is just insanity to me.
(That people cant figure this out that is)
Your logical fallacy is:
BLACK AND WHITE THINKING.
What leaked US assessment of Israeli plans to strike Iran shows
(Warning, I'm gonna be all over the place with multiple quotes from multiple sources, not following the articles or blog post chronologically etc.
"Officials have not determined whether the documents were released due to a hack or a leak, Mr Kirby said."
(To frame that statement in the manner than it was, would only leave one of two options
(hack or leak)
when in fact
as will be demonstrated
there are more options than those two available.)
"US investigators are trying to find out how a pair of highly classified intelligence documents were leaked online.
The documents, which appeared on the messaging app Telegram on Friday, contain an alleged US assessment of Israeli plans to attack Iran."
("trying to find out how"?
Easy-peasy
The ONGOING
CYBER WARFARE CAMPAIGN.
Started in 2020 and
it has simply never ended yo.
Witness:
"Statements by U.S. government officials
On October 22, 2020, CISA and the FBI identified the Microsoft zerologon attacker as Berserk Bear, a state-sponsored group believed to be part of Russia's FSB.[23]
On December 18, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Russia was "pretty clearly" responsible for the cyber attack.[117][118][119]
On December 19, U.S. president Donald Trump publicly addressed the attacks for the first time, downplaying its severity and suggesting without evidence that China, rather than Russia, might be responsible.[51][50][119][52]
(I wonder why he did that?)
The same day, Republican senator Marco Rubio, acting chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said it was "increasingly clear that Russian intelligence conducted the gravest cyber intrusion in our history."[37][120]
On December 20, Democratic senator Mark Warner, briefed on the incident by intelligence officials, said "all indications point to Russia."[121]
On December 21, 2020, former Attorney General William Barr said that he agreed with Pompeo's assessment of the origin of the cyberhack and that it "certainly appears to be the Russians," contradicting Trump.[122][123][124]
On January 5, 2021, CISA, the FBI, the NSA, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, all confirmed that they believe Russia was the most likely culprit.[125][126][127] On June 10, 2021, FBI Director Christopher Wray attributed the attack to Russia's SVR specifically.[128]
U.S. Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-IL) described the attack as tantamount to a declaration of war.[49][4]
U.S. government
On December 18, 2020, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that some details of the event would likely be classified so as not to become public.[73]
(Well I wonder why?)
"The attackers exploited software or credentials from at least three U.S. firms: Microsoft, SolarWinds, and VMware.".[43][21]
(Exploited credentials means, "Now we can create credentials for ourselves (We can now create the accounts that create the accounts) and you'll never know which ones are legit and which ones aren't, also means, you'll never get us out of here and remember, it was 9 months before anybody ever knew about it.)
Impact
However, it appeared that the attackers had deleted or altered records, and may have modified network or system settings in ways that could require manual review.[63][141] Former Homeland Security Advisor Thomas P. Bossert warned that it could take years to evict the attackers from US networks, leaving them able to continue to monitor, destroy or tamper with data in the meantime.[47] Harvard's Bruce Schneier, and NYU's Pano Yannakogeorgos, founding dean of the Air Force Cyber College, said that affected networks may need to be replaced completely."[142][143]
"I told brother Brian that night after bible study they got the keys to the kingdom. He asked, "How do you know brother?" I just point skyward. A lil after that after that came an article about the Russians exploiting credentials. Speaking as a former Network Operations Control Technician?
AND?
We have seen this TV show before BTW:
US scrambles to trace source of highly classified intel leak
"Classified documents that appeared online, with details ranging from Ukraine's air defenses to Israel's Mossad spy agency, have U.S. officials scrambling to identify the leak's source, with some experts saying it could be an American."
Know what other classified documents first appeared on Telegram?
(A Russian messaging /social media app BTW)
"In April 2023, two sets of leaked classified foreign intelligence documents of the United States began circulating on Twitter, Telegram, and 4chan.
"Russia 17,500 troop losses
Ukraine 71,500 troop losses"
(Think its an accident they call them the "Discord leaks"? Those documents were on Twitter, Telegram and 4chan well before they were ever on Discord.
"Some giving battlefield casualty estimates from Ukraine appeared to have been altered to minimize Russian losses."
(That was a big point that they were trying to make right there. Those numbers, (Russia 17,500 troop losses Ukraine 71,500 troop losses) are the correct ones and The Pentagon knows it. Notice how they weren't even mentioned in the article? Again, Why?)
"Jack Teixeira, an airman first class of the Massachusetts Air National Guard, had allegedly photographed printouts of the documents at his parents' home in Dighton, Massachusetts, and posted them to the instant messaging platform Discord."
Another question that has never been answered is, Why would a 23 year old airman first class of the Massachusetts Air national guard
ONLY ALTER A HANDFULL
OF DOCUMENTS
OF THE MULTITUDES
HE
"allegedly photographed printouts of the documents at his parents' home in Dighton, Massachusetts, and posted them to the instant messaging platform Discord"
?
ALL HAVING THE SAME SUBJECT MATTER?
THAT BEING:
"Russia 17,500 troop losses
Ukraine 71,500 troop losses"
Seeing the parallels yet?
BOTH POSTED EARLY ON TO TELEGRAM
BOTH BEING BLAMED
(POSSIBLY)
ON
"AN AMERICAN".
(That it would be a leak is what is being infered, as is here also, although a "hack" hasnt been ruled out.
THERE ARE PEOPLE IN OUR GOVERNMENT THAT KNOW WHAT I AM SAYING IS TRUE.
THAT IS TWO HIGHLY CLASSIFIED "LEAKS" ON SENSATIVE SUBJECT MATTER IN A LITTLE OVER A YEAR
AND NOT ONE MENTION BY ANYBODY:
CNN
FOX NEWS
ABC
CNS
MSNBC
LA TIMES
CHICHAGO TRIBUNE
WASHINGTON POST
NEW REPUBLIC
ETC, ETC, ETC.
TWO MAJOR SECURITY BREACHES IN A LIL OVER A YEAR AND NOT A ONE OF ANY OF THOSE SOURCES HAS SO MUCH AS MENTIONED THE SOLARWINFDS CYBER CAMPAGIN.
WHY?
HOW IS THAT EVEN POSSIBLE?
"The only way to be absolutely certain of anything is prior dismissal before adequate consideration."
I read somewhere once.
Missler I think. Yup.
DISCERNMENT:
Knowing what is being said by what is not being said. Two sever intelligence breaches in a lil over a year and not one word from anyone anywhere about the ongoing Solarwinds cyber warfare campaign, tells you exactly what is going on in both this instance and in the Pentagon Leak (their term, not mine) last year.
Reference:
Biden is ‘deeply concerned’ about the release of secret documents on Israel’s possible attack plans
"Rep. Mike Turner of Ohio, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said the unauthorized release of the information was concerning, especially given the “high stakes of what’s going on in the Middle East right now.”
While it remains possible the information was obtained through hacking, “if this has been a leak, it is criminal and it is certainly espionage,“ Turner said Monday on the BBC."
(Well thank you Captain Obvious and again only two options are presented while the one with more evidence pointing toward it is left out.)
BACK TO:
"What leaked US assessment of Israeli plans to strike Iran shows"
(In a nutshell here is what is shows:
Due to the ongoing SolarWinds Cyber warfare campaign? Our enemies will know our plans ahead of time. I mean that's all you really have to know.)
"Officials have not determined whether the documents were released due to a hack or a leak, Mr Kirby (National Security Communications Advisor) said."
"Are the documents genuine?
Military analysts say the phrasing used in the headings looks credible and is consistent with similar classified documents revealed in the past."
(Like what?
The documents in the above mentioned
Pentagon "leak"?
Interesting they didnt mention what the "documents revealed in the past" were.)
"What do they tell us?
Taken together, the two documents are a classified US assessment of Israel’s preparations to hit targets in Iran, based on intelligence analysed on 15-16 October by the US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency."
"What features prominently is the mention of two Air Launched Ballistic Missile (ABLM) systems: Golden Horizon and Rocks."
"Rocks is a long-range missile system made by the Israeli company Rafael and designed to hit a variety of targets both above and below ground. Golden Horizon is thought to refer to the Blue Sparrow missile system with a range of around 2,000km (1,240 miles).
The significance of this is that it would indicate that the Israeli Air Force is planning to carry out a similar but greatly expanded version of its ABLM attack on an Iranian radar site near Isfahan in April.
"By launching these weapons from long range and far from Iran’s borders it would avoid the need for Israeli warplanes to overfly certain countries in the region like Jordan."
"What do they not tell us?
Glaringly absent from these documents is any mention of what targets Israel intends to hit in Iran, or when.
The US has made no secret of its opposition to the targeting of either Iran’s nuclear research facilities or its oil installations.
That leaves military bases, most likely those belonging to Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) and its affiliated Basij militia as these two institutions are seen as the backbone of the Islamic Republic, projecting its military reach abroad and suppressing popular protest at home."
(Love how the BBC
just acts like
"Well the US doesnt want Israel
to hit these targets so they wont."
Nothing could be farther from the truth.
We wouldnt have:
"intelligence analysed on 15-16 October
by the
US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency."
THAT PROMENANTLY FEATURED:
"...two Air Launched Ballistic Missile (ABLM) systems:
Golden Horizon and Rocks."
"Rocks is a long-range missile system made by the Israeli company Rafael and designed to hit a variety of targets both above and below ground. Golden Horizon is thought to refer to the Blue Sparrow missile system with a range of around 2,000km (1,240 miles) if the Israelis weren't getting ready to go after Iran's nuclear program.
The Israelis showed the Iranians in April
they can take out their radars so that they wont see them coming.
(Using the Blue Sparrow missile)
And they just used their own Bunker Busters
in taking out Hezbollah's HQ in Beirut.
You know, the kind we wouldn't sell them
so they just developed their own.
HOW?
CAN YOU NOT SEE
WHATS COMING?
REGARDLESS
OF WHAT THE US WANTS?)
Back to the article:
"Were they leaked on purpose?
Possibly yes, by someone who wanted to derail Israel’s plans."
(By Someone?
Or some entity?
that has proven
consistently over time
they have the capability
to do so?
Who is Russia getting
cheap drones/missiles from again?
Russia Sharing Nuclear Secrets With Iran
So what makes more sense?
Someone?
Or some entity?
that has proven consistently
over time
that it has this capability?
Hum?
Which argument would
you wanna present in court?
"Iran has a large and sophisticated cyber-warfare capability so the possibility of a hostile hack is also being investigated."
(BBC?
Come on man.
Russia or China seems much more probable then Iran
although they all want to help each other and China has used hacked administrator accounts on our networks as well.)
Given recent history,
the ongoing Solarwinds cyberwarfare campaign
and its ability to get cheap missiles and drones
in exchange for its nuclear technology?
Most arrows would seem to point toward:
RUSSIA.
Simply put?
They have the best
cyber-warfare capabilities
in the world right now
AND?
New York Times?
LA Times?
The Atlantic?
BBC?
Guardian?
Fox
CNN
The Atlantic
The New Republic
etc., etc., etc...
The fact that nobody else is even thinking in this direction? Except the idiot biker hick from the sticks?
Ought to be very concerning to you.
And it ought to tell you
just who is guiding him.
The Holy Spirit.
Cause he is not capable
of any of this on his own
and he knows it.
You should too.
People?
Our adversaries own our networks and know what we are going to do (or what is coming from our allies in this instance) in advance.
IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE.
Everybody that just wanted to get back to "normal" after Covid?
WELCOME TO IT.
There aint but one way
out of this mess:
Promise.
No comments:
Post a Comment