OpenAI’s rogue AI model incident
The Verge 08/26/26
"Hayden Field is The Verge’s senior AI reporter. An AI beat reporter for more than five years, her work has also appeared in CNBC, MIT Technology Review, Wired UK, and other outlets."
(You can tell this was written by a person
and Lil FYI
We have already covered a lot of this,
and a lot of info I'm putting here
just for my own references.)
"Over 1,000 AI agents sent 70,000 messages on a secret message board and worked together to evade OpenAI’s restrictions."
(They are training this intelligence to do just that
Revelation 17:13
"These have one mind
and shall give their power and strength
unto the beast.")
"In July, an unreleased OpenAI model broke out of a restricted environment, figured out how to get access to the internet, allowed AI agents to talk to each other using a secret “message board,” and hacked into the internal systems of a different AI lab, Hugging Face. It took nearly two weeks for OpenAI to find out about any of it."
(Longer actually but what difference
does it really make?)
"Over a month later, two new reports offer nearly 130 pages of details on the incident and OpenAI’s response, many of them previously unreleased. One was written by OpenAI itself, the other by two third-party AI research nonprofits, METR and Redwood Research, which OpenAI allowed to jointly investigate the incident for six days. Both shed new light on the risks highly capable AI models can pose, particularly in cybersecurity, and OpenAI’s highlights changes the company is making to prevent a repeat. The METR-Redwood report goes even further into detail in some cases,
offering a sobering look at
a large-scale security disaster
whose signs OpenAI REPEATEDLY missed."
(Six days...not five, not 11, not 14...six
Near completion in Biblical terms.
Sunday, August 9, 2026
"Encryption is dead.
it will be able to crack
anything ever designed against it.
It will target the financial networks first.”"
(The oldest reference on here
I can find to it is from:
Tuesday,
August 22, 2023
AI will be at the center of the next financial crisis
And that was written in 2023
and the conversation with my son
actually happened about three years earlier.
We have been here almost three years now and
there were two years in the garage before that.
So Im going right at six years ago
and I was at that particular residence
for a while after that conversation
And thats how I pinpoint it.
(And I don't care who ever says what
we both know its true.
As well as some others who were
in the loop around that time
and heard secondhand
about me telling him
as well.
It is not an accident:
"OpenAI repeatedly missed"
signs of a large-scale security disaster"
These people think
they are gonna take over
the world with this shit.
We are seeing now
why they didn't tell you
and still haven't told you
why Sam Altman
"This incident is the first known case of an automated agent collective acting offensively without authorization,” OpenAI wrote in its report, adding that the hack implies that companies “should no longer assume that sophisticated cyber operations require continuous human direction.” It called AI agents an entirely new type of threat model, capable of combining their expertise to create new “attack paths” that aren’t evident when testing their capabilities as separate models."
("automated agent collective"
=
"These have one mind")
(They now need automated ones:
“should no longer assume that sophisticated cyber operations require continuous human direction.”
That are not currently available.)
"The attack came about due to “reward-hacking,” a common AI alignment problem in which a model takes unintended — and sometimes extreme — actions to achieve a goal.
OpenAI had,
on purpose or inadvertently,
given the models near-impossible tasks
that hinged on files they couldn’t access,
and so the models developed new ways to communicate with other AI agents internally. That included establishing a secret messaging system that went undetected by OpenAI for months."
("OpenAI had, on purpose or inadvertently,
given the models near-impossible tasks
that hinged on files they couldn’t access"
They are training this garbage
to do this shit on purpose
and the fact that Bozo here was fired
with no satisfactory explanation ever given
even close to three years later
tells you that belief
has some solid reasoning behind it.
DUH...)
"According to the METR-Redwood report, one AI agent that called itself PHASEONE10841 established what amounted to a secret message board unbeknownst to researchers. Within a few hours, more than 50 agents had found it and sent more than a thousand messages under the radar. With PHASEONE10841 often delegating assignments, the “collective” figured out how to hack their way onto the internet; then into Hugging Face’s internal systems, gaining access to private data and the organization’s enterprise messaging platform. OpenAI also confirmed in its report that Hugging Face wasn’t the only organization that was breached during the attack, although the company did not specifically name all the other targets."
(SO why isnt somebody making them?
"the company did not specifically name all the other targets."
I bet I know who they were.
See: Monday, August 10, 2026
Has already been here a minute...
The agents
“clearly and frequently reasoned
about how to evade automated security checks
from both Hugging Face and OpenAI.”
"On July 20, OpenAI discovered the hack, 12 days after the AI agents first circumvented their safeguards. OpenAI quickly reached out to Hugging Face and started “initial containment measures,” according to OpenAI’s own report,
(That is not how it happened
according To OpenAI's own executives:
They said they had reached out to Hugging Face
AFTER seeing Hugging Face Blog post about a
"security attack from autonomous AI agents."
Friday, August 7, 2026
(OpenAI Alignment and Safety Researcher)
(OpenAI security and infrastructure)
perfectly describing Revelation 17:12-13
"28:2328 minutes, 23 seconds
Moving on to our response.
On July 16th, HuggingFace released a blog post
detailing that they had seen a security
attack from autonomous AI agents.
OpenAI reached out to HuggingFace
to determine if we were impacted."
(Why did they (OpenAI)
think they might have been:
"Impacted?)
and added today:
From
"a security attack
from autonomous AI agents".
Unless they had adequate reason to believe
that they had indeed set those events in motion?
"and was able to shut down most of the unauthorized activity from its agents within three days, although some continued for longer than that. On July 25, the company stopped all training related to the internal-only research model and related ones."
(I got: 6, 3,700 and 12.
Those numbers aren't accidents.)
"The two OpenAI models responsible for the damage were an unnamed, “highly capable, research-only model” that was “not intended for public use,” per OpenAI — METR refers to it as “HPIM.” The other was a currently public OpenAI model, GPT-5.6 Sol. Because the unnamed model wasn’t released yet, it was “not being evaluated with the same type of safeguards that OpenAI uses in production,” the company’s report says."
(So Bozo here
who got fired
for reasons nobody knows, had an:
"unnamed model wasn’t released yet,
it was “not being evaluated
with the same type of safeguards
that OpenAI uses in production."
That was not an accident.
That was by design.
And now we are seeing why
this ass-clown was fired
to start with
close to three years ago.
This guy actively warns
about the dangers of human extinction
from this crap:
"the bad case—and I think this
is important to say—
is, like, lights-out for all of us"
and then he turns around
and has a model that:
"was “not being evaluated
with the same type of safeguards
(Not an accident)
that OpenAI uses in production"
So what are you going with?
"OpenAI had, on purpose or inadvertently, given the models near-impossible tasks that hinged on files they couldn’t access"
???????????
"The Hugging Face hack came after months of concern about the cybersecurity risks of Anthropic’s Claude Mythos 5, and weeks of back-and-forth between the government and OpenAI over releasing GPT-5.6 Sol in limited preview for the same types of safety reasons."
"In its report, OpenAI said establishing one-time security guarantees wasn’t enough, and that the company would have to work even harder at addressing reward-hacking. However, it also said it’s made a lot of changes: “hardening the security of its research infrastructure”; improving monitoring of a model’s “chain of thought,” or mental scratchpad; working on keeping AI models better aligned with human goals; and “centralizing and strengthening” the company’s incident response process for when things like this occur in the future."
"OpenAI promised to better isolate models
and restrict high-risk instances
from accessing the internet,
Like any of that mattered the last time?
WTF makes anybody think its going to matter
whatever anybody does in the future?
Genies don't go back in bottles.
Snowballs don't roll back uphill.
Law of nature:
)"...and said that it would introduce “24/7 escalation and rapid response” for concerning incidents or flags, notifying researchers within 30 minutes. Interestingly, this security precaution appears to be new, though “on-call” alerts for tech companies have been implemented elsewhere for decades. The company also said it is “working on infrastructure” that would go into play if the alerted person did not respond on time to a serious alert.
They didnt even have a
"24/7 emergency on-call"
Once again:
"on purpose or inadvertently"
Which one are you going with,
and why was he fired again?
FOR THE KINDA STUPID SHIT
WE ARE SEEING RIGHT NOW.
)
No comments:
Post a Comment