Discoverers of DNA’s structure attack Christianity
September 2003
Lets go see how many dogmatic
positions in the cult of scientism
have "evolved"
(pun intended) in 23 years.
I think you can guess the answer.
Fundamentalist will never change their positions
in spite of overwhelming evidence.
Never.
"DNA: really evidence for design
But what was it that Watson and Crick discovered that supposedly disproved the idea of an intelligent Creator God? The DNA molecule has often been described as the most efficient information storage system in the entire universe. The immensity of complex, coded and precisely sequenced information written on the DNA is absolutely staggering. The evidence speaks of intelligent, information-bearing design. Complex DNA coding would have been necessary for even the hypothetical first ‘so-called’ simple cell(s). Indeed, Creation magazine also used the 50th anniversary of the double helix’s discovery to publish a detailed article on the wonders of DNA.2"
"Crick reasoned that life could not have evolved from non-living chemicals under any conceivable earth conditions. But the idea of a creator was unacceptable, since it would go against his atheistic faith.
("Fundamentalist will never change their positions
in spite of overwhelming evidence.
Never.")
"He affirmed this when he said, ‘People like myself get along perfectly well with no religious views.’1"
(That itself, is a religious view, so
"Watchatalkin bout Willis?")
"Crick’s atheistic faith leads to absurd pseudoscience"
(100% Truth)
"Unfortunately, Crick was not being entirely forthright in this regard. He does hold a religious view. Atheism is a religion in the sense of answering the ‘big questions’, such as ‘Where did we come from?’ and ‘What is our destiny?’, and is foundationally a belief system, since the non-existence of God could hardly be said to have been proven! So he must explain the origin of DNA from his religious perspective, and, subsequently, the origin of life on earth.'
(It aint just him and the DNA)
"To overcome the huge hurdles of evolution of life from non-living chemicals on earth, Crick proposed, in a book called Life Itself, that some form of primordial life was shipped to the earth billions of years ago in spaceships—by supposedly ‘more evolved’ (therefore advanced) alien beings."
(This is their religion.
This is their faith based
satanic belief system.
There is absolutely 0 evidence for it.
None.
And not only cant be proven?
It is in fact
a 100% impossibility
Anywhere in our Universe.
This was 22 years ago.
And in all that time,
with all the evidence we have,
about information, and complexity etc
knowing all us this for this long
and they still have the same positions.
"Fundamentalist
will never change
their positions
in spite of
overwhelming evidence.
Never."
They want
complex
structured information
somehow
randomly putting itself together.
Are they really that stupid?
To understand
it just can not be done?
I don't think so because they are smart enough
to never even talk about the info.
They always talk about the parts randomly assembling.
They know they are just making shit up cause they dont like what they see, and its been this way since the discovery of cosmic background radiation in the 60's and DNA in the 50's.
Tells you 100% wats up.
Really does.)
"Although he tried to solve the problem of the source of intelligence for the creation of DNA without God, Crick only succeeded in pushing the problem into outer space
(Its that easily discredited
and this is still a belief system?
From the sixties?
KNUCKLEDRAGGERS.
"where, of course, it cannot be tested. After all, if such alleged aliens, in turn, were not created by a greater intelligence than themselves, then how did they evolve from non-living chemicals in the first place?"
(DUH.
These people are just not this stupid.
Stubborn yes.
Stupid no.)
"Moreover, how could these benevolent extraterrestrials presume to know what the outcome of evolution would be, with its undirected processes of time and chance? Another insurmountable problem for Crick is that evolution is supposed to have been occurring for the last 3.5 billion years. How could any intelligent race plan for, and expect to be around to see the results, some billions of years later?"
(Just on and on and on...)
"Crick later acknowledged the mounting problems and futility of his ideas when he was reported as saying, ‘Every time I write a paper on the origin of life, I swear I will never write another one, because there is too much speculation running after too few facts … .’
(Well maybe that should tell you something then.
Ya think?
Thats why the code is in there.
He is saying to us:
"I am real.
I am alive.
I did this just
so you would see it
and know so.)
"After all of these speculations, have Crick or Watson reconciled the evidence of intelligent design with the Creator God of the Bible? Absolutely not! Watson still maintains that religious explanations are ‘myths from the past.’
(Here is your myth from the past:
in a book called Life Itself, that some form of primordial life was shipped to the earth billions of years ago in spaceships—by supposedly ‘more evolved’ (therefore advanced) alien beings."
(That's just toast as a belief system.
Its invalidated by the evidence.)
"Life’s enormous complexity in miniature is a serious objection to atheistic evolutionary theory. Evolutionists cannot account for the origin of the first cell(s),"
(Still cant)
"and there are further problems with the increasing complexity and new information that is required to produce higher, or more ‘evolved’, life-forms.'
"Even the non-Christian molecular biologist, Michael Denton, says, in his best-selling book Evolution a Theory in Crisis,
(This is 22 years ago.
What yall doing
holding on to something that outdated?
Knuckledraggers...
Better wake up homies.)
‘Nothing illustrates clearly just how intractable a problem the origin of life has become than the fact that world authorities can seriously toy with the idea of panspermia.’
"Everywhere we look, life possesses the hallmark of the design and purposes of its creator. Unfortunately for some, they are so blinded by their worldview
(2 Corinthians 4:4
The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.)
that they are incapable, or unwilling, to consider the most obvious and sensible explanation.
Burger King is open.
Tell em to go have it their way then.
Oh yeah and 0 dogmatic
changes in the last 22 years.
IT"S JUST
NONSENSE.
No comments:
Post a Comment