First of all
your blog post are starting
to be more and more fluff these days
kinda like the NASA news conference was.
And?
I always had my doubts about this:
An Extraordinary New Anomaly of 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 11/23/25
"In other words, the non-gravitational acceleration introduced a small course correction of exactly the magnitude needed to bring the minimum distance of 3I/ATLAS from Jupiter to the value of Jupiter’s Hill radius. 3I/ATLAS would have missed the edge of the Hill sphere otherwise."
I didnt really say that much about it
because it just seemed to be to kind of a "stretch" if you will, and?
Being by Jupiter kinda made it irrelevant as far as I was concerned.
It just seemed like a stretch to get 3I/ATLAS a "13th anomaly."
But I gave you the benefit of the doubt.
I can just here the conversation:
"Well we cant let it
just have 12
anomalies Bob
that assigns
potential religious significance
to it
better to make it have 13."
And then:
the Non-gravitational Acceleration
Avi Loeb Medium 11/27/25
"Given these revisions, the new JPL Horizons forecast for the perijove distance of 3I/ATLAS is now 53.587 (+/- 0.045) million kilometers, slightly outside the Hill radius on March 16, 2026."
(And Avi goes on to say he doesnt
think those revisions are correct.)
Avi?
This community is gonna go with
3I/ATLAS has
12 anomalies.
And if you get to think:
"the new JPL Horizons forecast"
are incorrect?
Because they didn't like your
"13th anomaly"?
This community
also thinks
"the new JPL Horizons forecast"
are incorrect albeit
for very different reasons.
Things are happening
just like me and honey said they would be.
back in July.
The best images of 3I/ATLS
we are getting these days
are from ground based
amateur astronomers
and astrophotographers.
Not NASA's armada of spacecraft
they have watching it.
Now just why would that be?
An amateur astronomer
is gonna break this thing wide open
here before to long.
No comments:
Post a Comment