my reasoning
for what The False Prophet
is gonna do and why
as outlined here:
Monday, January 12, 2026
Trump, Iran, Turkey,
and Syria
(Part one of Four)
"When you understand
the false prophet would be accomplishing
multiple goals
by attacking Iran.
(It's immanent, It's coming)
It get his extorter
(Netanyahu)
off of his back.
How many time he gotta visit Trump
before it sinks in he owns him?
(Honey said she found something that said they had met 6 times since Trump was inaugurated 1/20/25. Never seen that many get togethers with one foreign head of state in such a short amount of time after an inauguration.
Never.
IT OUGHT TO TELL YOU SOMETHING.)
Why Trump’s options are limited
when it comes to using force against Iran
Dan Sabbagh Defence and security editor
Guardian 1/13/26
(A day after
my post BTW.
And very few links in my post either BTW.
Spiritual gift of discernment
on full display yo.)
"As US president tells protesters ‘help is on the way’,
any military action would be unlikely to succeed"
(And they already know that
and they are going
to go ahead and do it anyway.
SO WHY?
See above:
"It get his extorter
(Netanyahu)
off of his back."
And fulfills prophecy.
(Matthew 12:43-45
(After Iran attacks Israel in retaliation.)
"Donald Trump may not be unafraid to use military force against Iran, according to the White House, but the reality is the US president has few to no options that could obviously help that country’s protest movement, never mind the fact that the history of US intervention in the region has hardly been a success."
"Emboldened by the seizure of the erstwhile Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, after an operation that took months of planning, Trump talked up military intervention against the Iranian regime with no military pre-positioning having taken place. In fact, there has been a drawdown in the last few months, reducing military options further.
"The US has had no aircraft carriers deployed in the Middle East since October, after two years of near continuous deployment following the Hamas attack on Israel, having moved out the USS Gerald R Ford to the Caribbean in the summer and the USS Nimitz to a port on the US west coast in the autumn."
(You can make the argument that was done
for the express purpose
such that we cant be there now.
NO AIR DEFENSE SUPPORT THIS TIME BIBI
WAIT TILL YOU SEE HOW THIS GOES DOWN.
Had to be some reason
we were firing all those interceptors
willy-nilly not all that long ago.)
"It means any air or missile strikes against regime targets, and perhaps at the Iranian leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, would probably have to come from or involve US and allied airbases in the Middle East."
(Heard all about this:
"President Trumps plan
for the Middle East."
Well there it is
he is gonna
set the tinder box on fire.
Gaza gonna be a Rivera,
you people are on dope.)
"An alternative would be similar to June’s long range B-2 bombing mission against the underground Iranian nuclear site of Fordow, although that sort of attack against an urban site would appear to be dangerous overkill."
"The US would also have to ask permission to use bases in countries such as Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq, the UAE, Oman and Saudi Arabia (perhaps even the UK’s Akrotiri base in Cyprus) – and protect them and their host countries against retaliation.
(When are these people gonna learn,
This band of gangsters aint asking nobody for shit ever.
And they aint gonna care about protecting anybody
from retaliation either.
The fuckin whole idea
is to get people to retaliate.
DUH!)
"Even if such assets were not used by the US,
Iranian leaders have threatened to strike US bases
and ships if the country is attacked."
(Well why wouldn't they.)
"Although Iran’s military capabilities were badly degraded in the 12-day summer war with Israel, and its air defence systems easily overwhelmed, Tehran has retained a limited missile capability.
(It aint near as limited as what he is saying.
More on that in a minute.)
"Key launch sites remain buried in the mountains, and it has been rebuilding. It is estimated that Iran has 2,000 heavy ballistic missiles, capable, if launched in numbers, of evading US and Israeli air defences."
(That statement above is entirely misleading.
Iran has been saying they are ready
for war for a good while now.
And their missiles
don't have to be
"launched in numbers"
to evade US and Israeli air defenses.
And what US air defense are going to be there?
Two THADD systems we don't have any interceptors for?
Patriots Israel doesn't even want they are so ineffective?
At the end of the 12 days
Iran's Advanced Missiles
(as in just a couple.)
were getting through tons more Air defenses then
than it is going to have to deal with this time.
See:
Saturday, July 12, 2025
I love how they do this stuff...
Iran took out a geodesic dome
at our air base in Qatar that was
a secure communications hub
for forward operating
Central Command.
If you wish to be informed?
I would highly encourage you
to read that post.
The cease fire in the 12 day war
was the very next day.
Well I wonder why?
Israel bout to be devastated.
They are not saying a word about supporting US
or if they agree or dont agree, nothing.
THE SILENCE FROM ISRAEL
ON THIS MATTER IS DEAFENING.
AS IS THE FACT
THAT THE US MEDIA
ISNT BOTHERING
IN THE LEAST
TO BRING THAT FACT UP.
It tells you Israel does not want this.
All the more reason to pull the plug so to speak
if you are The False Prophet.
So that's the whole point
of attacking Iran right now.
Nothing else.
Attack them
(Iran)
so they attack them.
(Israel.)
IT IS WHAT THE SATANICLY
ENERGIZED ENTITY WANTS!
IT IS GODS WILL
FOR ISRAEL TO SUFFER MIGHTILY
IN THE END TIMES.
SO THEY CAN COME TO THEIR SENSES
AND ACCEPT THE MESSIAH
THEY REJECTED.
(Getting ready to make a deal with the Anti-Christ
aint exactly helping matters.
(US Military Bases in the Middle East.
40,000 troops or so.)
"A more salient question is:
what would the US bomb?
(Like he cares at this point?
"Just bomb something!"
Seems to be the mantra
everyday anymore.)
"It would be possible to identify military and civilian sites used by the Iranian regime, but both the protests and the increasingly bloody regime crackdown are taking place across the country. Targeting is not always accurate, sites can be misidentified and civilian casualties in urban locations would be an evident risk. And it is not obvious this would be effective on the ground."
"It would also not be difficult for the Iranian regime to try to use any US attacks as a rallying point for what is left of its support, given the long history of US meddling dating back to the 1953 CIA coup. ..."
(Glad to see somebody finally talking about it.
My son knew about it in like 7th grade or something.
WTF, is WRONG with you people?
"In the abundance of water
the fool
is thirsty."
You already know who.
Keep watching stupid cat videos.
Keep mindlessly scrolling
your life away on Tic Toc.
See whats gonna happen to you
for not pondering your soul
and where it is going to spend eternity.
Cause this shit is now homies.)
"And, however unpopular it may be with ordinary people protesting, the ruling regime does not appear to be brittle or weak, having already survived Israel’s sustained attack in June.
“There is a clearly a cohesive government and military and security service in Iran,” said Roxane Farmanfarmaian, a senior associate at the Royal United Services Institute thinktank. “The government is showing it doesn’t have any red lines: it is going to secure its borders and streets, and the extraordinary number of body bags reveals its determination to do so.”
(This one just chaps my ass.
They sell/market
a completely false "narrative"
and then go and do what they want.
Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq much?
The story we are being sold is this Iranian regime is
about to go over the cliff right this very instant
and its just not true.
NOT RIGHT NOW IT ISNT.
So the selling of the false narrative
alsogives it away what this is really about
along with the fact
that military planners and analysist know
exactly what this reporter is saying is true.
MILITARY STRIKES ARE NOT GOING
TO HELP THE RESISTANCE IN IRAN
IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM.
So why even bother then
to manufacture
a false narrative to sell?
"It get his extorter
(Netanyahu)
off of his back."
And fulfills prophecy.
"The US could consider a direct attack on Khamenei. Trying to kill the Iranian leader would be easier militarily than a Maduro-style seizure operation, which would be considerably more complex than in Venezuela because Tehran lies hundreds of miles from the country’s borders. However, killing the leader of another country would be astonishingly escalatory, raise a host of legal concerns, and invite a sustained military response."
"Nor would it necessarily lead to regime change.
(He doesn't fucking care about that!
It is not what this is about!)
"During the 12-day war, Khamenei appears to have evaded Israeli detection: the country’s defence minister, Israel Katz, defence minister said afterwards that “if he had been in our sights, we would have taken him out”.
(Mossad couldn't get him
but Trump will?
Get a clue.)
"The Iranian leader had also lined up three senior clerics on a shortlist to replace him if he was killed, in an effort to secure a rapid transition."
"Other experts, such as Farmanfarmaian, argue that the most likely outcome would be a takeover led by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.
(I agree with that assessment.)
"But either way, the Iranian regime remained intact after Israel killed as many as 30 military and security leaders in June.
A handful of US demonstration strikes
would be unlikely to change that,
while US allies, Congress and Trump himself would almost certainly not want a lengthy campaign. Already, the president himself has ruled out “boots on the ground”.
(So what is left as the rationale
to go ahead and do it then?
"It get his extorter
(Netanyahu)
off of his back."
And fulfills prophecy.
"Against such an uncertain backdrop, it is not surprising alternatives have been canvassed. The most notable is a targeted cyber-attack, raising the question of what would be intended. After the seizure of Maduro, Trump claimed that the US had turned off the power in Caracas to help facilitate his capture,
(That was a 100% inside job, nothing ever goes perfect in an operation like that unless it was And "Trump claimed that the US had turned off the power in Caracas" is a fairytale. You gotta remember who this guy is and what entity is energizing him.)
"but this would only be useful in Iran in conjunction with a military operation."
"Ciaran Martin, a former head of the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre, argues that “it is hard to see what could work” and that “disrupting civilian or even government services” such as electricity would probably affect civilians more.
(You would be hurting the resistance
ability to try and organize.
Did I mention this band of gangsters just don't care?)
"A theoretical possibility would be for the US to try restore the internet, largely shut down since last Thursday, though Martin added it would be “hard to intervene via cyber” to do so."
"A simpler possibility would be to try and “flood the place with Starlink” – Elon Musk’s satellite internet service – by overcoming Iranian jamming, providing the service for free. But, Martin said, that was “not really a cyber-operation” and sharing more information about repression may not stop the killing in the streets. What can be achieved by US military intervention may not match up to Trump’s promise that “help is on its way”.
(Says the guy
that couldn't give a shit less
about the homeless vets
right down the street
from the White House.
Gotcha!)
No comments:
Post a Comment