nuclear program
isn't just the biggest threat
to the world right now
its the biggest threat,
that the world has ever seen.
And you wonder?
Why you wake up to this:
as your top news story?
Not one story about the negotiations
that went on yesterday.
5/11/25
Now you understand why
they held them on a Sunday?
And all that stuff about the tariffs with China?
Can change in an instant.
Irans threat to the world?
Still there.
Gonna work em in backwards chronological order
oldest to newest,
like I said before
it was a lil bit of a busy weak over here.
Published May 8, 2025 11:23am EDT
This is what the run up to war looks like people.
Who honestly believes
we didn't know about any of this
before this article?
It's called justifying what
ALREADY KNEW
we are about to do.
"Fox News has exclusively obtained satellite imagery revealing what an opposition group says is a previously undisclosed Iranian nuclear weapons facility — raising fresh concerns amid ongoing negotiations between Tehran and the Trump administration."
"The newly identified site, located in Iran’s Semnan Province, is far from the regime's already-known nuclear facilities. According to the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), intelligence gathered from sources inside the country points to a sprawling compound covering nearly 2,500 acres."
"Code-named the "Rainbow Site" by Iranian officials,
the facility has reportedly
been in operation
for more than a decade,
masked as a chemical production company known as Diba Energy Siba."
(And the US didn't know about it until a
"Fox News Exclusive"?
Please.
)
"According to NCRI sources,
the primary function of the Rainbow Site
is the extraction of tritium —
a radioactive isotope
used to enhance nuclear weapons.
Unlike uranium enrichment, tritium has virtually no peaceful or commercial applications, casting further doubt on Iran’s longstanding claims that its nuclear ambitions are solely for energy or civilian use."
(You would kinda need
"nuclear weapons"
before you could
"enhance them"
Dont ya think?
Ref:
Saturday, August 31, 2024
"The discovery of the Rainbow Site
could complicate the already delicate diplomacy
surrounding Iran’s nuclear capabilities
and the possibility of a renewed agreement."
(That was kinda the whole point
of the article.)
"The relationship between the United States and Iran has become increasingly volatile in recent weeks,
marked by a series of military provocations,
stalled nuclear talks,
and shifting diplomatic dynamics."
"Both nations continue to face off over issues ranging from
Iran's nuclear ambitions
to its expanding military capabilities
and influence in the Middle East.
(??????????
Lets review:
1) Hezbollah? No longer near what it was
2)Hamas? Same.
3) Syrian ally? Gone.
WTF
is Newsweek even talking about?)
"While both sides have expressed a desire to avoid full-scale war,
several developments suggest
the risk of direct conflict is rising."
(Well no kidding,
thx Newsweek.)
"diplomatic efforts to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions have shown little sign of progress,...
Deadlock increases the likelihood
that both sides could turn to military action
as a means to resolve their disagreements.'
(Military action
was decided upon
a long time ago already,
everything else,
is merely widow dressing
in the run up
to it.
See point #10
Saturday, August 31, 2024
27 August 2024
"Brown also met with Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who told him that Israel and the United States must be “prepared at any time” to work together to prevent Iran’s efforts to attain nuclear weapons."
"In a video statement from northern Israel, Halevi said: “I just finished a visit with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States military at the Northern Command. We are strengthening operational cooperation in the face of challenges and threats in the Middle East.”
(Not, we are going to,
"WE ARE."
And there was a reason for that.
AND NOW?
Now they are letting you know so.
Might wanna ask why that is.
Its pretty obvious really.)
Here are five signs
that the risk of conflict is increasing:
1. U.S. Deployments
(This one just flat out gives it away.
We started putting assets in place
under the Biden Administration,
BEFORE
the election.
Friday, October 4, 2024
"In May 2025, four B-52 bombers were deployed to Diego Garcia, a U.S. base in the Indian Ocean roughly 2,000 miles (3,218 kilometers) from Iran. The base also houses six B-2 Spirit stealth bombers as part of an ongoing Bomber Task Force mission. Meanwhile, two aircraft carriers—the USS Harry S. Truman and the USS Carl Vinson—have been operating in the Red Sea and Arabian Sea, respectively. These deployments underscore Washington's increased state of readiness and serve as a forceful message of deterrence aimed at Tehran."
(Said nothing about
well before May of 25,
and
Dear Newsweek:
WE CANT EVEN
DETER THE HOUTHIS
(all that much,
they are still firing at Israel so,
so much for that:
"Forceful message of deterrence"
I JUST LOATHE
STATE SPONSERED PROPAGANDA.)
2. Iran's Military Advancements
(They have taken way more of a hit:
Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria,
IRGC top brass etc
than they have made any advancements militarily.
US State -sponsored propaganda much?)
" As U.S. forces expand their footprint, Iran recently unveiled an underground drone base. This facility, built to house reconnaissance drones such as the Mohajer-6, enables Iran to monitor U.S. naval movements in the Persian Gulf. The base's fortified, subterranean design signals Tehran's intent to survive potential airstrikes and prepare for sustained conflict."
(They had been doing that
with their air force
for a long time already.
It's nothing "new" really.
2/23/23)
"At the same time, Iran has introduced the Qassem Basir missile, a medium-range ballistic system with a 750 mile (1,200 kilometer) reach. Engineered to evade interception by U.S. defenses such as THAAD, the missile presents a direct challenge to Western military dominance and poses a potential threat to regional allies like Israel."
(Again:
(Persian: موشک بالستیک شهید حاج قاسم)
is an Iranian ballistic missile which was
unveiled in August 2020.)
So It's nothing "new".
In the run up to the coming war?
We will be seeing more
propaganda pieces
just like this one.)
3) The Israel Factor
"Israel's role in the confrontation is growing increasingly pronounced. Long wary of Iran's expanding military reach,
Israel has signaled its readiness
to act unilaterally if needed.
(And if you think they wont?
or that some deal brokered by:
will stop them from doing so?Might wanna try and find
a clue somewhere.)
"The recent explosion at Iran's Bandar Abbas port has fueled suspicions of Israeli involvement, reinforcing concerns about covert operations — although Iranian authorities said it was due to negligence."
(It was an obvious Israeli covert action.
Isfahan shortly afterwards gave it away.)
"In a pointed warning, Defense Minister Israel Katz stated, "Whoever harms us – we will strike back sevenfold," directly linking Iran to proxy attacks and vowing full retaliation. Katz also emphasized Israel's right to act independently: "Israel must be able to defend itself on its own against any threat and any enemy."
"we will strike back sevenfold"
Eerily reminded me of
Matthew 12:43-45
43 When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none.
44 Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished.
45 Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be also unto this wicked generation.
That is straight up a prophecy of
the state of Israel in the last days
Unger, Biblical Demonology p.213:
The seven other more evil idolatrous spirits,7 joined with the first, enter into the man and forewarn of the last and worst state of the nation in the great tribulation.
(Not quite there yet but well on our way)
Then, destitute of faith, and bereft of God's Spirit, the nation will be the pitiable prey of more numerous, more depraved and destructive demons than at any previous period in its history, and will be held in the grip of a more intense, complete, and tyrannous state of demon possession than ever before.)
4. Trump's Middle East Visit
'Adding to the geopolitical backdrop, Trump is set to embark on a regional diplomatic tour with visits to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE. The trip is intended to reinforce alliances and confront growing security challenges,
particularly those posed
by Iran's rising military assertiveness"
(Reference:
They have taken way more of a hit:
Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria,
IRGC top brass etc
than they have made any advancements militarily.
US State -sponsored propaganda much?
Trumps gonna tell em
what we are getting ready to do,
and talk about golf courses and graft
and free planes etc.
Yup.)
"However, the omission of Israel from the itinerary is striking, given its strategic importance to U.S. policy in the region.
Whether this reflects a tactical shift
or a move to de-escalate tensions
with Iran remains uncertain."
(It is deliberate ("the omission of Israel from the itinerary") to try and make em (Iran) think we are not working together. If "negotiations" were ever thought of as going to be effective, then we wouldn't have moved every piece of military hardware we can get into the region here in the last year and a half or so.
Im telling ya gives it away
its been a foregone conclusion
what we are gonna do now for a while.)
5. Nuclear Talks
Parallel to military maneuvers,
diplomatic efforts continue
but remain precarious.
The fourth round of nuclear talks—originally delayed—is now scheduled for Sunday in Oman.
(That was yesterday
5/11/25)
However, fundamental disagreements persist: the U.S. demands a halt to uranium enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief, while Iran maintains its right to peaceful nuclear development and says it has no intention of building nuclear weapons.
With trust eroding
and little progress made,
the diplomatic window appears to be narrowing,
heightening the risk
that regional tensions
could tip into open conflict."
(I feel its been demonstrated
that this coming
attack on Irans nuke program
has been in the works for a good while now
and that nothing will stop it.
You should be expecting the same at this point
or we wouldn't be seeing pieces like this one.
We weren't seeing stuff like this till just here recently.
Talked about this before
its the "softening up" process
of getting the populace ready for what's coming.)
6 PM Saturday 05/10/25
The night before the talks.
Somebody finally starts telling the truth:
"An Iranian official told CNN that recent indirect talks with the United States aimed at addressing Tehran’s nuclear program and lifting sanctions were “not genuine” from the American side and were likely designed from the outset as a “trap to draw the situation toward tension.”
"Iran evaluates the talks’ interruptions and weekly gaps, which were against Tehran’s preference,
as a political and media game
by the American side
and is now preparing for scenarios
in which the talks fail.
"It comes after US special envoy Steve Witkoff
(A fuckin real estate lawyer?
Seriously?
Biggest issue in the world ever and
our "special" guy is a real estate lawyer?.
Okay...watever)
"warned on Friday
that if the next set of talks in Oman on Sunday
were not productive,
“then they won’t continue
and we’ll have to take
a different route.”
("I feel its been demonstrated that this coming
attack on Irans nuke program
has been in the works for a good while now
and that nothing will stop it.
You should be expecting the same at this point
or we wouldnt be seeing pieces like this one.
We weren't seeing stuff like this till just here recently.
Talked about it before its the "softening up" process
of getting the populace ready for what's coming.")
"CNN understands that the technical team,
which negotiates on more granular aspects of a deal
like sanctions relief,
is not expected to attend."
(Cause its never gonna happen.
And? Not pointed out was the fact they
were originally scheduled to attend BTW.)
"Earlier Saturday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi – who is expected to meet Witkoff on Sunday – said Tehran had received
“contradictory messages”
from the US as
“different individuals express different views.”
(Well ya know?
Wat else would you expect
right now?
When every day is just more bizarre
than the next?
Ya might wanna think about that
for a second.)
"The Iranian source said
the American side
“is basically not ready for meaningful technical and political talks,”
adding that the United States gives
“short and general answers”
to questions,
ignores “main proposals,”
and “constantly changes its position”
throughout the negotiations."
(It's been a sham on both sides from the get go.
They been getting ready for years,
cause they know what's coming.
Just like we know what we have known
what we are going to do for a while
as well.
These talks are a sham on both sides
and have been from the start.)
I have been saying it all along.)
"According to the source,
this situation has led Iran to conclude
that the negotiations
“likely will not yield the desired outcome
in sanctions relief and economic benefit.”
"As a result,
Tehran is “preparing for the next stage,
with political, economic,
and other sectors
having prepared
the necessary scenarios
over the past month.”
(Thats why they hardened their underground sites last week.
"and other sectors
having prepared")
"The comments come after Witkoff,
in an interview with Breitbart posted Friday,
described the US’ expectations for the talks
in some of the greatest detail to date.
(And they will never agree to this
and thats how you know war is coming.)
“An enrichment program
can never exist in the state of Iran ever again.
That’s our red line.
No enrichment.
That means dismantlement,
it means no weaponization,
and it means that
Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan –
those are their three enrichment facilities –
have to be dismantled,”
Witkoff said."
(Its the Israelis position too BTW)
"Iran has said it is nonnegotiable
that it be allowed to enrich uranium."
"The Iranian source reiterated to CNN on Saturday
that uranium enrichment on Iranian soil
is Iran’s “definite red line” in the negotiations,
a fact he said the United States “is well aware of.”
"Iran has long insisted it does not want a nuclear weapon
and that its program is for energy purposes."
(Yeah...right...)
"In his interview with Breitbart, the special envoy (Witkoff )
said the talks are focused exclusively on the nuclear issue,
a change from the attempts of the first Trump administration
to deal widely with Iran’s aggressive actions in the region.
(In the first administration?
They wanted the original treaty with Iran
to also include
its proxies
Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria
(pre Assad over throw)
and?
Their ballistic missile program.
Well now they got to many missiles
to ever give em up
so thats out
and so are
Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria
which kinda only leaves
the nuclear issue.)
Iran calls latest nuclear talks with US ‘difficult’
but both sides agree negotiations will continue
4:00 PM EDT, Sun May 11, 2025
(22 hours after the previous article.
After the talks were completed.)
"Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei confirmed on X that the talks had concluded, saying they were “difficult but useful to better understand each other’s positions and to find reasonable & realistic ways to address the differences.”
"A senior Trump administration official gave a more positive assessment, telling CNN the discussions “were again both direct and indirect” and lasted over three hours, calling them encouraging."
(The previous article was spot on
this is all just
meaningless window dressing.)
"the US side was “encouraged by today’s outcome” and looks forward to their next meeting “which will happen in the near future.”
(Translation:
There aint much of this bullshit
left in either side at this point.)
"...signs of firm progress are slim"
"Iran’s demand to continue enriching uranium for its nuclear program,
which is insists is peaceful,
something the US calls a “red line.”
"US President Donald Trump, who is headed to the Middle East next week, has threatened that the US would resort to military strikes
against Iranian nuclear sites,
with Israel’s help,
should Tehran fail to reach a deal with its interlocutors."
"The Iranian delegation was led by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said before the talks got underway that the US side “holds contradictory positions which is one of the issues in our negotiations.”
“We have been clear about our boundaries,” Araghchi added, according to the Fars news agency."
"Iranian officialS
told CNN on Saturday
that recent talks with the US were “not genuine” from the American side.
(The previous article said
"official"
Now we get
"officials"
22 hours later.
Which was it?)
"The Iranian source also reiterated that allowing uranium enrichment on Iranian soil is Iran’s “definite red line” in the negotiations.'
(Ya got two red lines that do not intersect.
How much time you think
you got left to decide
what team you are on?)
"US special envoy Steve Witkoff, who has been heading the American side,
warned
that if this session of talks were not productive,
“then they won’t continue
and we’ll have to take a different route.”
"Speaking to Breitbart, Witkoff outlined the US’ expectations for the talks, including on the country’s uranium enrichment program. “An enrichment program can never exist in the state of Iran ever again. That’s our red line. No enrichment,” he said.
(They know they will never accept it.)
"Iran has said it will not surrender its capability to enrich uranium. The country has long insisted it does not want a nuclear weapon and that its program is for energy purposes.
And now yesterday:
4th round of US-Iran talks ends
as Trump set to embark on historic Middle East tour
05/12/25
A day before the start of talks,
Iran's supreme leader
welcomed chants of 'death to America' in Tehran
(Thats how well things are progressing BTW)
"A day before the start of talks, Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei welcomed chants of "Death to America" in Tehran. "Your judgment is right," Khamenei told a crowd of supporters who called for the destruction of the U.S."
"President Trump announced a 60-day time frame to reach an agreement with Iran over its illegal atomic weapons program. The first U.S. negotiating session with Iran commenced on April 12."
(60 days puts us at June 11th.
I said an attack on Iran by the end of June.
Honey says end of May.
Does "when"
even really matter any more?)
"Mardo Soghom, an Iran analyst and journalist, noted prior to the start of talks several months ago that
Iran’s regime will go to great lengths
to preserve its right to enrich uranium—the material required for a nuclear weapon.
(Its the only thing
thats gonna keep them in power
and they know it.)
"The Trump administration vehemently opposes a uranium enrichment program on Iranian soil."
(Translation?
We are a month in to talks
and all that has been accomplished
is red lines that both sides knew of
before entering into them
have been severely hardened.)
"Iran is trying to save its enrichment operation at a lower level and also not accepting any pressure to halt its anti-Israel stance. Khamenei's speech [Saturday] highlighted that second point. But at this point, the main issue is dismantling Iran's uranium enrichment," Soghom told Fox News Digital.
(They will never let it happen.
They will set the region on fire
and soon after?
The world too will be.
We know it
and they know it,
I figure you should too.
)
"President Trump’s Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff recently stressed that
Iran cannot have an enrichment program
during an interview with Breitbart News prior to Sunday’s bargaining session."
(If we would have just said that at the start?
There never would have been any talks.
Thats how you know the talks are nothing but a stall tactic
(largely ours, B2's to Diego Garcia etc.)
but being used by both sides
to get ready for the inevitable.)
"Witkoff said...
(US special emvoy for negotiations)
"We believe that they cannot have enrichment,
they cannot have centrifuges,
they cannot have anything
that allows them to build a weapon.
We believe in all of that. "
(Then the only reason to have
"talks"
would be to get military assets in place.)
"Brodsky said "The original sin of U.S. decision-making on Iran’s nuclear program was when the Obama administration changed the U.S. position from zero enrichment to tolerating enrichment at 3.67%. That laid the groundwork for Iran to retain the capability to continue to use its nuclear program to extort the United States and ultimately build a nuclear weapon."
(Kinda a side point
but I am surprised the intelligence services
didnt/havent
taken Obama out yet TBH.)
"The anti-American news outlet, Kayhan, that serves as the mouthpiece for Khamenei, published a full-page screed
against Trump where it stated,
"He is a framework based on
narcissism,
superiority delusions,
and threat-based tactics."
They kinda got a point TBH.)
"Iran's regime spokesperson, Baghaei,
said that
a decision on the next round of talks
is under discussion."
We are a month in
and all that has happened is
RED LINES
on both sides
have been hardened.
Just like we knew they would be
Otherwise?
Why were we moving assets into place
over a years ago
under the Biden administration?
GODSPEED
everybody.
Journey well.
Make more sense now?
Absolutely
NOTHING
is allowed
to be a distraction.
NOTHING.
)
)
No comments:
Post a Comment