Just how much damage did Ukraine do
in its 'Spiderweb' drone attack on Russia?
NBS NEWS 6/7/25
The attacks we have seen from Russia the last two nights?
ought to tell you what's up.
Ill just be honest
if I hadn't been writing what I have
about the subject the last few days?
This story wouldn't have appeared.
Its a weird feeling knowing that is true.
Thats:
"A plague of common sense"
the day after having said it.
Honey saying
"Trojan Horse" attack repeatedly after
the Israel pager/walkie talkie attack
and now seeing that phrase used
to describe the Ukraine Drone attack.
"Smacked (Putin) in the face"
and then see it in headlines two x the next day.
(Yesterday)
and
"Keys to the kingdom"
then Trump gives Musk a key.
So yeah, were being watched/monitored
and we dont care.
Now to the article.
"NBC News has analyzed satellite imagery to dig into the claims being made by Kyiv and Moscow
as part of a wider
propaganda war
being waged in parallel to the actual fighting."
"While Russian claims that none of its planes were destroyed
are demonstrably false,
there are also questions around
Ukraine’s own triumphant account
of the success of its
“Spiderweb” operation."
"That tracks with a wider propaganda war being fought in parallel to the actual battlefield, with Russia making easily disprovable claims and Ukraine also seeking to shape the war narrative to its own advantage."
(Most times?
You can not believe one
any more than you can the other
They are both on about the same level.)
"With the help of military experts, NBC News has analyzed satellite images taken by independent companies such as Planet Labs and Maxar,
and determined that
at least 10 planes were destroyed.
That concurs with an assessment by NATO."
(10, not 41,
not
"a third of its nuclear bombers"
etc.)
"The Western alliance agrees with Ukraine that around 40 aircraft were damaged,
but says that only “10 to 13 aircraft were completely destroyed,” according to a senior NATO official, speaking on condition of anonymity to journalists at the margins of a Thursday meeting of defense ministers in Brussels.
That’s only half as many aircraft
as Ukraine claimed to have destroyed."
"Oliver Alexander, a Danish open-source intelligence analyst, told NBC News that
the publicly available evidence
best supports this version of events.
“Right now, the number coming from NATO officials is the one that lines up most accurately with what can be observed from high-resolution satellite imagery and the videos released by the SBU,” he said, referring to Ukraine’s SBU intelligence service.
"The satellite images and SBU footage show 12 aircraft “completely destroyed” and another 10 “hit” by the drones, according to Alexander."
(Like I told Honey
they were small and light weight
and couldn't have carried a very large payload.
And yes
aircraft are not like armored vehicles,
much more venerable out in the open etc.)
“Though they did not burn, so assessing the level of damage from satellite imagery is hard or impossible,” he added. “If more were hit” — as Ukraine says is the case — “we are missing video evidence of around 15 hits,” he said."
"Satellite imagery from Planet Labs and Maxar taken 2,500 miles away from Ukraine, in Russia’s Irkutsk oblast, on June 5, four days after the attack, showed six aircraft at Belaya airfield that were completely destroyed in the Ukrainian attack."
"filming a wall of flames
also around a Tu-95 bomber."
Cause we all believe
everything we see on social media
right NBS news?
"wall of flames also around"
on social media
just doesn't confirm shit.
Just to point out
That airbase in in the top of the map.
Even if:
"at least two were Tu-95s
and another was a Tu-22."
is confirmed there?
Why is most of the damage
happening
so far away from Ukraine?)
"Destroyed Tu-95 planes
at Olenya air base in Russia on June 4."
(Real simple question:
Why did it take three days to get that image?
"Ill just be honest
if I hadn't been writing what I have
about the subject the last few days?
This story wouldn't have appeared.
Its a weird feeling knowing that is true.")
"While Ukraine released what it said were recordings of drones attacking these air bases, as well as two others in the Ivanovo and Ryazan regions, satellite imagery did not show any visible signs of damage at these sites."
(Oh you mean the ones closest to Ukraine
where it would make more sense
to hit them if they were truly
acting on their own?
Gotcha.)
"Whatever the total losses, few outside Russia contest that Ukraine’s operation was a remarkable feat
of intelligence, planning
and utilizing cheap, modern warfare tools."
(Its just not something a stand up comic
and a bunch of corrupt wheat farmers
could have planed and executed on their own.
And it does nothing to change
the outcome of the war.)
"Meanwhile, a source close to the Kremlin told Bloomberg that the number of affected aircraft may be closer to 10. According to the outlet’s sources,
only a small number of the targeted Russian bombers
are required for strikes against Ukraine,
meaning the pace of missile and bombing attacks
is unlikely to slow."
(In fact?
As we have seen the last two nights?
It has had the opposite effect
and the attacks have intensified.
"Russia’s Tu-95 Bomber Fleet Will Never Recover
From Ukraine’s Latest Drone Attack:
How Can the Air Force Respond?"
Militarywatch 06/02/25
"Zelenskyy aide Pavlo Palisa told journalists in Washington on Wednesday that 41 Russian aircraft were hit, around half of which were “completely destroyed” and the rest no longer able to fly."
(I thought NBC news said earlier it was
"Russia making easily disprovable claims"
(You can not believe one
any more than you can the other
They are both on about the same level.)
above.)
"The SBU and Zelenskyy said
34% of Russia’s nuclear-capable strategic bombing force
had been taken out of action — at a cost of $7 billion."
(WHY?
NBC NEWS
Are you repeating false claims
that your own article contradicts?
Now we have entered
the US propaganda
portion of the programming.
As in:
"part of a wider
propaganda war")
"Russia has a far different version of events."
"Deputy Defense Minister Sergei Ryabkov told the TASS state-run news agency that the planes were “not destroyed, but damaged,” and that they “will be restored.”
He said there was
“nothing even close” to Ukraine’s figure of 41.
(According to Ukraine's own General Staff?
He is correct.
The Kyiv Independent 6/04/25
"Ukraine's General Staff said in its daily update on June 3 that Russian forces lost 12 aircraft, without elaborating on the types of destroyed planes or whether more had been damaged."
Why is nobody reporting that?
Well, except for The Kyiv Independent
and somebody else :-)
"Pro-Kremlin commentator Sergei Markov said that while
it was a “strong” strike,
it “will have no military significance.”
He put the losses at eight aircraft,
only half of which were bombers,
without elaborating on how he reached that number."
(He is right,
It hasnt had any, and it wont have any
not every much anyway.
"In fact?
As we have seen the last two nights?
It has had the opposite effect
and the attacks have intensified."
And:
"Russia’s Tu-95 Bomber Fleet Will Never Recover
From Ukraine’s Latest Drone Attack:
How Can the Air Force Respond?"
Militarywatch 06/02/25
"The Tu-95MS currently forms the backbone of the Russian strategic bomber fleet, with 60 of the aircraft estimated to have been in service before the attack..."
"The loss of several Tu-95s
could lead the Russian Aerospace Forces
to respond by bringing more
Tu-22M3 bombers out of storage,
as although the lighter aircraft lack a comparable range, they can be given greater responsibility for engaging nearer targets, and have a limited capability to launch intercontinental range strikes if refuelling in the air.")
“Aren’t the Ukrainian Armed Forces lying all the time,
exaggerating Russia’s losses?”
he wrote on Telegram.
“And here they are greatly exaggerating.”
Okay so.
Neither side is telling
the ENTIRE
story truthfully.
But Russia's version of events
are born out by Ukraine's own General Staff
where as Ukraine's version of events
are to date unsupported.
And this piece?
Nothing but another example
of Western propaganda
as it failed make the point mentioned above.
Or bring up the point about
the damage being done
is at airbases
where the attacks against Ukraine
are not being launched from,
So why do you think that is?
Look, I aint pullin for Russia, Okay?
But the fact is
we have been lied to so very badly
about what has been going on
in this conflict since it started.
Im just trying to present
a lil more balanced perspective
than what you might find elsewhere.
Gonna close with two points:
1) If Ukraine lies about how many planes were destroyed, which they obviously have been,
THEN WHY SHOULD YOU
BELIEVE THEM
WHEN THEY SAY
THEY ACTED ALONE?
AND ALL THE DAMAGE
IS SO FAR AWAY FROM
THE THEATRE OF CONFLICT?
2) Satan tells you what you wanna hear.
Prophets bring bad news.
Queue my buddy somebody:
"It's not complicated!"
This shit is getting ready to go down yall.
Honey said she just wrote something
to the effect of:
"I aint trying to scare ya,
Im trying to prepare ya."
Ditto.
God owns your soul.
Ezekiel 18:4
Behold, every soul belongs to Me;
both father and son are Mine. The soul who sins is the one who will die.
The soul is not immortal.
Only eternity can give it eternity.
And ultimately what happens to it?
Lives forever with him
or is destroyed?
Is up to him.
Godspeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment