Monday, June 19, 2023

Information

 


is always a sign of a conscious, sentient intellect.

Everywhere we see information?

There is an intellect behind it.

Everywhere.

Not one exception ever all throughout recorded history.

Information simply does not "evolve".

It is consciously produced.

Information is somebody trying to tell you something.

Period.




"On black holes

"If you jump into a black hole, your mass energy will be returned to our universe but in a mangled form which contains the information about what you were like but in a state where it can not be easily recognized. It is like burning an encyclopedia. Information is not lost, if one keeps the smoke and the ashes. But it is difficult to read."


— Information Loss in Black Holes, 2005


WHERE DID THE INFORMATION IN RNA AND DNA COME FROM?

THATS WHAT I WANT ONE OF THESE BRAINIACS TO COME EXPLAIN TO ME.




On dimensions

“Evolution has ensured that our brains just aren't equipped to visualise 11 dimensions directly. However, from a purely mathematical point of view it's just as easy to think in 11 dimensions, as it is to think in three or four.”


— As quoted in the Guardian, 2005


That isnt exactly how it happened:


"Evolution has ensured that our brains 

just aren't equipped to visualise 11 dimensions directly."


Nowhere in the bible does it say:

"And the garden of Eden was destroyed."



Genesis 3:24 

“He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.”


Eden didn't go away.

Mankind just lost access to it.

And it wasn't an evolutionary process that did it.


Believers will one day be restored to that state:


"At the end of time, God’s people will experience the blessings of a restored creation and renewed access to the tree of life."





On life on Earth

The life we have on Earth 

must have spontaneously generated itself

It must therefore be possible 

for life to generate spontaneously elsewhere in the universe.”


(Where do we see this?

This guy thought

"life on earth"

As well as "the universe" itself

must have:

"spontaneously generated itself."


Holler at me when you find some 

empirical, measurable proof of it. 


What he really said?

(I know :-) 

Strawman :-)

 Might as well have been:


Something 

that we dont/cant see

and that 

we can not prove 

exist

beyond a reasonable doubt

not only 

brought the universe into exitance?

But also the very life 

that we know exist in that universe.


Now what does that sound like to you?







No comments: