"0:06
saying is that there is a plume of gas around it
(3I/ATLAS)
and by the way the only 4% by
mass is uh water.
So even though the experts was saying initially
it must be water rich, it's not water rich."
(Strike one.
I can go back on here
and get the articles and the dates
and prove to you
they knew that it wasnt
and they kept on
repeating that it was anyway.
Why?)
" much as 5° with ecliptic plane
1:03
anomaly number two. Then when you look at this object even now there seem to be
an extension of the object in the direction of the sun. So this is an anti
1:15 tail anti tail
(To his credit,
He is the only one
really talking about it
So again,
WHY?
And it is still there
but now its on
the other side of the object.
The red blob from the lower left corner
back to the point in-between
the two lil green dots is your anti-tail.
500,000 km into the solar wind.
800,000, 1.4 million mph etc.
It defies the laws of physics.
Avi says so himself here in a minute.)
In this image the anti-tail is pointing
to the upper left corner
and the cone shape of 3I/ATLAS is apparent.)
"So we've never observed any kind of
1:29
comet with an anti-tail.
This is the first time we've ever seen
so when people say oh we have seen
1:34
examples they have to realize
most of those examples
were just optical illusion."
(Like here:
Optical illusions
dont switch sides of an object
like is the case with the anti-tail
of 3I/ATLAS
"But no, I mean the reason
the physics of
1:58
that is simple.
The physics is that the solar wind
and the solar radiation
are pushing gas particles, dust particles
2:06
away from the sun. Okay?
So whenever so usually the surfacing side is
2:12
uh you know losing those particles because it's heated
and then they immediately get turned
2:17
around into a beautiful tail
of either you know gas particles like ions or
2:23
atoms or um dust particles pushed away.
But in this case at least in the early
2:30
days you know July and August we saw an extension
just towards the direction of
2:36
motion towards the sun
and it was really paradoxical.
(It is still there and as stated it has switched from
the front side of 3I/ATLAS facing the sun,
to the the rear side of 3I/ATLAS facing the sun.
(Seems to me like
if an entity that exist outside
of the laws of nature
(and controls them
since he created them)
wanted to prove to you he is real
he would send you something:
"really paradoxical".)
"Now the high-rise image in
2:41
the NASA press conference you know
is really of very poor quality."
(Strike three.
Why even release it?
NASA is causing
more problems for itself
these days than it is solving.)
The people who analyzed the data stated
3:36
that there was some jitter in the camera
"that degraded the image"
and they gave us
3:41
(Shock wave from 3I/ATLAS
bouncing off Mars.
And why didn't NASA ever explain
what this image was of?
right during the time frame
3I/ATLAS was passing by Mars
They never even said
what it was of, or why they released it.)
3:53
the point is that if you
3:59
look at that fuzzy image,
which by the way is much worse quality
than the amateur astronomers
4:04
now.
(Strike four.
Why is that Avi?
We know that is happening,
the question we want answered is:
Why is this happening
And hy are you not sharing thought
as to why you think that might be?
And why didn't the interviewer ask him?)
"Yeah. Um
what you see is
an extension of the glow
around three atlas
in the direction of motion,
4:12
not in the direction of the sun.
and could see uh it
when it was moving
4:43
roughly perpendicular
to the direction of the sun.
So it's it's moving sideways
relative to the direction of the sun
as you can see here.
(Strike Five.
It wasnt doing so before.
But after passing by Mars it is?
And cant none of these brainiacs
figure out why?
And all we get from NASA
is lesser quality pictures than from amateurs?
And nobody thinks that a problem?
Not Avi, not show host, not anybody?
There's a picture released
and nobody knows what is of?
Or why it was released?
And nobody is even asking
questions about it?)
"when
6:01
it came closest to Mars, you know,
it was moving in a direction
that was perpendicular
to the direction of the
6:07
sun."
(What the hell does this brainiac think caused that?
All he ever says is it was doing so.
Never once have I read or heard of him or anyone
explaining as to why that might be.
Not once.
Why?)
"usually the story is that submicron
particles scatter sunlight and then you
8:02
can calculate if they scatter sunlight
they also get pushed behind the the object.
They they create a tail.
8:08
There is no escape from that "
(And now you see why
nobody but Avi
even talks about that.
Let me tell ya something Avi
You just admitted
Aliens dont get to escape it either
(If they existed
but as this community knows
they cant.)
"because the same process that gives you the glow
from scattered sunlight also pushes them."
"So when people say it's a comet, they don't
9:45
attempt to explain the anomalies I mentioned.
They just ignore them. Okay?"
(The cult of scientism
is pretty good at:
"They just ignore"
what ever it is
they don't like:
Information needs a brain.
The angular momentum issue
with the nebular hypothesis.
Right handed DNA needs left handed proteins.
RNA DNA and proteins
all had to come together
at the same time.
They just ignore what they don't like
make up some fairy tale nonsense
more fanciful than what they don't like
and just go on about their day
like they solved something.
Science is supposed to be agnostic.
It is supposed to just accept the facts
as they present themselves
and work from there.
Only problem is,
ever since we discovered
the double helix
information storage structure of DNA
and the cosmic background radiation,
(left over glow from the light of the big bang,
the fuzzy static on your TV
when it does have an input)
everything points to a creator.
And recent discoveries in:
Cosmology, Physics and Biology
all point to there having to be
an intelligence behind it all.
And they dont like it.
So they just ignore it
or make up some horse shit
from their imaginations
and call it science.
It aint science.
It is a faith based belief system
which has:
"ANYTHING BUT A CREATOR"
as it's central dogma.
Anything but one option
that increasingly has more evidence
pointing toward is just horrible logic.
My contention is,
the reason for all these discovery's
pointing toward a creator
across three fields of science is because,
there is a creator
and he wants you to know
he is real, right now
cause this age is ending.
Credit to Stephen C. Meyer
Return of the God Hypothesis etc.)
And that's what you should ask NASA officials
when they say we are confident the
okay how do you explain the large
9:56
mass of the object
(3I/ATLAS)
how do you quantitatively
not just say oh comets are weird
and some of them are unusual
10:02
and therefore it's okay
they're all different right
but that's not an explanation
if you don't have enough mass
in rocky material
10:08
in interstellar space to accommodate
the delivery of such a package
over the past decade
you need to explain that you
10:13
can't just ignore it
(Why not?
The cult of scientism
does it everywhere else
they see something they don't like.
3I/ATLAS is like God saying:
"Here bitches,
you cant just ignore this away.
Have fun."
"this is not politics
we are talking about science here"
(Avi? You just demonstrated
how woefully ignorant
you really are
about the state of affairs
in the country you live in.)
"and you have to think you can't
10:19
just So you you can't just be a a bureaucrat
that makes statements
and everyone should believe you because of
10:25
your authority.
(That statement is gonna come back
and bite him in the ass here at the end
of this, promise.)
"That's not the way science is done.
We all know that the the church,
the Vatican, apologized and
10:31
admitted 350 years after
Galileo died that he was right."
(More on that in a bit
cause he uses it a lot.)
"So if you want to be sincere and honest,
you don't make some
10:50
authoritative statements by bureaucrats,
you go to the data and explain the anomaly."
(See the comment above.
about not understanding
what is going on in this country.
Did it ever occur to this guy
that
"to be sincere and honest"
is about as far away from the minds
of these political fucks
as it could be?
Once you admit to yourself
the age we are embarking on?
Life gets so much more peaceful.
it really does.)
"anyway, so turns out that there was
some non-gravitational acceleration uh
14:31
observed for 3i Atlas,
meaning that
when it came closest to the sun
during the month of October,
it deviated from the
14:39
original path a little bit
(Oh he means after
it went by Mars.
Interesting.
Ever think accounting for
3I/ATALS colliding with Mars
as to maybe having
something to do with:
"during the month of October,
it deviated from the
original path a little bit"
??????????
Strike five BTW)
"so that it gets exactly
15:12
where it needs to get so that
it can deploy devices near Jupiter"
(8 billion years old devices
are they?
Interesting.)
"maybe at the lrange points
15:19
or deploy vices devices
like probes or something.
Yeah. or or communication
15:26
devices
(So why doesn't it bother
communicating with us then
It's just ridiculousness
it is not science.)
Now, we will be able to tell when it gets there
because we have orbiters like um
16:39
the Juno spacecraft there that could monitor
if anything unusual happens,
(Dude?
Amateurs' are getting better quality pictures out
They aren't ever going to tell you shit about:
"if anything unusual happens"
cause it already has happened
when it hit mars and they didn't say anything.
(It takes a really special kinda jack ass to believe
there can be 8 billion year old
"communications devices"
but ignore all the evidence we have to date
of a 3I/ATLAS collision with Mars.
It really does.
People just don't want their illusions destroyed.
TOUGH SHIT!
Better your illusions than your soul.)
if
16:44
there are any satellites being deployed
(8 billion year old satellites?)
uh and so the Juno the Juno is going around or
16:49
uh Jupiter. Yes. And we can we can tap into the Juno
and get the pictures from it.
(Just like you did the pictures from Mars
you were so excited about
till all MASA gave you was a fuzzy blob?
Gotcha...right...)
Yeah. Yeah, definitely.
Juno will also
16:55
have has also a radio antenna
that can look for radio signals from the Atlas if
17:01
there are any. Uh-huh. Um,
and NASA controls all this.
Yeah."
(Oh you mean the people that don't even
talk about anomalies during their
"Live Event"
??????????
And we have amateurs taking better pictures
with ground based telescopes
than NASA does with space based ones
that cost us billions?
Nice. Awesome. So reassuring.)
"But I talked I spoke to the
17:07
principal investigator of Juno
and you know he's a faculty member
17:14
and at the university
and he told me that they will do the best they can.
(They are not releasing anything
but fuzzy photographs since Mars
and wont even talk about one anomaly?
Is it that hard to figure out how good:
"they will do the best they can"
Is really gonna be?)
"I
17:20
was hoping they can
bring it closer to 3 Atlas."
(The Juno craft that is.
Why?
So you can just get more fuzzy pictures?
Brother?
You're denser than I am)
"and so by the holidays
we should know and uh
21:12
let's just hope
that we will not get any
unwanted gifts for the holidays
from this object.
(He has been saying this
for over a month now.
Why?
And "lets hope"
just isn't a very effective strategy Avi.)
"22:27
every day you can see images
of 3 atlas taken by halfmeter telescopes that are
22:33
owned by amateurs you know with
at a cost of I don't know thousands to tens
22:38
of thousands of dollars.
Compare that to the instruments
used by NASA that cost
22:44
altogether billions of dollars.
Nevertheless, the information in those images
taken by amateurs now is much
22:52
greater than in the NASA images
at the press conference that we heard about.
(Okay, awesome you bring it up.
But that's not what matters.
What we wanna know is
What are your thoughts as to why that is?
The fact that he aint saying why he thinks that is?
Leads me to question his
integrity, honesty, sincerity etc.
It just does.
Why repeatedly bring this up
and not give a explanation as to why you think that is the case?
And this is the head of the Harvard Astronomy Department?
Strike 7 I think we are up to now. )
"this object is bright you know
it's the fact that half a meter telescope
saw it at a distance
23:18
of 4 and a half times
the earth sun separation means
that it's a very bright very big object"
(Cause It's a volcano
"and I calculated that if
23:25
it's a you know the brightness of this object is as a result of
23:31
reflection of sunlight from a solid body
it has to be 20 km in diameter which is
23:36
the size of Manhattan
at Nile and you know the length
uh that's a huge object
that's you know comparable to the size
23:44
of the asteroid that killed the dinosaur
66 million years ago.
These are extremely rare things.
"there is not enough rocky material in interstellar space to
24:01
deliver such a big package over the past decade
because this survey went only for one decade and you would
24:07
expect it once per
10,000 years.
(Seems to be a recurring number here lately.
Friday, December 12, 2025
)"Now you might say, oh well maybe you know it's a
24:14
a rare object that happens to come by.
that that's obviously possible, but at a
24:19
probability of 0 0.1% or so or less.
(So its not really
even a possibility lol.)
24:25
and then so that was the first anomaly
that struck me, you know, uh the size
24:30
the the mass.
So it's a a million times more massive than the first interstellar object
discovered in 2017 called Oumuamua
24:37
That was the size of a football field.
So compare the size of a city to the size of a football field.
"And this is the third object.
So, you know, again, we we've only been monitoring
these interstellar objects for how long?
27:40
Uh, about 8 years. About 8 years.
Yeah. Okay. So, since about roughly 2017."
(Third interstellar object in three years.
Your creator is trying to tell you something.
I knew it when Oumuamua showed up.)
"if three i Atlas was headed
in a trajectory to inter intercept earth
30:25
would that be a civilization ender?
Definitely.
And what would we do we really have the
30:31
ability to deflect that?
Not really."
"that was a task that the US Congress gave
to NASA back in 2005.
And that's why
34:36
these survey telescopes that found Oumuamua
and now um three Atlas were developed in
34:43
response to the mission that NASA received
from Congress and uh they were
34:51
aiming at finding near-Earth objects
bigger than a football field
and the in the process of doing that found Mua
34:56
which is the size of a football field.
Now comes three Atlas it's much bigger.
35:02
What's going on?
It's the size of Manhattan, right? Roughly. Yeah"
(And now all they want to give you
is blurry images with them?
It's the end of an age yo.
Better wise up homie.)
"What is the best photograph we have of it?
It was supposed to be the high-rise
35:15
image from the Mars Recon,
but it was too fuzzy.
(Repeat of an previous "Strike"
and I'm not sure which one
and dont really wanna look it up
right now either lol.
And?
The interviewer didnt ask
what "was supposed to be"
the best photograph we have of it?
He asked:
"What is" the best photograph we have of it?
Question went unanswered.
It is in seeing continual things like this
that make me question Avi's sincerity, integrity etc.
Makes me think he knows way more
than he is letting on
(see amateur astronomers
vs NASA no explanation etc.)
I think he is just running interference
for the US government
constantly talking about
Aliens, technology etc.
I really do.)
"so far we've seen
35:29
amateur astronomers giving us images um but they use telescopes that are you
35:35
know smaller than a meter like half a meter or smaller. However, you know
35:41
professional astronomers have access to telescopes that are up to 10 m in diameter. So those should give us
35:47
amazing views of three atlas
and we haven't seen the reports yet
but I I'm hoping
(Why not?
Why are the amateurs out performing
the professionals? With tons larger better equipment?
Were getting great stuff from the amateurs',
so why aren't we seeing any
from the professionals outside of NASA, ESA etc?)
"38:06
many people feel that science
is an occupation of the elite."
(Cause we know now
yawl just ignore the evidence you don't like
then make up a fairytale
that suits your cults needs
and then try to force your faith based
dogma down our throats
like you're superior.
Yawl just like the NASA bureaucrats
you complained about Avi.
We are just supposed to accept
whatever fairy tail of the day
yawl wanna make up
cause yall are the authority.
People aint buying this mess anymore Avi.
This paradigm is dead in the water these days.
People see through it.)
"I should say up front that I'm not hugely excited about the vision of going
40:01
to the moon and Mars is the ultimate you know um destiny of humanity because you
40:08
know these are rocks that are not better than earth.
Earth is a paradise.
It has an atmosphere, liquid water. We feel
40:16
comfortable here"
(He can say that again.)
"We we are very late by the way
if you want to get a good dose of modesty
42:46
then you have to realize
we are not at the center of the universe.
We know that
since Copernicus and Galileo despite the
42:52
wishful thinking of the Vatican"
(So the head of the Harvard astronomy department
doesn't know
that in an ever expanding universe
there isn't a center?
Avi? Brother?
Please...
Ethan Siegel Big Think 11/02/23
"all observers
located at all points
have equal claim
to the notion that they are at the center"
And since we are the only observers
that we have ever seen or know of,
then what would that make us Avi?
Thanks Ethan :-)
Love ya brother.
And it will become apparent here in a bit that Avi and the cult of scientism
are every bit as in love with their dogma, and with themselves "being the authorities"
as the Catholic church was back in the time frame he is referencing.
How are they any different from them these days really?
or from the NASA bureaucrats?
"WERE THE AUTHORITIES HERE!
YOU WILL LISTEN TO
WHATEVER IT IS WE SAY!"
They have become what they hated.
It just absurd.
It really is.)
"but um we also came very late to the cosmic
42:58
play. You know only over the past few million years
the human species came to exist and the universe existed for 13.8
43:05
billion years. So the conclusion from that
is if you arrive late to the play
(Completely irrelevant,
it has nothing to do with anything.
The amount of something
(Stars)
or how old it is
(Universe)
has nothing to do with the formation of life
But information sure does.
Seems like these brainiacs would point it out for you.
I wonder why it is they never do?
Couldn't be because it disproves their faith based dogma
or anything now could it?
Tell you what, since they wont point out
information is the most important ingredient needed for life?
Ill do it for them.)
"and you're not at the center of stage
(Prove it. good luck
You cant.)
"43:12
the play is not about you.
(Thats right.
Its not about you
it's about you
and a relationship your with God
and enjoying his creation together.)
"It's a very simple conclusion."
(Only if you buy the premise.
These types need logic courses
I swear they do.)
"and you better find other actors
43:19
to ask them
what the play is about.
(Avi?
I already just told you.
And? Thats assuming there are some.
"other actors"
What if theres not?
We haven't found any nor they us.
Why is that never a consideration?
No evidence to date.
Find me a cell.
Anywhere but here.
Have fun.)
"We have very limited knowledge of what
happened to our cosmic neighborhood"
(Then why do you sons of bitches act like
anything that comes out of your moths
is gospel just because you said it?
Cause that just might have something to do
with people thinking your an elitist's
faith-based cult
forcing your dogma on the populace.)
"43:33
And so much has happened on Earth.
Uh we don't even know if on Earth there was
a very advanced civilization before ours,
43:41
right?
(I know this much.
There a 12,000 year old
lunar solar calendar at
Go build you one
from just star gazing
without any modern equipment
or instructions.
Good luck.
Did I mention there was a large petrified boat
a few hundred kms from Gobekli tepe?)
"46:13
we are very shortsighted because if you look right now
we are engaged mostly in conflicts
we live for a short time
46:18
each of us just century territorial apes.
(Im sorry,
I must have missed the press conference
when they announced they found the missing link
between apes and humans.
This is why people see this cult as elitists.
They accept things as truth
because they want it to be
not because of any evidence they have
that it's true.
Avi couldn't prove:
"each of us just century territorial apes"
Nobody has
or can.
I'm a child of the almighty God
who merged the physical with the spiritual
in my mind.
Name me one other species
that stuck around after it evolved
into a different life form?
Not that we did, we supposedly
shared a common ancestor
that nobody can find any
fossilized remains of anywhere.
See:
Günter Bechly
Evolution News May 10, 2024
Impossible BTW
as there is no biological process
that generates enough new information
to create new life
(including the original.)
And I love this too
this is great:
"Would you trust an ape enough
to get in a cage with it?"
"Well hell know!"
So why you gonna trust the brain
you think we both evolved from?
Checkmate Mr. Ape Brain.
I know more about Biology
than the head of
the Harvard Astronomy Department
He should really shut up about biology
as should they all,
every cosmologist, astronomers,
particle physicist, astrophysicist etc.
all they do is make themselves look
extremely ignorant about the subject.
Seems like they would stop after a while.
So it is with the faith based
members of this cult.)
"49:11
smaller body than right than than Earth
and therefore it (Mars) had life
probably before Earth
(Here we go again
there is zero evidence for that.
Zero.
None.
No "may have had"
"We think it had"
Just:
"therefore it (Mars) had life"
Go prove it then Avi
but shut up
trying to pass things off as truth
that just just do not
have any evidence to support it
This is the very essence of a cult.
I have evidence for my faith.
Millions of changed lives.
This is what he honestly believes in
with zero evidence to support it
and if you challenge them on it
they just look at you
exactly like the Vatican did
Copernicus, Galileo etc.)
"it could have delivered
49:25
life to Earth"
(Just because something
"could have"
(and it cant)
doesnt mean that it did!)
"because
there were rocks that were basically um making the trip
49:30
from the surface of Mars to Earth as a result of an impact
by a bombardment by some asteroids. We know that there was
49:37
there were lots of bombardments
and um we have uh one rock that was
49:44
analyzed about 45 years ago uh from Mars and
49:50
it was possible to say that this rock never heated was never heated to more
49:56
than 40° C uh during its entire journey from the
50:01
surface of Mars and passage through the Earth's atmosphere created the fireball
50:06
and then landing on the earth. Never the core of the rope was never heated by to
50:12
more than 40° because it has magnetic properties
that would have been erased if it were to be heated by more. And
50:19
that means that microbes could have survived
at the center at the core of this this rock
(Doesn't mean anything.
How hard is this?
Microbes don't generate 3 billion character codes.
Francis crick who originally has this idea
had a complete DNA molecule arriving here
to explain the storage capacity of DNA
as he knew it took an advanced intelligence
to have created something like that
and even that is missing RNA
and the associated proteins you need
in the same timespan.
Now days Cricks original idea has been watered down, diluted, and perverted to the point where the practitioners of the faith-based cult of scientism think all you need is a piece of space dust, microbes etc.
Ignoring what you dont like
just isnt science.
These guys have painted themselves into a corner alright,
“Astronomers now find they have painted themselves into a corner because they have proven, by their own methods, that the world began abruptly in an act of creation to which you can trace the seeds of every star, every planet, every living thing in this cosmos and on the earth. And they have found that all this happened as a product of forces they cannot hope to discover. That there are what I or anyone would call supernatural forces at work is now, I think, a scientifically proven fact.”
one from which they will not escape unless they humble themselves before their creator.)
"that we have an example
50:25
of. And the same is true for the rocks that came early on.
So it's possible that microbes were the first astronauts
50:32
really that came from Mars to Earth."
"But if the evolution of life was accelerated for
51:09
some reason on Mars by a factor of two,
that's that's the only thing you need.
Then you could have had uh intelligent
51:17
creatures over there as well.
(100% completely wrong,
the thing you need more than anything
is the information to make it all work.
So where is that huh?
And when they go:
"Well it was different over there."
Then they just violated the scientific principal
Now they are not promoting science
they are promoting
a faith-based ideology.
Im telling ya
This paradigm is finished.
its just toast.
Intelligent informed people
know better than this Dogma
Avi is preaching here.)
"Well, it's interesting. There's that element,
the xenon 129 that was found on
51:34
Mars. And um the only place on Earth
it's actually found is like ground zero of of
51:42
the tests of thermonuclear bombs.
That's interesting. Yeah. So wherever there's nuclear explosions
51:47
where we we've tested nuclear bombs on land,
we find this xenon 129. Interesting.
And that seems to be that I guess it's
51:53
an isotope and that was found on Mars.
Well, imagine a situation where
there was a population there uh that went into
52:02
a nuclear war and wiped itself.
And it's not a So, yeah, it's not a So,
the Xenon 129 is not a naturally
52:07
occurring phenomena. That's interesting.
It's only allegedly created where
52:13
there's nuclear bombs
and we found it on Mars.
(A fucking microbe
took it there Ape brain.
Works for you for getting
life here on this planet
from there, so
I figure it works for me
getting your element to Mars.
Same exact logic.
What's your beef with it?)
"no we haven't found
any evidence of life
54:48
on Mars yet?
Not yet.
(Theres never been any.
Ever.
What intelligence designed their information
that "as far as we know" is needed for life?
Hum?
Guy needs to stay away from biology and figure out why amateurs are getting better results than NASA these days.)
I mean the most recent um uh clue is the these rocks that were
54:55
discussed in a recent press conference where uh
it looks like
um they have some residue
55:01
that could have been from microbes
(They dont even have microbes
They have "residue"
"That could have been" from some
That aint life
and it aint even nowhere close to it.
Ethan Seigal Big think 9/15/25
(And the press just sells it like its truth
and its preaching to the choir
they are just selling people a made up lie
that they wanna believe.)
"and but to to be sure about it
that it's not geological effects that
55:07
that produce those residues.
We need to bring these rocks to Earth
and analyze them
to make sure that it's not
55:14
something geological
but rather biological
that created their appearance
55:20
which resembles rocks on Earth
with microbes on them"
(Meanwhile everybody on earth
is convinced there are Martians.
Its just all so stupid.)
"so I would imagine a
59:32
brain bigger than ours
with uh which is AI assisted."
(Talking about how he would design an Alien.
Thats why ya got 3I/ATLAS
to start with there Ape Brain.)
"I'd be curious to uh see what kind of
1:00:54
things we can observe
under the oceans as well. "
(You and a whole bunch of us.)
"I'm talking about the congressman Tim Borchett. He made a comment that um you
1:03:31
know there there is some evidence
from military sources for unusual motion
1:03:37
under the ocean
that um is not fully understood
and it's sort of similar to
1:03:42
the unidentified anomalous phenomena in the atmosphere.
You have even more anomalous phenomena under water and most
1:03:49
of the u ocean base was not really searched.
Uh we
1:03:55
don't know what's going on there.
So, uh, it makes sense to to look for those,
(That aint the only place homie where:
"we don't know what's going on there")
"1:04:28
there is so much we don't know
that we cannot really pretend
uh uh you know
(So then why do you
and your cult:
"pretend
uh uh you know"
Ape brain much?)
Because the the the cra
one of the craziest things to me is how
1:05:32
anomalous our moon is.
It's it's our 1% the mass of our planet and it's 25% the
1:05:39
size of our planet, right?
And it's also which is seems like
some sort of miracle that it's 1400th the
1:05:47
distance to the sun and 1/400 the size.
So it creates this perfect eclipse.
It is:
"some sort of miracle"
And I also don't know, I'm sure you do, if
1:05:54
there's any other moons that exist
that we know of that are perfect spheres
within that perfect distance to create
1:05:59
an eclipse like that.
No, that's a that's a coincidence
Absolute Horseshit.
I guess it is also a "coincidence"
that there is an ancient religious text
that says it is
to mark off the
sacred seasons?
Genesis 1:14
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven
to divide the day from the night;
and let them be for signs,
and for seasons,
and for days, and years.
And the same religious text has
time space energy and matter
all coming forth in an instant?
Just like we know it did?
I guess that is a coincidence as well?
And the same text has
light on two separate instances
in its creation story.
First one is electromagnetism
and the second one is star formation.
I guess that is a coincidence as well?
How many coincidences
till they are not coincidences anymore Avi?
Same text has expanding heavens
1000's of years before we knew they were.
That's another coincidence Avi?
Same text says you will never figure it all out start to finish.
Thats a coincidence Avi?
And forget about, the size, shape and distance of the moon
relative to the sun to make it perfect for eclipses
and explain to me why the moon has a five degree tilt to it
to make those eclipses cause with out the 5 degree tilt?
We would have one every month:
and let them be for signs,
and for seasons,
What is the probability of all of that
being a coincidence Avi?
Exactly 0.0 what?
GET A FUCKING CLUE DUDE!
Everything is a random, chance accident.
Another piece of the cult of scientism Dogma.
It's just doesn't give us
the order and complexity we see.
"Well Drew that don't mean anything."
"Yeah well the information in every cell
of everything that's ever lived
the only place we know that has had
does have or ever will have life means something
so sit down and shut up
and learn something.)
"that is I mean
there is one scientific paper trying to explain it, but
it's not a
1:06:06
convincing argument
(Well I wonder why)
"and it's really a puzzle"
(Hey Ape Brain?
No it aint.
See Genesis 1:14 above.)
"because the distance of the moon from Earth keeps changing
and right now
So tens of millions of years.
It's just right now we are in a
1:06:24
special time and
it's not clear why.
There is no simple scientific reason for that
(Maybe to you.
But Not to us.
We know better than to think
our brains developed along with the apes.
Why the completely different consciousness then?
Shared common ancestor and all?
Apes dont wonder about the stars Avi.
Psalm 19
The heavens declare the glory of God;
and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
2 Day unto day uttereth speech,
and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
3 There is no speech nor language,
where their voice is not heard.
4 Their line is gone out through all the earth,
and their words to the end of the world.
In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun,
Pretty simple.)
1:10:02
the ice.
So if you can have life,
the chemistry of life as we know
(Newsflash:
Go talk to people in the biology department Avi.
There is no chemical process that produces
enough new information
to produce new life.
None.
Information is what is needed
and that would have to be organized
pre-planned, sequenced and involve logic.
It takes a a brain yo.)
"it in liquid water,
you might have it there.
1:10:08
It might not be evolved because
the thought is that
(Thoughts aren't evidence.
They don't prove shit
quit acting like God!
These people think
cause
THEY
thought it?
Then it just has to be true.
It has to Exist.
It had to have happened
the way they imagined it up,
no matter how ridiculous it may be.)
"primitive life evolved to complex life
as a result of the
1:10:14
interface between
like a solid rock and water."
(Another central component
to the cult of scientism, that must be accepted as fact
even though there is absolutely no evidence
to support it.
But even that's not good enough for them
because YOU have to believe it as well
because they imagined it up
and they are the authoities
the socital priest of the day as it were.
They are being to us now
just like the Catholics church was being to
to Galilo back in the day.
100% absolutely no difference.
People please. eternity is at stake, wake up!
They might as well be Zoroastrian priest
in the royal courts of Persia preaching this nonsense.
Not a lick of difference.
Consciousness.
Rationality.
Intelligence?
Logic?
All comes from:
"the
interface between
like a solid rock and water."
It's just beyond preposterous.
Go do it in a lab then.
If thats how it happened.
If its that easy.
And they have not ever
created life
in a lab.
Not from scratch they havent.
You see boys and girls,
the creation of life
is solely the providence of God.
No matter what kinda junk garbage
click bait AI generated nonsense you may read.
According to Dr. James Tour
(synthetic chemist)
they cant even take the working living components of a cell apart
(they can manage to keep them
all alive individually for a while.)
and then put them
back together and have it work.
And even if they ever did?
Then all they proved was
something outside
of the life created
had to have directed the process
to bring it into existence
now didn't it?
Well imagine that.)
"This is a water world we're on.
We're Yeah.
But the interface
the claim is that
("Extraordinary claims
require extraordinary evidence,"
~
Carl Sagan
They dont have any evidence
let alone any
"extraordinary evidence"
)"1:10:35
you need puddles uh of water.
When the water recedes
from a land, you
1:10:40
have some puddles of water
and then the sun uh vaporizes them
and and you concentrate
some chemicals making life
1:10:47
evolve this way to more complex systems.
So there is this notion that the
1:10:52
interface between rock and and and and water
was necessary to develop the life
we have on Earth.
(None of that generates
any information.
None of it.
It never has
and it never will.
Because it simply cant.
If that was the case?
Why did new life forms
quit developing?
That process described
happens every single day.)
And so, okay,
that paper you said there
1:11:53
was one paper written about our moon.
How so?
No, that's a paper trying to explain
the coincidence that you brought up.
(As demonstrated above
it's not just one coincidence
but about 6 of them.)
"Why is
1:11:59
the angular size of the moon
so close to the angular size of the sun on the sky
1:12:04
such that when the two objects overlap
on the projected on the sky you get the eclipse?
(He is leaving out the biggest part of the puzzle.
Without the five degree tilt of the moon?
It would happen monthly.
Kinda Hard to mark off special occasions season etc
if something were to happen monthly dont ya think?)
"I mean it could have naturally
1:12:12
the moon could have been much bigger in angular size
in angle than the sun in our sky or much smaller. It's just the
1:12:19
right would it make a difference to us
if it was much bigger or much smaller?
(The eclipses are there.
To mark the sacred seasons.
Reference:
Monday, November 18, 2024
for tons off additional information.)
the moon used to be much closer to Earth to start
1:12:34
because it was chipped out of Earth by a collision with a big object,
Mars-iz object called Thea that collided in the
1:12:42
early solar system.
That's the most popular model.
(It aint a popularity contest!
Being the most popular model?
Doesn't mean that's how it happened!
See how this works?
It a mind virus, group think etc.
Somebody just gets an idea
and they all just say to themselves:
"Yeah that will work."
Even though there no proof of anything
other than it being:
"The most popular model."
And then they expect us to believe it
cause they say so.
The other thing I want to point out here is
these priest of scientism are quick to point out the
selection observation effect
(anthropic principal)
when it comes to the 26 physical constants
of the universe that make it possible for life to exist,
but they don't ever mention any human bias
as having ever beenimputed into
the statistical models/computer simulations that they
themselves create to get the results they are looking for.
Double standard much?
These guys are so obviously on the run right now.)
There was an object the size of Mars that collided
1:12:48
with Earth and chipped off the moon.
So the moon started close to earth.
1:13:44
Earth, a Mars mass planet that collided with Earth called TIA.
It doesn't we don't see it anymore.
(Well isn't that just convenient?
There's no evidence or left over
relic from the inflation field either.
How many times you gotta see it
before you understand what they are doing?
They just make shit up
in their imaginations
and expect you to believe it
cause they say so.
This community knows better.
in case you havent noticed.)
"they collided and
1:13:50
merged with the earth
and and then uh
this is the most popular model."
(Yippie!
It Don't prove anything.
You wanna believe the cult
that cant tell you how the moon was made
or why it works to make solar eclispes
but wants to tell you
your brain developed along with the Apes?
You just go on right ahead.)
"You can do simulations
of what would happen and
1:13:56
you end up with some debris orbiting
around the earth
and creating the moon.
1:14:01
You see that's how it happened.
Uh that's the the best assumption.
(He caught himself.
He stated it as fact
what he knows is nothing but a guess
and then he corrected himself.)
"There are some issues to do with the
1:14:07
composition of the moon
that were highlighted recently.
But but um at any event
this seems to be a reasonable"
"Reasonable"
And
"Popular"
with the members
of a Cult
are not "evidence"
of anything
let alone proof.
Avi?
Brother?
Congratulations
because now
now you are the dinosaur,
the relic from the past
just like the Catholic Church was
in Gallio's day.
"So you you can't
just be a a bureaucrat
(Or a cosmologist,
or an astrophysicist,
or a particle physicist, or an astronomer,
or anybody really)
that makes statements
and everyone should believe you
because of
10:25
your authority."
You neither Avi.
You Neither.
Told you he was gonna
regret ever saying it.
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”
~
Carl Sagan
The demon haunted world 1995.
Pretty obvious to anybody with a logical, rational brain just who the bamboozlers are today.
"We dont fight for victory,
we fight from victory."
Brother Joseph Kim
We have already won
Anti-tail.
Small white arrow pointing toward the bottom left.
Call it what it is
a miracle.
Orwell.
Just tell me how that "evolved".
Just explain that to me.
.JPG)
17 of them "randomly"
acted together to create life did they?
Interesting.
.jpg)
There is no such thing as
"Nothing"
Not "in" this universe there isnt.
Expansion of space time.
Why there is no "center" of the universe.
By the time you find it?
It has already moved.
Love ya everybody.
Luke 21:19
By your patient endurance
you will gain your souls
No comments:
Post a Comment