From Dec 6th:
Research Notes of the AAS ©2025.
Published by the American Astronomical Society
2 Loeb
1. INTRODUCTION
High-resolution imaging of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS with the Hubble Space
Telescope (HST) on July 21, 2025 showed a sunward anti-tail with an apparent 2:1
elongation in the plane of the sky (Jewitt et al. 2025a). The small misalignment
angle α ∼ 10◦ between the line-of-sight and the comet-Sun axis, increases the threedimensional axis ratio by a geometric factor of ∼ 1/(sin α) = 5.76. Other
(Sierra-Ricart et al. 2025; Cordiner et al. 2025; Chandler et al. 2025)
observations confirmed this
feature as the most definite instance of a sunward anti-tail that is not a conventional
cometary tail - commonly pushed away from the Sun by solar radiation and wind but
sometimes displaying a portion that appears to point toward the Sun due to viewing
perspective.
An earlier paper (Keto & Loeb 2025) that I co-authored suggested that the antitail seen on July 21 at a heliocentric distance of 4 AU can be explained by a coma
model where the scattering is dominated by volatile ice grains with lifetimes long
enough to travel the extent of the observed anti-tail, but short enough that the
grains are destroyed by sublimation before solar radiation pressure sweeps them into
a conventional tail on the opposite side of the comet. In this case, the nucleus
must be rotating slowly enough that the surface temperature responds quickly to
the illumination angle, so that the mass flux from the sunward surface exceeds that
from the rest of its surface by a factor sufficient to produce the observed sunward
elongation.
(Everything above from:
"An earlier paper (Keto & Loeb 2025)...
to right now is complete garbage.
And he knew it when he wrote it
or he wouldn't be putting forth
the alternative explanation that follows.
I am going to tell you right now
I am 100% not
afraid or intimidated
by anybody
on this earth.
Not a single one.
Cause I know who has got my back:
(That aint lens flare
or camera scattering.)
I now someday
Im going to die for what I am saying
and I knew that years ago
and I didnt care then
and I dont care now.
Life changes you
when you have been
given the precious gift
of seeing beyond it.
Dying don't matter so much
all the sudden.
We clear?
Good then.
I'm glad we understand each other.)
"Here, I consider an alternative interpretation of the anti-tail,
associated it with scattering
by a swarm of macroscopic non-volatile object"
(Like what the fuck exactly Avi?
"Macroscopic", How big?
And what kinda "object"
what's it made out of?)
"that are not affected
by the
solar radiation pressure
or the solar wind."
Dude?
I see you found your crack pipe again.
That is science to you?
That there is some kinda something
(object)
of a certain kinda size
that is:
"not affected
by the
solar radiation pressure
or the solar wind"
(800,000 mph
on the low end BTW)
One of these days
this tribe of dunderheads
is gonna get it,
I pray they do,
I really do.
Sunday, November 9, 2025
It's not a technological problem...
(3I/ATLAS)
It's a
laws of nature
problem.
Nothing that is made of matter
(object)
goes out 37,000 miles
straight into
a 800,000 mph headwind.
AINT NO FUCKIN WAY.
Period.
Checkmate.
He only wrote this
to make it seem like
THERE IS
a scientific explanation
for something going out 37,000 km
into a 800,000 mph wind.
I bet
I know
why he felt
compelled to write it
in the first place.
I guarantee you I do.)
This alternative model is motivated by the
latest post-perihelion data on 3I/ATLAS.
During the month of November 2025, post-perihelion images of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS showed a tear-drop shape of its coma with an anti-tail extension of
about an arcminute towards the Sun (Jewitt & luu 2025). This feature was also apparent in the second HST image taken of 3I/ATLAS on November 30, 2025, where the
sunward extension of the sunward anti-tail is apparent out to a distance of ∼ 6 × 104
km from the nucleus1
.
On December 1, 2025, the JPL Horizons tracking of 3I/ATLAS reported2 a nongravitational acceleration. Its radial component - normalized at a heliocentric distance
of 1 au to A1 = 7.2(±2.1) × 10−8
au d−2
, amounts to a small fraction ∆ = 2.4 × 10−4
of the gravitational acceleration from the Sun.
JPL Horizons scales the non-gravitational acceleration inversely with the square
of the heliocentric distance (assuming CO2 sublimation interior to 5 au), exactly
as the Sun’s gravitational acceleration. This means that the ratio between the two
accelerations remains constant along the orbit of 3I/ATLAS.
1 https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/3iatlas/2025/12/04/nasas-hubble-space-telescope-revisits-interstel2 https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=3I%2FATLAS&view=VOP
Research Notes of the AAS ©2025. Published by the American Astronomical Society
The Anti-Tail of 3I/ATLAS 3
2. DYNAMICS
The dominant component of the non-gravitational acceleration is in the radial direction away from the Sun. A simple way to incorporate it into the dynamics is to
consider 3I/ATLAS as accelerating in response to a slightly reduced mass of the Sun,
by a fraction of ∆.
If 3I/ATLAS is
surrounded by a swarm
of macroscopic non-volatile objects
that do
not share its non-gravitational acceleration, then these objects will tend to be closer
to the Sun relative to 3I/ATLAS, because 3I/ATLAS is pushed away from the Sun
relative to the objects through its non-gravitational acceleration.
As long as these
objects are
much larger
than micron-scale
dust particles,
the solar radiation pressure
and solar wind
will have a negligible effect on their dynamics.
(So, Avi?
How
"much larger"
than micron-scale?"
Do they have to be
And why didn't you say so?
Tells me everything I need to know.
Also?
What exactly is producing:
"a swarm
of macroscopic non-volatile objects"
and how has it been able
to do so for so long?
An 8 billion year old energy source?
On an interstellar visitor?
Avi? Brother?
You would need a crack pipe to believe it.)
Energy per unit mass is a conserved constant of motion in trajectories shaped
by the Sun’s gravity. However, the trajectory of 3I/ATLAS has a slightly smaller
gravitational binding energy because of the reduction in the effective mass of the Sun
by the non-gravitational acceleration.
If the objects started at the same velocity and position as 3I/ATLAS,
(I must of missed something somewhere
How were they being created again?
And for how long?
8 billion years?)
then they
would have a surplus in gravitational binding energy by a fraction of ∆ relative to
3I/ATLAS. However, they would have the same binding energy and track 3I/ATLAS
if they move at the same velocity and are displaced from its heliocentric distance by
a fraction ∆.
At the current separation of 3I/ATLAS from the Sun of 2.7×108 km as of December
1, 2025, the displacement would imply that the objects are closer to the Sun than
3I/ATLAS by about 6.5 × 104 km
if they overlapped
(e.g. as a result of being broken off)
at perihelion."
(So why were you telling NASA
we should be looking for
satellites around Mars then?
After 3I/ATLAS close pass?
Cause that was well before perihelion.
So you can just stop that bull shit right here.
BUSTED!
This guy knows what this thing has been doing all along.
He has mentioned "Unwanted gifts around the Holidays"
He has talked about, looking for Satellites around Mars etc.
Sure sounds like somebody thinks
we are going to be going through a debris field to me.
These people knew this thing was trouble well before June.
You can take that to the bank.)
This displacement corresponds to an angular separation of ∼ 0.8′
in the sky at the current distance of 3I/ATLAS from Earth, ∼ 1.9 au. This angular
separation is comparable to the sunward elongation of the teardrop glow around
3I/ATLAS in recent images (Jewitt & luu 2025).
As long as the objects are made of
refractory elements with no volatiles
and do
not experience non-gravitational acceleration
from mass loss as a result of the solar
illumination
(Like fucking what?
What are they made out of.
And how big are they?
And how are they being created
this long into 3I/ATLAS lifespan
just on and on and on...
Avi?
Im gonna stay on you like white on rice.
When you write bull shit
and call it science?
Im gonna expose it
for the complete made up bull shit that it is.
Tired of listening to this garbage.
You got three choices
about 3I/ATLAS:
1) Natural,
it's already been ruled out
as it shouldn't even exist in the first place
according to Mr. Loeb.
2) Technological,
aliens made it.
Aliens don't get to circumvent
the laws of nature either,
and where did they come from?
and how did they get their information that
"as far as we know"
is needed for life?
Leaves one choice left:
Supernatural.
It exist outside of the laws of nature.
It exist and it shouldn't
so what else
are you gonna call that exactly?
Other things that exist
outside the laws of nature:
UAP.
(We see em almost nightly BTW.
Probably because we know what they are.
Locust of the deep, Revelation 9:1-11 btw)
DNA
The information
in the genetic code
requires an intellect behind it.
IMPUTATION METHOD
Not just that the genetic information is there
but how did it get into
every sell of every living thing
the only place we know
life "as we know it" exist?
So I got three things that we all know
exist outside of the laws of nature.
You got:
Something by your own admission
that shouldn't even be here
and:
not so much as a living cell
away from this planet.
So Im going to go straight up supernatural:
1) As demonstrated above
we already know of other things
that exist that are supernatural
and
2) Counting 3I/ATLAS?
I got four things supporting my contention,
and nobody else in the world
got one thing that supports
a natural or technological conclusion.
CHECKMATE.
GOD WINS.
, they should maintain an anti-tail geometry - pointing always towards
the Sun relative to 3I/ATLAS and converging to its location at perihelion.
3. IMPLICATIONS
A large swarm of objects could have a much larger surface area than that of
3I/ATLAS, even if the total mass in them is a small fraction of the mass of 3I/ATLAS.
For example, 1012 similar objects carrying a total fraction of merely 10−3 of the mass
of 3I/ATLAS would amount to a total surface area that is 102
times larger than that
of 3I/ATLAS (since surface area scales as radius squared whereas mass scales as radius cubed). This swarm would create the appearance of a coma that reflects 99%
of the sunlight in the glow around 3I/ATLAS. This is consistent with the fraction of
Research Notes of the AAS ©2025. Published by the American Astronomical Society
4 Loeb
light in the coma within the image of 3I/ATLAS taken by the Hubble Space Telescope
on July 21, 2025 (Jewitt et al. 2025b).
As long as the non-gravitational acceleration of 3I/ATLAS scales inversely with the
square of heliocentric distance, the spatial extent of the objects would be of order ∆
times the heliocentric distance of 3I/ATLAS, always pointing towards the Sun. This
model predicts that the teardrop shape towards the Sun will maintain its angular
shape in the coming months.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported in part by the Galileo Project at Harvard University.
REFERENCES
Chandler, C. O., Bernardinelli, P. H.,
Juri´c, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints,
arXiv:2507.13409,
doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.13409
Cordiner, M. A., Roth, N. X., Kelley, M.
S. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints,
arXiv:2508.18209,
doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.18209
Jewitt, D., Hui, M.-T., Mutchler, M.,
Kim, Y., & Agarwal, J. 2025a, ApJL,
990, L2,
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf8d8
—. 2025b, ApJL, 990, L2,
doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf8d8
Jewitt, D., & luu, J. 2025, The
Astronomer’s Telegram, 17490, 1
Keto, E., & Loeb, A. 2025, MNRAS,
doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2054
Sierra-Ricart, M., J.Licandro, & Alarcon,
M. 2025, Jet detection on interstellar
comet 3I/ATLAS, The Astronomer’s
Telegram No. 17445.
https://astronomerstelegram.org/?read=17
Ephesians 6:12
For we wrestle
not against flesh and blood,
but against principalities,
against powers,
against the
rulers of the darkness
of this world,
against spiritual wickedness
in high places.
(Harvard among them.)
2 Corinthians 10:4
For the weapons
of our warfare
are not carnal,
but mighty through God
to the pulling down
of strong holds;)
Avi?
In case you aint noticed?
Yawl's lil tribe of snobs
is #1 on Gods hit list
as far as the
"pulling down of strongholds"
goes.
Believe that.
That is a part of our commission
and it/we will not be stopped.
People?
This age is ending
and people like Avi
and his compadres?
They better get a grip
before they perish eternally.
No comments:
Post a Comment