It really is.
I already read Avi's post yesterday afternoon.
Does 3I/ATLAS Generate Its Own Light?
Medium 08/18/25. I just laughed.
7 Billion year old nuclear reactors?
Yeah...right....gotcha.
I told ya before this ever started
they were gonna just be making up shit
about it.
Cause it just don't fit
anything they have ever seen.
I know this much.
On Air craft carriers
and submarines?
Eventually?
You have to replace the reactor.
They aren't made to last 7 Billion years.
And aliens cant exist
so like I said
the whole thing is getting stupider by the minute.
I wonder why?
Oh,
and still no spectroscopic data from JWST.
Hum...interesting.
Mysterious Object Hurtling Toward Us From Beyond Solar System
Appears to Be Emitting Its Own Light, Scientists Find
Futurism 08/18/25
"One possibility, he suggests:
it's a "spacecraft powered by nuclear energy."
(Guy don't know that doesn't last 7 billion years?
He knows.
They are just making up stuff cause it doesn't fit
with how they think things have to be.)
"Loeb has continued to entertain the idea that it may have been sent to us by an intelligent species (Insert: Designer) from outside of the solar system (The Universe) — and he's far from backing down."
"Loeb pointed to observations by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, which showed a "glow of light, likely from a coma, ahead of the motion of 3I/ATLAS towards the Sun."
(Dust doesnt go forward coming off of something going 130,000+ MPH,
so there is a problem here.
And still no signs of gases, water etc,
no matter what Universetoday tries to say:
Where are the Interstellar Objects 1I/'Oumuamua, 2I/Borisov,
08/18/25
"This latest object also appears to be a comet based on recent observations that showed it was actively releasing water vapor as it neared the Sun."
And that then links to here:
3I/ATLAS Is Very Actively Releasing Water
universetoday 08/12/25
Which was discredited here:
No, There’s No Clear Evidence for Water Around 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 08/08/25
When you start to put it all together you gotta ask yourself:
Why is universe today doubling down on something
that was discredited
(3I/ATLAS Is Very Actively Releasing Water
universetoday 08/12/250
before they ever said it?
No, There’s No Clear Evidence for Water Around 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 08/08/25.
So that rag
(website)
has just lost all credibility on this topic.
But I digress,
back to 7 billion year old nuclear reactors.)
"However, there's "no evidence for a bright cometary tail in the opposite direction," he wrote,
(Dear universe today:
If:
3I/ATLAS Is Very Actively Releasing Water.
Then it would have a tail dipshits.)
"with scientists suggesting it was evidence
that dust was evaporating
from the object's Sun-facing side."
(They are just making stuff up.
Dust does not go forward
coming off of anything
going 130,000+ mph.
I dont care who says it.
They got problems with this object
and they are really just now getting started.
I just cant emphasize it enough
the lack of spectroscopic data from JWST
tells you something just isn't right
with this object and people know it.
Otherwise?
We would have had that data by now.
12 more days until 3I/ATLAS
starts moving out of position.
They can still look at it, for a while
but not with as good a view.
SO WHAT IS/WAS THE HOLD UP?)
"The observations led Loeb and his colleagues to an intriguing, albeit far-fetched possibility: is the mysterious space object generating "its own light?"
"After deliberations with his colleague and Harvard astrophysicist Eric Keto, Loeb suggested that the "simplest interpretation" of 3I/ATLAS' observed "steep brightness profile" is that its nucleus "produces most of the light."
(Okay?
But how then?)
"The Harvard astronomer suggested two possibilities: either 3I/ATLAS is naturally emitting radiation because its a "rare fragment from the core of a nearby supernova that is rich in radioactive material" — or it's a "spacecraft powered by nuclear energy, and the dust emitted from its frontal surface might be from dirt that accumulated on its surface during its interstellar travel."
"Loeb deemed the former explanation "highly unlikely," and the latter as requiring "better evidence to be viable."
(So the "rare fragment from the core of a nearby supernova that is rich in radioactive material" is, "highly unlikely," and "a spacecraft powered by nuclear energy" would require 7 billion year old nuclear reactors. It's a pretty safe bet to go ahead and rule both of those options out. Gods got ya comin and goin. Period, end of story.)
"Loeb previously argued that the object's unusual trajectory — which includes suspiciously close flybys of both Earth and Jupiter — and its lack of a visible tail both undermine the theory that it's a comet."
(Completely, 100% incorrect.
It's not a close fly by of earth.
Its inner solar system path takes it by
Venus, Mars and Jupiter
Is the Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Alien Technology?
07/16/25
4. For its orbital parameters, 3I/ATLAS is synchronized to approach unusually close to Venus (0.65au where 1au is the Earth-Sun separation), Mars (0.19au) and Jupiter (0.36au), with a cumulative probability of 0.005% relative to orbits with the same orbital parameters but a random arrival time.0
"Intriguingly, 3I/ATLAS will come within spitting distance — at least in astronomical terms — of Mars this fall, giving us a tantalizing opportunity to have a first-hand look. Loeb suggested using NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter to point its scientific instruments at the rare visitor."
(Oh its gonna be intriguing alright.
Remember now the "mini-probes" (Fragments)
released from the "mothership" (Asteroid)
will arrive at earth
a few months after 3I/ATLAS perihelion
Oct 29th.)
"Best of all, scientists at the space agency appear to be game."
"This morning, I encouraged the HiRISE team to use their camera during the first week of October 2025 in order to gather new data on 3I/ATLAS," Loeb wrote. "They responded favorably."
I think its safe to say
we are just gonna continue to see
more and more
nonsense, disinformation
and outright lies about this object
and that there is
a very deliberate reason for that.
No comments:
Post a Comment