Thursday, December 11, 2025

Well...because...

 


The Tale of 3I/ATLAS and Sterile Neutrinos

Avi Loeb Medium 12/10/25


"Why is the idea of 

a technological origin 

for interstellar objects 

far more controversial

than the failed idea 

of sterile neutrinos?"


Well Avi?

Because:


Thursday, December 11, 2025

Avi, 3IATLAS...yawn etc...


"Common sense says, 

codes don't create themselves

by their very nature they are

pre-panned, sequenced

and arranged

which takes preplanning.


It can not be done

by a random arbitrary process

chemical or otherwise.


It takes an intelligence 

to be able make a code,

a recipe, a blueprint, 

whatever you wanna call it

it's all still:

information etc.



Everything that has ever processed oxygen

to exist, the only place we know has had

and does have life?


Has had a 3 billion character code

(DNA) in it. Call it a blue print, recipe whatever,

if it wasnt there?


We wouldn't have life here.


Therefore,

for there to be life somewhere else?


Common sense says

that life form would need

a genetic code, DNA, blueprint

instructions (information) etc. as well.


So where did that life's

 information come from?


Simple.

It came from nowhere 

cause there isn't any.


Life here wasnt an accident.


Life here took an intelligence.

Therefore it wasnt an accident.


Given that 

there are no 

chemical, biological

or physical process

by which information results

to produce new life?



Then there is 0 chance in hell

of it ever arising anywhere else

by random arbitrary processes either,

and informed intelligent people

not beholden to a false dogmatic 

faith based belief system

know it 

and 

accept it.


See how hard that was?

So the best, 

simplest shortest answer 

to the question:


"Q: What is the best evidence so far 

that suggests we are probably 

not alone in the universe?"


There isn't any."




These cosmologist and biologist

know all this 

and they have 

and they will

tell people such

 off the record.


On the record?

Yeah not so much.


I wonder why that is?



No comments: