Im gonna stay on this subject
till its just not a subject anymore
just do to the sheer amount
of false and PURPOSELY misleading
information that exist about it.
And a few other reasons...
people need to know
whats going on in their world etc...
Orientation of the Jets is Not Smeared by Rotation
Avi Loeb Medium 11/15/25
When he announced the 11th anomaly
I told honey:
"It will have 12."
Now it has 12
and there wont be anymore.
Somebody is trying
to tell you something.
"Back in July and August of 2025, the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS was inferred to rotate with a period of 16.16 (+/-0.01) hours (as derived here)."
Last week, preliminary images revealed a network of jets around 3I/ATLAS (as discussed here and here). These observed jets from 3I/ATLAS should have been smeared by the rotation. Instead, the image taken by F. Niebling and M. Buechner on November 9, 2025, shows tightly-collimated jets extending to distances larger than a million kilometers. At the expected thermal speed of sublimated volatiles from a natural comet, 400 meters per second, it takes about a month for the material to traverse a million kilometers.
How could these jets maintain their orientation
if 3I/ATLAS is rotating every 16.16 hours?
(The Supernatural is real yo.)
"The possibility that outflows slowed down the rotation since July is unlikely because asymmetries in outgassing typically enhance rotation (as discussed here). There is no recent measurement of the rotation period of 3I/ATLAS, but we expect related data in the coming weeks."
"Another possibility is that illumination by the Sun induces outgassing only at specific angles relative to the Sun, which are dictated by the orientation of the pockets of ice and the surface topography of the nucleus. For example, ice pockets in deep valleys surrounded by mountains that shadow them will be exposed to direct sunlight and sublimate only when the Sun is at the right angle. This would lead to pulsating outflows from that spot with a period of 16.16 hours, resulting in a jet which looks like peas in a pod separated by a spatial scale of 400 meters per second times 16.16 hours which is 23,270 kilometers. There should be 43 peas on a pod of a million kilometers length and these puffs of gas should all be in the general direction of the Sun as the ice quickly cools when it is not illuminated by sunlight. This sunward orientation effect could not account for jets pointing away from the Sun, as evident in the image of 3I/ATLAS taken by M. Jäger, G. Rhemann and E. Prosperi on November 8, 2025.
(Thats not a technological problem
thats a laws of the universe problem.)
"Alternatively, the apparent features might represent the evaporated trail of fragments that were ejected from the main nucleus. This would imply that the nucleus exploded near the Sun, in contrast to the single object inference from the image obtained by D. Jewitt and J. Luu on November 11, 2025."
(
Monday, September 8, 2025
So ask yourself this, (3I/ATLAS)
And also dont forget:
Avi Loeb Medium Aug 5, 2025
(Parenthesis added)
“The more likely scenario from an engineering (Supernatural) perspective
(Since the thing shouldn't exist to begin with)
involves a mothership (Asteroid)
that releases mini-probes (fragments)
which perform a reverse Oberth maneuver
to slow down at perihelion and intercept Earth,
taking advantage of the Sun’s gravitational assist.
The change in angular momentum per unit mass needs to be of order ~(0.36 au)*(68 km/s) where 0.36 au is the change in orbital radius required to get to the Earth’s distance from the Sun from the distance of closest approach of 3I/ATLAS (where 1 au=149.6 million kilometers) and 68 kilometers per second is the speed of 3I/ATLAS at perihelion. The amount of fuel (momentium) required for this maneuver depends on the mass of the mini-probe. (Fragment)
The mini-probe
(Fragment(s)
can potentially reach the Earth
within a few months
after perihelion.”
3I/ATLAS perihelion
with the sun is Oct 29th.
A "few months"
would seem to imply
more than two.
So late January 2026.)
"A more speculative possibility is that the jets maintain their directionality because they are produced by technological thrusters which preserve global orientation for navigation purposes."
Avi?
Dude?
Youre killin us.
Please, stop, just stop.
Sunday, November 9, 2025
It's not a technological problem...(3I/ATLAS)
It's a
laws of nature
problem.)
"12 mysteries concerning 3I/ATLAS:
1. Its retrograde trajectory is aligned to within 5 degrees with the ecliptic plane of the planets around the Sun, with a likelihood of 0.2% (see here).
2. During July and August as well as in early November of 2025, it displayed a sunward jet (anti-tail) that is not an optical illusion from geometric perspective, unlike familiar comets (see here).
3. Its nucleus is about a million times more massive than 1I/`Oumuamua and a thousand times more massive than 2I/Borisov, while moving faster than both, altogether with a likelihood of less than 0.1% (see here and here).
4. Its arrival time was fine-tuned to bring it within tens of millions of kilometers from Mars, Venus and Jupiter and be unobservable from Earth at perihelion, with a likelihood of 0.005% (see here).
5. Its gas plume contains much more nickel than iron (as found in industrially-produced nickel alloys) and a nickel to cyanide ratio that is orders of magnitude larger than that of all known comets, including 2I/Borisov, with a likelihood below 1% (see here).
6. Its gas plume contains only 4% water by mass, a primary constituent of familiar comets (see here).
7. It shows extreme negative polarization, unprecedented for all known comets, including 2I/Borisov, with a likelihood below 1% (see here).
8. It arrived from a direction coincident with the radio “Wow! Signal” to within 9 degrees, with a likelihood of 0.6% (see here).
9. Near perihelion, it brightened faster than any known comet and was bluer than the Sun (see here).
10. It exhibits sunward and anti-solar jets which require an unreasonably large surface area in order to absorb enough sunlight needed to sublimate enough ice to feed the mass flux of these jets (as calculated here).
11. Near perihelion it exhibits non-gravitational acceleration which requires massive evaporation of at least 13% of its mass (as calculated here), whereas preliminary images indicate that the object maintained its integrity and did not break up (as discussed here).
12. Its tightly-collimated jets maintain orientation across a million kilometers in multiple directions relative to the Sun despite its measured rotation."
"So far, I have not updated my rank for 3I/ATLAS on the Loeb Scale (defined here and quantified here), since we expect a flood of new data in the coming weeks.
(Daniel 9:26
And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;
and the end thereof shall be with a flood,
and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
Revelation 12:15-16
15 Then from his mouth
(Through his emissary
The False Prophet no less.)
the serpent spewed water
like a river,
(Misinformation, disinformation, propaganda,
lies, deceit etc.)
to overtake the woman
(Wisdom)
and sweep her away with the torrent.
16 But the earth helped the woman
by opening its mouth and swallowing the river
that the dragon had spewed out of his mouth.
(People come to their senses
and realize what's what.
"the earth helped the woman
by opening its mouth and swallowing the river"
A lot of em will anyway.)
"If the measured speed, composition and mass flux of the jets are consistent with sublimation of volatiles from pockets of ice on the surface of a natural comet, I will reduce my Loeb Scale rank. On the other hand, if the speed and mass flux are inconsistent with warming by sunlight of a natural comet, then I will raise the Loeb Scale rank to a higher value than 4.
The rank will reach a value of 10
if there is evidence
for new objects
near Earth or Mars
that are related to 3I/ATLAS."
(Notice he didn't say:
"mini-probes" but instead
"evidence for new objects"
Interesting.)
Avi Loeb Medium 11/16/25
"unconventional hypotheses is not only refreshing
but essential to the health of scientific inquiry"
The only problem here is Avi's
"unconventional hypothesis"
is just so easily refuted.
I mean if I can do it?
Please...)
No comments:
Post a Comment