Avi Loeb Medium 11/14/25
"Multiple sources informed me today that NASA is expected to release the HiRISE images of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS within a few days from today, November 14, 2025."
(Multiple times on his blog
Avi Loeb has stated:
"The highest resolution image was taken by the HiRISE camera onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. HiRISE has an angular resolution that translated to 30 kilometers per pixel on October 3, 2025. The brightest pixel in the HiRISE image will provide the best constraint yet on the area of 3I/ATLAS. We are all hoping that the HiRISE team will release their images as soon as possible."
from the Perseverance Rover Camera
Avi Loeb Medium 10/06/25
And if you read that
again very carefully,
you will notice
that it only says:
"The highest resolution image
was taken
by the HiRISE camera
onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter."
And then states:
"HiRISE has an angular resolution
that translated to 30 kilometers per pixel
on October 3, 2025."
Nowhere does it explicitly
say the image that
"was taken
by the HiRISE camera"
was taken on Oct 3rd,2025.
Only:
"HiRISE has an angular resolution
that translated to 30 kilometers per pixel
on October 3, 2025"
It is called discernment
and it is a spiritual gift.
So why would it take
this long
after the shutdown
to release something that
"was taken
by the HiRISE camera"
between Oct 2nd-3rd
??????????
It's like they are kids and got caught with their hands in the cookie jar and just keep making up lies about it thinking somehow they are going to get themselves out of this mess they have created for themselves.
If they already had the image
of 3I/ATLAS that
"was taken
by the HiRISE camera"
Then why
does it take this long
to release it?
Truth don't cause questions.
It answers them.
Pretty simple.
"The images should have a spatial resolution of ~30 kilometers per pixel and a side view of the anti-tail and jets from 3I/ATLAS on October 2–3, 2025, when it came within 29 million kilometers from Mars."
(This community couldn't care less
about any images from Oct 2nd.
Watch them lump some images all together and say
something to the effect of:
"taken of 3I/ATLAS on October 2–3, 2025".
They are not
driving the "narrative" of this.
They are responding to the narrative
that this community has fostered.
Are you seeing
how it works yet?
"Just give us any data
from the reconnaissance rover."
Then later pictures get posted
to www.uahirise.org.
Then?
When you say thats not good enough:
Thursday, November 13, 2025
"So, so called "new images"
just aint gonna get it.
It's just way to easy
to manipulate images these days
to go with that.
New scientific papers written,
(and submitted for peer review)
with
new spectrographic data
from the Mars Reconnaissance Rover
is what is now required
to get me to change my mind to
believing that rover is still there
and still functioning.
And now we basically get:
"We will get them to you in a few days."
For images
that were taken on
Oct2-3rd
??????????
"For now,
we are all anticipating the release
of the HiRISE images
of 3I/ATLAS next week."
A set of much more
intriguing questions
to me
these days is:
WHAT EXACTLY WAS THIS?
from the Perseverance Rover Camera
Avi Loeb Medium 10/06/25
"The above analysis is
based on the assumption
that the Navcam images are of 3I/ATLAS.
This was not specified
explicitly on the NASA website.
and why did NASA post them as
"Pictures of the week"
and then not bother
to even say
what they were of
??????????
Thursday, October 9, 2025
3I/ATLAS, Phobos, Fragmentation etc...
"The ESA’s announcement comes just a day after speculation that a fellow Martian explorer, the NASA Perseverance rover, had caught a glimpse of 3I/ATLAS, which appeared as a blurry, cylindrical streak."
"But that may not be the case. David Kipping, an astrophysicist famous for his work on exoplanets and who runs the YouTube channel Cool Worlds, was skeptical that the rover’s puny camera would’ve been able to spot the comet."
"On his social media, Kipping argued that the likelier explanation for what was actually depicted in the image was Phobos, the innermost of Mars’ two moons. Astrophotographer Simeon Schmauß agreed that it was almost certainly Phobos, and added that the Martian moon only appeared cylindrical because of the image’s long exposure."
(Or it was rattled around while taking the picture
from the impact of 3I/ATLAS
they don't want you to know about.)
Where's the picture of the CME hitting it again?
Where are all the updated trajectory's since?
etc etc etc...
But this is the first time
Im going against Avi Loeb
about 3I/ATLAS since July.
Im with theses guys.
This:
is Phobos,
not 3I/ATLAS.
Why?
Because it just makes more sense
and because NASA never said
those images were of 3I/ATLAS
and you have to consider what time
we are living in
and the cast of ass-clowns
running this shit show these days
in this country.
Throw in the shutdown w NASA etc etc etc...)
NASA?
Just
prove this wrong:
Monday, November 10, 2025
try and keep an open mind.
After Orbit Tilts by 1.4 Degrees
International Business Times 11/07/25
"The Stunning Claim:
3I/ATLAS Swerves to Target Earth"
"The sensational new report, published on the X platform by the account 3I/ATLAS WHISTLEBLOWER, presents alarming, unconfirmed 'data'. The claim, made public on 7 November 2025, states unequivocally:
'3I/ATLAS BREAKING: 3I/ATLAS JUST SWERVED TO AIM AT EARTH'.
The account
backed this shocking headline with
precise, unverified metrics,
asserting that a 'NEW IMAGE SHOWS 1.4° orbit tilt.'
The implication of this alleged manoeuvre is terrifyingly specific. The report claims that following this shift, 'Earth is now 0.015° dead center Dec 19.'
"This date, 19 December 2025,
corresponds exactly to the object's
previously calculated
closest approach to our planet,
though that approach was measured
at a safe distance of around
270 million kilometres."
That post is still up on "X" BTW.
I haven't heard of anybody
disproving it yet.
Seems like it would be
a pretty easy thing to do.
We firgue we'd give you guys
first crack at it.
No comments:
Post a Comment