Tuesday, June 17, 2025

Route

 


to a nuclear war in the Middle East:


1) Iran gets desperate 

and uses" a dirty bomb"


"Dirty Bomb" attack

This could be Irans Next move against Israel


("Drew? You said they had nukes, 

why wouldn't they just use it instead?"

Having a nuclear weapon 

and being able to miniaturize it, 

put it on a missile 

and deliver it where it needs to go

and have it go off 

in the manner it needs to

are two very different things.

I said all along thats where the bottleneck was.


Friday, October 11, 2024

It's very much worth a read

Having weapons grade material is one thing, having a device is one thing, having missiles is one thing, putting a nuclear weapon on a missile and having it work like you want it to is a whole different level of technical problems (the most difficult part of the process) and that's where they are in the process and that is what is going on w Russia exchanging technology for weapons.)


Thursday, February 20, 2025

You might just wanna wake up.

(Bull shit. They got what they need, it's the delivery mechanism that's the trouble spot for em with delivering a nuclear payload.)


Monday, November 4, 2024

THE MOST IMPORTANT STORY OF THIS PAST WEEKEND

(My opinion is well documented

they already have nuclear weapons

they just haven't got it squared away 

with the delivery mechanism just yet.

Hence the cheap drones to Russia in exchange for the tech.)


2) Israel retaliates with tactical nuclear weapons 

to finish off Irans nuclear sites.


The Persian Leopard and the Rising lion

"If Iran, under increasing internal and external pressure, chooses to strike back in desperation—not with symbolism, but with fury—by targeting Israeli cities with a full-scale barrage of ballistic missiles


(Yesterday that's what I said is coming:

Monday, June 16, 2025

Review Time...Iran, Israel, nukes etc...

"Irans strategy will be what it always has been

if things came to this moment,

to simply exhaust Israeli and US air defenses in the region

and then launch an unprecedented attack on Israel.")


or worse, if it unleashes chemical or radiological weapons, the Lion (Israel) may have no choice. It may sink its teeth into the Leopard’s neck—decisively, irreversibly."


"But if that regime (Irans government) chooses death over survival, it may force Israel’s hand toward the unthinkable."


(They most assuredly will:

"Choose death over survival"

Wiping Israel off the map

is at the core of their belief system.

(People forget the Irainain government

in its current form?

Didn't come into being until 1979)

But if they know they are going down?

They most certainly

will give it their best shot

to take Israel with it.)


"The nuclear doctrine of ambiguity may vanish. The world may see, for the first time, what the Lion’s final bite looks like. Tactical nuclear strikes, not on cities, but on hardened military targets—silos, command centers, nuclear labs—would become not just possible, but necessary."


3) Turkey enters the fray.


"Drew, now I know you have lost it.

Turkey isn't even a nuclear power."


Sunday, April 8, 2018

That picture


"The Turkish Armed Forces collectively rank as the second largest standing military force in NATO, after the U.S. Armed Forces, with an estimated strength in 2015 of 639,551 military, civilian and paramilitary personnel.  


(That above has probably changed since it was posted,

what is listed below HASNT.)


"Turkey is one of five NATO member states which are part of the nuclear sharing policy of the alliance, together with Belgium, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands. A total of 90 B61 nuclear bombs are hosted at the Incirlik Air Base, 40 of which are allocated for use by the Turkish Air Force in case of a nuclear conflict, but their use requires the approval of NATO."


And? 

As stated here:


Thursday, October 12, 2023

(Five days after the Hamas attack on Israel.)


If

you are not figuring Turkey in as a nuclear power?

In any kinda new world order/ new geopolitical calculus?

You are making a mistake...

"Turkey is one of five NATO member states which are part of the nuclear sharing policy of the alliance, together with Belgium, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands. A total of 90 B61 nuclear bombs are hosted at the Incirlik Air Base, 40 of which are allocated for use by the Turkish Air Force in case of a nuclear conflictbut their use requires the approval of NATO."

Like they are gonna ask for permission.

Give me a break.

I'd make getting them out of there a priority quick like in a hurry.


And it aint like we didn't know, 

or others haven't talked about this problem previously:


Monday, November 13, 2023

Why?


Nuclear sharing

"In 2017 due to an increasingly unstable relationship between the United States and Turkey it was suggested that the United States consider removing 50 tactical nuclear weapons stored under American control at the Incirlik Air Base in Turkey.[21][22][23][24][25][26][27] The presence of US nuclear weapons in Turkey gained increased public attention in October 2019 with the deterioration of relations between the two nations after the Turkish military incursion into Syria.[28][29][30][31][32]"


 "Let's get our nuclear weapons out of Turkey". Los Angeles Times. 11 August 2016. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2017.


 "Why the U.S. should move nukes out of Turkey". The Japan Times. 25 July 2016. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2017.


 "Should the U.S. Pull Its Nuclear Weapons From Turkey?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2017.


 "How safe are US nukes in Turkey?". CNN. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2017.


 "The U.S. stores nuclear weapons in Turkey. Is that such a good idea?". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 17 February 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2017.


 Borger, Julian (17 July 2016). "Turkey coup attempt raises fears over safety of US nuclear stockpile". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 25 February 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2017.


 "Should the US remove its nuclear bombs from Turkey? | News | DW.COM | 16 August 2016". Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 13 March 2017. Retrieved 12 March 2017.


 Sanger, David (14 October 2019). "Trump Followed His Gut on Syria. Calamity Came Fast". New York Times. Archived from the original on 20 October 2019. Retrieved 19 October 2019.


 "US nuclear bombs at Turkish airbase complicate rift over Syria invasion". The Guardian. 14 October 2019. Archived from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2019.


 "With Turkey's invasion of Syria, concerns mount over nukes at Incirlik". The Air Force Times. 14 October 2019. Archived from the original on 4 September 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2019.


 "Amid rising tensions, US said considering plan to remove nukes from Turkish base". The Times of Israel. 14 October 2019. Archived from the original on 15 October 2019. Retrieved 15 October 2019.


 "Turkey fired on U.S. special forces in Syria. It's absurd that it still has U.S. nukes". NBC News. 18 October 2019. Archived from the original on 19 October 2019. Retrieved 18 October 2019.


Before its all over?

We are going to wish 

we had got those B61's out.


Turkish Armed Forces

Countries with Turkish military bases, 

facilities and troops.



"According to a study conducted in England, Turkey has the largest deployment of international troops after the United States, with an estimated strength of at least 60,000+ military personnel stationed outside of the borders of Turkey. This means that 1 in 6 of the active military troops of Turkey (which is estimated to be 355,200 in 2020)are deployed outside of the borders of the country."

If you ask me? 
It looks like they are piecing together 
the "corners" so to speak 
of a reconstituted Ottoman Empire.

Compare where they have their military stationed now (above)
to The Ottoman Empire back in the day:



Somebody has been talking about all of this 
since Brother Joes
Book of Revelation Bible Study.

Friday, August 25, 2017

Turkey

(Close to eight years ago BTW)


Also consider:

Monday, January 13, 2025


Somebody has

been trying to tell you.

For years 

somebody has been trying.


Israel must prepare for potential war with Turkey, 

Nagel Committee warns

JANUARY 6, 2025 

"The committee, established by the government, warns that Turkey’s ambitions to restore its Ottoman-era influence could lead to heightened tensions with Israel, possibly escalating into conflict."


"Israel must prepare for a direct confrontation with Turkey, according to the Nagel Committee's latest report on the defense budget and security strategy.


(THE BOOK IS BEING PROVEN TRUE 

RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU FOR A REASON!)


The threat from Syria 

could evolve into something 

even more dangerous than the Iranian threat,” 

the report states, 

warning that Turkish-backed forces might act as proxies, 

fueling regional instability."


(Just Added the following:

Reference: 

Micah 5:5

"And this man shall be the peace," 

(Christ)

"when the Assyrian shall come into our land:"


(Antichrist this time around

Law of double intention etc.)


"and when he shall tread in our palaces, 

then shall we raise against him 

seven shepherds, 

and eight principal men.


(All juxtaposed 
(WOD BTW)

right in-between 

the end of this age

(Seven)

and the start of the new one:

(Eight)

Millennial Kingdom

Revelation 20:4-6


If only there was a book that could explain it to us..

)


"Netanyahu addressed the report, stating, “We are witnessing fundamental changes in the Middle East. Iran has long been our greatest threat, but new forces are entering the arena, and we must be prepared for the unexpected. This report provides us with a roadmap to secure Israel’s future.

Revelation 17:9-11 

“This calls for a mind with wisdom. 

The seven heads are seven hills 
on which the woman sits. 

(Rome, of which the Eastern part of the empire
had it's Capitol in Constantinople (Named after emperor Constantine) it was a historical city located on the Bosporus that served as the capital of the Roman, Byzantine, Latin, and Ottoman empires between its consecration in 330 until 1930, when it was renamed to Istanbul.


10 "They are also seven kings. 

Five have fallen,"


(Egypt,

Assyrians,

Babylonians

Medo-Persians

Greeks)



"one is,"

(Rome at that time)

"the other has not yet come;"

(Ottoman Turks)



"but when he does come, 
he must remain 
for only a little while."

(Ottoman Empire
1299/1302–1922 
620 some odd years, 
not very long
on Gods timetable.)



11 "The beast who once was, 
and now is not, 


(Hasn't been since 1922 anyway...)


"is an eighth king."


(New beginning)


"He belongs to the seven 
and is going to his destruction."


(Ottoman Turks).



For all realistic purposes?

There is a Muslim nuclear power 

on the world stage now.

That just said it might invade Israel.

NOTICE IT WASNT IRAN.)




The fact that the Ottoman Turks 
committed the Armenian Genocide
against a Christian people







flat out gives it away who the:

The beast who once was, 
and now is not,
is an eighth king."
He belongs to the seven 
and is going to his destruction"

is.

"Drew, Turkey wont possibly gets its
hand on NATO nukes and use them,
they are under our supervision
and what about training etc?"

To the first point?

I say, 

"I know, and Russia isn't going to invade Ukraine

and Israel wont possibly take on Irans nukes by themselves either.

Right?


For a more complete list of 

"OPPS"

see yesterdays post:

Monday, June 16, 2025

Review Time...Iran, Israel, nukes etc...


To the second point I say:


"40 of which 

(B61 Nuclear bombs

)


are allocated for use 

by the Turkish Air Force 

in case of a nuclear conflict."


What do you think we are gonna do?

Train em on how to use them after 

" a nuclear conflict"

breaks out?


Yeah...go with that.

Right...


Now considering all of the information 

provided so far consider:


Wednesday, December 4, 2024

How far-fetched is it

to think

Turkey planned the Hamas massacre?

to weaken Iran and Hezbollah?

So that they could become 

the dominant player in the region?"


I'll tell ya what gives that away as well.

Hamas knew that was a suicide mission

they would never recover from.

They knew what the response would be from Israel

(Netanyahu)

and went ahead with it anyway.

They knew that would be the end of any hoped for

"Two-state" solution.


After that type of attack?

They knew Israel would never agree to it.


So either they "fell on the sword" for nothing

or it was part of a larger plan.

Now what makes more sense?


And?

Considering Turkey was one of Hamas biggest supporters?

And had let them coordinate an attack on Israel 

from its soil previously?

Who do you think might have been coordinating:

"a larger plan."

??????????


And if you doubt any of what's said above?

(people including my son 

laughed at me for purposing 

Turkey was behind the Hamas attack)


Just go read this:

Monday, October 16, 2023

WARING!

(Should say warning lol).


One more time:


Route to a nuclear war 

in the Middle East:


1) Iran gets desperate 

and uses "a dirty bomb"


2) Israel retaliates with 

tactical nuclear weapons 

to finish off Irans nuclear sites


3) Turkey enters the fray.


As a friend of ours said not to long ago

talking about Christ return:


"I think its gonna happen 

quicker than people think it is."


You better believe it is.


Other relevant links:


Saturday, April 5, 2025

Israel and Turkey might as well be at war. 


Monday, June 19, 2023

TURKEY...


Thursday, February 20, 2025

You might just wanna wake up.



Godspeed.

Journey well friends.





No comments: