from the thick disk of the Milky Way
08/27/25
"The new data brought unexpected results
challenging scientists’ previous ideas
about the origin of this alien."
(Remember that)
"Unexpectedly low water content"
"Spectral analysis revealed the presence of a symmetrical cloud of carbon dioxide (CO2) around the object. The rate of mass loss is estimated at approximately 70 kg/sec. However, another fact is much more important: no water in a gaseous state was found. This contradicts earlier hypotheses, according to which 3I/ATLAS was considered a water-rich comet."
"Scientists note that the absence of a bright coma of water gas is puzzling, since the object was not far from the so-called “water ice line,” where temperatures were low enough to cause CO₂ condensation, but not water.
Probably,
the comet could have been exposed to intense high doses of radiation, which led to the evaporation of water relative to CO₂,
or
it could have preserved internal structures
hat prevented heat penetration, thereby limiting water sublimation. "
So there are your two different options
Either A or B.
Thats it.
When the truth is,
it could have been an asteroid
all along.
Which would explain
the no water ice as well:
that mysterious object shooting
07/03/25
"News of the extrasolar entity, initially dubbed A11pl3Z, broke on Tuesday (July 1), when NASA and the International Astronomical Union (IAU) both listed it as a confirmed object."
"On Wednesday (July 2), NASA released a statement confirming that A11pl3Z is indeed an interstellar object and will not remain in the solar system for long. The researchers also shared the object's new official name, 3I/ATLAS, and revealed that it is most likely a comet, upending previous assumptions that it was an asteroid."
See,
in that scenario
"challenging scientists’
previous ideas"
isnt a a problem.
Because they previously thought it was an asteroid
but for some strange reason
nobody wants you to know
about that option.
Well here is maybe why:
Thursday, August 28, 2025
"From the 34:36 mark on
as he talks about Mars.
"35:35 and what's interesting about this model is that it would account for catastrophic events on a number of 35:42 occasions in fact seven of them in history apparently"
"Dr. Missler doesn't explicitly say that this book is where he got that information, but later he mentions that we are "deeply indebted" to its author Immanuel Velikovsky."
They knew it was an asteroid
No comments:
Post a Comment