Saturday, June 7, 2025

"More Yet!" (Ukrainian Drones etc.)

 

Just how much damage did Ukraine do 

in its 'Spiderweb' drone attack on Russia?

NBS NEWS 6/7/25


The attacks we have seen  from Russia the last two nights?

ought to tell you what's up.


Ill just be honest

if I hadn't been writing what I have 

about the subject the last few days?

This story wouldn't have appeared.

Its a weird feeling knowing that is true.


Thats:

"A plague of common sense"

then that was used by Trump 

the day after having said it.


Honey saying

"Trojan Horse" attack repeatedly after

the Israel pager/walkie talkie attack

and now seeing that phrase used 

to describe the Ukraine Drone attack.


"Smacked (Putin) in the face"

and then see it in headlines two x the next day.

(Yesterday)


and

"Keys to the kingdom"

then Trump gives Musk a key.





So yeah, were being watched/monitored

and we dont care.


Now to the article.


"NBC News has analyzed satellite imagery to dig into the claims being made by Kyiv and Moscow 

as part of a wider 

propaganda war 

being waged in parallel to the actual fighting."


"While Russian claims that none of its planes were destroyed

are demonstrably false

there are also questions around 

Ukraine’s own triumphant account 

of the success of its 

“Spiderweb” operation."


"That tracks with a wider propaganda war being fought in parallel to the actual battlefield, with Russia making easily disprovable claims and Ukraine also seeking to shape the war narrative to its own advantage."


(Most times?

You can not believe one

any more than you can the other

They are both on about the same level.)


"With the help of military experts, NBC News has analyzed satellite images taken by independent companies such as Planet Labs and Maxar, 

and determined that 

at least 10 planes were destroyed.


That concurs with an assessment by NATO."


(10, not 41, 

not

"a third of its nuclear bombers"

etc.)


"The Western alliance agrees with Ukraine that around 40 aircraft were damaged, 

but says that only “10 to 13 aircraft were completely destroyed,” according to a senior NATO official, speaking on condition of anonymity to journalists at the margins of a Thursday meeting of defense ministers in Brussels.


That’s only half as many aircraft 

as Ukraine claimed to have destroyed."


"Oliver Alexander, a Danish open-source intelligence analyst, told NBC News that 

the publicly available evidence 

best supports this version of events.


“Right now, the number coming from NATO officials is the one that lines up most accurately with what can be observed from high-resolution satellite imagery and the videos released by the SBU,” he said, referring to Ukraine’s SBU intelligence service.


"The satellite images and SBU footage show 12 aircraft “completely destroyed” and another 10 “hit” by the drones, according to Alexander."


(Like I told Honey


when I first saw the picture

they were small and light weight

and couldn't have carried a very large payload.

And yes

aircraft are not like armored vehicles,

much more venerable out in the open etc.)


“Though they did not burn, so assessing the level of damage from satellite imagery is hard or impossible,” he added. “If more were hit” — as Ukraine says is the case — “we are missing video evidence of around 15 hits,” he said."


"Satellite imagery from Planet Labs and Maxar taken 2,500 miles away from Ukraine, in Russia’s Irkutsk oblast, on June 5, four days after the attack, showed six aircraft at Belaya airfield that were completely destroyed in the Ukrainian attack."



(That is the base shown on the map, 
to the far right.)

"Three were Tupolev Tu-95 strategic bombers, 
and three Tupolev Tu-22 supersonic bombers, 
all of which have been used 
to launch missiles at Ukraine."

(Here we go again with absolutely no confirmation
that they were launched from that airbase,
just:

"have been used 
to launch missiles 
at Ukraine."

The fact that they went after strategic assets
that far away tells you
they weren't doing all of this 
by themselves,
they obviously had help
as the US just isn't going to let 
a stand up comic drag it into WWIII,
and hitting those bombers 
that far away serves other purposes
besides just Ukraine's.

War in the Indo-Pacific anybody?)

"At Olenya air base, 1,200 miles from Ukraine in Russia’s far north, fresh burn marks and rubble where planes had previously been parked were visible in satellite images taken the same day.

They suggest that 

Ukraine had destroyed at least four Russian aircraft."

("They suggest that"
is hardly a confirmation
Damaged?
Perhaps.
Destroyed?
Seems like we would know so.)


"The images confirm that 
at least two were Tu-95s 
and another was a Tu-22. 
Social media video geolocated by NBC News 
shows a man dressed in military fatigues 
filming a wall of flames 
also around a Tu-95 bomber."

(If it is 
"confirmed"?
then why 
in the previous paragraph 
was it stated:

"They suggest that"?


"filming a wall of flames 

also around a Tu-95 bomber."


Cause we all believe 

everything we see on social media 

right NBS news?


"wall of flames also around"

on social media 

just doesn't confirm shit.


Just to point out

That airbase in in the top of the map.


Even if:

"at least two were Tu-95s 

and another was a Tu-22." 

is confirmed there?


Why is most of the damage

happening 

so far away from Ukraine?)



"Destroyed Tu-95 planes 

at Olenya air base in Russia on June 4."


(Real simple question:

Why did it take three days to get that image?



"Ill just be honest

if I hadn't been writing what I have 

about the subject the last few days?

This story wouldn't have appeared.

Its a weird feeling knowing that is true.")


"While Ukraine released what it said were recordings of drones attacking these air bases, as well as two others in the Ivanovo and Ryazan regions, satellite imagery did not show any visible signs of damage at these sites."


(Oh you mean the ones closest to Ukraine

where it would make more sense

to hit them if they were truly

acting on their own?

Gotcha.)


"Whatever the total losses, few outside Russia contest that Ukraine’s operation was a remarkable feat 

of intelligence, planning 

and utilizing cheap, modern warfare tools."


(Its just not something a stand up comic

and a bunch of corrupt wheat farmers

could have planed and executed on their own.

And it does nothing to change 

the outcome of the war.)



"Meanwhile, a source close to the Kremlin told Bloomberg that the number of affected aircraft may be closer to 10. According to the outlet’s sources, 

only a small number of the targeted Russian bombers 

are required for strikes against Ukraine, 

meaning the pace of missile and bombing attacks

 is unlikely to slow."


(In fact?

As we have seen the last two nights?

It has had the opposite effect

and the attacks have intensified.


"Russia’s Tu-95 Bomber Fleet Will Never Recover 

From Ukraine’s Latest Drone Attack: 

How Can the Air Force Respond?"

Militarywatch 06/02/25


"Zelenskyy aide Pavlo Palisa told journalists in Washington on Wednesday that 41 Russian aircraft were hit, around half of which were “completely destroyed” and the rest no longer able to fly."


(I thought NBC news said earlier it was

"Russia making easily disprovable claims"

(You can not believe one

any more than you can the other

They are both on about the same level.)

above.)


"The SBU and Zelenskyy said 

34% of Russia’s nuclear-capable strategic bombing force 

had been taken out of action — at a cost of $7 billion."


(WHY?

NBC NEWS

Are you repeating false claims

that your own article contradicts?

Now we have entered

the US propaganda

portion of the programming.

As in:

"part of a wider 

propaganda war")



"Russia has a far different version of events."


"Deputy Defense Minister Sergei Ryabkov told the TASS state-run news agency that the planes were “not destroyed, but damaged,” and that they “will be restored.”


He said there was 

“nothing even close” to Ukraine’s figure of 41.


(According to Ukraine's own General Staff?

He is correct.

Ukrainian strike on Russian bombers alarmed Kremlin over nuclear carriers vulnerability, Bloomberg reports

The Kyiv Independent 6/04/25

"Ukraine's General Staff said in its daily update on June 3 that Russian forces lost 12 aircraft, without elaborating on the types of destroyed planes or whether more had been damaged."

Why is nobody reporting that?

Well, except for The Kyiv Independent 

and somebody else :-)


"Pro-Kremlin commentator Sergei Markov said that while 

it was a “strong” strike, 

it “will have no military significance.” 

He put the losses at eight aircraft, 

only half of which were bombers

without elaborating on how he reached that number."


(He is right, 

It hasnt had any, and it wont have any

not every much anyway.

"In fact?

As we have seen the last two nights?

It has had the opposite effect

and the attacks have intensified."


And:

"Russia’s Tu-95 Bomber Fleet Will Never Recover 

From Ukraine’s Latest Drone Attack: 

How Can the Air Force Respond?"

Militarywatch 06/02/25


"The Tu-95MS currently forms the backbone of the Russian strategic bomber fleet, with 60 of the aircraft estimated to have been in service before the attack..."


"The loss of several Tu-95s 

could lead the Russian Aerospace Forces 

to respond by bringing more 

Tu-22M3 bombers out of storage

as although the lighter aircraft lack a comparable range, they can be given greater responsibility for engaging nearer targets, and have a limited capability to launch intercontinental range strikes if refuelling in the air.")


“Aren’t the Ukrainian Armed Forces lying all the time, 

exaggerating Russia’s losses?” 

he wrote on Telegram. 

“And here they are greatly exaggerating.”


Okay so.

Neither side is telling 

the ENTIRE

story truthfully.


But Russia's version of events

are born out by Ukraine's own General Staff

where as Ukraine's version of events

are to date unsupported.


And this piece?

Nothing but another example 

of Western propaganda

as it failed make the point mentioned above.


Or bring up the point about 

the damage being done

is at airbases 

where the attacks against Ukraine

are not being launched from,

So why do you think that is?


Look, I aint pullin for Russia, Okay?


But the fact is 

we have been lied to so very badly

about what has been going on 

in this conflict since it started.


Im just trying to present

a lil more balanced perspective

than what you might find elsewhere.


Gonna close with two points:


1) If Ukraine lies about how many planes were destroyed, which they obviously have been,


THEN WHY SHOULD YOU

BELIEVE THEM

WHEN THEY SAY

THEY ACTED ALONE?

AND ALL THE DAMAGE

IS SO FAR AWAY FROM 

THE THEATRE OF CONFLICT?


2) Satan tells you what you wanna hear.

Prophets bring bad news.


Queue my buddy somebody:


"It's not complicated!"


This shit is getting ready to go down yall.

Honey said she just wrote something 

to the effect of:


"I aint trying to scare ya,

Im trying to prepare ya."


Ditto.


God owns your soul.


Ezekiel 18:4

Behold, every soul belongs to Me; 

both father and son are Mine. The soul who sins is the one who will die.


The soul is not immortal.

Only eternity can give it eternity.


And ultimately what happens to it?

Lives forever with him 

or is destroyed?


Is up to him.


Godspeed.








No comments: