make you wonder why it was
"born"
the way it was dont it?
5 “what ifs” that would have changed cosmic history
"If our Universe were born
a little differently,
there wouldn't have been any
planets, stars, galaxies, or chemically interesting reactions."
Hey Neil Degrasse Tyson?
I heard somebody say you were looking for
EVIDENCE
of a creator.
Well there ya go.
(along with a bunch of other stuff:
Constants etc...)
Let me give you a hint
(and I've been telling my own people the same)
Dont look for a bearded man,
you wont find one.
John 4:24
"God is Spirit."
"After 9.2 billion years,
what would become our Solar System
gradually began to form from a collapsing cloud of molecular gas,
and after another 4.55 billion years or so, humanity first arose on planet Earth."
(There is your "evidence" of a theistic agent acting upon his creation for ya Mr. Tyson.
Theism
belief in the existence of a god or gods, especially belief in one god as creator of the universe, intervening in it and sustaining a personal relation to his creatures.)
"If you would have increased or decreased that density by just 0.00000000001%, the Universe would have:
recollapsed on itself, ending in a Big Crunch after less than 1 second, in the case of an increase,
or expanded so quickly that no protons and electrons would ever have found one another to form even a single atom in the Universe, in the case of a decrease.
This incredible balance, along with the need for it, highlights just how precarious our existence in this Universe is.
(Already covered this one a while back, but once again? It just how shows how exact the intelligence behind it's design was if you ask me Mr. Tyson. And why were you so visibly upset during that interview? I cant find the exact interview I was looking for or I would have included it. If people want evidence of God? Just look at the stars.
Psalm 19:1-4
The heavens declare the glory of God;
and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
Day unto day uttereth speech,
and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
There is no speech nor language,
where their voice is not heard.
You're living in his creation.
It had a beginning.
Something outside of it had to have created it.
An entity can not exist in something that hasn't been created yet.
I wonder which metaphysical beginning to the universe Mr. Tyson ascribes to?
There are six possibilities,
one is head and shoulders above the rest.
I hope you choose wisely sir.)
What if there had been exactly equal amounts of matter and antimatter? This is another problematic one for us, and in fact it’s one of the greatest unsolved problems in all of physics: why do we live in a Universe with more matter than antimatter? This puzzle has many possible resolutions, but no definitive answer.
(I 100% disagree. while it might be a problem for the physicist?
It is by no means a problem for the theologian.
Matter is primary.
it shows gods intent to enjoy his creation with man.
Without matter?
There is no need for
Time and Space
nor the energy required to put it all together.
New American Bible (Revised Edition)
Notes:
Genesis 1:1- Genesis 2:3
"The chapter highlights the goodness of creation
and the divine desire that human beings share in that goodness."
What we can say, for certain, is that:
in the early stages of the hot Big Bang, the Universe should have been perfectly symmetric between matter and antimatter,
and that somehow, some process occurred
(That sounds "certain" to you?
Just whatever could it have been?
)that resulted in the existence of approximately
1,000,000,001 matter particles
for every 1,000,000,000 antimatter particles,"
(The battle has already been won.
Good defeats evil.
There's your EVIDENCE.
Brother Joe:
"Christians fight from victory.
Not for victory.
The battle has already been won.)
and when the excess annihilated away,
(Told ya :-)
we were left with that
tiny bit of matter amidst a leftover bath of radiation.
That radiation still survives, as does the matter, which is why we can reconstruct what happened at early times."
"We still don’t know how it happened..."
(Well...
ya know...
who really cares?
:-).
We'll get that when we get to heaven :-)
The fact is it did or we wouldn't be here, and lots of us know already know why we are here.)
"Today’s Universe, you’ll recall, has about ~1 proton per cubic meter of space: if you smeared out the entire Universe and drew a box that was 1 meter × 1 meter × 1 meter, you’d expect to find about 1 proton inside. When you work out the math for what happens if matter and antimatter annihilated away from a perfectly symmetric state, you’d find a very different Universe. Radiation would keep scattering off of these particles for tens of millions of years, rather than just a few hundred thousand, and the average density of all forms of matter and antimatter would be the equivalent of only ~1 proton (or antiproton) per cubic mile: a box that was 1 mile × 1 mile × 1 mile, or about 10 billion times less dense than the Universe we have today.
"If our Universe hadn’t created a matter-antimatter asymmetry early on, none of the remarkable steps that came afterward to lead to our existence could have taken place."
(Hey Mr Tyson?
Want some more evidence?
The universe on it's own decided:
"matter-antimatter asymmetry"?
"If our Universe hadn’t created a matter-antimatter asymmetry early on..."
Interesting concept.
Theism
belief in the existence of a god or gods, especially
belief in one god as creator of the universe,
intervening in it
and sustaining a personal relation to his creatures.)
"Take dark matter away, and what happens? The small-scale structure you’d attempt to form wouldn’t exist, as the early radiation-dominated phase of the Universe would wash those imperfections away. Meanwhile, the galaxies that you did form would undergo one burst of star formation, and then those stars would boil all the surrounding matter away, ejecting it from the galaxy entirely. In a Universe with no dark matter, only that first generation of stars would exist, meaning there would be no rocky planets, no biochemistry, and no life."
(More EVIDENCE of an intellect behind the design Mr. Tyson!
I mean how long can you just go on assuming all of these are some kinda grand accident?
I assure you Mr. Tyson knows of these.
To put forth the proposition that they aren't EVIDENCE of design
and therefore that there has to be an "intellect" behind them?
ITS FLAT OUT RIDICULOUS.
Maybe that's why he was so visibly upset in that interview?
COSMIC CONSTANTS
Gravitational force constant
Electromagnetic force constant
Strong nuclear force constant
Weak nuclear force constant
Cosmological constant
INITIAL CONDITIONS AND “BRUTE FACTS”
Initial distribution of mass energy
Ratio of masses for protons and electrons
Velocity of light
Mass excess of neutron over proton
“LOCAL” PLANETARY CONDITIONS
Steady plate tectonics with right kind of geological interior
Right amount of water in crust
Large moon with right rotation period
Proper concentration of sulfur
Right planetary mass
Near inner edge of circumstellar habitable zone
Low-eccentricity orbit outside spin-orbit and giant planet resonances
A few, large Jupiter-mass planetary neighbors in large circular orbits
Outside spiral arm of galaxy
Near co-rotation circle of galaxy, in circular orbit around galactic center
Within the galactic habitable zone
During the cosmic habitable age
EFFECTS OF PRIMARY FINE-TUNING PARAMETERS
The polarity of the water molecule
"What if dark energy weren’t constant in space or time? This is the one possibility that’s still on the table for our Universe: that dark energy might evolve in some fashion. To the best of our observational limits,
Psalm 74:17
You set all the boundaries of the earth;
You made the summer and winter.
(God did)
it certainly looks and behaves like a cosmological constant — as a form of energy inherent to the fabric of space itself — where the energy density remains constant in time and all throughout space.
(Dark energy just decided for itself to come into existence?
And how it should operate?
As did the speed of light
and all the other constants in the universe?
These things just have a mind of their own
and decide for themselves
what they should be/how they should work?
Where else do we see this in nature?
No EVEIDENCE of any intellect behind them (constants of the universe) at all?
Please...
Things just keep getting more and more preposterous the more you dig into it.)
"If dark energy strengthens, the Universe could rip apart. If dark energy weakens or reverses its sign, the Universe could yet recollapse. And if dark energy decays, the Universe as we know it could end. None of these things have happened yet, but if the Universe were only slightly different, any one of them could have taken place in the past, precluding our existence from occurring at all."
No comments:
Post a Comment