Wednesday, November 5, 2025

3i/ATLAS updates...of course...:-) Part 3

 


This one just blows my mind.


So yesterday I said:


Tuesday, November 4, 2025

It's about to be information overload on 3I/ATLAS


4) Not one picture has been released of 

the CME hitting 3I/AYLAS.

 And no word about any updated trajectory 

for 3I/ATLAS afterwards.


5) It's trajectory

hasn't been updated 

to the public since

it was hit by the CME..."


(Thats what I have been all about 

since the Coronal Mass Ejection hit it, 

what  the trajectory  of 3I/ATLAS now? 

People?

Were not simply not gonna be told.

And it ought to be obvious why...


"...the observed drift in 3I/ATLAS 

exceeds known cometary behavior 

by several magnitudes."


(This is why knowing the trajectory 

since the CME hit it is so important

and it is WHY we are not being told

what it is.

Seems like they would have 

at least just made something up

its what they do with everything else,

so why not do the same here?)


Well apparently they have,

"just made something up"


Post Perihelion Data on 3I/ATLAS

Avi Loeb Medium 11/05/25



"Trajectory of 3I/ATLAS 

with positions of the planets on November 5, 2025.

 (Credit: NASA/JPL)


When I first saw it I was like what?

Thats it? Really? Kinda studied it for a minute.

Then re-read the photos caption more intently

and deduced:

"Trajectory of 3I/ATLAS"

Okay which trajectory?

Pre or post?

Coronal Mass Ejection.


Notice the caption doesn't say:


"Trajectory of 3I/ATLAS 

on November 5, 2025."


But says:

"Trajectory of 3I/ATLAS 

with positions of the planets 

on November 5, 2025."


The only thing explicitly said about 

the "positions" of anything

is the position of the planets,

NOT 3I/ATLAS.

 

So I thought well thats 

a lil weird, so I went to the 

NASA/JPL website

and what I found there 

just shocked me:


As of 3:40 PM CST


Not just no data 

about 3I/ATLAS current trajectory

since its collision with a CME

but absolutely

NO DATA ABOUT 

3I/ATLAS AT ALL!


So where did:

come from Avi?

Hum?


This community isn't a bunch of third graders,

were ready to spend an eternity with our creator

any day now, ANY DAY!

"Seems like they would have 

at least just made something up

its what they do with everything else,

so why not do the same here?)


Well apparently they have,..."


Avi?





Since you are so obviously paying attention?
Let me remind you of something you said
a lil while ago:

"The effort of gatekeepers to hide 
anomalies and maintain 
traditional thinking 
will ultimately fail."

They are.
Yours included.


Avi Loeb Medium 7/12/25


TBH?
The rest of this particular blog post 
seems pretty inconsequential.

We'll go through it anyway.

 "This ejection speed would be the maximum expected value for a natural comet, thus implying that 3I/ATLAS must have lost more than 13% of its mass near perihelion in the natural scenario. However, a technological rocket engine 

Engines require maintenance homie.
Where did they get it 
during their 8 billion year
journey?

Your friendly neighborhood 
intergalactic
Texaco?

What they had to get the ET's out of the cryogenic chambers
to do the maintenance at your friendly neighborhood 
intergalactic, Chevron, Texaco watever...)


"...could expel gas through its exhaust at a much higher speed, thus reducing the required fraction of the mass loss. The considerable brightening and blue color of 3I/ATLAS near perihelion (as reported here) could either be a signature of cometary mass loss and CO+ emission (as discussed here) 
or a hot engine with a much smaller mass loss.

(Just absolutely ridiculous beyond belief, 
at this point one could argue 
Avi is only saying such, 
so as to keep the masses 
intentionally misinformed,
since this is what they would 
prefer to believe.

A generation
that would rather believe in 
extraterrestrials 
and 8 billion year old
"engines" that can survive 
the harsh conditions 
of interstellar space travel?

100% deserves 
the hell they 
most assuredly
got coming em.)

"However, if 3I/ATLAS is not enshrouded in a much more massive gas cloud after perihelion than it had in the months preceding perihelion, then its recent non-gravitational acceleration must have resulted from a different cause than cometary evaporation."

(Well you know,
 jets pointing forward 
on an object going 
in excess of 200,000 KMP
would appear to be 
outside of the known laws of nature
otherwise known as supernatural, 
so whats to stop that 
from being the case here as well?

(Its exactly what happened btw, 
that's for tomorrow.)




Avi Loeb Medium 11/03/25

"2. During July and August 2025, 
it displayed a sunward jet (anti-tail) 
that is not an optical illusion 
from geometric perspective, 
unlike familiar comets (see here)."

This object clearly exist 
outside of the known laws 
of nature. And there is 
absolutely 0 evidence 
for any of it being
a "technological relic."


Joel 2:30-31
 And I will shew wonders in the heavens 
and in the earth, 
blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.

31 The sun shall be turned into darkness, 
and the moon into blood, 
before the great and terrible 
day of the Lord come.)


"This morning, I received the following email 
all the way from Australia, down under:

“Dear Professor Loeb,...

What I find in your views on the topic, of course only as far as I can follow given my rather rudimentary understanding of the background theories and models, is a very refreshing and bold move to rise above the imposed walls within which current scientific thinking seems to relish staying confined. I think these walls have unfortunately been imposed, and keep getting imposed, not necessarily via any consensus of the global scientific community at large but rather by some well-endowed core groups and lobbies within that community, often with interests that are perhaps not exclusively of an intellectual kind. In my upcoming book titled ‘Brainmaker — coevolution of human and synthetic intelligence’, I have drawn sort of an analogical parallel between the ‘scientific power lobbies’ of today and the church of the Middle Ages. It is of course well known that scientific thinkers and astronomers like Galileo who propounded alternative viewpoints (eventually proved correct) were severely persecuted as their viewpoints flew in the face of those held by the church back at the time. I think (and fear) that

 science is increasingly being positioned 
as kind of an organized religion 
and scientific power lobbies 
have started to resemble 
the high priesthoods of ancient temples. 





"Anything but God"
Is the religion of our time.


It is highly illogical
to only rule out one option
because of a built in bias
and leave 
ALL THE OTHER OPTIONS
that haven't been ruled out
are all in play.

Bad logic 
can never result 
in good science.
Never.)


"If dissenting ideas...

(Alien's simply are not 
a "dissenting" idea.

 Above all else, 
life requires information 
you can have all the perfect conditions
all the right circumstances 
all the right ingredients
and if you don't have the information 
in the DNA molecule
which no one knows 
where it came from 
or how it got there

(outside of the laws of nature again, 
Supernatural as it were)

and so far out of the mainstream of scientific thought
 such as to never even be researched.

No individual component 
would know how to build the other 
let alone work with the other, 
its nothing but nonsense from 
"high-minded scientist."
(John Lennox :-).
pushing their 
government financed
faith-based agenda
on the masses.

(Through no other means 
of human endeavors 
does the demonic 
impact humanity
than through the affairs of state.

It is the simplest, 
easiest, and quickest route
to adversely affect 
as many as possible 
as quickly as possible.

Just look at governments
over history 
and come try and argue 
what I just wrote isn't true.)



"...are to sprout outside of what is deemed mainstream by those lobbies, they tend to be met with a resistance ironically comparable in their destructive ferocity to what proponents of scientific knowledge like Galileo had faced from the church. Perhaps the only real difference is the substitution of physical persecution with intellectual persecution — systematically belittling radical ideas (and their propagators) often via ad hominem and straw man attacks and calling for an intellectual banishment from the so-called mainstream."

Theres no:

ad hominem and straw man attacks
here.
Not at all.

Life requires information.
Every cell, in everything
that ever processed oxygen
to live
the only place 
that we know 
has life
has had 
a three billion character code 
in it.

Every plant.
Every human.
Every animal.
Every fungi.
No exceptions.

There is only one place 
we have ever seen life.

That all life 
anybody has ever seen 
has had information in it,
is not an accident.

It cant be.
Information requires:
preplanning, logic, sequence


Therefore it cant be an accident
anywhere else either.

And if you go with:

"Well it could have developed 
differently somewhere else."

Now you are violating the scientific principal
and are no longer a scientist
but instead are pushing 
a state sanctioned 
faith based agenda on people.

Who do you think 
pays the majority of scientist 
around the world 
??????????



And 



Dr Sukanto Bhattacharya

(The author of the letter)

Deakin University

Victoria 3220, Australia”

Don't think I don't know where you got the idea of:

"In my upcoming book titled ‘Brainmaker — coevolution of human and synthetic intelligence’, I have drawn sort of an analogical parallel between the ‘scientific power lobbies’ of today and the church of the Middle Ages...I think (and fear) that

 science is increasingly being positioned 
as kind of an organized religion 
and scientific power lobbies 
have started to resemble 
the high priesthoods of ancient temples. 



Thursday, November 21, 2024

"I dont give a shit what a bunch of "multiverse believers", 
"Societal Priest of the day", 
"adherents to the faith based belief system of scientism", 
so called "scientist", say 
The arrow of time 
flows in one direction, 
forward 
and everything 
moves toward chaos and destruction.

Thats almost a year ago.
When did you start on your book?


Chuck Missler said it first BTW.

And I really don't see any difference
between the magicians in Babylon's courts
and this bunch of jackassed media personalities
we got pretending to be scientist today.

Not knowing that life requires information
and that machines require maintenance.

And most of it financed by the sate.

God backed them in a corner 
with their own bull shit.

It's kinda how 
infinite wisdom works yo.

Psalm 139:5-6

You hem me in behind and before,
    and you lay your hand upon me.

6 Such knowledge is too wonderful for me,
    too lofty for me to attain.

1 Corinthians 3:19
For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

Gods not subject 
to the rules of the universe.

He makes them.
They obey him.

Might wanna go buy yourself
a clue somewhere here 
like quick in a hurry etc...






No comments: