Researcher claims he found proof
Few things before hand lol.
Genesis 1:3
And God said,
Let there be light:
and there was light.
First thing he ever said BTW.
Why?
Because it created the
electromagnetic spectrum:
.png)
Hebrews 11:3
By faith we understand
that the universe was formed
at God’s command,
so that
what is seen
was not made
out of
what was visible.
If there is any other ancient
religious text?
That describes:
any better than that?
Somebody needs to point it out to me.
Cause I dont believe there is one.
(And if there is? I Already know for a fact there is not a religious text with light on two separate instances in its creation story to go along with it, so it would be a moot point anyway.)
Not to mention
that Atoms have even smaller parts.
"so that what is seen
was not made
out of what was visible."
Hebrews 11:3
"so that what is seen
was not made
out of what was visible."
Hebrews 11:3
ALL OF THAT?
MAKES UP
ALL THE MATTER
IN ALL THE UNIVERSE.
(Minus Dark matter etc as stated above.)
And you cant see any of it.
With all of that said?
Lets get to it:
("The Matrix" to some.)
Researcher claims he found proof
"What if the universe isn’t as spontaneous as it seems?
What if the galaxies,
the laws of physics
—even you—
are all running on code?
(Codes don't write themselves.
Anywhere ever.
It requires logic
and sequence.
Therefore it can not be random
It demands, that it has to have
an intellect behind it.
PERIOD.)
It’s a theory that’s captivated scientists and sci-fi fans alike.
And now, a physicist says he may have found the universe’s source code.
(Oh boy lets see the proof!)
"The idea that we might be living in a simulation really took off in 2003,
when Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom suggested
it could be more likely than not
that our reality
is a hyper-advanced
computer program.
(Wait till you meet the programmer of it all
and understand what he has done for you.)
"Since then, researchers have been chasing signs
of anything that might resemble
a glitch
in the matrix."
(Good luck, don't think so.)
"But physicist Michael Vopson is taking a different approach. Instead of looking for broken pixels in the cosmos, he’s searching for efficiency—patterns that suggest our universe is built like a well-optimized algorithm. At the heart of his theory is something called the Second Law of Infodynamics."
(Just because somebody
with a bunch of letters after their name
makes something up?
Hardly qualifies it as a theory.
Our programming?
Our souls?
"The immaterial part of man"
(is what this calls it in its cyclopedic index.
)Are massless.
Data is massless.
Weigh a hard drive.
Put a Terabyte of data on it.
Weigh it again.
It will be Unchanged.
We
(and all other matter)
are virtually massless.
99.9999999999999%
Electromagnetic energy.)
"Unlike the traditional laws of thermodynamics, which describe energy and entropy, Vopson’s law applies to information itself.
He argues that over time,
the universe doesn’t tend toward chaos
but toward compressed order.
He suggests the universe is operating like a vast data optimization program."
(So is in an argument or a theory?
And why wouldn't it be:
"operating like a vast data optimization program"?
Remember,
Theory's have
multiple streams of documented evidence
to support them.
His "theory",
is more like an idea or argument
than a theory.
And?
It Violates the entropy Laws.
So lets see.)
"This behavior extends beyond physics, too.
Genetic information,
for instance,
doesn’t behave as randomly
as Darwinian theory might suggest.
(WELL THATS BECAUSE IT
SIMPLY CANT!
Information
is the opposite
of randomness.
Information
requires
logic and sequence.
From a cave painting,
to a ballet
and
anything and everything in-between,
nowhere ever,
has anyone ever seen,
or experienced
any information
that was the result
of a random process.
SO FUCK DARWIN.
It's stupidity.)
"Instead,
it seems to minimize information entropy over time
in the same way a system is designed
to store and transmit data as efficiently as possible.
In short, Vopson believes
this could be evidence of
the universe’s source code at work.
(They will call it anything
but what it is:
THE LIVING GOD ALMIGHT.
"universes source code at work"
Awesome,
who wrote the code dipshits?
Anybody ever seen code write itself?
As if you say AI?
Ill wanna smack ya.
Because somebody wrote the AI code initially,
It didn't write itself either.)
"Of course, not everyone’s convinced—and why should they be? Some scientists are skeptical, saying the
simulation theory treads dangerously close to pseudoscience
or even theology dressed up in tech lingo.
(They will call it anything but what it actually is.)
"After all, is there a real difference between
an all-powerful creator
and a superintelligent programmer?"
(No, no there is not.)
"Still, Vopson’s claims open the door
to a new way of looking at the cosmos."
Somebody needs to tell
Joshua Hawkins
Writer
Josh Hawkins has been writing for over a decade, covering science, gaming, and tech culture. He also is a top-rated product reviewer with experience in extensively researched product comparisons, headphones, and gaming devices.
Whenever he isn’t busy writing about tech or gadgets, he can usually be found enjoying a new world in a video game, or tinkering with something on his computer.
Genesis was written some 3000 years ago.
And
The book of Hebrews some 1900 years ago.
"If he’s right,"
(Based on what evidence?
Darwin was wrong?
Weve known that for a while now.)
"it means the universe isn’t just expanding:
it’s compressing.
Not into black holes, as stars do when they die,
but into a beautifully ordered
string of digital logic.
(Logic isnt ever,
anywhere ever, random.
It is always the result
of an intellect.)
Also consider:
Wednesday, July 24, 2024
"...modern holographic images really derived from the work of Emmett Leith at the University of Michigan and I had the privilege of being with him in his laboratory in the early 60s looking at some computer-generated Holograms so Holograms are it's worth your trouble to stick with me here to see what a hologram is let's assume I have a three-dimensional object I'm using here the bust of Lincoln as an idiom on the slide and now the piece of photographic film okay I can arrange a laser beam to flood that image directly okay and I'll call that the reference beam because the laser is very collimated I use a beam splitter a spreader to spread that over the spread of the image I can also have that same laser deflect some of its light and shine it directly on the object of interest you with me so far so I've got the laser driving and illumination of the film plate and the object simultaneously by highly highly organized light that's what a laser does it's temporarily uh it's in Phase all together so light will reflect from the bust onto the film and it'll also get light from directly from the laser what you end up with on the film when you process the film in the dark room you hold up the light and it looks like a fog piece of film you think it's a darker mistake until you set it down and you shine the laser on that piece of film and you discover it acts like a window into a three-dimensional space that was in front of it when this thing was formed and it has some very unusual product that's called the Hologram it's some people call it lensless photography it's a little misnomer because you do have some lenses trying to organize the light to get it where you want but but so the point is there's a what's on the film is what mathematically is a Fourier transform of the image it's not in the space domain it's in the frequency domain
(My comments follow below:
My friend is happy lol and I have no problem with the idea of the far reaches of space being a hologram, none. All these astronomers/cosmologist etc are studying is based on what? Light. Why couldnt the creator of it create a hologram to simulate what he wants to? This explains the JWST finding galaxies that didnt fit models of galaxy formation etc. In fact we see this all the time, what scientist think it has to be like and then it gets completely destroyed, why? Because the encoder of the hologram has a terrific sense of humour. They study his creation (light) and then he changes the encoding up on them after they figure something out...How hard is that to understand? Why wouldnt you want to spend eternity with the encoder of it all?)
and that has some profound implications
it acts like a window
in three-dimensional space
let's imagine how three-dimensional hologram three-dimensional space and as we look at it as we move our eye around you can look around things let me give you an example: let's assume that I held up my Bible and you took a photograph of me you would not be able to see my tie would you but if you took a hologram you could move your eye around the Bible and see my tie and tell what color it was follow me that's what I mean by a three-dimensional effect and so it uh it requires proper illumination it's useless in natural light you really need to have it illuminated by laser I'm talking about a true hologram not a synthetic one um something interesting the information of the Hologram is spread over the entire piece that doesn't I could cut the Hologram in half and get two complete pictures if I took a photograph and cut it in half you're going to get one half or the other right but if I take a hologram cut in half you each have one and gives you a complete picture one might not be as sharp as you know not quite as sharp as it was you lose a little resolution you can cut a hole in the Hologram and doesn't hurt you because you can look around it see what was behind it follow me see every piece of information is on every inch of the Hologram it's spread okay there's no loss from dropouts it's also resilient to specific interference there's no way to jam it so to speak it anticipates hostile jamming now where I'm headed here as you can probably tell you have the equivalent of a hologram in your lap (Their Bibles) just like a natural hologram in normal white light there's it has no form to come to this there's no reason for you to desire it but you illuminate it by the light that created in the first place you get an image and we take your Bible and it's illuminated by the Holy Spirit you get an image of what Jesus Christ it goes oh by the way if you illuminate it with a laser that's of a different frequency than created you get a false image oh you're with me you're get you pick it up I could tell okay good the Bible's a hologram it has Fourier transform properties it's it's a transcendent of any parallax and that's exactly what Isaiah says is the word of the Lord was unto them precept upon precept precept upon precept line upon line line upon line here a little there a little what's he saying these the message of God in the Bible is spread throughout the entire Bible you could conduct an experiment take your Bible randomly tear out a page don't literally do it but do it conceptually what have you lost there is no important Doctrine no important truth in scripture you will have lost it's immune in fact it's been designed in anticipation of what we would call a Communications during hostile Journey there's no chapter on baptism there's no chapter on salvation there's no Chapter and pick a Doctrine it's not all in one place it is deliberately spread and that if you're a Communications engineer and you're given a certain bandwidth between two points and your job is to design a communication system to communicate between those two points in a lot of ways you can go about it but if you say if you want you they want you to design it in anticipation of hostile jamming someone's going to try to jam your signal what do you do you do several things one of which is you spread your message over the available bandwidth you don't concentrate it you spread it because it's harder to jam that's exactly what's been done in the scripture the scripture has been designed with a sophistication that will astonish you as you get into it so we have the Bible as a hologram we have what we what the engineer would call spread Spectrum design it exploits the entire bandwidth and therefore has immunity to hostile jamming I've often threatened to do this we're going to have a meeting tonight and we're going at the meeting we're going to tear out the page of the Bible That's unimportant and then when everybody gets together I'll take the page between the old New Testament and tear it out and it's one book not two okay I thought that would smoke out the fundamentals okay (lol)
That was Chuck Missler over 21 years ago!
(My comments from 8 months ago.)
So what is so new about:
physicist Michael Vopson's claims?
How do they?
"open the door
to a new way
of looking at the cosmos."
When an evangelist was sayin
what he said before
21 years before he did?
Somebody needs to tell:
Joshua Hawkins
Writer
Ecclesiastes 1:9
The thing that hath been,
it is that which shall be;
and that which is done is that
which shall be done:
and there is no new thing under the sun.
"More yet!"
Somebody likes to say :-).
Thursday, March 16, 2023
Friday, May 5, 2023
"The universe is indeed a hologram."
Thats not me.
That's cosmology's golden boy.
And again, that was years before:
"Michael Vopson's claims."
They don't just decide
to be one day,
and then are.
It takes sequence and order,
and those require logic
and therefore an intellect
to arrange them.
"Yet still!"
(Hey , you aint never backed up a tailor
with him guiding Lol.)
Friday, March 17, 2023
"So how crazy is it to assume:
?
Like I said,
I dont have a problem with it."
It should be fairly obvious
to those around me that
I look well beyond
the illusions this world offers."
Friday, September 27, 2024
People also ask
"What is the holographic principle in simple terms?
"A holographic universe means
information
(that always HAS to derive from an intellect.)
that makes up what we perceive
as a 3D reality
is stored on a 2D surface,
including time.
This means, essentially,
everything you see and experience
is an illusion."
(And thats what Satan knows,
and why he wants you
to keep fighting to keep hold of,
nothing but an illusion.
Electromagnetic energy.
And you are going to loose it all
eventually someday anyway.
So why are you fighting so hard
to keep it?)
"Susskind (Leonard) said,
"The three-dimensional world of ordinary experience—the universe filled with galaxies, stars, planets, houses, boulders, and people—
is a hologram,
an image of reality
coded
on a distant
two-dimensional surface."
So thats:
One of the fathers of string Theory
Leonard Susskind,
An evangelist from 21 years ago.
Chuck Missler,
The foremost cosmologist of the 20th century,
Stephen Hawking,
and yours truly all agreeing on something.
Might wanna look out,
Somethings up lol.
Holograms required encoding,
encoding requires logic and sequence(s),
logic and sequence(s)
require an intellect
and are never
in fact by there very nature cant be
the result of random processes.
Meanwhile?
Turkey and Israel might as well be at war.
It's decision time.
Made yours yet?
"Why wouldn't you want
to spend eternity
with the encoder of it all?"
Hum?
The period of Grace
(unmerited favor)
comes to an end.
You are witnessing that start.
Choose wisely.
Eternity is at stake.
p.s.
Friday, September 13, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment