Tuesday, May 9, 2023

AI

 


oh boy...

Look out.


We Interviewed the Engineer Google Fired for Saying Its AI Had Come to Life


"Last summer, former Google engineer and AI ethicist Blake Lemoine went viral after going on record with The Washington Post to claim that LaMDA, Google's powerful large language model (LLM), had come to life. Lemoine had raised alarm bells internally, but Google didn't agree with the engineer's claims. The ethicist then went to the press and was fired by Google shortly thereafter."


(People just never learn...

Luke 8:17

For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be made known and brought to light.) 



"A lot has changed since that original Washington Post piece came out. It's been a fast few months for AI."


"Lemoine: Nothing has come out in the last 12 months that I hadn't seen internal to Google. The only thing that has changed from two years ago to now is that the fast movement is visible to the public."

(Because they cant hide it anymore.)


"But there's still a lag time. So by the time the public learns about an AI product, the companies who built it have:

vetted their PR story, 

have consulted with their lawyers, 

and have potentially lobbied regulators 

to get preferential legislation passed. 

That's one of the things I always dislike — tech companies will try to get legislation passed that will govern technology that regulators do not yet know exists. They're making bargains around what clauses to include in regulations, and the regulators legitimately have no idea how those things will work out in practice because they don't yet know what technology exists. The company hasn't revealed it.


(Just because a tech company hasn't reveled it?

Doesn't mean it doesn't exist!)



"They 

(google, his former employer) 

still have far more advanced technology that they haven't made publicly available yet."


(It doesn't mean 

they haven ran some test marketing

Big Springs etc...)


"What they've spent the intervening two years doing is working on the safety of it — making sure that it doesn't make things up too often"


(John 8:44

You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.)


"The most sophisticated system I ever got to play with was heavily multimodal — not just incorporating images, but incorporating sounds, giving it access to the Google Books API, giving it access to essentially every API backend that Google had, and allowing it to just gain an understanding of all of it.

That's the one that I was like, "you know this thing, this thing's awake." And they haven't let the public play with that one yet."


(Revelation 13:15

The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed.)



"We are rapidly approaching the point where we just simply won't be able to know whether any form of media that we encounter online was created by a human or by an AI."


How much longer do you really think God Almighty is gonna let evil go on when:


"fact is fiction

and TV reality"?


To Borrow a line from:



"Some scientists have said that this is a big moral red line that we should not cross, we should not have human-like artificial intelligence. They distinctly don't believe it has any feelings, and they just think that creating a kind of system that mimics human feelings and gets people involved in emotional relationships is simply harmful."

(YEAH!)

Main point?

"That's one of the things I always dislike — tech companies will try to get legislation passed that will govern technology that regulators do not yet know exists. They're making bargains around what clauses to include in regulations, and the regulators legitimately have no idea how those things will work out in practice because they don't yet know what technology exists. The company hasn't revealed it."

They wouldn't be trying to get:

"legislation passed that will govern technology" 

if they didn't already have that technology.


So how crazy is:


really?







No comments: