said it wasnt a comet
on July 4th.
Aint to may others that did.
I cant figure out how to use a telescope
to save my life lol.
Im serious.
We got 2 lol.
So far?
No luck at all
figuring either them out lol.
Truth.
Avi Loeb Medium
08/24/25
And a lil warning some of it gets a lil technical.
Important points will be
highlighted, bold, Italics, red text all caps etc...
The more sever the formattimg?
The more important the point.)
?The team of NASA’s SPHEREx space observatory just reported tantalizing new data on the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS (accessible here). The observations were made between August 8–12, 2025 when 3I/ATLAS was at a distance from the Sun of 3.2 times the Earth-Sun separation (AU) and a distance from Earth of 2.6 AU."
The new observations reveal a cloud of carbon dioxide (CO2) around 3I/ATLAS corresponding to a mass loss rate of about 70 kilograms per second.
No water (H2O) cloud was detected
with an upper limit of
4.5 kilograms per second
on the water mass loss rate.
(Translation?
They know where to look for it.
And they look
where they have found it
consistently in the past.)
"This is an order of magnitude below the previous claims of water detection with a mass loss rate of order 40 kilograms per second at a larger distance from the Sun of 3.5 AU. These early claims from two research teams were unsubstantiated by the reported data, as I argued in a previous essay (accessible here).
(Its been pointed out numerous times that there has been a steady stream of deliberate falsehoods, misrepresentations and out right lies regarding this object, and that was by design.)
The excellent SPHEREx report notes that “The lack of a bright water gas coma is puzzling as 3I/ATLAS was not too far outside the Solar system’s “water ice line” at 2.5 AU during the observations.”
"Although no water (H2O) in gas form was identified, some absorption features in the reflected spectrum from the surface of 3I/ATLAS were consistent with a mix of water and carbon dioxide ices combined with organics, as often found on the surfaces of Kuiper belt objects in the Solar system which are similarly exposed to interstellar cosmic-rays. Could it be that 3I/ATLAS is not a water-rich comet as envisioned by comet experts when it was discovered?"
(Always remember:
Before 3I/ATLAS was confirmed by NASA
to be an interstellar visitor?
Somehow or another, somebody or peoples somewhere
somehow came to the conclusion it was an asteroid.
07/03/25
"News of the extrasolar entity, initially dubbed A11pl3Z, broke on Tuesday (July 1), when NASA and the International Astronomical Union (IAU) both listed it as a confirmed object."
"On Wednesday (July 2), NASA released a statement confirming that A11pl3Z is indeed an interstellar object and will not remain in the solar system for long. The researchers also shared the object's new official name, 3I/ATLAS, and revealed that it is most likely a comet, upending previous assumptions that it was an asteroid."
So if it was previously
presumed to be it was an asteriod?
Why wouldnt it
"Could it be that 3I/ATLAS is not a water-rich comet as envisioned by comet experts when it was discovered?"
More like:
"Could it be?
They were lying to you deliberately?
Cause they know what this thing is gonna do?
Aint no way something this big
going this fast
goes this close to Mars
and doesn't make some kind of disturbance.
Still not one mention
of perturbations
in any article
and honey reads hers too.)
"The SPHEREx images show 3I/ATLAS as a point source. No dust coma was resolved, implying that the glow of scattered sunlight around the object in its Hubble Space Telescope image is compact and amounts to a small amount of dust."
"SPHEREx images were taken at specific wavelengths near the characteristic emission lines of water-H2O (3.0 micrometers), carbon dioxide-CO2 (4.26 micrometers) and carbon monoxide-CO (4.7 micrometers). No coma was detected in water or carbon monoxide."
"Most interestingly, the flux detected at a wavelength of 1 micrometer from 3I/ATLAS suggests a large nucleus with a diameter of 46 kilometers."
(Thats 25 miles across.
Everest is 5.5 miles tall.
Its almost as big as five Everest.
Revelation 8:8
8And the second Angel blew the trumpet,
(Notice it doesn't say which # trumpet
just that the second angel blew it.)
and as it were a great mountain,
burning with fire,
was cast into the sea,
and the third part of the sea became blood.)
"If this represents a solid body,
then the mass of 3I/ATLAS
must be a million times bigger
than the previous interstellar comet 2I/Borisov."
"This makes little sense..."
(Thx for the opening.
The only thing making any sense in our world today? Is biblical Prophecy coming true.
So when people say:
"This doesn't make any sense."
I'm like:
"Makes perfect sense to me Jack.")
"since we should have found of order a million objects
of the size of 2I/Borisov before discovering a 46-kilometer interstellar object."
(It shouldnt be as big as it is.)
"Moreover, as I noted in my first paper on 3I/ATLAS (accessible here), the amount of rocky material per unit volume in interstellar space is too small by a factor of ten thousand than the value needed to deliver into the inner Solar system one giant rock of this size over the ATLAS decade-long survey."
(It shouldnt be here.
I love this:
"hey lets be surprised at how big
the thing thats not supposed
to even be here is"
line of thought.
I laugh everytime.)
Alternatively, 3I/ATLAS may have targeted the inner solar system by technological (Supernatural) design. This possibility is consistent with the alignment of its trajectory with the orbital plane of the planets around the Sun, a coincidence of a part in 500 for a random orientation — as observed for 2I/Borisov.
(So far I got:
The thing that isn't even supposed to be here
is bigger than it should be
and it's taking a path
through the inner solar system it shouldn't.
And you wanna rule out the almighty?
And you cant explain
the source of a 3.2 billion character code
that all life has had in it?
Nor can you explain
the mechanism by which it got
embedded?
Gotcha.
Righton.
Makes perfect sense.
Not.
Luke 21:15
For I will give you a mouth,
and wisdom
where against all your adversaries
shall not be able to speak
nor resist.
Been on display pretty regularly.)
"The lack of a cometary tail in the Hubble Space Telescope image is evidence that there is not much dust around 3I/ATLAS with particle size on the scale of the wavelength of sunlight (0.5 micrometers). In that case, the observed reddening in the spectrum of reflected sunlight should originate from the surface of the object, implying that the object is large and dominates the reflected sunlight rather than the dust cloud around it.
(So far I got:
The thing that isn't even supposed to be here
is bigger than it should be
and it's taking a path
through the inner solar system it shouldn't.
And it doesnt have pieces/parts
(cometary tail)
that we think it should.
And numerous stories
and "scientist"
even tried to sell this as a "tail."
And then even when doing that?
A lot of times they wouldn't point out
that it was facing sunward.
(Not all
But a lot of em wouldn't.)
"What lies under this outer layer is still unknown. We are all waiting for the release of the first data from the Webb Space Telescope, when it observed 3I/ATLAS on August 6, 2025."
(Now I know were
"making some noise"
because :
"the first data from the Webb Space Telescope,
when it observed 3I/ATLAS on August 6, 2025."
wouldn't have even been included here
if people were being made aware
that none has been released yet.
So good job team!
Way to go everybody!
Keep spreading the word!)
"Here’s hoping that as the Sun turns on the heat on 3I/ATLAS in the coming months, it will reveal its true nature."
It already has
it is simply outside
of the laws of nature
as we understand them:
"The thing that isn't even supposed to be here
is bigger than it should be
and it's taking a path
through the inner solar system it shouldn't.
And it doesnt have pieces/parts
(cometary tail)
that we think it should."
Therefore it is:
"Supernatural"
and it will most assuredly
continue to:
"reveal its true nature."
No comments:
Post a Comment