And

 

while were at it?

One more time.

Sabine Hossenfelder

Physicist Sabine Hossenfelder: 

‘There are quite a few areas where physics blurs into religion’

Interviewer:

Is it just as reasonable to say that God or some other higher power created the universe?

Hossenfelder: That’s a tough question. There is a difference between them in the sense that 

the theories that physicists work with are mathematical in nature, whereas the God hypothesis is not a maths thing."

Is there a mathematical equation for love?

If so where is it?

Who discovered it, etc?

I just wanna  ask her:

"Do you believe in love?"

Does everything have to have 

a mathematical equation 

behind it in order for it to exsit/be real?

What about all the other emotions then?

Do they have to have a mathematical equation behind them?

If so?

Where are they then?

Who discovered the math behind emotions?

We know that they exist.

So where is the equation then?

And if love exist 

and doesn't have a mathematical equation behind it?

can not other things exist 

that you will not be able to prove with math?

Where did the math come from?

and

Where did love come from?

1 John 4:19

We love because he first loved us.

He invented math too :-).

To her credit?

I do like some of what she says.

Interviewer:

You don’t have much time for the multiverse either. Why not?

Hossenfelder: It’s another one of those ideas that I’d call ascientific...you can believe this if you want to, it’s not in conflict with anything we know. But from a scientific perspective, if you want to make progress in our understanding of natural law, I’d say it’s a waste of time exactly for that reason, because you can’t test it.

"You’ve just assigned reality to some mathematical expressions. You can’t support it with a scientific argument."

Interviewer:

What prompted you to write the book?

Hossenfelder: The major message I wanted to get across was: we’re painting a very one-sided picture of physics in our education and in the popular science press – of a very technocratic, maths-heavy discipline with particle accelerators and all that kind of stuff. But physics also touches on big existential questions: How does the universe work? How did everything begin? What are we made of?"

If you've read as much as I have about these things?

Here is one thing that kinda jumps out at ya:

"How did everything begin?"

That?

That they stay away from.

They are all about telling you about what happened after it (The primordial egg, the condensed state of the universe, the singularity etc) was already created (Big Bang) but nobody goes anywhere close to how it was created in the first place and the fact that the universe had a beginning means definitively that something outside of it had to have created it and of the six options for a metaphysical beginning to the universe, a theistic agent creating it and intervening in it is head and shoulders above all the other options as for why things are the way they are.

THAT?

That they stay well away from.

I wonder why?