about what Avi Loeb had said
about 3I/ATLAS and its Mars pass by?
6) Avi Loeb changed 3I/ATLAS from going to go past Mars at .2 AU, to going past it at .02 AU, with a chance of a slight course correction making that 0 AU, all without any explanation, none whatsoever.
Thursday, September 4, 2025
"What matters is
we went from
.19 AU
to .018 AU
seemingly overnight
with absolutely
no explanation as to why."
"In addition, an orbit correction by 10–15 kilometers per second during the month of September 2025, could shrink the closest approach distance of 3I/ATLAS from Mars to zero, as calculated in Figure 4 of my paper with Adam Hibberd and Adam Crowl (accessible here).
The Challenge of Measuring the Mass of 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 09/01/25
And as mentioned in the piece
that was all posted on a Holiday 9/01/25.
complete coincidence I am sure.
I know you read what is written here Rafi.
To purpose multiple different explanations
(all easily dismissed BTW)
for the loss of communications
with the MAVEN orbiter
while deliberately leaving out information
you don't wanna share with others
isn't exactly
being a man of integrity Rafi.
The Times of Israel Blogs
12/18/25
"On Friday, December 19,
(1+9=10.
Divine Order.)
the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS will reach its closest point to Earth — at a distance of approximately 168 million miles (about 270 million kilometers)."
(1 God
6 = right before completion
1+6=7, completion
8 = New Beginning.)
"The unusual object,
(Volcano actually)
estimated to be roughly the size of Manhattan,
arrived in our vicinity nearly six months
(See note on 6 above.)
after its discovery,
and even longer
after entering the solar system."
"Scientists, NASA, the European Space Agency (ESA), other space agencies, and a large global audience — observers who are curious, skeptical, and even emotionally invested — have been following with fascination the ancient visitor, more than seven billion years old,
(See note on 7 above.)
now passing through our neighborhood."
"The strange visitor arrived on a trajectory opposite to the direction of planetary rotation, traveling at approximately 60 kilometers per second."
(Agian, see note on six above.)
"...at least 15 anomalies in observations of the object — phenomena for which no full explanation yet exists. As far as we know, it is now on its way out of the solar system."
(1+5 =6, see note above.
And:
"As far as we know,
it is now on its way
out of the solar system."
I bout went off.
Is all based on the JPL data.
I just can not
in good conscious
trust any data
from people who wont even mention
1 anomaly of something that has 15
of them
during their "Live Event".
You want to?
Go ahead.
If it involved anything else?
You sure wouldn't trust it.)
"There are purely theoretical speculations that even at a distance of 53 million kilometers, it could leave behind a probe or research instrument, but the likelihood of this is considered very low."
(5+3=8
New beginning.
Just making the point
that it wasnt solely
Laser Highway AI Dude's issue
with the numbers.
Theay are built into this object.
The #'s that is.)
"it could leave behind
a probe or research instrument"
(Over seven billion years old
"probe or research instrument(s)"
???????????
And people think
I have lost my mind?
This community isn't a bunch of blockheads
We know Brains don't come from rocks.)
"ejecting gas jets extending hundreds of thousands of kilometers — on the scale of the distance between Earth and the Moon."
(Notice how he left out the fact
that they always
face toward the sun and shouldn't?
Thats not having integrity Rafi,
leaving out
important parts of what you don't want
people to know.
Brother we got off on a bad foot
and I don't see that getting any better
any time soon.)
"On December 6, as MAVEN transitioned from the dark side of Mars to the sunlit side in the course of its routine orbit, NASA’s operations team failed to re-establish contact with the spacecraft."
(12/6
12 tribes of Israel, disciples.
6, right before completion
None of this is any kind of accident.
None of it.)
"Three major media outlets in the United States and the United Kingdom — US Herald, Daily Mail, and IBT UK — have reported on a possible connection between 3I/ATLAS and the loss of communication with MAVEN. All three, and especially the Herald, highlighted growing public distrust of NASA, as well as the blurred images presented at a November 19
(Three major media outlets.
Not 1, 2, 4 or 5, three.
1+9= 10 Divine order, God's law.
Rafi? Brother?
We both know
where they re getting their
information from.
Thursday, December 18, 2025
of a Mars 3I/ATLAS collision:)
"press conference, following a prolonged period of silence attributed to the US government shutdown."
(Doesn't mean it was the case
only that the silence
was "attributed" to it.)
("Three media outlets..."
Not one, not two, three.
And we all know
where they are getting
their information
to base
"a possible connection between 3I/ATLAS and the loss of communication with MAVEN"
from.
Thursday, December 18, 2025
There aint nobody else on this earth
that has put that together.
Not one.
"The two most powerful people
on the face of the earth
since Old Testament times
are here on this earth right now
and about to join forces."
Somebody said a lil while back.)
"The images, taken around
Mars on October 2,
(10/2
10 = Divine law.
God's order.
2 = Two witnesses.)
'were released in low quality. NASA promised to provide clearer images later — a promise that has not yet been fulfilled."
(Apparently Rafi aint figured out how the world works these days.
Say you are going to just to get everynody off of your back
and then just dont is how things work anymore Rafi. Duh.
But we should just
believe anything else NASA presents right?
Even though they make promises
and then dont follow through on them?
If it was a child that did the same thing
what would you do?
I know what I would do.
So does my son.)
"NASA has provided few details
regarding the communication failure,
(Well I wonder why that is?)
describing it only as an “anomaly.” This is a broad term that can encompass a wide range of scenarios — from a technical malfunction to an external, unidentified factor. More specific explanations, such as a collision or system failure, were not offered, and the choice of wording raised additional questions."
("Truth doesn't cause more questions
It answers them."
and
"NASA has only made things
worse for themselves
since their "Live Event.")
"Nonetheless, the prolonged silence
and the partial disclosures
amplified conspiracy theories
already circulating online."
(The prolonged silence
and the partial disclosures are
signs of something else being in play.
Why not
just not have:
"prolonged silence
and the partial disclosures"
And then things wouldn't have gotten
so amplified on social media?
They made things worse for themselves.
WHY?
Because they can not tell you the truth
they know you are not prepared to deal with.
Nor do they want the panic that would ensue.
Nor does any other country with a space program
ESA, Japan, China etc...)
"What Could Have Gone Wrong?
Several possible causes
have been suggested for MAVEN’s failure:
(Not by NASA they aint been.
Again,
WHY?)
"A collision or impact
with an external object"
(Most likely scenario
as it has the most supporting evidence.
Ref:
Thursday, December 18, 2025
11 points of evidence supporting
the conclusion of a Mars 3I/ATLAS collision: )
"A cyber operation
(Those types are like ISIS.
They are proud of their work.
They want you to know they did it.
No hacker group has taken credit for it
and if they did?
Then how secure
is NASA's cyber infrastructure?)
"Failure of physical systems"
(It's two and a half weeks later
On 12/6 they lost contact for good.
If that is the case
they should know so by now
so why not just say it?)
"Failure of onboard computing systems
(Same thing:
If that is the case they should know so by now
so why not just say so?)
"Human operational error"
(And same thing again.
If that is the case
they should know so by now
so why not just say it?"
That just crawls under my skin.
One postulate has 11 pieces of evidence supporting it.
Four others have none
And yet they are presented as all
being equally valid explanations?
False equivalence much there Rafi?
He will gladly offer up things
that can easily be dismissed
but then he just blatantly and obviously
leaves out:
6) Avi Loeb changed 3I/ATLAS from going to go past Mars at .2 AU, to going past it at .02 AU, with a chance of a slight course correction making that 0 AU, all without any explanation, none whatsoever.
Thursday, September 4, 2025
"What matters is
we went from
.19 AU
to.018 AU
seemingly overnight
with absolutely
no explanation as to why."
"In addition, an orbit correction by 10–15 kilometers per second during the month of September 2025, could shrink the closest approach distance of 3I/ATLAS from Mars to zero, as calculated in Figure 4 of my paper with Adam Hibberd and Adam Crowl (accessible here).
The Challenge of Measuring the Mass of 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 09/01/25
After knowingly having read
what was written in my post about
11 points of evidence to support
the conclusion of 3I/ATLAS
having collided with Mars.)
"A senior space industry scientist told The Register that switching a spacecraft’s computers into Safe Mode alters its orbit, as it involves firing thrusters. Recovery, he explained, requires a maneuver to correct the orbital deviation caused by entering Safe Mode."
(So who is he? And he obviously isn't
a NASA official or former one
as they would have said so, so, nope.
And if that is/was the case?
Then why doesn't NASA just say so?)
"It is important to note that
such recovery operations
can take months
— and in some cases
even years.
Moreover, there is no no guarantee
that sufficient fuel remains for corrective maneuvers."
(Ravi put the red words above in bold
for emphasis in his piece.
Should have given us a link too
an example Rafi.
Thats what some of us do.
Why not you Rafi?
You cant just say something
and then think people
are going to believe you
just because you said it.
Thats the providence
of the high priest
of the cult of scientism .)
"Other experts
(Who?)
told SpaceNews that in January, Mars will enter a solar conjunction period, when it lies behind the Sun relative to Earth — a condition that could delay recovery efforts and diagnostics."
(If this article was a Wikipedia entry
they would be telling you it needs help.
Truth!
MAVEN is done and they know it
and they know why
and that's what they cant tell you.
Something else this guy conveniently leaves out:
9) After the close pass by of Mars
Avi encourages NASA to look for "Satellites"
There is Nothing More Deceptive than an Obvious Fact:
NASA’s Press Conference on 3I/ATLAS
"Three weeks ago,
(At the end of Oct.)
I recommended to NASA to check whether they see any evidence for new objects that either accompanied 3I/ATLAS or left it towards Mars and Earth. Related data from Mars rovers or orbiters or from Earth-based NASA satellites or Galileo Project observatories could reveal fragments from an iceberg that broke up …"
(Quit reading my stuff
and leaving out important facts Rafi.
Cause you will be exposed
for doing so.
Obviously.)
"The Broader Context: Planetary Defense
MAVEN is not merely a scientific probe.
It is a core component of the Mars Relay Network, serving as a communications hub for other NASA missions, and until recently was considered one of the most advanced relay nodes operating around Mars."
"At the same time:
An unusual interstellar object
passed near Mars only two months ago
NASA has issued an official statement
regarding a communication anomaly in MAVEN
(Oh you mean the people
that didn't list one anomaly of the 15
(let alone explain any of them)
in their live event?
It's toast and they know it.)
"There has been a sudden reliance on older-generation relay systems, requiring assistance from ESA and potentially coordination with other space agencies operating around Mars, including China, India, and the United Arab Emirates.
The potential implication is a reduced ability for NASA to manage Mars as a continuous operational environment, with possible consequences for future plans — including crewed missions and preparatory launches."
"All of this is unfolding
while the world is in the midst
of a large-scale United Nations
planetary defense exercise —
(As stated previously,
it aint an "exercise".
Funny timing
if its an "exercise"
dont ya think Rafi?
As the head
of the Harvard Astronomy Department
wants NASA looking for
"satellites" around Mars
after the 3I/ATLAS close pass by
and communications are lost
and the orbit changed with Maven.
Hey Avi?
Everybody reading this.
WHAT ARE THE ODDS
OF ALL OF THAT
HAPPENING
BY ACCIDENT?
)
"UN/IAWN — centered on 3I/ATLAS.
The exercise involves approximately 80 observation sites worldwide, along with a global fleet of satellites and spacecraft.
(80, go figure right?
And no
"fantastic pictures"
of 3I/ATLAS passing
by earth to be had?
Maybe by amateures,
not by the space agencies,
NONE
of them.)
"From a theoretical risk-management perspective, the loss of contact with MAVEN is not evidence of anything, but rather an edge-case scenario that systems are expected to handle."
(ITS WHAT ALL THE EVIDENCE
POINTS TO.
I tell you one thing.
There aint nothing theoretical about
this guy intentionaly leaving out
important information.)
"Programs such as IAWN / SMPAG are designed to address not only what is likely, but also scenarios with high impact, even if their probability is extremely low."
(Oh you mean the kind like
Avi always says we should be preparing for?
Interesting.)
"In risk-management terms, this is defined as:
Low probability – high consequence
The MAVEN anomaly, occurring just two months after spacecraft near Mars “observed” the interstellar visitor, and only days before 3I/ATLAS reached its closest point to Earth, fits precisely the type of scenario that planetary defense exercises are meant to examine."
"Exercise managers are expected to ask:
Are new objects appearing in Mars’ orbital environment?
Is there an unexplained change in the object population?
Is there an object that does not match known signatures
(debris or natural bodies)?
Could an external body — natural or otherwise —
disrupt orbits, affect spacecraft,
or cause communication anomalies?"
`
"Any serious safety system must also ask:
What happens when an anomaly
cannot be immediately explained?
Who reports it?
Who classifies it?
Who is responsible
for public communication?
This applies even if the final explanation
turns out to be:
A technical fault
Instrument noise
Or a rare natural phenomenon
(Thats the explanation
with the most overwhelming evidence
pointing toward it
and this douchebag
just conveniently leaves out
the important parts
of that evidence?
WHY?)
"Had NASA — the largest participant in the planetary defense exercise and one of its five governing authorities — initiated a formal activation of the exercise mechanisms following the MAVEN incident, there is a strong likelihood that the case would have been examined in depth, that conclusions would have been shared with scientists worldwide, and that the event would have been handled in a scientifically, technologically, and communicatively transparent manner — meeting the level of clarity the public reasonably expects."
(Ever since their
"Live Event"
you can forget about
any of that happening.
Ever.
SO WHY DIDNT THEY
"initiate a formal activation
of the exercise mechanisms
following the MAVEN incident"
THERE RAFI?
Cause they were already in place?
And they just cant tell anybody?
AND WHY ARE YOU
INTENTIONALLY LEAVING OUT
THE FOLLOWING
IMPORTANT PIECES OF EVIDENCE?
6) Avi Loeb changed 3I/ATLAS from going to go past Mars at .2 AU, to going past it at .02 AU, with a chance of a slight course correction making that 0 AU, all without any explanation, none whatsoever.
Thursday, September 4, 2025
"What matters is
we went from
.19 AU
to.018 AU
seemingly overnight
with absolutely
no explanation as to why."
"In addition, an orbit correction by 10–15 kilometers per second during the month of September 2025, could shrink the closest approach distance of 3I/ATLAS from Mars to zero, as calculated in Figure 4 of my paper with Adam Hibberd and Adam Crowl (accessible here).
The Challenge of Measuring the Mass of 3I/ATLAS
Avi Loeb Medium 09/01/25
And:
"Notice how he left out the fact
that they face toward the sun and shouldn't?
9) After the close pass by of Mars
Avi encourages NASA to look for "Satellites"
There is Nothing More Deceptive than an Obvious Fact:
NASA’s Press Conference on 3I/ATLAS"Three weeks ago,
Avi Loeb Medium 11/19/25
(At the end of Oct,
well before contact with Maven was lost.)
"I recommended to NASA to check whether they see any evidence for new objects that either accompanied 3I/ATLAS or left it towards Mars and Earth. Related data from Mars rovers or orbiters or from Earth-based NASA satellites or Galileo Project observatories could reveal fragments from an iceberg that broke up …"
Rafi?
I dodnt trust NASA.
And I dont trust you either.
Not only do I not trust you?
I dont like you
as you deliberately left out
key pieces of information
and we both know
it wasnt an accident.
I'd get my nose in the New Testament
if I was you Ravi.
I really would.
No comments:
Post a Comment