If you wanna believe stupid shit?
You have every right to.
New scientific discovery reveals the origin of life on Earth
"Scientists made a bold leap in the search for life’s origins, offering a fresh look at how chemistry might have crossed over into biology."
Others of us in an informed community?
Simply know better.
"Under critical analysis?
It all just falls apart."
~
Missler
The molecular biologist (who are honest with themselves) will tell you:
Random Chemical, Biological, or Physical processes, do not create, in fact can not create the amount of information needed, (new or otherwise) to create life.
As such? Life had to have came from outside the boundaries of the laws of nature.
Something has to have transcended them then in order for their to be life on this earth.
Psalm 74:17
It was you who set all the boundaries of the earth;..."
"...offering a fresh look at how chemistry might have crossed over into biology."
(That is not what your click-bait headline says.)
"Tiny droplets that behave like primitive cells—
organizing key ingredients of life such as RNA, lipids, and proteins."
(The problem for people that wanna believe in stupid shit is,
you need the proteins and the DNA to work together
and to be able to do so?
the DNA is right handed and the proteins
(Over 100,000 in our bodies)
are left handed
and the chance of all that being the result of a random process,
coming together at exactly the same time?
As they have to have each other to exist?
Zero.
None.
Nada.
Zilch.)
"Led by Muneyuki Matsuo and Kensuke Kurihara, the group built synthetic droplets using amino acid thioesters. These molecules come from the “thioester world” hypothesis, which suggests early life may have depended on thioester reactions to drive metabolism.
Their findings, published in Nature Communications, are the first to show protocells reproducing in the lab."
(Here is the problem with all of these types of things:
1) Show me how they do it randomly
2) outside the guided process of
3) the sterile environment of the lab)
"This behavior mimics essential biological processes,
offering a potential link
between prebiotic chemistry and cellular biology."
(Again, not what your headline said:
"New scientific discovery reveals the origin of life on Earth")
“This study may serve to explain the emergence of the first living organisms on primordial Earth,” Matsuo explained. The findings suggest that coacervate droplets could represent a critical evolutionary step, bridging the gap between molecular assemblies and life."
(Nothing here creates the information that is needed for life.
Nothing.)
"Such findings challenge the long-standing RNA world hypothesis, which posits that life originated from self-replicating RNA molecules. Instead, Matsuo and Kurihara’s research points to a "droplet world," where coacervate droplets evolved into complex molecular aggregates capable of replication, organization, and survival."
(There is the whole problem explained in a nutshell:
"Such findings challenge the long-standing RNA world hypothesis,
which posits that life originated from self-replicating RNA molecules."
Scientist simply can not get RNA to self replicate
even in the guided process of a sterile lab.
If they could?
Then you wouldn't have the type of research that this article is about.)
“This discovery provides a plausible mechanism for how life could have emerged from a mixture of simple organic molecules,” commented Dr. Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy from the Scripps Research Institute."
(Nothing stated here is generating the information
that we know is needed for life,
so, yeah, naw, try again.)
"The team's work has significant implications for understanding not only the origins of life on Earth but also the potential for life elsewhere in the universe."
(NEWSFLASH FOR STUPID PEOPLE
WHO WANNA BELIEVE IN STUPID SHIT:
Life here wasn't an accident,
codes (Genetic, or otherwise)
do not randomly create themselves,
neither here
nor anywhere else.)
"By demonstrating that life-like properties can emerge under simple, prebiotic conditions, the findings open doors to studying life's possibilities on planets with similar environments."
(Ya might wanna find that first before you go on rambling about things that cant create themselves by random processes. Seriously, just find me a planet with the Hydrological cycle of the earth first please, seems like it would be a lot easier.)
"Techniques such as molecular dynamics simulations and microfluidic devices have enabled precise studies of molecule behavior under early Earth-like conditions."
(Nobody knows what they were:
"early Earth-like conditions"
Nobody.
It's all a guess.)
"These advancements, combined with Matsuo and Kurihara’s breakthrough, push the boundaries of what we understand about life’s beginnings."
(Nobody has ever seen a natural cell
being created from scratch.
Nobody, ever
Every cell that exist on this earth
got here by splitting from another
already existing cell.
Every one.
Ever.
That?
and the fact that no Random Chemical, Biological, or Physical processes, create, in fact can not create, the amount of information needed, (new or otherwise) to create life
Is all that is needed to:
"understand about life’s beginnings.")
“Our results suggest that droplets became evolvable molecular aggregates—one of which became our common ancestor,” said Matsuo.
(Where did the information come from then?
"information always comes from an outside source."
The information scientist say.
Except in biology of course where the second law of thermodynamics also doesn't apply.
Seriously,
Where's the data coming from?
A living organism creates its own?
Hey, if stupid people wanna believe stupid shit?
That's up to them.)
"The self-reproducing coacervate droplets represent a leap forward, offering tangible evidence of how primitive molecular assemblies could proliferate and evolve."
(Im sorry, the information that's needed
came from where exactly again?)
"This discovery challenges long-held assumptions
and presents a new framework for understanding life's origins."
Here is the
"new framework"
that needs to be understood:
Life comes from life.
Brains come from brans.
Its all anybody who has ever lived has ever witnessed.
Science is supposed to be based on observation.
Seriously this kinda ignorant shit violates
not only the laws of information
(always comes from an outside source,
hard drives by themselves don't create their own data)
but also the physical laws of nature
in a closed system
(The universe)
EVERYTHING TRACKS TOWARD CHAOS/DISORDER.
Except in regard to life
is what the stupid people would want you to believe.
It's child play at this point
refuting all of these any more.
If an idiot like me
can tear these arguments to shreds?
Then why do they even bother?
No comments:
Post a Comment