Putin yet to retaliate in full force
over Operation Spiderweb, officials say
Sun 8 Jun 2025 02.34 EDT
2:30 on Sunday afternoon
when everybody is paying attention right?
(Just wanna point out:
Iran carried out implosion tests
for nuclear weapons development, IAEA reports
Came out late Sunday night.
Ive been doing this for close to 50 years now.
(Privately for most of that time :-)
The timing of these two articles
is simply not an accident.)
"Diplomat predicts
‘huge, vicious and unrelenting’
assault,"
(I 100% agree, and nothing we have seen in the last few days
comes close to what
we should expect to see happening.
"Well why do you say that Drew?"
Because:
“President Trump said
we’ll know in two weeks
whether he’s being strung along,”
(By Putin)
Graham said."
After talks with Zelenskyy and Macron,
US senators warn: Putin ‘is preparing for more war’
AP 06/01/2025)
"though "a Russia expert" thinks Moscow
is unable to escalate much
beyond current level of attacks."
They simply couldn't be
any more incorrect
and they have been previously
as well.
Gotta point out
most of the
"the experts"
said the Russians
were not gonna invade.)
"What we know on day 1,201.'
(2:30 Sunday afternoon)
'Vladimir Putin’s threatened
retaliation against Ukraine over its drone attack on Russia’s bomber fleet has not happened yet in earnest, despite heavy bombardment of Kharkiv and Kyiv the past two days..."
(You can make that four days in a row now:
the biggest overnight drone bombardment of the war
AP Updated 7:58 PM CDT, June 9, 2025
That was reported on the 9th
about the attacks on the 8th.
Russian strikes in Ukraine hit Kyiv and kill two in Odesa
BBC 6/10,
reporting on attacks on 6/09.
"Russia has launched one of its largest strikes on Kyiv, injuring four people and causing widespread damage across seven of the capital's ten districts, officials said.'
The overnight attack was "one of the largest strikes on Kyiv", Zelensky said on social media.'
(This aint nothing but the warm up
for whats coming, the "diplomat' will be proven correct.
Why?
Well, largely because when we, or Israel,
or US and Israel moves on Irans nukes?
Then Russia will unleash its:
‘huge, vicious and unrelenting’ assault,"
on Ukraine.
Simply put,
why do it now?
When the coming attack
on Iran is so close?
“President Trump said
we’ll know in two weeks
whether he’s being strung along,”
(By Putin)
Graham said.")
"and is likely to be a significant, multi-pronged strike soon, US official(s) have told Reuters.
"One senior western diplomat anticipated a “huge, vicious and unrelenting” assault by Moscow.'
(Who ever they are?
Knows whats up.)
"Michael Kofman, a Russia expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said Russia might seek to punish Ukraine’s SBU domestic security agency which orchestrated last weekend’s assault, possibly employing intermediate-range ballistic missiles, as well as targeting defence manufacturing sites. Still, Kofman suggested Russia’s options for retaliation may be limited, as it was already throwing a lot of its military might at Ukraine. “In general, Russia’s ability to substantially escalate strikes from what they are already doing – and attempting to do over the past month – is quite constrained.”
(Im gonna just absolutely destroy
that position here in a lil bit.)
"The Ukrainian drone attack – called Operation Spiderweb – likely damaged about 10% of Russia’s strategic bomber fleet and hit some of the aircraft as they were being prepared for strikes on Ukraine, according to a German military assessment. Maj Gen Christian Freuding told a YouTube podcast that “more than a dozen aircraft were damaged, TU-95 and TU-22 strategic bombers as well as A-50 surveillance planes”. He said “only a handful” of the A-50s exist and can now no longer be used for spare parts."
"Despite the losses, Freuding did not see any immediate reduction of Russian strikes against Ukraine, noting that Moscow retained 90% of its strategic bombers, which can launch ballistic and cruise missiles in addition to dropping bombs. “But there is, of course, an indirect effect as the remaining planes will need to fly more sorties, meaning they will be worn out faster, and, most importantly, there is a huge psychological impact.”
(It takes very few of these assets
to launch what they launch
against Ukraine.)
'Freuding said Russia had felt safe in its vast territory, which also explained why there was little protection for the aircraft. “After this successful operation, this no longer holds true. Russia will need to ramp up the security measures.”
(Or just obliterate Ukraine, or both.
But that is a very valid point he makes about why the aircraft were so unprotected and it applies to US in the Indo-pacific as well:
The United States Can’t Afford to Not Harden its Air Bases
War on the Rocks January 15, 2025)
Now to just demolish the following nonsense:
'Kofman (Michael Kofman)
suggested Russia’s options for retaliation
may be limited,
Does the "Expert" not know the Russians have the largest inventory of nuclear warheads of any country on earth?
Or that they have already warned multiple times over
that they will use them ?
Or that attacks on strategic assets (such as the bombers that were hit) is justification for their use under their Russians Nuclear doctrine?
So how are their options for retaliation limited exactly?
A lot of these "talking heads' you see on various pod cast, broadcast TV etc,
are paid to push
the western propaganda narrative,
and this instance here
is nothing but a blatant example of that.)
"...as it was already throwing a lot of its military might at Ukraine. “In general, Russia’s ability to substantially escalate strikes from what they are already doing – and attempting to do over the past month – is quite constrained.”
Four nights in a row
of the largest strikes yet
tell a completely different story.
Not to mention:
NATO chief calls for 400% boost
in the alliance’s missile defenses
Defense news 06/09/25
Why then
is the head of NATO suggesting that?
if, as "Russia expert" Michael Kofman says:
"Russia’s ability to substantially escalate strikes...
is quite constrained.”
??????????
It's nonsense and he knows it.
More from that defense news article:
'Rutte plans to say in a speech at the Chatham House think tank in London that NATO needs thousands more armored vehicles and millions more artillery shells, as well as a 400% increase in air and missile defense.'
“We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,” he plans to say.'
“Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.”
(They weakened their air defenses
by giving Patriot missile batteries to Ukraine
which Russia has since taken out.
Thursday, May 29, 2025
A Dangerous Air Defence Shortage Three Parts
Long story short?
NATO countries donated Patriot missile batteries to Ukraine
(at 2.5 billion a clip mind you)
and Russia has just obliterated them.)
NATO’s Rutte: ‘We’re all on the eastern flank now’
"Military alliance chief makes the case for gargantuan defense spending increase as Vladimir Putin lurks."
Politico June 9, 2025
(The Baltic states and Poland
have been warning about this for a long time.)
"...he warned that Russian President Vladimir Putin could launch an attack by 2030."
"Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within 5 years. Let’s not kid ourselves, we’re all on the eastern flank now,"
(Compare that with:
“President Trump said
we’ll know in two weeks
whether he’s being strung along,”
(By Putin)
Graham said.")
"The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends," he added.
(VS our "expert's" analysis of:
"Russia’s ability to substantially escalate strikes...
is quite constrained.”)
"Last week, NATO defense ministers approved fresh so-called capability targets — meaning new requirements for military equipment to implement the alliance’s regional defense plans against a potential Russian attack."
(Yo, Kofman baby, if:
"Russia’s ability to substantially escalate strikes...
(against Ukraine)
is quite constrained.”
as you suggest?
then why is NATO sounding the alarm
about a coming Russia attack?)
"While the details are classified,
the priorities include
air and missile defense,
(Thursday, May 29, 2025
A Dangerous Air Defence Shortage Three Parts
Think that wasn't planned?
To make air and missile defense systems
in short supply?
Thursday, October 20, 2022
I thought they were out of missiles?
"They dont fight wars like we do.")
"...large formations of land forces,
long-range capabilities and logistics."
'NATO allies need “a 400 percent increase in air and missile defence…
(Russia "expert" Michael Kofman
"Russia’s ability to substantially escalate strikes...
(against Ukraine)
is quite constrained.”)
"Our militaries also need thousands more armored vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells, and we must double our enabling capabilities, such as logistics, supply, transportation, and medical support,” Rutte said Monday.'
(I got news for ya, one side has been getting ready for this since the 2007 Munich security conference, and one side aint been, and the side that aint been, is 18 years behind and simply aint gonna catch up.)
"Governments are also on track to purchase more warships, drones, long-range missiles and aircraft
— including at least 700 U.S.-made F-35 warplanes,
he added.'
(For some perspective on "700 F-35's"
We have built 1170 in 19 years.
Yeah so, good luck with all of that.
See note above about:
"one side has been getting ready..."
"When it comes to ammunition,
Russia produces in three months
what the whole of NATO
produces in a year,"
Rutte warned."
(Might wanna add,
its been that way for a long time
18 years or so, already.)
I've had problems with
"Russia Expert"
Michael Kofman's analysis previously
as well:
Friday, November 29, 2024
"MYRE: Yeah, absolutely. I spoke with Michael Kofman at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He recently returned from Ukraine, where he visited front-line areas.
He described this as a war of attrition
that neither Russia nor Ukraine can sustain."
"This is how Russia fights
and wins wars.
Its what they do.
They simply outlast you."
I guess:
"Michael Kofman
at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace."
He either doesn't know
what the fuck he is talking about?
Or he is spreading
US government propaganda
Because apparently?
He didn't get the memo.
See also:
Friday, April 12, 2024
Somebody has been trying to tell ya...
"Gen. Christopher Cavoli, the head of U.S. European Command, said Thursday that Russia’s army has grown by 15 percent since before the invasion of Ukraine, raising the alarm that Russian forces are reconstituting “far faster” than initial estimates suggested.
“The size of the Russian military is bigger today
than when the war started,” he said."
“The army is actually now larger — by 15 percent — than it was when it invaded Ukraine,” he said in written testimony. “Over the past year, Russia increased its front line troop strength from 360,000 to 470,000."
"Cavoli said in his written testimony that Russia is expected to produce more ammunition than all 32 NATO allies combined per year and is on track to “command the largest military on the continent and a defense industrial complex capable of generating substantial amounts of ammunition and materiel in support of large scale combat operations.”
Thats "the head of U.S. European Command" last year
as compared to our "Russia expert" Michael Kofman's who:
"described this as a war of attrition that neither Russia nor Ukraine can sustain."
(Opps, yet again there Michael Kofman,
strike two homie,
at this rate?
I'm gonna put you out of business buddy.)
Monday, April 3, 2023
"Ammunition availability might be the single most important factor that determines the course of the war in 2023," US defense experts Michael Kofman and Rob Lee wrote in December for the Foreign Policy Research Institute, adding that Ukraine will depend on international stockpiles and production for access to the ammunition it needs."
(the course of the war,
not just 2023)
VS
"When it comes to ammunition,
Russia produces in three months
what the whole of NATO produces in a year,"
Rutte warned."
See Also:
Thursday, October 20, 2022
I thought they were out of missiles?
"Not one "expert", not one? is even suggesting that the Russians are sandbagging for the real conflict when it comes? Why? Not even one is suggesting as much? Why?)
“If Russia had a limitless supply of PGMs, I think that they would still strike civilian targets, because that’s what the Russian way of warfare is,” Muzyka said.
("They dont fight wars like we do.")
"He said analysts did not have confirmed information about Russian missile stocks or production levels, and judgments were based on the decline in usage of PGMs and Moscow’s greater reliance on less accurate missiles."
(Thats faulty logic, black or white thinking, it is ignoring the possibility of other options that do exist.
Another example: Russia isn't using as many precision guided missiles as it was before, therefore it's stockpiles of such weapons must be running low. That argument just flat out ignores the other possibilities that exist.)
"...if the Russians had access to a large stock of PGMS, they could probably inflict a similar damage to Ukrainian armed forces, but they haven’t."
(Maybe because they want this conflict drug out?
Because it benefits them
and hastens the fall of the US and the West?
Thats not even a remote possibility
as to why they are engaging in this conflict
in the manner they are?
No "expert" ever thought of that?
I have a hard time believing that, I really do.
Remember the Fiona Hill interview piece I
did a few days ago? What did she say?
"Time is not on our side."
So if you could destroy a country pretty much at will, but dragging it out benefits your side long term and hurts more serious foes abroad than the foe you are engaged with? why wouldn't you conduct the conflict in such a manner as is being waged?")
“They actually failed to,” he continued. “They even failed to interdict the main Ukrainian supply roads. They failed to destroy bridges, railway, railway intersections, and so on and so forth.”
(Yeah, they are saving it for later...duh...)
Adding the comment below today:
Or they wanted it in tack
as much as possible?
Monday, April 3, 2023
when we were being told the Russians were running out of ammo?
Going to war? Good news! The United States is 13 years behind in ammunition production, NYT reports
March 25, 2023
"Missile and munition stockpiles are dwindling as the US continues to send aid packages to Ukraine."
"Since production capacity changed after the Cold War, the US can no longer keep up with wartime demands."
"The United States' commitment to support Ukraine against the Russian invasion appears to have rattled the stability of the domestic stockpile of missiles and munitions."
('They dont fight wars like we do"
somebody been trying to tell ya.
They will run you out of weapons first.
THEN, comes the real war.
And you don't 'switch' to a war of attrition
as some have suggested
following the Russian convoy to Kiev's stall.
You plan it out years in advance.
We got caught with are pants down,
people know it and they are trying their best
to keep you in the dark about it.
Somebody has been saying all of this for a long time now...)
Now also consider:
Monday, June 9, 2025
Iran carried out undeclared nuclear tests,..."
"The fact that it carried out
various explosive tests
also suggests that
Iran is further along
in other skills needed
for developing a nuclear bomb,
besides just enriching uranium,
than many observers
may have thought."
Now tell me
WHAT HAVE THE EXPERTS
GOT RIGHT SINCE COVID?
The only way
our world
will make any sense to you
is seeing it
through the proper lenses:
Those Rose colored
by the blood of Christ.
Matthew 24:3-4
"...what shall be
the sign
(as in singular)
of thy coming,
and of the end of the world?
4 And Jesus answered
and said unto them,
Take heed that no man deceive you.
Indeed.
Michael Kofman?
Zero credibility
at this point sir.
Zero.
Zilch.
Nada.
No comments:
Post a Comment