There is Nothing More Deceptive than an Obvious Fact:
NASA’s Press Conference on 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 11/20/25
(So what caused the "jitter"?
We get all kinds of other images from spacecraft without it, but the image from the by the HiRISE camera onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has "jitter"? Notice also the date of that image was not given.)
"On November 19, 2025, NASA broadcasted a press conference here in which new data on the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS was shared for the first time after the U.S. government shutdown.
An hour earlier, I was asked by a reporter what I expect from the press conference and I replied: “I do not expect big news. NASA will repeat the official mantra that 3I/ATLAS is a natural comet and that they were unable to process the data until this week because of the government shutdown. Both are boring messages. The HiRISE image will probably show a fuzzy ball of light, like the Hubble image here. But I hope to be surprised.”
I was not surprised. There was no big news. NASA repeated the official mantra that 3I/ATLAS is a natural comet and that they were unable to process the data until recently because of the government shutdown."
(And we have already dissected all of that here:
Thursday, November 20, 2025
They cult of scientism is having their faith-based belief system (3I/ATLAS)
destroyed right in front of their faces.)
"The image taken by the HiRISE camera onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on October 3 and available here, shows a fuzzy ball of light."
(Thats what we have been wanting to see, the images from Oct 3rd from that instrument, but if you go to that link, there isn't an image from Oct 3rd, only ones from Oct 2nd.
"The collection of other new images from other space telescopes is available here. The new data includes fuzzier images that that of HiRISE and a UV spectroscopic detection of hydrogen by MAVEN that adds slightly to what we already learned this summer about 3I/ATLAS from the Hubble (here), Webb (here) and SPHEREx (here) space telescopes."
(So why we getting
"fuzzier images"
all the sudden?)
"NASA’s representatives should have emphasized what we do not understand about 3I/ATLAS rather than insist that it is a familiar comet from a new birth environment.
(They cant, because
some of what we dont understand
violates the laws of physics.
NASA just aint going there.)
"They stated that 3I/ATLAS does what comets do, namely shed gas and dust and responds to gravity."
"When monitoring an interstellar visitor, we should not fall prey to traditional thinking but scrutinize new interpretations. The public resonates with science as a learning experience, where the collection of evidence leads the way to new knowledge rather than reinforces variants on past knowledge."
"Sherlock Holmes noted: “There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact.” He also observed: “It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.” I wish NASA’s representatives shared this wisdom."
(I just explained why they cant do that above.)
"Imaginative scientists master the humility to learn something new from anomalies rather than display the arrogance of expertise."
(Avi, brother?,
That would violate part of the Dogma of the faith based belief system of the cult of scientism Avi.
Ever since man split/combined atoms he has though he is God, so he worships his own intellect.)
"At the press conference, there was no mention of the 12 puzzles associated with 3I/ATLAS
(They cant, because
some of what we dont understand
violates the laws of physics.
NASA just aint going there.)
(as summarized most recently here), including the anomaly that its mass is a million times larger than that of 1I/`Oumuamua and a thousand times larger than that of 2I/Borisov. Given the limited reservoir of material in interstellar space, one would expect to discover a million objects with the mass of 1I/`Oumuamua or a thousand objects with the mass of 2I/Borisov before finding a package as massive as 3I/ATLAS,
(Funny thing about things
that shouldn't exist,
they dont behave by your rules.)
unless this rare package was intentionally targeting the inner solar system (as discussed in my first paper on 3I/ATLAS here).
(You can count on that.)
"The unlikely (0.2%) alignment of the trajectory of 3I/ATLAS with the plane of the planets around the Sun (as discussed in my second paper on 3I/ATLAS here) made it an easy target for many NASA observatories. NASA’s officials should have at least acknowledged this unlikely fortune. In case 3I/ATLAS is a natural icy rock as they suggest, mother Nature was kinder to NASA than expected from a random delivery of rocks by at least a factor of 100,000 based on the two anomalies mentioned above."
(None of this is an accident.)
"The most interesting new insights about 3I/ATLAS were obtained in recent weeks. After the closest approach of 3I/ATLAS to the Sun on October 29, new images were taken by amateur astronomers (see discussions here, here, here and here). These images show tightly collimated jets pointing towards and away from the Sun and reaching distances of order a million kilometers. In retrospect, these amateur astronomer images are far more exciting than the HiRISE image shared by NASA’s officials."
(This is exactly what we (me and honey) said would happen in July. As it gets closer and closer there are to many people who will be able to see it (amateur astronomer or not) and they wont be able to hide what it is, where it's going, and what it's going to do anymore. There is a reason NASA doesn't want people to know the size of the nucleolus and it's not just the size itself, it's what you could determine if you knew the nucleus size, shape and composition, the trajectory etc.)
"n the coming weeks, larger ground-based telescopes as well as the Hubble and Webb telescopes will be able to characterize the jets of 3I/ATLAS by measuring their composition, speed and mass loading rate."
"Three weeks ago, I recommended to NASA to check whether they see any evidence for new objects that either accompanied 3I/ATLAS or left it towards Mars and Earth. Related data from Mars rovers or orbiters or from Earth-based NASA satellites or Galileo Project observatories could reveal fragments from an iceberg that broke up ...
(The day of the NASA "live event"
was the first time Avi called 3I/ATLAS an iceberg.
I found it interesting.
And?
Would this
Perseverance rover discovers alien rock on Mars.
It came from outside the planet
MSN Via India today 11/17/25
not already be:
"Nasa's Perseverance rover has made what could be one of its most intriguing discoveries yet on the Martian surface, a rock that may have originated from deep space."
"The rock, named "Phippsaksla," measures about 80 centimeters across and immediately caught the science team's attention due to its unusual colour, shape, and texture. Using its laser-equipped SuperCam instrument, Perseverance analysed the rock's composition and discovered high concentrations of iron and nickel, elements typically found in metallic meteorites."
And take your pick of sources if you want:
Screenshot from yesterday BTW
The "high concentrations of iron"
might rule out it being from 3I/ATLAS
but as stated above
Avi been yapping about lookin for things
that don't belong on Mars for a few weeks now,
WHY?
He also changed from wanting images from the HiRISE
from Oct 3rd, to wanting the ones from Oct 2nd
Why?
He also changed 3I/ATLAS pass by of Mars from a distance of
.2 AU to .02 AU without explaination
and said with a small course correction it could be 0 AU
Why?
And then it got hit with a CME
that we dont have pictures of and NASA doesnt discuss?
WHY?
Even with the armada of NASA instruments
watching it since it came into our solar system?
And now the images from Oct 2nd are
"smeared"? So that you cant resolve the nucleolus?
All of that adds up to:
NOT GOOD.
Not good at all.)
"Bureaucrats or unimaginative scientists want us to believe in the expected. But the rest of us know that the best is yet to come."
(Yes we do.)
No comments:
Post a Comment