Detection of an Anti-Solar Tail for 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 8/30/25
First of all?
Why you think there making a point of this now?
Think:
Thursday, August 28, 2025
Broadening my Horizons lol...(3I/ATLAS)
and
Thursday, August 28, 2025
Didnt have something
to do with that?
Of course they did.
"The H2O mass loss rate is only 5% of the CO2 output,
unlike expectations from a water-rich comet."
"It therefore comes as no surprise that the plume of gas around 3I/ATLAS is
shaped by the solar wind
and the solar radiation pressure
to a teardrop configuration."
(So?
This thing is estimated to be older than our solar system based on the trajectory where it came from. Estimates vary, but lets go low ball and say its Four Billion years old.
And? It's speed is due to having obtained gravitational assist
from Stars and Nebula over that time frame.
Well to get the gravitational assist?
An object would have to get somewhat close in astronomical terms to be accelerated by it, as you get closer to stars (Our sun)
the radiation would increase.
So if this thing is gonna laugh "mini-probes"?
Thats sure gonna be some irradiated aliens let me tell ya.
They survived billions of years of intense solar radiation.
Sweet.
How exactly?
"Well they had nuclear powered
lead encased cryogenic chambers...etc etc etc..."
Please.
From what?
The same 4 billion year old
nuclear reactor that doesnt need its fuel repluntished?
Some cryogenic chamber as well
Still works after 4 billion years.
Its just so ridiculous.)
"As of now, it is unclear whether the scattering of
sunlight in the glow
and tail around
3I/ATLAS
is from dust particles or icy fragments
made of CO2, CO and H2O
that broke off the surface of the nucleus."
(Notice Avi here omits
what he had said earlier:
"We've never seen such a thing.
A comet doesn't have
glow in front of it."
Avi Loeb on CNN This Morning
Thursday 08/07/25 per Raw Story)
"Early data from NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), taken on May 7 to June 2, 2025 (accessible here), suggests that 3I/ATLAS may have been active with a surrounding glow of scattered sunlight already at a much larger heliocentric distance of 6 times the Earth-Sun separation. At that distance, the warming of water ice by sunlight is insufficient to trigger cometary activity."
(So Then?
It was doing this
before it was confirmed:
NASA confirms that mysterious object shooting through the solar system
is an 'interstellar visitor' — and it has a new name
07/03/25
"News of the extrasolar entity, initially dubbed A11pl3Z, broke on Tuesday (July 1), when NASA and the International Astronomical Union (IAU) both listed it as a confirmed object."
"On Wednesday (July 2), NASA released a statement confirming that A11pl3Z is indeed an interstellar object and will not remain in the solar system for long. The researchers also shared the object's new official name, 3I/ATLAS, and revealed that it is most likely a comet, upending previous assumptions that it was an asteroid."
AND:
"At that distance,
the warming of water ice
by sunlight
is insufficient
to trigger cometary activity."
So if it was doing that?
Before it was close enough?
And:
"The H2O mass loss rate
is only 5% of the CO2 output,
unlike expectations
from a water-rich comet."
Then what do you really think
is responsible for:
"the scattering of sunlight
in the glow
(Nothing goes forward
on something going 130,000 mph)
and tail around 3I/ATLAS is from:
dust particles
or
icy fragments
made of CO2, CO and H2O
that broke off
the surface of the nucleus."
"As of now, it is unclear"
They running out of ways to hide their Bull Shit.
The whole point of Avis piece seems to be:
"HEY LOOK!
IT HAS A TAIL NOW!"
First of all?
(See:
Why you think there making a point of this now?
Think:
Thursday, August 28, 2025
Broadening my Horizons lol...(3I/ATLAS)
and
Thursday, August 28, 2025
Didnt have something
to do with that?
Of course they did.)
And remember:
"On Wednesday (July 2),
NASA released a statement...
shared the object's new official name, 3I/ATLAS,
and revealed that it is most likely a comet,
upending previous assumptions
that it was an asteroid."
I keep telling you
it is an old dried out asteroid
30 miles across
doing a near pass of Mars.
And we have seen this before
and it aint good
and its got some
people in power
all shook up.
"By comparing Hebrew historical, Chinese astronomical, and Latin ecclesiastical material,
we have established
that it was the planet Mars which caused
a series of catastrophes
in the eighth
and seventh centuries
before this era."
No comments:
Post a Comment