This

 

is so simple.

Its like childs play at this point.

Modeling the origins of life: 

New evidence for an 'RNA World'

When you can find:

1) Self-replicating RNA

(we haven't found and /cant reproduce)

2) Without outside direction 

(Researchers)

in a pristine environment

(a lab)

3) On a primordial Exoplanet

4) That is in the habitable zone 

of a star like ours

5) In the habitable zone of a galaxy

(not to close to the black hole in the center 

and not to far out on the outer edges)

Then holler at me.

Otherwise?

Who really fuckin cares?

Cause you aint found and cant explain shit.

RNA needs DNA and proteins.

It's a contiunuium.

Just like time space energy and matter.

They all have to arrive at the same time or it doesnt work as intended.

"Genetic information in the form of DNA sequences 

is copied and passed down from one generation to the next."

(Information always comes from a brain.

NOBODY ever on this earth

has ever explained

where the genetic information came from.

They simply avoid this problem altogether.)

The findings also bring scientists 

(an outside agent directing the process?

Interesting concept.)

one step closer to 

re-creating RNA-based life in the laboratory.

(Outside agents cant even recreate/direct

RNA based life in the pristine environment of the lab.

But somehow it managed to do it on its own?

On the primordial earth?

Yeah...sure...

Brains come from brains people.

Its what all the "observable" evidence 

anybody who has ever lived has ever seen.)

"how life may have started on Earth, 

or even other planets."

(No evidence supporting this. None.

"may have started"

See notes above about exoplanets.)

"We're chasing the dawn of evolution,"

(Evolution explains what happens to life

not how it got here to start with.

Just like The big Bang explains what happened to the universe 

when it was in a hot dense condensed state, 

not how it got in that state to start with.)

"...we're uncovering the potential origins of life itself,"

(Key words there are 

"potential origins"

Holler at me when you KNOW.)

"Double-stranded DNA helices are great for 

storing genetic information."

(Tell me where did the information come from 

and how did it get there,

then I'll be impressed, till then? Not so much.)

"Over the last decade, 

Joyce and his team 

have been developing 

RNA polymerase ribozymes 

in the lab, 

using a form of directed evolution 

to produce new versions capable of replicating larger molecules.

(Oh I see

so an outside entity 

is directing the process

in an controlled environment you say,

interesting.)

"We've long wondered how simple life was at its beginning 

and when it gained the ability to start improving itself," 

says first author Nikolaos Papastavrou, a research associate in Joyce's lab."

(Oh you mean like AI is now?

"...and when it gained the ability to start improving itself...")

"This study suggests the dawn of evolution 

could have been very early and very simple."

(Once again for the dunderheads out there 

that just cant/don't/wont get it:

Evolution doesn't describe how life got here

it only describes what happens to it once its already here.)

"Joyce's team is 

re-creating this process 

in laboratory test tubes, 

applying increasing 

selective pressure on the system 

to produce better-performing polymerases, 

(Translation:

A team of outside agents 

is making it do 

what it wants them to do.

This is why I just yawn 

at these type articles anymore...)

"with the goal of one day producing an RNA polymerase that can replicate itself."

This would mark the beginnings of 

autonomous RNA life in the laboratory, 

which the researchers say could be accomplished within the next decade.

(I've already climbed the mountain of ignorance.

I'm not holding my breath waiting on shit.)

"We've seen that selection pressure 

can improve RNAs with an existing function,"

(With every last one of these types of experiments?

There has always got to be an outside force 

directing the process where they want it to go.

(Just couldn't have ever been one 

(AN OUTSIDE FORCE ACTING ON HIS CREATION)

when it happened originally right?

Makes no fucking sense at all.

Why yall buying this crap for?)

"The methods used in the Joyce lab also pave the way for future experiments testing other ideas about the origins of life, including what environmental conditions could have best supported RNA evolution, both on Earth and on other planets."

LIKE I SAID AT THE START:

When you can find:

1) Self-replicating RNA

(we haven't found any 

and /cant reproduce any either)

2) Without outside direction 

(Researchers)

and in a non-pristine environment

(outside of a lab)

3) On a primordial Exoplanet

(See point #2)

4) That is in the habitable zone 

of a star like ours

5) In the habitable zone of a galaxy

(not to close to the black hole in the center 

and not to far out on the outer edges)

Then holler at me.

Otherwise?

Who really fuckin cares?

(And keep in mind:

Each criterion listed above?

Decreases exponentially

the likelihood

of ever finding such a thing.)

You people have simply lost your minds.

You are being blined by satan.