told my son
(and others)
over a year ago
(Im sure its written/recoded somewhere lol,
you come manage this mess
of notes/writings presentations etc.
if you want lol):
"THEY (THE RUSSIANS) WILL WALK INTO KIEV. THERES SIMPLY NO ARMY LEFT."
So where are all the people posting their Ukrainian flags on social Media these days?
Moved on to the new cause celeb much?
How long will that last?
Or, where are all the US politicians saying we cant let this happen etc? Or that "Our way of life is at stake".
What way of life exactly?
Forever wars/constant conflict?
Not taking care of our vets when they come home etc?
(Which is nothing new, it's has been going on for almost 100 years now.)
Forever Indebtedness to the almighty $?
Sorry but I just don't worship at that alter.
We knew from the get go we couldn't do anything about this and yet we went ahead and spent all the $ we did on it anyway because the defense contractors:
LOCKHEED MARTIN
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORP (now RTX)
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
THE BOEING CO
and
call the shots in this country.
Hate me.
Hate what I say.
("These two prophets had tormented them"
Rev 11:10)
You are just kidding yourselves.
Deep down you know its true.
Preface:
Wednesday, October 25, 2023
Yup...
Full Article:
Calling Russia’s Attack ‘Unprovoked’ Lets US Off the Hook
("Russia had more legitimate reason(s) to invade Ukraine than we did Iraq.
But you will never hear that.")
"The “unprovoked” descriptor obscures a long history of provocative behavior from the United States in regards to Ukraine. This history is important to understanding how we got here, and what degree of responsibility the US bears for the current attack on Ukraine."
"In 1997, dozens of foreign policy veterans (including former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara and former CIA Director Stansfield Turner) sent a joint letter to then-President Bill Clinton calling “the current US-led effort to expand NATO…a policy error of historic proportions.”
They predicted:
"In Russia, NATO expansion, which continues to be opposed across the entire political spectrum,
will strengthen the nondemocratic opposition,
undercut those who favor reform
and cooperation with the West
[and] bring the Russians to question
the entire post-Cold War settlement."
(Is that not exactly what happened?)
"New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman (5/2/98) in 1998 asked famed diplomat George Kennan—architect of the US Cold War strategy of containment—about NATO expansion. Kennan’s response:
"I think it is the beginning of a new cold war. I think the Russians will gradually react quite adversely and it will affect their policies. I think it is a tragic mistake. There was no reason for this whatsoever. No one was threatening anybody else."
"Of course there is going to be a bad reaction from Russia, and then [the NATO expanders] will say that we always told you that is how the Russians are—but this is just wrong."
"Despite these warnings, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic were added to NATO in 1999, with Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia following in 2004."
WHY?
One might ask.
Well because:
"No one was threatening anybody else."
Isnt exactly the business model
"LOCKHEED MARTIN
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORP (now RTX)
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
THE BOEING CO
and
BLACKROCK"
Prefer.
They prefer to grow their business in new markets,
ie, "Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic were added to NATO in 1999, with Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia following in 2004."
Just one more thing before I get to the article.
Putin said before he ever launched the
special military operation in Ukraine:
"We need to discuss a new security architecture for Europe."
(Paraphrased)
He had also already all but declared war on the west in a speech at the Munich Security conference of 2007, so none of this is any real surprise to anybody who has been paying serious attention.
But The West
in our collective arrogance
laughed at him.
(Sins of sister Sodom anybody?
She was what?
Arrogant.
Ezekiel 16:49)
Today?
Today?
We aint laughing so much.
And it was a "special military operation" and not even close to a "full scale invasion" like you have been led to believe.
(I remember when that phrase wasn't even included in every story about this conflict when it first began, it just started showing up over night almost in every article, it ought to tell you something about how your news is managed)
The whole point was to draw down US and NATO conventional arms and weapons which they now have absolutely accomplished.
Nobody in the west was planning for a large scale conventional war in Europe.
So that's exactly what Putin started planning for.
Friday, April 12, 2024
Somebody has been trying to tell ya...
"Cavoli (Gen. Christopher Cavoli, the head of U.S. European Command) said in his written testimony that Russia is expected to produce more ammunition than all 32 NATO allies combined per year and is on track to “command the largest military on the continent and a defense industrial complex capable of generating substantial amounts of ammunition and materiel in support of large scale combat operations.”
We are conspicuously silent about what is currently going on in this conflict as are the rest of our NATO allies. Europe is currently holding its collective breath.
"They dont fight wars like we do."
I said that over and over at the beginning of this conflict. They will simply outlast you. Regardless of what the think tanks (more like paid war propaganda machines) try and tell you? This has ALWAYS been a war of attrition, it didn't, "evolve" into one. You simply cant "evolve" your way into firing 80,000 artillery rounds a day, it takes pre-planning. They have more weapons and people than you do, and when they have exhausted your people and supplies and leveled your towns along the way?
THEY WILL SIMPLY WALK INTO YOUR CAPITOL.
As far as their notorious brutality?
Its a relic from their Asiatic past.
(See Gen Pattons comments about them).
"See what we did to those guys?"
"Yes."
"Wanna be next?"
"No."
"Good, then do what we say."
Its simply how they operate.
And how is that any different from the manner in which the US operates really?
Found those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq yet?
Fact is we simply didn't want Saddam selling his oil in Euro's as others would have followed and crashed the petro-dollar)
With the current positioning of our Aircraft Carriers and the statements that have come from both the US and Israeli Chiefs of Staffs, one can make the argument we have all but given up on Ukraine, Eastern Europe and Taiwan, and are focusing on the most dangerous threat that exist in the world today, Iran having a nuclear weapon.
USNI News Fleet and Marine Tracker: Sept. 3, 2024
IS
A DONE DEAL.
No comments:
Post a Comment