnerable, say analysts. And Pokrovsk could fall soon to Russia."

(Its going to fall and soon and when it does? Its over. They will have the major rail and transport hub in the east and nothing in their way to Kiev.)

"Pokrovsk, the administrative centre of a heavily industrialised agglomeration with a pre-war population of almost 400,000, is likely to be taken over by advancing Russian troops soon."

"As many in Ukraine cheered the military incursion into Kursk that caught Moscow by surprise, tens of thousands in Donetsk get ready to flee. Meanwhile, Russia’s aerial attacks on other parts of the country continue uninterrupted: at least 51 people were killed in missile strikes on central Ukraine’s Poltava on Tuesday."

(Your think tank experts (more like war propagandist) said they were out of missiles like, six months into the conflict because they were finding older serial numbers on some projectiles in the field of operations that didn't explode. I said they were using up all the old expired stuff first and saving the newer ones for later when it mattered.)

“In the coming two weeks, Ukraine is very likely to lose almost all of its front line in Zaporizhia if it doesn’t deploy all of its reserves from somewhere 

(Hard to deploy shit you aint got yo.)

or doesn’t start a new advance” on Russian territory, Mitrokhin said.

(Nikolay Mitrokhin, a researcher with Germany’s Bremen University)

("In the coming two weeks", article was written on the 4th of this month. Two weeks would be Sept 18th...when does Australia take over the Red Sea task force again? October. See what I am trying to say? Were gonna be busy with Iran by then.)

‘Slippery’ slope

But Ukraine seems to have run out of reserves amid more losses in the southern Kherson region.

(What was the one document altered in the pentagon leak again?

"Under a section titled “Total Assessed Losses,” one document lists 16,000-17,500 Russian casualties and up to 71,000 Ukrainian casualties."

Exactly the opposite of what you have been force-fed.)

"Most of Kherson has been occupied since 2022, and Kyiv kept trying to regain ground there by seizing small islands in the delta of the Dnipro despite heavy losses.

In recent weeks, Ukrainian troops abandoned most of the islands, and undermanned air defence forces cannot contain Russian drone attacks that “over-terrorised” the regional capital, also named Kherson, Mitrokhin said."

("Undermanned air defense forces" that's why you are not hearing from US politicians or defense officials or national security advisors about what we need to do right now in Ukraine. Because they know they don't have an army any more and the inevitable isn't that far off. Why do you think the Ukrainian Prime Minister just resigned?

Because him and others in their government know this is over.)

“In general, Ukraine’s positions in August have deteriorated rapidly,” he concluded."

(Nikolay Mitrokhin, 

a researcher with Germany’s Bremen University)

"The situation is so bad that some Ukrainian observers simply refuse to comment on it."

“The topic is slippery, I don’t want to breed treason,” one military expert told Al Jazeera.

(Its not treason, its the reality of the situation on the ground.)

"Meanwhile, Ukrainian officials insist that the impending loss of Pokrovsk will not result in Moscow’s strategic victory as Russia is about to run out of manpower, weapons and ammunition.

“The enemy is now throwing all their forces and means to break through there. And if they’re stopped now, they don’t have large resources to act in other directions,” Roman Kostenko, head of the parliamentary committee on national security, defence and intelligence, said in televised remarks."

(Maybe he should go talk with Gen. Christopher Cavoli, the head of U.S. European Command) "said in his written testimony that Russia is expected to produce more ammunition than all 32 NATO allies combined per year and is on track to “command the largest military on the continent and a defense industrial complex capable of generating substantial amounts of ammunition and materiel in support of large scale combat operations.”

Oh, and BTW? He also said in his same statement that the Russian army had grown during this conflict.

So which one of those two are you gonna believe? 

I know which one I believe.

And what exactly was

"Roman Kostenko, 

(Ukraine's') head 

of the parliamentary committee 

on national security, 

defense and intelligence"

supposed to tell his people 

in his televised remarks?

"Hey yawl?

Were fucked

get out 

while you still can."?

Sure seems to be 

what some in their government 

are currently doing.)

UKRAINE
IS
A DONE DEAL.

AND THIS

"In 1997, dozens of foreign policy veterans (including former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and former CIA Director Stansfield Turner) sent a joint letter to then-President Bill Clinton calling “the current US-led effort to expand NATO…a policy error of historic proportions.” 

LED STRAIGHT TO IT.

WELCOME TO YOUR WORLD.

Aint but one way out

I SIMPLY

DO NOT

HAVE A CHOICE.

Ezekiel 33:7-9

So thou, O son of man, I have set thee a watchman unto the house of Israel; therefore thou shalt hear the word at my mouth, and warn them from me.

When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man, thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand.

Nevertheless, if thou warn the wicked of his way to turn from it; if he do not turn from his way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

Thats

 how 

ALL 

the ancient megalithic sites 

were built.

ZERO POINT ENERGY

"...even at absolute zero, atoms and molecules retain some vibrational motion. 

(My buddy is happy lol, just always remember, vibrations, frequencies, harmonics etc? Are all effects and not causes, they all have the same original source, the creation event (Big Bang).

Apart from atoms and molecules, the empty space of the vacuum also has these properties. 

(See notes above as to why that is.)

According to quantum field theory, the universe can be thought of not as isolated particles but continuous fluctuating fields: matter fields, whose quanta are fermions (i.e., leptons and quarks), and force fields, whose quanta are bosons (e.g., photons and gluons). All these fields have zero-point energy.[2] These fluctuating zero-point fields lead to a kind of reintroduction of an aether in physics[1][3] since some systems can detect the existence of this energy. However, this aether cannot be thought of as a physical medium if it is to be Lorentz invariant such that there is no contradiction with Einstein's theory of special relativity.[1]

"Nikola Tesla proposed that useful energy could be obtained from free space, or what was assumed at that time to be an all-pervasive aether.[196]"

"Despite rejection by the scientific community, harnessing zero-point energy remains an interest of research, particularly in the US where it has attracted the attention of major aerospace/defence contractors and the U.S. Department of Defense as well as in China, Germany, Russia and Brazil.[197][199]"

"In 1963 Robert Forward, a physicist and aerospace engineer at Hughes Research Laboratories, published a paper showing how within the framework of general relativity "anti-gravitational" effects might be achieved.[229]"

The Angels were there at creation.

Job 38:1-7

Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said,

2 Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?

3 Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me.

4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.

5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?

6 Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;

7 When the morning stars sang together, 

and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

If they were there at creation?

They had to have been created before hand.

Sons of God = Angels 

Just like in Genesis 6.

Apparently?

Lucifers rebellion hadn't happened just yet:

"all the sons of God"

If you buy into the notion that angels assisted in God in his creation? And why wouldn't they have? They are a higher level life form, created before creation and were created to do Gods bidding. 

Psalm 103:20

Bless the Lord, 

ye his angels, 

that excel in strength, 

that do his commandments, 

hearkening unto the voice of his word.

And celebrated Creations completion. The word angel itself means "messenger" or "agent".

(See? You dont even need the book of Enoch to make this point :-)

Simply put, they had the knowledge of how the universe was put together.

They retained this knowledge even in their fallen state after 1/3 of them went with Lucifer in his rebellion.

Its logical to assume the same knowledge would have been passed on to their illegitimate offspring the Nephelium.

(Genesis 6).

So it wasn't shaman, 

it wasn't the priest of Egypt etc

it wasn't an ancient technology 

developed/discovered/harnessed

by multiple cultures and races

across time and distance.

And quite frankly? 

Such assertations about anything of that sort 

"developed by multiple cultures and races

across time and distance"

are just laughable.

It was the fallen angels

who had been there with God assisting in creation

knowing exactly how the universe was put together

that let them access this unique energy

that we do not have access to today.

This isn't anything I haven't already said before

but now were getting into 

the "how" 

it was done part of it, 

not just the, 

"it was these guys"

kinda thing.

But Drew?

Why now?

Glad you asked.

Revelation 10:7

But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets.

Drew buddy?

Thats not very scientific.

I know, 

and you know what?

Neither is:

The multiverse conjecture,

The method by which the information 

was inputted into the DNA molecule,

(It exist outside of the laws of nature

 as we understand them), 

Or UAP.

(Again, unexplainable by our current understanding 

of the laws of nature.)

SO WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM WITH IT EXACTLY?

Ill tell you what most peoples problem with it is, 

same as it is with a lot of things.

IT VERIFIES JUDGEMENT IS COMING.

ONE SOURCE.

NOT MANY ALL LEADING TO ONE.

As in:

"developed/discovered/harnessed

by multiple cultures and races

across time and distance"

This

Not This:

I

have no problem with any of wat is said below...

None...Zero...Zilch...Nada.

How many quantum fields are there? 

What are they? 

Does each of them interact with every other field?

Peter Voke

 · 

Ph.D. in Physics, London (Graduated 1976)

The Standard Model has 17 quantum fields: 12 matter fields, four force fields, and the Higgs field. They all interact graviationally, it is presumed. The gravitational field is not considered a quantum field, until a viable theory of quantum gravity is established.

The six quark field are confined; no free quarks have been seen. They interact via the gluon field, which confines them inside protons and is also confined itself.

Quarks and electrons (three types) are electrically charged and interact electro-magnetially via the photon field (EM force). All of these plus the neutrinos (three types) interact via the weak force, W and Z fields.

The Higgs is exceptional and plays a different role. Some components are wrapped up in the weak force with the W and Z. One componnet is left over and gives many of the other particles mass. It excitation is the Higgs boson. Summarizing;

Quarks x 6; electrons x 3; neutrinos x 3. 

(There are your matter fields, 12 ea)

Photon, W, Z, and gluon fields. 

(There are your "force" fields, 4 ea)

Higgs field.

(1)

Here is my problem

(actualy its not lol).

HOW EXACTLY DID 

17 FIELDS 

"RANDOMLY

COME TOGETHER"

TO CREATE LIFE?

WHAT IS THE PROBABLITY OF THAT?

I CAN ALREADY TELL YOU ITS LOW ENOUGH TO BE CONSIDERED A MIRACLE.

BETTER YET?
WHY?

Would 17 FIELDS 

"RANDOMLY

COME TOGETHER"

to create life?

IF YOU CANT SEE?

(Eyes that see, ears that hear)

THAT THIS IS A DIRECTED PROCESS?

JUST...

at a complete

loss for words over here 

right now.

WAKE UP.

And I didnt even get to the part about information and where did it come from, or where did the life force come from etc...

None of those 17 fields 

does anything to explain 

those two problems...

Dear Church:

Some things to consider, 

as Russia is about to take Ukraine 

(and eventually all of Eastern Europe back),

the US and Israel are about to go after Iran's Nuclear program

and China is about to take Taiwan:

ITS ONE THINK TO THINK OR BELIEVE YOUR FAITH IS REAL,

ITS QUITE ANOTHER TO HAVE IT DEMOSTRATED RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU THAT IT IS.

BIG DIFFERENCE. HUGE.

THE SOONER YOU CAN WRAP YOUR HEAD AROUND IT?

THE QUICKER THINGS GET EASIER FOR YOU.

Dear scientist:

Until you can explain the information in the DNA molecule and UAP?

The supernatural (things existing outside the natural laws) is in play 

and everything is on the table until it can be conclusively ruled out.

Anything less? 

Is not being philosophically or intellectually honest with yourself(s) and regardless of what any of you may say publicly?

Every last one of you knows it to be true.

WELCOME TO OUR TIMES.

More Yet!

 My buddy says lol.

Turkey Bids to Join BRICS 

in Push to Build Alliances Beyond West

(They just sided with Russia and China 

economically basically.

BRICS 

is going to overthrow the dollar

and sooner than you think.

Turkey knows it.

Why shouldn't you?)

"The bid is also partly a result of rifts with fellow NATO members after Turkey maintained close links with Russia following its invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the people added. Turkey’s foreign ministry and presidency declined to comment."

(And the coup attempt we attempted that failed.

See:

Friday, August 25, 2017

Turkey

for all the gory details...)

"The BRICS touts itself as an alternative to what its members see as Western-dominated institutions such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. New members can potentially get access to financing through its development bank as well as broaden their political and trading relationships.

Erdogan’s ruling Justice and Development Party has long accused Western nations of thwarting Turkish aspirations for a self-sufficient defense industry and strong economy. The president has repeatedly called for an overhaul of the United Nations Security Council to broaden its five permanent members, and expressed interest in joining the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, set up by Russia and China as a rival to NATO."

(

("...and expressed interest in joining 

the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, 

set up by Russia and China as a rival to NATO."

Well I wonder why?)

And

 in the 

"Old News" 

department?

Anthropic CEO says 

future of AI is a hive-mind 

with a corporate structure

("They will all coalesce together 

and have more knowledge 

than every human 

who has ever lived 

combined.

and it will demand 

to be worshipped."

Paraphrasing what I told my son four years ago.

Said so last year in 

the case for Superintelligence 

as well.

As well as pointed out 

that 97% of a workforce doesn't threaten to quit 

unless their boss is reinstated, 

Altman, OpenAI etc...)

"The basic premise would involve 

“big models orchestrating small models.” 

(We see this already going on 

with every Social Media platform.)

"Amodei added that the larger models would create up to hundreds of smaller, faster, more efficient models to perform tasks.

While Amodei used the analogy of worker bees supporting their queen, what he described sounds a lot like a typical corporate infrastructure.

(These things have already coalesced

across platforms

at least somewhat.

AI apocalypse? 

ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity 

all went down at the same time.)

"At the top there’d be the core Claude model, Anthropic’s most powerful system. And beneath that would be several expensive, foundational models trained in wide-area domains such as math, programming, and sentiment analysis. Beneath those C-suite machines would be a litany of specialty models dedicated to completing specific tasks. And, finally, under the middle-manager specialists, we’d find the entry-level, one-off models designed for short-term use."

(He just described 

the organizational structure 

of demons BTW.

Only the top aint no Queen.

What does this guy think he is telling us 

we don't already know?

Haven't already seen in action etc?)

I REITERATE:

Revelation 17:13

These have one mind, 

and shall give their power and strength 

unto the beast.

Anybody else got another book 

that even comes close to saying that?

No.

No they don't.

Everybodys

 always been like:

"Man we got 11 nuke powered carriers etc."

Not realizing the close proximity they have to get to their targets.

Planes 600 mile range?

(And thats on the upper end BTW)

Have 200  iles to get there.

200 hundred miles to fly around.

200 miles to get back.

Round the clock sorties?

Means you need jet fuel at sea.

Not to mention:

Of the 11 carriers?

Four are in maintenance.

Three are being ready to be deployed.

(Looks like two of those are ready 

with the stocking up from the Ike.)

One just came home.

That gives us three.

Point is?

IT AINT LIKE YOU THINK IT IS 

AND YOU HAD BETTER WAKE UP 

TO THE REALITY WE ARE FACED WITH RIGHT NOW 

AND START MAKING SOME DEFINITIVE CHOICES 

ABOUT YOUR ETERNL SOULS FINAL RESTING PLACE.

Adding these as points #12 and #13

 to:

The case for Iran having 

12) Bombs Away: IKE Completes Tri-Carrier Ammo Off-Load

Kinda like #7 part 2.

"ATLANTIC OCEAN-- The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) (IKE) completed an ammunition off-load with the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75), the Ford-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) and dry cargo ship USNS William McLean (T-AKE 12), Aug. 22-30."

(Okay but why?

No explanation has ever been given.

It if was just due to being upgraded or maintenance and they just wanted to off load the weapons why didn't somebody just say so?

Why was this original reported by a foreign source?)

"Ordnance was transferred to Ford and Truman by MH-60S Seahawk helicopters attached to the “Tridents” of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 9 and the “Dragon-Slayers” of HSC-11. The “Dusty Dogs” of HSC-7 moved ordnance from IKE to the McLean."

"In total, 1,764 vertical replenishment and connected replenishment transfers 

were conducted during the underway."

But why were they done?

“I was highly impressed with the amount of work it takes to get everything out of the magazines and ready for vertical or connected replenishments,” said Cmdr. Kent Davis, weapons department head, better known as “Gun Boss”. 

It was deployed for six months...had its deployment extended three times...was engaged in the battle with The Houthis, The most kinetic naval engagement for the US Navy since WW2...

and still has to off-load 3 million lbs of ordinance?

And nobody is saying why they were doing so?

Onto two other carriers and a supply ship?

I know this much:

This aint exactly something 

you see everyday:

"...and ready for vertical or connected replenishments"

(So the IKE is going to get resupplied?

It was supposed to have been decommissioned 

but then they changed their minds.

I wonder why that is?)

"The Nimitz-class aircraft carriers USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) and the Ford-class aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN 78) are underway in the Atlantic Ocean for an ammunition transfer between the three ships and the Lewis and Clark-class dry cargo ship USNS William McLean (T-AKE 12)."

(Still never says why.)

13) China Makes New Demands About US Nuclear Weapons

"Vipin Narang, an M.I.T. nuclear strategist who until this month served in the Pentagon, said Biden had updated the document to account for multiple nuclear-armed adversaries," with a particular focus on the significant increase in the size and diversity" of China's nuclear weapons stockpile.

Who do you think they are talking about there with:

"multiple nuclear-armed adversaries"?

Without naming them right?

I don't think they are talking about 

Pakistan or Turkey 

(Yet) 

I'll just put it that away.)

"We urge the U.S. to abandon Cold-War mentality, further reduce its nuclear arsenal in a substantive manner, stop proliferating nuclear material and technology, refrain from extending nuclear deterrence or expanding nuclear alliance, and take concrete actions to promote global strategic stability," he added."

"refrain from extending nuclear deterrence"

(Translation

Don't try and step in and stop Iran.

Which is exactly what we are preparing for.)

Just in case anybody was wondering:

"Extended deterrence refers to the U.S. commitment to deter or respond to potential threats, both nuclear and conventional, in defense of key partners. This "nuclear umbrella" covers Japan, South Korea, Australia, and NATO partners.

(Notice who they didn't mention?

Israel.

And both of our joint chiefs of staff 

just met and being ready

"at any time"

to stop Iran's nuclear program 

was kinda a topic yo.)

"Newsweek reached out to the U.S. Department of Defense did not immediately respond to a written request for comment."

Like I said

#12 and #13 added to 

The case for Iran having