several things that jumped out at me
about the NASA live event.
Thursday, November 20, 2025
is having their faith-based belief system
destroyed right in front of their faces.
One was:
is that
this is being monitored, monitored.
There are some changes to the orbit,
but the uncertainties
are still fairly large.
It's difficult because
we can't see the nucleus directly.
48:14
"It's difficult to get a very,
very precise track
on exactly where it's going."
Tom Statler,
lead scientist for
Solar System Small bodies in
the Planetary Science Division.
NASA
I just couldn't believe
he actually said that.
And this is the thing
that was said
that explains the most:
13:06
"And what Hubble's images revealed was a few things. First, a teardrop shaped coma of dust coming off
13:12
that solid, icy nucleus of the comet itself.
From these data,
13:18
astronomers were able to more accurately narrow a few things.
Importantly,
the size of the nucleus.
We now know
it's between
At that point,
actually."
Shawn Domagal-Goldman,
director for
the astrophysics division,
NASA
What they
know now
about the size of the nucleus
and what
they knew then
from that Hubble image
are two different things.
1) Old dude backtracked
on his statement above.
2) That is why they keep pointing
everyone to that Hubble image,
to gauge the size of 3I/ATLAS.
3) Thats why the images
from Oct 2nd are
"smeared".
4) Thats why the astronomer in charge of the HiRISE instrument, didn't respond to Avi's email asking questions about the HiRISE images.
I was racking my brain yesterday, trying to figure out why
they didnt want people to know
about the nucleus size.
It just didnt make any sense.
If its going to miss us
by as much as they say it is,
why would they care about
people knowing how big the nucleus is?
Thats when it dawned on me,
why all the concealing the nucleus size, just like one of the panel members said, if you get the size, shape and composition of the nucleus, you get a much more accurate trajectory, and that's the reason for all the secrecy right there.
And if you don't think so?
Then explain:
1) Old boy backtracking on his statement.
2) Continual pointing toward
the Hubble image to gauge size.
3) October 2nd images smeared.
4) And Avi's email ignored.
Cause I got one thing:
"Not wanting the nucleus size known"
that explains all four of them.
And remember:
Multiplying entities
to try and explain
those four things
violates Occam's razor.
I wanna hear
somebody elses explaination
for all four of those things
listed above
that only involves one issue
(Not wanting nucleus size known)
to solve all of them.
Good luck.
Spiritual gift of discernment yo.
On full display.
Watch the video.
He caught himself
and backtracked.
And Avi and others are like:
"How does this guy
figure all of this out?"
Avi, brother?
I told you,
it aint me doing the figuring.
It's an
"unseen power worthy of reverence"
at work in somebody
in the last of Daniels 70/7's.
No comments:
Post a Comment