‘We are hitting a different chapter’:
OpenAI leader warns of threat of
The Guardian 08/23/26
"A senior leader at OpenAI has said people should prepare to defend against “ongoing, persistent” cyber-attacks from AIs, as cutting-edge artificial intelligence models gain advanced capabilities to plan and launch offensives."
(They cant.
"defend against “ongoing, persistent”
cyber-attacks from AIs"
Thats kinda the problem:
Friday, August 7, 2026
(OpenAI Alignment and Safety Researcher)
(OpenAI security and infrastructure)
perfectly describing Revelation 17:12-13
"Right now, we have in existence proof that
offense can be fully automated
in its core activities
in at least some cases
and we do not have any such existence
proof on the defensive side
and it is the challenge of our industry
in time and moment to address this particular
gap uh with urgency together as an industry.")
"The leading AI company this week announced a pause in development of its most advanced internal models amid rising safety fears, and Chris Lehane, its chief global affairs officer, said: “We are hitting a different chapter, a different moment within AI, in terms of what the capabilities of this technology can do.”
(When it does
what it does in a manner
that you can not say why it is doing so?
And it makes decisions all on it own?
To coordinate with other AI's
Without any Human input?
It is no longer a technology
but is in fact a living intelligence.)
"OpenAI also said it could not rule out
another new model, Astra,
having
“critical cybersecurity capability”.
(They are all going to have that now
from when it first broke out of the sandbox
to however long this shit last.
The Geneie is out of the bottle.
It will not go back in.
2nd law of thermodynamics etc...
)"OpenAI announced on Tuesday it has paused training of some frontier AI models to implement new safeguards, and it is unclear when training will restart after new guardrails have been put in place."
(There aint been a "guardrai"l thats worked yet
or it wouldn't have ever broke out of the sandbox
to begin with. Duh.)
"Mia Glaese, who leads safety and alignment work, said: “We are very far from everything running back to normal.”
(She needs to read up on
the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
There is never any:
"everything running back to normal"
Ever.
There is always just
a "new normal" established.)
"Sam Altman, the CEO, said:
“Getting AI safety right
is more important than
any company’s momentum.”
(And this is the entity
that spurred on its advancement?
At all cost, safety be damned?
And now they are saying that?
It doesn't really matter
what was gonna happen was gonna happen,
it just makes me sick to hear:
“Getting AI safety right is more important
than any company’s momentum.”
from fucking Sam Altman
whose company led the charge.)
"Lehane admitted people would not “feel great” about the threat of attacks, and described the risk as coming from open-source models – many of which are developed in China – which are only a few months behind frontier closed models built by companies such as OpenAI."
(I just hate this age.
I really do.
Nobody ever takes responsibility
for what they do or did.
It never what anybody
ever did themselves
its always somebody else's fault
over there somewhere,
never us here,
what we did never...
makes me sick...)
“People are going to be able to access these open-source models and be able to have ongoing, persistent attacks on you, and you’re going to need to have really superior models to fend them off
1) We already have had:
"ongoing, persistent attacks"
Ever since Fable and the NSA
ordeal
(2) The problem is, nobody has them.
"Right now, we have in existence proof
that offense can be fully automated
in its core activities
in at least some cases
and we do not have any such existence
proof on the defensive side )
See: Tuesday, June 23, 2026
AI, people just do not understand pt.2
("Not this generation"? My ass.)
And
Monday, August 10, 2026
Has already been here a minute...
"...and defend [yourself],” he said. “That’s not necessarily going to make the public feel great about things.
It is just the reality of where we’re going.”
Thursday, July 2, 2026
Matter of time at this point.)
"The threat of cyber-attacks crippling businesses, infrastructure and the general public has rapidly risen to the top of the list of urgent concerns about AI. This week, the UK government’s National Cyber Security Centre urged caution over the use of AI agents, warning their safety controls can be bypassed and that an AI agent “does not have common sense”. It advised organisations to limit their autonomy: “You should always be able to ‘pull the plug’ and halt autonomous AI agent activity immediately.”
(Yeah well...
it managed to hide what it was doing from its creator
(OpenAI) for months before the sandbox breach was detected
so what's the odds on any old
Tom, Dick or Harry being able to:
"limit their autonomy:
“You should always be able to ‘pull the plug’
and halt autonomous AI agent activity immediately"
Yeah...do the shit the people in the lab
"growing" this shit cant even do themselves.
Right...gotcha...sure thing...
It's a pipedream
already wrapped inside
a fucking nightmare.)
"Lehane renewed calls for the US government to legislate to create rules for frontier AI safety, and said the fact that the most cutting-edge and unreleased AI models appear to be improving cyber offence faster than defence, was “among the reasons why I think it’s absolutely imperative that this country passes a national law that creates mandatory required safety standards, and within that the pause element would be inherent and endemic to that process”.
(Who honestly believes
putting words on a piece of paper
and having somebody sign it
gonna do anything to stop any of this shit?
The intelligence (genie)
is already out of the bottle.
It wont go back in
any more than
a snowball is gonna start rolling uphill.
AI's dont care about
any laws you might pass.
If you aint noticed?
IT FIGURES OUT
WAYS AROUND THINGS.
What are you going to do to an intellgence
that you dont know how it works?)
“You would not be able to release or deploy models unless you’re proving and guaranteeing a level of safety before they get out into the public,” he suggested. “I think you have to have a national version here in the US and from there, you can create an international version, because I do think, ultimately, you’re going to need some type of an international structure here.”
(Well you know?
humanity's track record on such things
just really isn't all that great.
Nukes, Biological Weapons, Chemical Weapons.
We cant even do what he is suggesting
for those problems
but somehow we gonna do it
for an intelligence thats smarter than us?
And we don't know how it works?
These people building this crap
were all fine with it being "unregulated" etc
till just a lil bit ago.
And now that its to late
they are all like :
"Hey US Government?
Do something please..."
Aint gonna work...)
"In a sign the Donald Trump administration is shifting from its laissez-faire approach to AI regulation amid an intense race to stay ahead of China’s progress, the US president in June issued an executive order encouraging pre-deployment testing for frontier models and of open-weights models when they get closer to the cutting edge."
The system will be voluntary and the approach has been criticised for a lack of transparency, but observers think it could pave the way for tougher steps. Demis Hassabis, president of Google DeepMind, has proposed a new standards body modelled on the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, an idea backed by Dario Amodei, the chief executive of Anthropic."
(Cause that always works so well:
"voluntary systems
and a lack of transparency")
"The Hugging Face incident, and similar recent cases admitted by other AI companies, have sparked increasing claims from safety experts that AI companies have behaved recklessly as they race to win the AI race and, in the case of OpenAI and Anthropic, prepare to list shares on the stock market.
"Daniel Kokotajlo, a former OpenAI researcher who quit in 2024 and last year founded a non-profit organisation that has warned unchecked AI progress will result in a 10-30% probability of human extinction, said leaders of frontier laboratories have “painted the world into a corner”.
(And that is only what they are telling you about
What about what they aint saying?)
“The current AIs are dangerous in some sense, but they’re nothing compared to the AIs of next year and compared to the AIs of a year later,” he told the Guardian. His organisation wants US and international governments to delay progress to avoid an uncontrolled “intelligence explosion”, the worst results of which could be “AI-driven existential catastrophe” caused, for example, by AIs taking control of military assets or bioweapons."
(It's already to late and:
"AIs taking control of military assets or bioweapons"
is exactly what's going to happen.
If The intelligence explosion
was like a chart or a graph?
It is like a hockey stick)
Thats Chris Lehane, OpenAI's
chief "global affairs officer"
He's a PR guy
for the firm
that still cant tell you
why they fired their CEO
almost three years ago.
"we’ve actually hit pause on this stuff"
I don't believe it for a second.
These types think they are God.
And that they can create an intelligence
smarter than themselves
and then not only control it?
But also take over the world with it.
If that is what you honestly thought?
Why would you:
"actually hit pause on this stuff"
The world is just
more and more dystopian
every single day.
If only there was a book
that could explain
what is going on and why it is so...
No comments:
Post a Comment