is kind of why I don't get to excited about Exoplantes.
Extra-terrestrial life etc.
You see boys and girls.
It's not enough to be a
"rocky planet"
orbiting a star.
of which only 3%-7%
(I've seen different estimates
It's a small fraction of what's out there,
lets put it that way.)
in the universe are.
Then it has to be in that starts habitable zone.
This is what they get all excited about
but then they dont tell you:
It has to be in the Galactic habitable zone as well.
This is just but some of what they don't tell you
when they extrapolate the numbers and say there's possibly
a gazillion earth like planets suitable for life in our solar system
or what ever the actual number is.
This has to do with
one
(Okay four but thats later lol)
Out of a bunch)
of the
"Brute Force Facts"
about us being here
on this earth that I talk about.
"Our planet sits in the Habitable Zone of our Sun,
the special place where water can be liquid
on the surface of a world.
But that’s not the only thing special about us:
we also sit in
the Galactic Habitable Zone,
the region within the Milky Way
where the rate of star formation is just right."
(So theres two
"Brute Force Facts"
We sit in our suns
(A white dwarf)
habitable zone.
And we sit in our galaxy's
"Habitable Zone,".
"The Earth was born with all the ingredients necessary for life –
(Accident you think?
Interesting.)
something that most other planets lack.
Water as a solvent.
(That could be be considered a third
"Brute Force Fact.")
Carbon, with its ability to form long chains and bind to many other atoms, a scaffold.
(That could be a forth
"Brute Force Fact")
Oxygen, easily radicalized and transformable from element to element, to provide the chain reactions necessary to store and harvest energy.
(That could be a fifth)
And more: hydrogen, phosphorous, nitrogen.
(Just on and on and on.
Get the idea?)
"Some elements fused in the hearts of stars, other only created in more violent processes like the deaths of the most massive stars or the collisions of exotic white dwarfs."
And with that, a steady, long-lived Sun, free of the overwhelming solar flares that could drown the system in deadly radiation,
(Thats why it has to be a star like ours.
Brute Fact# whatever.)
providing over 10 billion years of life-giving warmth.
Larger stars burn too bright and too fast,
their enormous gravitational weight accelerating the fusion reactions in their cores to a frenetic pace, forcing the stars to burn themselves out in only a few million years.
And on the other end of the spectrum sit the smaller red dwarf stars, some capable of living for 10 trillion years or more. But that longevity does not come without a cost. With their smaller sizes, their fusion cores are not very far from their surfaces, and any changes or fluctuations in energy result in massive flares that consume half their faces – and irradiate their systems."
"And on top of it all, our neighborhood in the galaxy,
on a small branch of a great spiral arm
situated about 25,000 light-years from the center,
seems tuned for life:
a Galactic Habitable Zone."
(I assure you there is no
"seems"
It was tuned for life.
And it is,
Tuned for life.
This is your:
on full display yet again.
Always keep in mind:
"observation selection effect"
does nothing to explain
Initial conditions
Of the universe
or of
the natural laws governing it
nor how the information got in
every living things DNA.
There is no
"observational selection effect"
there.
That's why they don't ever bring it up in those circumstances)
Back to our:
Galactic Habitable Zone
and why it is
we have to reside
where we do in it.)
"Too close to the center and any emerging life must contend with an onslaught of deadly radiation from countless stellar deaths and explosions, a byproduct of the cramped conditions of the core. Yes, stars come and go, quickly building up a lot of the heavy elements needed for life, but stars can be hundreds of times closer together in the core. The Earth has already suffered some extinction events likely triggered by nearby supernovae, and in that environment we simply wouldn’t stand a chance. Explosions would rip away our protective ozone layer, exposing surface life to deadly solar UV radiation, or just rip away our atmosphere altogether."
"And beyond our position, at greater galactic radii,
we find a deserted wasteland. Yes, stars appear and live their lives in those outskirts, but they are too far and too lonely to effectively spread their elemental ash to create a life-supporting mixture. There simply isn’t enough density of stars to support sufficient levels of mixing and recycling of elements, meaning that it’s difficult to even build a planet out there in the first place."
(Lil bit more to consider
than just a rocky planet
orbiting a star
in its habitable zone.
But you never hear that.
WHY?
Kinda becomes the question in that case then and I got the same answer for it as I do for why
some of these ideologues
are pushing their "Multiverse"
faith
(cause that's what it is
when you believe in something
you know you can not prove)
based system on people.
BECAUSE THEY KNOW JUST HOW SPECIAL OUR PLANET IS AND HOW UNLIKELY LIFE ANYWHERE IN THE UNIVERSE IS AND THEY PURPOSELY DO NOT WANT YOU TO THINK SO!
AND ITS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW JUST LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE IN THE WORLD IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW BECAUSE SATAN KNOWS HIS TIME IS SHORT!
"And so it seems that
life would almost
INEVITABLY
arise here"
INEVITABLY?
Are you kidding me?
THEY COULD NOT BE MORE WRONG.
These ideologues are not molecular biologist,
most of them have no idea
just how hard is it
to get to where we have life, if they did?
They wouldnt say things like:
"life would almost
inevitably
arise here"
on this world,
around this Sun,
in this region
of the Milky Way galaxy.
There’s little else
that we could conceivably call home."
ITS NOT JUST HERE.
ITS ANYWHEER
AND THEY KNOW IT
BUT THEY JUST CANT ADMIT IT TO THEMSELVES.
SO THEY'RE NOT GONNA TELL YOU.
ITS ALRIGHT.
I GOT THIS FOR US :-).
PROMISE.
But for all you Exoplante freaks out there?
Remember this:
"Numbers don't equal life."
In fact
If you go with all the above listed criterion?
It needs to be a star like our sun
(Which they don't make it a point to tell you very often,
kind of shows what they are up to.)
It has to be in the Galactic habitable zone as well.
(Cause they always bring that point up so often.)
And as far as we know it needs:
Water
Carbon
Oxygen
Hydrogen,
Phosphorous,
Nitrogen.
(Which if you are in the Galactic Habitable Zone?
You should get the last five of those.)
And if you have all of that?
"Disparate reaction conditions
in the multi- step syntheses
(conditions are in bold text):
Step 1) Ribose + cyanamide / 0.2 M sodium carbonate (pH ~10), 55° C -> RAO
Step 2) RAO + cyanoacetylene / hydrosulfide in aqueous formamide, UV light -> Intermediates A
Step 3) Intermediates A / phosphate, anhydrous formamide, heat -> alpha & beta- ribopyrimidines (pyrimidine ribonucleosides completed)
Step 4) Intermediates A + 8- mercaptoadenine / dry state in magnesium chloride, 150° C -> Intermediates B
Step 5) Intermediates B / bisulfate in phosphate (pH 7), 60° C or sulfite in phosphate (pH 8-10), heat, UV light -> Intermediates C
Step 6) Intermediates C/nitrous acid (pH 4) -> adenine and inosine products (purine ribo- and deoxyribonucleosides completed)"
just to get
to how
RNA
"could have"
happened.
And that was
a controlled process
guided by individuals
in a lab BTW)
That was literally FOUR
(There's plenty more)
"Brute force Constants"
(Not even talking about
one set of initial conditions
for the universe
and another set of initial conditions
for its laws
Or any of the universes physical constants
(Speed of light,
mass of
subatomic particles etc)
That was just:
Right type of sun
Habitable zone of that sun.
Water.
Habitable zone of the galaxy.
Thats it.
That's all we are talking about here
When you do the math, and to be honest at this point its just so obviously right in front of you that you don't even have to do the math.
You can just try and imagine
all the possible combinations in your mind
(Even for just
four
brute force facts)
that have to be
just so
for us to even
have the opportunity
where its
habitable for life?
And they can't even tell you
how low the odds are?
(There's not a supercomputer today
able to process all the odds
for all the initial conditions,
physical constants
and brute force facts
that have to be in place)
that there should be
anyplace
habitable for life in the universe?
Let alone
us be in it?
In my community?
We call that what it is
a miracle.
You wanna think your insignificant?
You go right ahead.
Some of us know better.
Youre more than welcome to come join along.
Only one creation story with light created in two seperate instances.
I wonder why that is?
Pure coincidence I'm sure, right Ethan?
No comments:
Post a Comment