Avi Loeb Medium 07/31/25
"Communicating my research to the public is an important responsibility. However, I find less value in talking about scientific work than doing it."
(So he is setting himself apart from
a lot of social media/internet personalities
in his field already.)
"Before the internet was invented and when written news was printed on paper, it was often said that “Today’s newspaper is tomorrow’s fish and chip paper.” People forget the news of yesterday, but the physical reality maintains its nature.
Therefore,
any new scientific knowledge
about that physical reality
is far more precious
than the chitchat in social media
or news outlets about it.
(AMEN!)
"The nature of 3I/ATLAS will not be revealed by listening to opinions of commentators but rather by analyzing data collected by state-of-the-art telescopes."
(Avi? A lot of people in your field just don't care. They want the likes/views/follows and will do anything to secure our "information space" and get our attention on themselves, rather than what is the nature of whatever it is they happen to be talking/posting about.)
"We can learn more by observing the interstellar show of 3I/ATLAS on the sky during the coming months with our best telescopes from the radio band to X-rays."
(Looking forward to it.
BTW?
Where are the spectroscopic results
of the JWST?
Just wondering.)
"An encounter with an artifact on the interstellar risk scale of 10 would be a tsunami of astronomical proportions. Trading options on the stock market volatility would not make much sense because money will lose its value in the aftermath of the encounter."
(Well now theres a sure way to accelerate "666",
the new economic system:
Dont ya think?
What if you wake up one day
and all of the worlds currency's
just happened to have lost
all of their value?
This guy is getting everything right.
Nothing about this thing is an accident,
it will do exactly whatever it is
that it is supposed to do.
He just gets the designer(s) wrong.
Aliens cant exist.
Life here is not an accident etc.)
Keeping Our Eyes on the Ball of 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 21 hours ago.
"We must keep our eyes on the ball rather than on the number of “likes” we get on social media for opinions about the nature of this interstellar object.
(Avi my brother?
You are a dinosaur.
That is not how the practitioners
of the extremists cult
of scientism work these days.)
"As 3I/ATLAS gets closer to the Sun, it will be warmed by absorbing sunlight. If it is indeed a comet similar to 2I/Borisov, then its outgassing will result in an extended coma of dust and gas."
(Im waiting, checking news about this object every few hours, so where is all that? Remember now when NASA confirmed this object as having originated outside our solar system? And said "it most likely is a comet" they "upturned previously held assumptions" that it was an asteroid, to date, no information about who those individuals were who held those assumptions, or how they were able to reach their conclusions. Who ever they were? It is my believe (until proven wrong, if that happens) they had it right from the start and this object will not outgas because it is an asteroid not a comet and certain individuals have known so all along.)
"Claiming that 3I/ATLAS is definitely a comet with water ice is premature. A recent paper used the infrared spectrum of 3I/ATLAS to suggest spectral features associated with water ice. However, a careful inspection of the observed noisy spectrum reveals an upturn at the wavelength for which the water model predicts a downturn, and vice versa. A proper statistical analysis is needed to demonstrate that the water model does better than the spectrum of L-type asteroids. These asteroids have a hard surface and no coma and the upper envelope of their possible spectra fits the observed data perfectly. The paper does not provide such an analysis, yet its title announces “Water Ice in the Coma”.
(I picked that assumption apart here:
Friday, July 25, 2025
Just gonna beat it to death (3I/ATLAS)
Interstellar invader Comet 3I/ATLAS
is packed with water ice that could be older than Earth
Space.com 7/23/25
Just by deductive reasoning alone
based on the information contained
in the article itself,
without having ever read the paper.
AVI? Brother,
this is what is better known as
a disinformation campaign.
Thats what we are witnessing.
For all we know?
AI could have authored that particular paper.
Such are the days we are living in.)
"Many commentators who criticize alternative interpretations of 3I/ATLAS did not write a single scientific paper over the past decade. They claim to protect science, but who are they protecting it from?"
(They are trying to protect the orthodoxy
of the extremists cult of scientism.)
"Over the past three weeks, I wrote four scientific papers on 3I/ATLAS (accessible here, here, here, and here). By all measures, those who know the answers in advance of conclusive data are anti-science. Their loud voices on social media disrupt agnostic scientific discourse which must be based on rigorous analysis of data and not be amplified by the megaphone of social media."
(I 100% agree
but its just not how things work anymore.
Like I said, Avi?
You are a dinosaur my brother.)
Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS: What We Know Now
Sky and Telescope 07/28/25
"As Comet 3I/ATLAS continues on its way, it will pass relatively close to Jupiter (0.36 au), Mars (1.5 au), and Venus (0.7 au), but its closest approach to Earth later this year is farther away, at 1.8 au. It’ll therefore be relatively faint in our skies come December."
("Mars (1.5 AU)"
??????????
WTF?
Hardly.
Reference:
Is the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Alien Technology?
Avi Loeb Medium 07/16/25
4. For its orbital parameters, 3I/ATLAS is synchronized to approach unusually close to Venus (0.65au where 1au is the Earth-Sun separation), Mars (0.19au) and Jupiter (0.36au), with a cumulative probability of 0.005% relative to orbits with the same orbital parameters but a random arrival time.
So.
Avi:
"The Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science at Harvard University, where since 2007 he has been Director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Center for Astrophysics.[1][2][3][4][5][6] He chaired the Department of Astronomy from 2011 to 2020, and founded the Black Hole Initiative in 2016.
Loeb is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American Physical Society, and the International Academy of Astronautics. In 2015, he was appointed as the science theory director for the Breakthrough Initiatives of the Breakthrough Prize Foundation."
Or the Sky and telescope website,
which bills itself as:
"The essential Guide to Astronomy"
Which one you gonna go with?
Avi's .19 AU?
of their 1.5 AU?
Its only a difference of
121,770,000 miles or so.
Luke 16:10
“Whoever can be trusted with very little
can also be trusted with much,
and whoever is dishonest with very little
will also be dishonest with much."
And?
Consider this,
since we are not seeing
JWST spectroscopic data
as of yet?
Was the "Mars (1.5 au)"
as stated by Sky and telescope
just a simple mistake?
Or was it intentional?
Your heart and soul already know the answer
to that question given everything else
that has been going on with this object.
Reference the article about
water ice above
if you need to.
And still no talk about:
Orbital Perturbations,
The theory of Mars moons
having been captured
by a near miss asteroid fragmenting,
Or the possible
effects of gravitational assist.
Combine all of that with:
it's currently not outgassing,
no JWST spectroscopic data as of yet
(For some unexplained reason)
and "previous assumptions"
about it being an asteroid
having been "upturned"
within 24 hours of NASA confirming
it as an interstellar visitor
I just dont see
where it is very difficult
to piece this puzzle all together.
Love ya everybody.
Godspeed.
Journey well.
No comments:
Post a Comment