One more thing

 

then Im done with it.

The NPR article 

Are there signs of life on alien planet K2-18b, or is it just a lot of hot air?

implies:

("When researchers first used the James Webb Space Telescope to study this planet a couple of years ago, they reported detecting methane and carbon dioxide.

(Why not just say: 

"Madhusudhan’s team reported in 2023 

that there were signs of methane"?

‘Revolutionary moment’: 

Astronomers working with space telescope report progress in search for extraterrestrial life)

"Intriguingly, they also saw hints of dimethyl sulfide. This sulfur-based molecule is seen as a potential indicator of life because on Earth, it's only made by living things such as ocean phytoplankton."

"The team 

(Whose team?

 And why arent you saying so NPR?

I'll tell ya why,

because if you knew it was the same team whose crap didn't pan out the last time?

You'd be a lot more skeptical of it now 

than presented in the manner it was

(As demonstrated above)

Thats why.)

announced this possible detection of dimethyl sulfide in 2023, but when other scientists followed up, it didn't pan out."

"That was weak from the beginning," says Holmberg, who said the instrument on the telescope that they used made it hard to distinguish this molecule from others like methane. "We didn't have much statistical evidence."

(But they went ahead and announced it anyway? 

So why should we believe you now then?

Want your name in the headlines much do ya?)

but the NPR article 

does not explicitly say that it was:

"Madhusudhan’s team reported in 2023 that there were signs of methane and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of K2-18 b."

"that didnt pan out."

When they announce crap like this? Its all over the headlines everywhere. but then when it "doesn't pan out"? Crickets. Meanwhile every idiotic satanic bot on every social media platform picks it up and runs with it.

THIS COMMUNITY SIMPLY KNOWS BETTER.