The First Webb Telescope Observations of 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 08/26/25
"The stunning Webb data from
a 6.5-meter infrared telescope
with unprecedented spectral sensitivity
was worth the wait."
"In short, the Webb data confirms the existence of a carbon dioxide (CO2) gas plume around 3I/ATLAS with significantly lower levels of water (H2O) and carbon monoxide (CO), as reported a few days earlier by the SPHEREx space observatory team (in a paper accessible here)."
(It just keeps getting worse for these guys.
Bigger than it should be.
Less H20 and Co than they said just a few days ago.
Where's Brian Cox?
Neil DeGrasse Tyson?
Why aren't the popular media personalities of the societal priesthood of our time and culture commenting on any of this?)
"3I/ATLAS does not feature a cometary tail that extends beyond the width of its coma, as was already evident from the higher resolution image taken by the Hubble Space Telescope (reported here). That this tail is not seen suggests that 3I/ATLAS does not shed a lot of dust particles with a size comparable to the wavelength of sunlight, ~0.5 micrometer, and that the reflected sunlight originates from the surface of 3I/ATLAS. This implies a diameter of up to 46 kilometers (28.58 miles) for an albedo of 5% according to the SPHEREx data."
"The spectral images at wavelengths in the range of 0.6–5.3 micrometers reveal a prominent carbon dioxide (CO2) dominated coma, with
enhanced outgassing
in the direction of the Sun,
as well as the presence of much less water vapor (H2O), carbon monoxide (CO), water ice and dust. The derived ratio of CO2 to H2O output by number of molecules is 8, among the highest ever observed. The data implies an intrinsically CO2-rich nucleus. The low abundance of H2O vapor is surprising at the object’s distance from the Sun."
(There ought to be more
given how close it is getting to the sun.
Flat out said
it wasnt going to outgas
like they were trying to sell us
on it doing.
Now how did I know that?
And I cant even operate
either of our telescopes?)
"The spectrum of 3I/ATLAS shows a prominent CO2 gas emission feature along with WEAK H2O and CO emission features and a prominent water ice absorption feature."
"The H2O mass loss rate is only 5% of the CO2 output. This is 16 times more extreme than expected for a typical comet at the same distance from the Sun."
(Where's all the comet experts?
Crickets...)
"If the optically-thin dust plume makes a small contribution to the total reddened spectrum, the flux detected by SPHEREx at a wavelength of 1 micrometer from 3I/ATLAS suggests a nucleus with a diameter of 46 kilometers (as reported here). This implies that the mass of the nucleus of 3I/ATLAS is a million times larger than that of the previous interstellar comet 2I/Borisov. This huge gap in mass is surprising since we should have discovered numerous objects of the size of 2I/Borisov before discovering a 46-kilometer interstellar object. Moreover, as I noted in my first paper on 3I/ATLAS (accessible here), the amount of rocky material per unit volume in interstellar space is smaller by a factor of ten thousand than the value needed to deliver into the inner Solar system one giant rock of this size over the decade-long survey conducted by the ATLAS telescope."
(It shouldn't even exist.
And they wonder?
Why they cant figure it out?)
"The Webb image at a wavelength of 1.2 micrometer shows no cometary tail behind 3I/ATLAS."
(So why then?
Were we being told
That was a tail?)
"...a relatively thin outer layer is sufficient to maintain the observed cloud of CO2 gas around 3I/ATLAS. What lies under this outer skin remains unknown."
"The high CO2 to H2O ratio is puzzling. There is only one previous comet with a similarly extreme CO2 to H2O ratio, named C/2016 R2, but its image shows a clear cometary tail that does not look anything like the plume around 3I/ATLAS."
(Friday, August 8, 2025
"A way to resolve the discrepancy between the mass reservoir of rocks in interstellar space and the unexpected discovery of a large object, is that 3I/ATLAS was not drawn from a population of rocks on random trajectories but instead — its trajectory was designed to target the inner Solar system.
Told ya it wasnt a comet etc 3I/ATLAS, JWST Data etc...
Haggai 2:6-7
6 For thus saith the Lord of hosts;
Yet once,
it is a little while,
and I will shake the heavens,
and the earth,
and the sea,
and the dry land;
7 And I will shake all nations,
(Happening, look at our world)
and the desire of all nations shall come:
(Christ)
and I will fill this house with glory,
saith the Lord of hosts.
To think something this big,
this fast, and this unusual
coming on this trajectory?
To the inner solar system
Aint gonna
"shake some things up"?
As in:
As in
the one word nobody is saying?
In any article ever?
You gotta be on some kinda crack.
To think that aint gonna happen.
And the fact
that nobody is saying anything about
PERTURBATION
and were absolutely adamant
about this object being
"a rather ordinary comet"
as one astronomer put it,
JUST TELLS US SO OBVIOUSLY
WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON.)
"To put 3I/ATLAS in perspective,
a human produces about 1 kilogram of CO2 per day.
The mass loss rate from 3I/ATLAS of 129 kilogram per second
amounts to the CO2 output of about 10 million people."
"In the Uber drive towards the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, I was glad to see a new preprint this morning advocating the search for technological signatures from interstellar objects (accessible here)."
Life requires an intelligence behind it.
(Genetic code)
If there are other ancient civilizations
in the cosmos
(0 evidence of any)
Then what was the intelligence
behind their creation?
Because the 26 physical constants of the universe
werent decided upon my multiple deity's
or by committee(s).
One creator of the universe.
One creator
and owner
of the life force.
I would say
I rest my case but:
No comments:
Post a Comment